Bitcoin Forum
June 03, 2024, 07:43:04 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 114 »
601  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BEE2] [BEECOIN V2] POW X11/POS Hybrid - Now With CLIENT CHAT Feature! on: December 01, 2017, 02:10:56 PM
So how is the progress coming along? Any rough estimates on the code update etc? Would love to see this coin back on the map.

Work in progress: https://github.com/gjhiggins/been/commits/bee



(Visual infelicity courtesy of Qt not yet being fully to speed w.r.t. 4K displays).

Currently working on the ledger transfer implementation. For an example, see https://github.com/jinwangbi/goldennetcoin/blob/master/src/snapshot.cpp

Cheers

Graham
602  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | New v0.5.1 binaries on: November 29, 2017, 03:28:37 PM
Maybe someone wants to try to put SLM for voting on Mercatox? I already did it. It would be nice if more people submit

Not an exchange I would consider using. A citizen of Costa Rica as sole named director of a London-yes-that-sink-of-depravity-registered pro-forma company with £1000 capital, run out of an accommodation address.

Director: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/10463744/officers, other directorships: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/vs7q6V9iee0eE4dlrcw3mSXc6DA/appointments

Application support: LM Capital SA, sole director, also Costa Rican, https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/officers/Ze9EDACFAIE_SIEdjfrWpTlICcw/appointments

I mean, really. The warning signals are plain to see.

Given the above, T&Cs are meaningless, as are any of their data protection/privacy statements.

Paid listing is $5000 - $50,000, at their arbitrary discretion. Voting procedure is detailed, votes can be bought but selection criteria are just waved away: “we are reviewing the coins that have received more votes than others” “We consider the first coins from the voting list twice a month” - well, isn't that so splendidly generous of them.

Cheers

Graham
603  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BEE2] [BEECOIN V2] POW X11/POS Hybrid - Now With CLIENT CHAT Feature! on: November 29, 2017, 01:12:49 PM
So how is the progress coming along? Any rough estimates on the code update etc? Would love to see this coin back on the map.

Still working on getting the published Navcoin test code to compile:

gjh@chrome ~/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core $ make
Making all in src
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src'
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src'
  CXXLD    test/test_navcoin
libnavcoin_server.a(libnavcoin_server_a-init.o): In function `StartShutdown()':
/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/init.cpp:138: multiple definition of `StartShutdown()'
test/test_test_navcoin-test_navcoin.o:/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/test/test_navcoin.cpp:149: first defined here
libnavcoin_server.a(libnavcoin_server_a-init.o): In function `ShutdownRequested()':
/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/init.cpp:142: multiple definition of `ShutdownRequested()'
test/test_test_navcoin-test_navcoin.o:/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/test/test_navcoin.cpp:154: first defined here
libnavcoin_wallet.a(libnavcoin_wallet_a-navtech.o): In function `Navtech::FindAnonServer(std::vector<anonServer, std::allocator<anonServer> >, long, int)':
/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/wallet/navtech.cpp:107: undefined reference to `curl_global_init'
/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/wallet/navtech.cpp:108: undefined reference to `curl_easy_init'
/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/wallet/navtech.cpp:115: undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/wallet/navtech.cpp:116: undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/wallet/navtech.cpp:117: undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/wallet/navtech.cpp:118: undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/wallet/navtech.cpp:119: undefined reference to `curl_easy_setopt'
libnavcoin_wallet.a(libnavcoin_wallet_a-navtech.o):/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src/wallet/navtech.cpp:120: more undefined references to `curl_easy_setopt' follow
[...]
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:3682: recipe for target 'test/test_navcoin' failed
make[2]: *** [test/test_navcoin] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src'
Makefile:9095: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/gjh/minkiz/fabshop/BeeCoinWork/navcoin-core/src'
Makefile:681: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1


Edit - fixed the above. Results from running the Navcoin test suite:


Running 213 test cases...
[...]
*** 178 failures detected in test suite "NavCoin Test Suite"



Now I know the baseline, for when I try running the Bee test suite.

Cheers

Graham
604  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | New v0.5.1 binaries on: November 28, 2017, 02:46:11 PM
gjhiggins, I saw you were helping gapcoin and I just went to research the old datacoin that was one of the coolest old coins that might have been dead and saw a repository that I guess is yours. 

My perspective is oblique to say the least. I have a notion to use the OP_RETURN data to carry a URI reference to the signature hash of an RDF subgraph containing metadata and content (hosted on an external, collectively-maintained RDF graph, i.e. a public resource, publicly curated). The signed RDF subgraph can represent anything that RDF is capable of formally modelling. The signature hash of the subgraph is inscribed on the blockchain, keeping everything honest. HD sub-addresses can be used to publish and reliably identify pseudonyms of posters (communicated by side-channel, another role for the communally-hosted RDF service), e.g. publish a FOAF file to the graph, publish the hash signature to the blockchain, an app could retrieve and display the published FOAF data of the addressowner-as-publisher (still optionally pseudonymous), along with the (hash signatures of RDF subgraphs) of other OP_RETURN txs  associated with that address, ultimately resolving to, e.g. metadata for a series of blog posts - title, date, author's pseudonym, thumbnail, summary etc. etc.

I had an initial pass (following the web2web example) using a torrenthash inscribed on the Slimcoin blockchain but ran into practical difficulties getting the torrent content hosted anywhere other than a m/c under my control. And I discovered that torrenthash metadata is confined to file chunk size and hash, there's no user-oriented metadata at all. Hence the RDF graph - for metadata.

(Pilot standalone blog post / torrent content: A different perspective on cryptocurrency, published as an HTTPS resource pro tem - in due course the tabs will be populated by metadata retrieved from OP_RETURN data pointers to RDF subgraphs)

I'm in the throes of building out the service into an easily-deployable hosted web app - to which I've given the label, ACME (A Cryptocurrency Metadata Explorer).

ACME could well work for Datacoin - whilst the DTC blockchain can store binary content, unfortunately - like torrenthash - there's no metadata to inform users of the contents of a blockchain-stored blob. So, it looks like Datacoin could well be languishing for want of metadata that reliably and accurately describes the content of what's stored (and therefore what risks attend the content).

As for Gapcoin, well BTCFX browbeat me into it - I reckon he's prolly a headmaster IRL Smiley No, seriously the prime gap work is interesting and as a 0.9 Core clone, it handles OP_RETURN tx as standard, so could pretty much immediately benefit from an ACME metadata publishing service - which could easily be adapted to publishing more detail about the approach, the overall effort and its current state.

If you like, I'm looking to the future, to when people start casting around for an alternative to having to store their published social network content on FB et al. and trying to work out a reliable and useful alternative approach to (what are fast becoming user-hostile) corporate-provided solutions.

Cheers

Graham

605  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | New v0.5.1 binaries on: November 28, 2017, 01:22:21 PM
nova closure is hurting this project a lot.

Can you support the “hurting ... a lot” assertion, i.e. describe to what effect and how this effect is measurable?.

Cheers

Graham
606  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | New v0.5.1 binaries on: November 28, 2017, 01:12:31 PM
Has anyone applied to bittrex at all?

Not applied, no. The application criteria (as published in 2014 and subsequently edited) are nonsensical in parts:

  • Coin Name
  • Enhanced Verified Account of team member on Bittrex - This team member must be either a core developer or a major shareholder (10% or more) of a company that backs the development of the coin.  That member will need to submit identifying documents to get their account enhanced verified.
  • Description of your coin -  Why does it exist and what makes it unique?  What new technology or business concept are you bringing to the blockchain? If your ANN thread only has coin specs on it, you are not going to get listed on Bittrex.
  • Coin trading symbol - The ticker needs to be 3-5 letters and cannot contain any symbols or numbers.  Please verify that your preferred symbol is not already in use on our exchange or any other.  There are a number of services that track coin prices that require the symbols to be unique. Even if the symbol is not on our exchange anymore, we won't reuse it.  Consider your symbol carefully because we will not change it once it is set.
  • A logo for your coin - png format with a transparent background.  The logo should be square with dimensions of 1000x1000 pixels with no white space on its border and no taglines.  It should only be a logo and expect it to show up in multiple spots in the Bittrex UI.
  • Launch Date (past or future)
  • Github Link - We only accept source code.  We will not run a binary that you provide us.
  • Did you raise money/bitcoin to launch your coin?  (i.e. a CFC/ICO)
  • Did you have a premine?  How much is it?  Is it escrowed?
  • What is the max money supply for your coin?
  • Exchanges you are currently on
  • Official blockchain explorer
  • What is your TxFee for a transaction
  • Any social media information such as your official website, twitter account, facebook page, subreddit, etc.

These are deep systemic fault lines that separate hierarchy and network.

Elsewhere, the information inviited for the promo API also clearly describe a hierarchical mindset -

Quote
You may have noticed new content appearing in the Market pages.  This information is for traders to research coins and for coin developers to reach new audiences.  If you are a coin developer and would like to submit some information, please fill out the JSON object below.

Each field below is optional.   If you have suggestions for other types of information that would be a great resource for traders to do research, please let us know.

{
    "description":"Put a description of your coin, up to 1000 characters long.  We will reject any content that misrepresents your coin",
    "blockexplorer":"http://yourblockchain",
    "website":"http://yourcoin.org/",
    "reddit" : "http://www.reddit.com/r/your_reddit",
    "twitter":"https://twitter.com/your_address",
    "facebook":"https://facebook.com/your_address",
    "forum":"https://yourforum.com",
    "slack": "https://yourslack.slack.com",
    "video": [
       {
          title: "your coin vid",
          caption: "your video is cool",
          url: "https://youtube.com/yourcoinvid"
        },
    ],
    "team": [
       {
          name: "cool dev",
          role: "developer",
          location: "seattle, usa",
          twitter: "twitter.com/coindev",
          email: "[email protected]"
      },
   ]
}


Only one website, only one subreddit, only one twitter, only one facebook a/c, only one forum, only one slack, only one video, only one team. Only one view, of only one a/c holder at a time, more systemic fault lines.

Cheers

Graham
607  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] Vcoin sha256 pow on: November 23, 2017, 01:30:01 PM
Any wallet who work??

this coin is dead?

No.

https://github.com/vcoin-project

https://github.com/gjhiggins/vcoincore

What's your interest?

Cheers

Graham
608  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: November 23, 2017, 11:46:09 AM
This forum is becoming unreadable with so many bots and spammers.

Indeed. Probably inevitable, given the age of the implementation. In today's spam:


Hello,
 
I sell an e-mail database of Bitcointalk forum users.
 
Quantity of unique e-mails: 543,690
63,000 users from parsing and 
492,000 users from the dump purchased on DarkNet.
 
The database is not fake, you can check it by doing the following:
1. Find any e-mail on any Bitcointalk page
2. Tell me first three characters of that e-mail
3. I send you all e-mails from my database that begin with these
characters
 
The price of the database is 1 BTC.
 
This database can be used to involve new investors in ICO projects
and find partners for any crypto-currency business.
 
If you are interested, do not hesitate to contact me.
 
Ivan Morozov
ivanbases @ stend.pw


So, if you want to check - Ivan's your boyt.

Cheers

Graham
609  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Ranking list of the oldest crypto coins still being traded. on: November 23, 2017, 03:34:49 AM
Truncated, date-ordered list of alts on coinmarketcap as of Feb 2016, (haven't updated it since):

BitcoinBTChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=7269.02009-01-03
FreicoinFRChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=89843.02011-02-01
NamecoinNMChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=6017.02011-04-19
iXcoinIXChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=36218.02011-05-07
I0CoinI0Chttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=36425.02011-09-11
LitecoinLTChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=47417.02011-10-07
BytecoinBCNhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=512747.02012-07-04
BBQCoinBQChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=93437.02012-07-15
ZcCoinZCChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=268575.02012-08-05
PeercoinPPChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101820.02012-08-19
TerraCoinTRChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=172760.02012-10-26
VertcoinVTChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=404364.02013-01-08
NovacoinNVChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=143221.02013-02-09
ElacoinELChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=203647.02013-04-14
FeathercoinFTChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178286.02013-04-16
RippleXRPhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=301635.02013-05-01
MincoinMNChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=165397.02013-05-03
YacoinYAChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=196196.02013-05-05
FrankoFRKhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=202417.02013-05-10
JunkCoinJKChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=202454.02013-05-11
BitBarBTBhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=238608.02013-05-14
WorldCoinWDChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=204894.02013-05-14
DoubloonDBLhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206361.02013-05-15
BitgemBTGhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=207008.02013-05-16
DigitalcoinDGChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=209508.02013-05-18
PhoenixcoinPXChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=330956.02013-05-20
LuckycoinLKYhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=568287.02013-05-24
SexcoinSXChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=218158.02013-05-28
MegacoinMEChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=218851.02013-05-29
FastcoinFSThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=218852.02013-05-29
DiamondDMDhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=580725.02013-06-01
InfinitecoinIFChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=225891.02013-06-05
AnoncoinANChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227287.02013-06-06
NoirbitsNRBhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=226903.02013-06-06
CopperlarkCLRhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227252.02013-06-06
EmeraldEMDhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=724463.02013-06-16
FlorinCoinFLOhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=236742.02013-06-17
BottlecapsCAPhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241445.02013-06-24
YbCoinYBChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=243046.02013-06-26
GlobalCoinGLChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=243911.02013-06-26
CryptogenicBullionCGBhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=245086.02013-06-28
KrugercoinKGChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=246803.02013-06-30
CurecoinCUREhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=603757.02013-06-30
RedCoinREDhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=246693.02013-06-30
OrbitcoinORBhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=586674.02013-06-30
PrimecoinXPMhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=251850.02013-07-07
GrandCoinGDChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=255629.02013-07-13
CasinoCoinCSChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=258090.02013-07-18
SpotsSPThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615513.02013-07-21
QuarkCoinQRKhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=260031.02013-07-21
HoboNickelsHBNhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=261550.02013-07-24
NeocoinNEChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=313506.02013-07-26
PhilosopherStonePHShttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=263744.02013-07-28
MastercoinMSChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=265488.02013-07-31
DevcoinDVChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=34586.02013-08-01
ZetacoinZEThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=267545.02013-08-03
PaycoinPYChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=268941.02013-08-06
BilsharesBILShttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=729068.02013-08-08
SecureCoinSRChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=270852.02013-08-09
ExtremeCoinEXChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=276609.02013-08-17
ColossuscoinCOLhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=279601.02013-08-22
TigercoinTGChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=289312.02013-09-06
TEKcoinTEKhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=320404.02013-09-07
JoulecoinXJOhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=299308.02013-09-22
BlakeCoinBLChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=306894.02013-10-06
UnobtaniumUNOhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=313126.02013-10-17
TagCoinTAGhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=317408.02013-10-24
GoldCoinGLDhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=231834.02013-10-24
FireflyCoinFFChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=318589.02013-10-26
BitSharesPTSPTShttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325261.02013-11-05
IncakoinNKAhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=333084.02013-11-13
DatacoinDTChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=325735.02013-11-17
AppleCoinAPChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=337782.02013-11-18
CryptobuckBUKhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=285224.02013-11-24
NextCoinNXThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.02013-11-25
StableCoinSBChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=349198.02013-11-27
DogecoinDOGEhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=361813.02013-12-08
LottoCoinLOThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=368153.02013-12-12
EarthCoinEAChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=379236.02013-12-20
CatCoinCAThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=380130.02013-12-21
FedoraCoinTIPShttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=380466.02013-12-22
KittehcoinMEOWhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=383068.02013-12-24
MemoryCoinMMChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=370806.02013-12-25
MoonCoinMOONhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389403.02013-12-28
iCoinICNhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389862.02013-12-29
RonPaulCoinRPChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=389070.02013-12-30
ParticlePRT2013-12-31
CagecoinCAGEhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=394958.02014-01-01
MonacoinMONAhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=392436.02014-01-01
CACHEcoinCACHhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400389.02014-01-05
42Coin42Chttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399658.02014-01-05
SmartCoinSMChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400893.02014-01-06
NobleCoinNOBLhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=402667.02014-01-07
BatCoinBAThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=400753.02014-01-09
AliencoinALNhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=407460.02014-01-09
KlondikecoinKDChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=407705.02014-01-09
CarboncoinCARBhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=465364.02014-01-14
ZedcoinZED2014-01-15
PxlcoinPXLhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418088.02014-01-16
TeslaCoinTEShttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=420605.02014-01-17
DashDASHhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.02014-01-18
NEMNEMhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426303.02014-01-19
ChaincoinCHChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422149.02014-01-19
TitcoinTIThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=423523.02014-01-20
ReddcoinRDDhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=423597.02014-01-20
PotCoinPOThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=426324.02014-01-21
LeafCoinLEAFhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=430091.02014-01-24
HunterCoinHUChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=435170.02014-01-27
ContinuumcoinCTMhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=440356.02014-01-27
UltraCoinUTChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5661160.02014-02-01
CounterpartyXCPhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=395761.02014-02-01
PopularcoinPOPhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=444745.02014-02-02
AuroracoinAURhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446062.02014-02-02
CorgiCoinCORGhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=444700.02014-02-02
RiecoinRIChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=446703.02014-02-03
KarmacoinKARMhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=447657.02014-02-04
MintcoinMINThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=450381.02014-02-05
TakeicoinTAKhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=452902.02014-02-07
RubycoinRBYhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=459622.02014-02-11
UFOCoinUFOhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=460522.02014-02-11
BattleCoinBCXhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=354612.02014-02-12
LiteBarLTBhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=461108.02014-02-12
FlappyCoinFLAPhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=464743.02014-02-14
ZeitcoinZEIThttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466066.02014-02-14
DopeCoinDOPEhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=425366.02014-02-15
DNotesNOTEhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=470155.02014-02-17
BitsharesXBTSXhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=485166.02014-02-28
ApplebyteABYhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=503131.02014-03-06
AdzCoinADZhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1292875.02014-03-13
NasCoinNAShttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=523187.02014-03-20
O2oCoinO2Ohttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=523196.02014-03-20
ChancecoinCHAhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=528023.02014-03-23
LegendaryCoinLGDhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=530175.02014-03-25
CommunitycoinCOMMhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=529481.02014-03-25
CannacoinCCNhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=529152.02014-03-28
BitcoinplusXBChttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=549485.02014-03-30
AidencoinADNhttps://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=558414.02014-04-04

See also: https://minkiz.co/stuff/cheatsheet/

Cheers

Graham
610  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | New v0.5.1 binaries on: November 19, 2017, 11:59:54 PM
If your coin is not approved, your ETH will be immediately refunded.

No published criteria, so an obvious PR ploy.

Cheers

Graham
611  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: November 18, 2017, 02:55:40 PM
AtOCDownloaded the Eth Win Miner, set the -.softball bat accordingly, obtained work and today creating my first DAG.Am I correct that my hashrate will only display after the first is performed?

More than a hint, it's shading into absolute certainty.

Cheers

Graham
612  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Test v0.5 on: November 17, 2017, 05:08:15 PM
gjhiggins introduced the PoB bug in the first place with an improper replacement of the C99 macro.

And even worse, it's not as if it wasn't explicitly specified in the code (https://github.com/slimcoin-project/Slimcoin/blob/master/src/util.h#L90) ...
#define PRI64d  "lld"
#define PRI64u  "llu"
#define PRI64x  "llx"


Sigh. Aaanyway, I revisited the original committed changes and ensured that each was appropriately longlonged: https://github.com/slimcoin-project/Slimcoin/commit/aaf3e387d39a1371c15adc811afdf0417246f22e

Cheers

Graham




613  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Test v0.5 on: November 17, 2017, 04:43:07 PM
Sorry for not updatiing the OS X version, will do so now ...
Drat. My Sierra OS X VM didn't survive the move from Ubuntu to Mint, VMWare reports the VM as running but there's no activity (spit).  There will be a short delay while I rebuild and re-provision the VM.

Replacing the now-elderly 5.0.something VMWare from the Mint 18.2 distro with the latest VMWare 5.2 d/l cured the problem. An OS X (Sierra) Slimcoin dmg of the latest version (master) is now available:

https://minkiz.co/noodlings/slm/SLIMCoin-Qt-v0.5.2.dmg

Usefully, it is also able to bootstrap from the datadir snapshot.

Also, it uses BerkeleyDB 4.8, so not speedy but is backward-compatible in that it will allow users to drop back to a previous version without borking the wallet (6.3 can read 4.8 wallets but 4.8 cannot read the wallets that 6.3 saves). At some point in the future I'll make available both a SLIMCoin-Qt48 (using 4.8 )  and a SLIMCoin-Qt (using 6.X).

Cheers

Graham
614  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: November 17, 2017, 10:22:27 AM
Inchalright i've read the Forbes post now and the phrase I had to study a few times to get was InchOpen Money found Chinese wise money."
What a load of shit.  A very long winded account farmer.

I've seen this Inch* mistranslation a number of times recently. Looks like experiments in automated post generation piped through a translation service.

As a Dune fan and (ex-)AI R'n'D, I've always wondered what might have started the Butlerian jihad, I think I'm starting to get a hint.

Cheers

Graham
615  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Test v0.5 on: November 17, 2017, 10:13:21 AM
Slim can use the HEAT exchange is someone knows how to set it up. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1959885

I might be interested but the heatledger website sucks so badly I couldn't find any details on setting up anything. Doesn't inspire confidence.
NEVER EVER consider using heat for anything!

In case there was ever any misunderstanding ... I'm British and just as subject to habitual understatement (litotes) as the rest of my countryfolk.

You can translate “Doesn't inspire confidence” as meaning: “I wouldn't touch them with a 10-foot bargepole.”

Cheers

Graham
616  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin" on: November 15, 2017, 02:11:15 PM
Just ignore the spammers.

To stake coins, is it enough with having your coins in your wallet and leaving it open (and up to date, of course)?

Yes, it is enough.

Cheers

Graham
617  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Test v0.5 on: November 14, 2017, 08:14:46 PM
I tried in the console:

reservebalance true 1
walletpassphrase mypassword 999999999999

You shouldn't need to do anything else. I will take a look at the code, see if I can spot a problem.

Otherwise, adding reservebalance=0 to the config file seems to work reliably.

Cheers

Graham
618  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Test v0.5 on: November 14, 2017, 08:09:45 PM

You are correct.

Cheers

Graham
619  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Test v0.5 on: November 14, 2017, 06:30:19 PM
I cannot stake

Is that a problem? (just checking)

Cheers

Graham
620  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Slimcoin | First Proof of Burn currency | Test v0.5 on: November 14, 2017, 06:25:50 PM
Sorry for not updatiing the OS X version, will do so now ...

Drat. My Sierra OS X VM didn't survive the move from Ubuntu to Mint, VMWare reports the VM as running but there's no activity (spit).

There will be a short delay while I rebuild and re-provision the VM.

Cheers

Graham
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 114 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!