You're asking on Bitcointalk, so it's obvious: buy Bitcoin. Store it in your own wallet, don't keep it on an exchange.
|
|
|
In the Netherlands, "plants" are very profitable indeed, but if the police find out you get arrested Food production is heavily regulated, and you can't just sell it in small quantities. For your own consumption it's allowed, but it's less time consuming to get a job and buy food in a shop. At least in countries with high wages.
|
|
|
Congrats! I can now confirm the solution and announcing the winner works on Tor browser too.
|
|
|
Thanks for the hints, that makes me think BAILOUT. Which leads me to ADAPT or ADOPT and something like DUE (DIE isn't friendly enough), but the context for DUE doesn't make sense.
|
|
|
Going with the BIP-39 theory, I get: I like fee most That brings me to: I like offer most: amateur another brother chapter cluster deliver despair empower hamster lobster monitor monster neither nuclear october outdoor panther pioneer popular prosper quarter regular scatter seminar similar slender soldier sponsor thunder toddler trigger uncover warrior weather whisper Too many permutations for confetti!
|
|
|
I hate people spending their bitcoin sort of being 'demonized', as there's definitely nothing wrong with what the dude did. He publicly showed that bitcoin can actually be used as a currency. Big achievement, if anything. Exactly! Use Bitcoin as a currency, spend it, earn it, save it. Adoption is what can make Bitcoin grow. Laszlo didn't spend all his Bitcoin on pizza, he had enough left. Bitcoin wouldn't be worth much if only a few guys would have kept all of it for themselves.
|
|
|
If you solve it, the words will decrypt a message which contains a 0.01 BTC or One Million Sats Bounty that you can sweep. Code is open source and the encrypted message is open to the public. Does it show the decrypted solution automatically once the correct words are entered? If so: that's genius! Or do you need the cypher from github? I've never solved a crossword puzzle without clues before. I'm collecting words: btc bit key sat feeare use due ode awe sign hash txid pizza block chain spend after often offer satoshi andreas address confirm private
|
|
|
A miner with 50% mining power has a 100% probability of mining the next block This is incorrect. 50% of the mining power gives you 50% probability of finding the next block.
|
|
|
I setup a CC for stacking sats off swan. . Can you explain what CC and swan mean in this context?
|
|
|
He's angry with the world and the website(s) are his vendetta/mouth piece. I often forget there are still people who care about opinions on the internet.
|
|
|
people think I'm joking when I say that I attacked america and they made the coronavirus in self defence. That's certainly a whole new level. And there I thought I could give you serious advice on hosting.
|
|
|
I've seen electric cars referred to as "power banks on wheels", but this is taking it a bit too literally. Why not power your house from the free supercharging instead?
|
|
|
Wordpress website somewhere else because the bill is 32€ Per year or per month? For $14 per year you can get a VPS. More work to install Wordpress but cheap to use. I like RackNerd: not bad quality for a low price.
|
|
|
What hosting specs do you use? And why is your website a priority if the rest of your life is as messed up as you say?
|
|
|
I am kind of confused, I thought nodes validate confirmed transactions, taken from the mempool and included into a block by miner for it to be confirmed and get validated by nodes.
Can a transaction not up to the minimum amount of bitcoin be broadcasted into the mempool, included into a block and got confirmed but later got invadated by nodes? I was thinking the transaction will never even be broadcasted into the mempool at all. Nodes have a mempool filled with unconfirmed transactions, and miners run nodes too. Each node can decide whether or not to reject a transaction that hasn't been confirmed yet. Most of them seem to agree you can't send dust.
|
|
|
Most nodes: 547 sat for legacy addresses, and a bit less when sending to Segwit. It's quite useless to do, I've seen many transactions that pay more in additional fees than the dust is worth.
|
|
|
UPDATE, I just converted my $100 USDT to $250 UST, and it's my first time buying a "stable coin" because of the fluctuation.
Let's hope this will be a lesson for those trying to make a quick profit by adopting a "stable currency" and beginning to develop a better model. How's this going? It's kinda ironic you mentioned turning it into a lesson. UST isn't backed by anything anymore. I'm surprised it still has 1.4 billion dollar market cap and 12 cents per coin. I'd say it's pure speculation.
|
|
|
I was asked to respond here. After reading most of the topic, including FortuneJack's response about their Terms, I won't Support the Flag that claims they "violated a casual or implied agreement". I do think the Terms are shitty though. If certain bets are not allowed, cancel them before the match. Not all the duplicated bets are canceled, only the ones that exceed 100,000 in euros. You should clarify this in your Terms and Conditions.
|
|
|
|