You literally renders me speechless for a moment.

Here's the situation, yes I know and understand that you'll have 15,000 token for sale, and from it, 10% were for private sale. That is why I wrote your private sale to be 1,500, and presale to be 13,500 (15,000 - (15,000 x 10%) = 15,000 - 1,500 = 13,500). In total, there is 15,000 token for sale and 6,000 token will be for farming. These two took the entire allocation of total token supply, (15,000 + 6000 = 21,000).

So, from where do you allocate token for liquidity pool? Were you trying to say that 60% of the presale token will be locked? As in, people buy 1 eth worth of token, and only got 0.4 worth of token because the 0.6 will be forcefully taken from them to be locked on LP?


This. Is. Where. You. Renders. Me. Speechless. The 1,500 token on private sale was not part of the total supply? The total supply??

Researching and supporting project that, like... one that encourage shilling activity and webpage forbid a visitor access with 403 error? And oh, it reminds me, from which project do you meet cris qatar, again?

Lord! I didn't know that my question was not obvious and clear enough. Here, let me break them by number and color:

You have 21,000 from total supply
From this number, 1,500 were for private sale, 19,500 remains unallocated from total supply
Next, 13,500 were for pre-sale (or token sale, given you don't have any other token sake after that, so the prefix "pre" were rather useless), 6,000 remains unallocated from total supply
Next, 6,000 were for farming. 0 remains unallocated from total supply.
Last, 60% of 13,500, or 8,100 were for liquidity pool. Where does it came from?

Here, the equation
total supply - private sale - pre-sale - farming - liquidity pool = 21,000 - 1,500 - 13,500 - 6,000 - 8,100 = -8,100

So which one's your plan?
A. Magic-ing 8,100 from thin air
B. Taking 8,100 from what people bought and locking them.

Nice tantrum, err... I mean, speech. By the way, while we're waiting for your KYC to pass (I didn't know how reputable distx, by the way, but that's a different matter for different time), can you answer the math behind your token allocation? It was on my previous post on this thread.

Well, do you have your own thread for this "helping project with different ways" service of yours? I would really like to know more, given your post history shows you also "promote" other project alike to this one. If you have, we'll move our talk there. If you don't, then we'll talk here.

Meanwhile, you have unanswered questions on post above

What project was it? And does his name made known as am investor on said project?

And, regarding your claim on being a mod on helping project on different ways, what does it mean? God forbid it's like a bumping service. Does this group you moderated has specific thread or channel I can learn about more?


Move to your own thread and answer there, it has a lot of unanswered questions

Have you studied or at least see the project that's currently being talked about? See what this "owner is not anonymous" claim looks like? Or were you just popping in to chase some post count?

In other words, you are sure that he is a real person with legit intentions, supporting, and can vouch for him, despite the extremely questionable pictures he use on his linkedin and website?

Dev didn't activate for almost two weeks itself shows a sign of bad project. Combine that with the nakedness of their website (like you also notice, there were no information, background, or anything about the project there) and the anonymity, we can probably just mark this project as scam.

Moving on from topic about token sale as it was cleared, now I'd like to know more about token allocation. Let's assume dev managed to sell all token during sale phases and got 3b development budget.

1. Just to be sure, bounty and other marketing activities will be paid from this allocation?

2. Dev said these funds will be escrowed. Do dev mean the fund were locked for certain duration and gradually released by the escrow, or was it simply means dev will put the funds on a third party wallet and they can ask for whatever amount they want, whenever they want?

Interesting. Were you related with their project? If so, at what capacity? And if you don't, then what's your reason for promoting and supporting them? Or are you just the alt account of their dev?

It wasn't there yesterday, the button used to be inactive. Besides, their WP looks more like an onepager (it literally can fit in quarter page, actually). And talking about their content, the tokenomic were different from the one listed here. On both cases though, I'm not sure if my math were rusty or what, their numbers just didn't adds up.

For the sake of convenience, I'll use the one on WP as they have a more friendly numbers



Ignore page 4, focus on page 3 and 5.

So Dev, your project will have 21,000 token as total supply, 6,000 will be allocated for staking, 13,500 for ICO and 1,500 for pre-sale (I'm helping you up here by correcting your sale number, and using a better term for your token sale), and then you'll have 60% of sale (that's around 8,100) token locked for liquidity? Like... LOL, seriously? What? You want people to buy, then they have to give their token to be locked for liquidity? Where does that 8,100 token comes from?

Now for page 5, I think we are all know here what's wrong with it. In case you didn't know, although word and excel has a nice charting feature that's fully functional and easy to use, you still need some brainpower to input your number properly into them and label each segment correctly.

Perhaps I should re-word my question: how do you plan to power the passive income activity? Sure you have some reservoir to distribute the token for stake holders (the literal stake-holders, not stakeholders), but what will you do to ensure the value of each of those token?

Oh, I know the answer for this one!! Yay!! Because I was interested to join the airdrop too, but I was too late in pressing the button, given the very small time window. You don't need to have DAG on your molly to claim, just make sure you claimed within the 24 hours window

That's hardly an answer. If you deliberately tried to be vague and mysterious, I don't think you're in position to do such maneuver, you haven't gain enough foundation to be trusted by whomever read your thread. In fact, you'll most likely be seen as evading answers, being shady, and indicating scam. Especially when people tried to gain more info on your website and they meet pages that's lack of any convincing matter, well... they meet with tons of ads instead. Were that your official website or your PPC personal blog?

Well... we already have such coin, several of them, actually. Bitcoin, ethereum, ripple, BNB, should I continue? Just google CMC top coins, you'll get a good list of token that make actual money (in sense of profit gained from trading, mining, and other crypto activities) instead of just dumping. So what do you propose, again?

They have the most crystal clear roadmap ever! They even put a great breakdown of their planned milestones in two months! OP, if you want some pixels, I sell some -_-

Seriously though, the name Cris Thompson didn't bring any result on Google, something that's quite strange, given the unique spelling of your name. Plus, your LinkedIn looks like someone's fake ID. Anything you'd like to say on this?

So, my confusion happened because BM said there will be 10b sold, while the stages shows only 7b sold. A simple misunderstanding from BM because there will be only 7b sold, divided into three token sale: presale with 1b, first phase ICO with 3b at 0.002, and second phase ICO with 3b at 0.003.

In total, there will be a maximum 7b sold (not 10b), which if all of them were fully sold, dev will generate 3b for development purpose, which will brings us to 10b maximum supply. We can say that if this project managed to sell their entire ICO allocation, DEV will generate small extra funds for development purpose. Otherwise, if the 7b is not sold (again, 7b, which the sum of pre+ico1+ico2, not 10b), they'll only generate 30% from the total amount sold.

If I may borrow CM's explanation, if 6 billion SYLs are sold then only 1.8 billion will be sequestered for the ecosystem.

You both aware that your view about whitepaper is not contradicting each other, right? One said this project still need WP because it give a better understanding of project, the other said this project is strange because they didn't have WP that explain details (about the project).

And yes, WP is not just for ICO, it's not a mere offering letter that can be removed just because someone didn't ask for funds, it was an official in-depth documents explaining about the current issue, your plan, and everything related to your project

Hold on a second, were you saying there will be a third phase? If your aim was to get 10b (where if there were less than 10b sold, then the unsold token will not be issued), and so far your sales were: 1b (presale) + 3b (1st ico) + 3b (2nd ico), so there'll be 3rd ico with 3b? What'll be the rate?

Edit: recalled there is a tokenomic detail on WO and found the explanation regarding this matter. Will explain on below post to avoid confusion