I mean, WTF happened here? I am not sure which version to pick.
Oh there are so many choices: 1) A few marbles short of a full deck. 2) Not the brightest knife in the chandelier. 3) As sharp as a bag of wet hammers. 4) All of the above. I was thinking about something and I thought timelord was joking in howeycoins topic but I am really not sure any more. I think he really investigated it! edit: here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3920469.msg41736089#msg41736089He is either become sick throughout the years which would be very unfortunate, or he was always actually quite morally evil and has only recently shown his true face. You can choose which version you wish to believe.
...this investigation happened 2 years ago, maybe he was always like this and eventually he showed his true face?
|
|
|
U kom smislu pomogao članovima? Vidim da je marlboroza ostavio neke scam prijave i istraživanja.
Istraživanje prevaranata pomaže i novim i starim članovima, znaš i sam. E pa sad, "najviše pomogao", mislim da je to subjektivno.
|
|
|
Flag created by bob123 is not valid...
The link i used pointed towards a specific post in given thread. However, somehow this simply gut cut off when creating the flag. So the real reference post is now the reference post of the red trust, which states the reason for the flag. Weird behavior. Nothing i can do about now. If i would have known that links to specific pages/posts get cut off, i would have created a separate thread. That's my mistake, and i admit it. But nonetheless, the flag itself is valid. A user who offers a wallet recovery service while being an alt of an account which got negative trust for engaging in spreading risky/malicious links/files while also having an active flag seems pretty solid enough for a warning flag. I am sorry, I didn't see that flag for account percenter was created by account MagicByt3, I was talking about that flag. That one is invalid, it points to not existing topic. Your flag on the other hand points to " known alts of any-one" topic, but I can't find any information about account walletrecovery, at least I couldn't find it in spreadsheet. Yes, that is something which must be linked in topic: You must link to a topic documenting your specific concerns. So it is also not valid but if you tell timelord to update topic it could make your flag valid...technicalities ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
~
Yeah, that's the one. New account who has found bitcointalk forum to talk about merits and spam copy/pasted articles about corona virus and world pollution ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) C/p articles and shitposting, that's it: Thank you very much I fully agree with you and please stay safe.
Yeah, but these things are really helpful too ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Yeah, I miss walking too, the sun, air ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) ... let's hope that it will end soon Well, i didn't know that i hope your air will purify as soon as possible
That's right, and good luck just have motivation!!!
If you compare permabanned RegulusHR to this not-banned shitposter, it really doesn't make much sense.
|
|
|
You need to create new topic and link it in flag. Evidence sometimes disappear so use web archives: http://web.archive.orgarchive.is ....and include archived links to topic. That's pretty much it. Or, if you need to flag users for very similar scam, you can do something like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157698.0.
Flag created by bob123 is not valid...
|
|
|
It's really nice to see, that even after 2 months of ignoring reputation branch, and finally, after i've came here, everything still the same. Marlboroza still debates with Tecshare in the same topic. Heh.
No, this person is shilling for fraudulent service. There was debate for previous feedback but I won't remove this one. TECSHARE is refusing to update topic with new info!Why on earth was this thread created?
Techy has a paid sig. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Eh, I am not sure but I don't think he is payed by post, perhaps, just to wear signature for few months...He might had case with previous feedback but now? I don't think so. I am really curious who will support his shilling for exposed fraudulent activities, especially in form of counter feedback.
|
|
|
That is your own interpretation of me being fraudulent despite me not intending to scam anyone around
Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me.
I'll probably bookmark this. That doesn't proof anything other than you being biased in your judgements and trying to ignore and even wrongly troll my statements. So it is trolling now, not fake review ico service business any more. ![Cool](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cool.gif) Actually, the whole topic proves my good judgement, I suspected what you are, you denied it, I investigated it and I proved my judgement is good. You, on the other hand, showed that you are one big liar.
|
|
|
That is your own interpretation of me being fraudulent despite me not intending to scam anyone around
Yes, I was involved in bumping business and I even had many other users working around me.
I'll probably bookmark this.
|
|
|
Why are you suggesting users to trust fraudulent account? SUGGESTED INCLUSIONS:
hacker1001101001
|
|
|
What about RegulusHr ?? He is not good enough?
You can start sending PM thanks to all the global moderators, then Cyrus and then theymos for their unbiased way of handling the forum. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Disappointing. This is even better: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fan2GH60.png&t=663&c=Y4vfwvp_55InqA) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FfCfKxNO.png&t=663&c=WDqNZFnxig0cmQ) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FWDMmhDN.png&t=663&c=89ruGKg_3CJ6iw) This report is in status "unhandled" for last 2 days. Here is another one "unhandled": ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FNh6B7R4.png&t=663&c=yWidy-l7XbRbag) So, in China, carbon dioxide emissions have dropped by as much as 100 million cubic tons in the last two weeks. That's almost six percent of global emissions. The rapid spread of the new coronavirus, which has killed more than 2000 in China and infected over 74,000 people. Environmentalists warn that the reduction is only temporary. "Once the coronavirus has subsided, we are very likely to face increased production that will seek to compensate for the losses," Li Shuo said. Meanwhile, emissions of nitrogen dioxide, a by-product of fossil fuel combustion in vehicles and power plants, fell 36 percent in China the week after New Year's holidays. As for the rest of the world, the situation is quite similar. In most cities, as far as Europe is concerned, people mostly stick to the rules and stay in their homes. The cities are empty but also cleaner. In some countries wild animals are walking the streets, and there are no people at all. The current environmental situation is actually much better than it was, but that can all change. Do you think will the environment become polluted or cleaner?
https://www.sciencealert.com/china-s-carbon-emissions-suddenly-dropped-recently-but-not-for-the-best-reasonsBut environmentalists have warned that the reduction is temporary Meanwhile, China's nitrogen dioxide emissions – a byproduct of fossil fuel combustion in vehicles and power plants – fell 36 percent in the week following the Lunar New Year holidays And so on...Whole post is just like that, some parts are paraphrased while the rest is nothing but blatant plagiarism. Not only report is not handled for more than a week, shitposting account lucia2015 is allowed to continue shitposting: I think that this situation is getting all over the world, and how I said nothing will be the same after.
yes, the government should absolutely watch their people first before themselves.
yes, i would agree because this is as possible as it can happen.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2Fe115642.png&t=663&c=sqwNfaRrbSSOlw) Dafack is this, whats up chat room? Makes no sense with OP.
|
|
|
I am curious why would one logout
Why not? That's what I am trying to understand, why one is usually used to logout from a bitcointalk account or any other media if he/she owns the device he used to log in.
There must be something in this post: Most people here use (should use) TOR and you are logged out by default when you closed the browser.
or <insert any other reason>
Ok, so there are few "tools" from where everyone can see merit history. Why don't we have it here?
|
|
|
North Korea has fairer politics than Bitcointalk.
Hm....In addition to previous my post, I have found another observable instance: Was RegulusHr behind ICO bump service and/or he sockpuppeted their way into DT? Why he can't get second chance like all other ban evaders and ICO fraudulent service account? Why is this account banned and all these accounts got second chance? Or, better, why all these accounts are not banned and regulushr is?
|
|
|
That's not what "frame" means. You didn't get framed with plagiarism or with ICO spam, you did it yourself.
He is clearly trying to spread baseless accusations about it and frame childish shit over, there are zero evidence of his comment below. LOL, you're too illiterate to be throwing dictionaries around. It's an opinion. Just like yours here: proves an pattern
Are you framing someone? Or just being a dumbass who can't even copy TECSHARE's indignant rants properly? Hold on a second! Is this user lecturing others how to use "freedom of speech"?
TECSHARE where are you m8? Hope everything is OK. Please update topic with shilling for fraudulent business https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213992.msg54213781#msg54213781 Thank you! Stay safe!
|
|
|
I'll just drop this here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=1668017Reference: anonymousminer derailed a thread. I called him a bitch for doing so in a private exchange between him and I. He said he wanted to fight me. I told him how to find me. Then he cried until I blocked his PMs and derailed another thread which is why I called him a bitch in the first place. Now he’s making a thread trying to seem like a tough guy. It’s funny to me. Why the community stands for people derailing threads and chasing away talent I have no idea, but I stand by my statement that it is bitch behavior. As for who the keyboard warrior is, I’m not the one publicly trying to sound tough behind a keyboard. I blocked the bitch and moved on with no worries. Post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5233577.msg54048974#msg54048974Archive: http://archive.is/VTH34Seems like negative trust has been sent in retribution for criticism and speaking freely. Seems this objective standardz guild support sending negative tags for derailing threads, I suppose we could call them from this point "DOUBLE STANDARDZ GUILD". @Guild leader TECSHARE, are you going to exclude Ognasty for trust abuse and add him to suggested exclusion list???
|
|
|
He is either become sick throughout the years which would be very unfortunate, or he was always actually quite morally evil and has only recently shown his true face. You can choose which version you wish to believe.
I have no clue what happened to Timelord. For example, Nutildah said he is in contact with Bruno's family. Timelord said this: Irony:I knew Bruno personally and have been in contact with a family member.
You want us to take your word that you've spoken to Bruno's family, but tell us not to believe another user who makes the same claim. ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Nutildah said: "YES" And Timelord said: Yes.
Thank-you for voting "yes" to the Poll topic. Next. I mean, WTF happened here? I am not sure which version to pick.
|
|
|
I know there are several working telegram bots that notify members about merit change, and as you said we can visit BPIP website for more information. It is workaround.
Do you use telegram bots/bpip to notify you about merits? Maybe someone ought to create an app for smartphones, sort of a merit-alert checker or something. Just thinking out loud here.
Why not clickable bitcointalk link to merits? So no apps, "merit-alerts", just click and see who has sent you merit. I always want to see what post someone "liked". I just can't do that with one single click. Ok, who voted against cunt ?!?
I did, for one. If you want me to call you a cunt, I can. Lol. It's almost like wanting to see you PM when not logged in or see your trust or someone else trust rate when you not logged in.
Nah, it is not, read hacker's post.
|
|
|
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F4MeSMcG.png&t=663&c=fUuYSYnx0JpUUQ) Ok, who voted against cunt ?!?
I have a different question: why do you even log out?
I don't have good answer to this question. Let's just say "I am logged out". Even I am curious as most possible reason near to OP as I see is having multiple accounts. ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Is my alt account logged in? You fake review prick, if I was logged in then I would have seen merit transactions therefore I wouldn't have created this topic, wouldn't I, you Bump? So I just login since it my own account to know who sent it.
Yes, but you need to log in. The thing is, "I am not logged in and I want to see who has sent me merit"
|
|
|
Each time I am not logged in and I receive merits, I always have this thoughts in my head: "where, where, who sent me merit, where, who, who...oh, here, why, why now, why"Why do we have to be logged in to find out who sent us merits? I mean, we can go to https://bpip.org and find merited post, but can this be somehow implemented in forum, for "guests" I mean...?
|
|
|
|