BCC is in total agreement with Satoshi's Whitepaper. SegWit is a wild deviation very far indeed from the whitepaper. Why do people insist on calling Core's Bitcoin the 'real' bitcoin. Bitcoin Cash is going to rule because on chain scaling will prove fine while Core Blockstream's altcoin will burn in flames. Don't sell your BCC.
|
|
|
Scaling issue is entirely political/business/economic/social.
Technically, there is not a problem. Dash just released a roadmap with 400MB blocks. Chew on that.
Luke Dash Jr.? I didn't think he'd go in for such things
|
|
|
As far as my understanding is correct since Im still new to bitcoin world, even with a chain split, there is still bitcoin. If the chain splits, then you will have double Bitcoin. After split, hope for another split. Good way to get rich.
|
|
|
BTC has been stuck in impasse hell for over two years because Adam Back and G. Maxwell want to monopolize transaction processing on their Lightning. Although Bitcoin seems 'decentralized', Blockstream/Core has complete control over the impasse and only they can break it. They won't.
On the other hand, ETH is like a heavy loaded freight train going straight down the tracks toward an awesome goal. Many, many, many companies are now building onto that platform as the future. That platform is far more dynamic and far more powerful. It offers many opportunities that don't even exist with Bitcoin. Many of these features are actively being deployed now, not just a bunch of talk like the people at Bitcoin. Ethereum is highly organized and orderly. Even in major crises, they get it sorted and move on in a short time.
ETH will pass Bitcoin in about 2 more months.
It's not too late. Time to switch or get left behind.
|
|
|
Yea, the master troll in action again. So you saying the users/miners should be in control of the coding and developing? How fucked up would that be, if the users and miners were in control of programming the code.
Kaka-makr = Fucking moron. Holy fuck. I didn't say user/miners in charge of coding. Are you stupid? They are and should be in charge of the network. Whoever has the best code, will have the users/miners support, or that is the theory....
Precisely. And this is why those assholes at Blockstream are losing. It is not because of paid shills or FUD or ASICBOOST. It is because SegWit is garbage that renders the network control over to Blockstream via LN and does nearly nothing to address capacity.
|
|
|
The same toxic trolls have a $24B market running on their software That is not their software. That is Satoshi's software. Their software is full of shit like SegWit and Lightning hooks. Fuck them. They are toxic and Gavin knew it all along but tried to be decent until it became impossible. GMaxwell can just fuck right off. It'd be even better if he managed to do it yesterday. at the people who are in control You see there! Even the Blockstream shills admit that Blockstream is " in control" I thought the distributed users/miners were in control? Blockstream believes they are "in control". This is the primary reason Blockstream is fucked up and people need to stand up and resist now. Even if you just make one post, do fucking SOMETHING. Sitting there like a lamb is the only thing that assures your slaughter.
|
|
|
Wala! Bitcointalk becomes a useful, clean, happy place once again.
Been studying your French again I see.
|
|
|
the wholesome maidens seem closer now ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) What sort of filthy pig are you? Let me see if I got this right?: If you get more money, the maidens come closer to you? Those aren't 'wholesome maidens', those are gold digging whores. Run.
|
|
|
I was wondering if the Antbleed news would finally cause BU/Bitmain defenders to admit they have been wrong, or if they would go full bore insane. Guess I have my answer. Defending an exploit that could be used to wipe out much of the network is stark raving insane, as is the notion that exposing it somehow helps the clowns who perpetrated the exploit.
bitmain having a switch in its own server, that only affects only its own equipment, which will cause its customers to request refunds. hmm oh and also if they wanted it as a weapon they would have pulled the trigger already however this last month has all been about blockstream flock trying to find any bug in anything not blockstream advocated.. but not willing to listen when code made by blockstream has flaws Bla bla bla bla like ussual from paid shill Franky1. Bla bla bla bla like ussual from paid shill Darkbot. At least Franky1 isn't a new made up username like yours. pathetic how low Core will go.
|
|
|
The last time I see the charts Bitcoin unlimited has 49% votes leaving the core at somewhere between 30 to 40%. But this does not mean that the core has lost since there are still group of miners who have not placed their sides. It is only a matter of time. It is now clear that the community is not prepared to have 1MegGreg and AdamBack be the overlords. Blockstream tried lots of very dirty tricks - the people figured it out. That low down censorship stuff sometimes comes back to haunt you. Fuck them. Can't wait for them to be sitting on the minority fork.
|
|
|
I think the argument is finished. It is now clear that Blockstream won't be able to take over the blockchain to run their proprietary (patented) bullshit and pay back their $70 million to AXA. Whew!, that was close. But in the end, people are watching out and they don't like private takeovers.
The 'Antbleed' thing might be the last final effort to shit the bed.
It won't be long and we will have 8MB blocks and finally get rid of those Core idiots who think they own the world.
|
|
|
no threats, no PoW bombs. no blackmails.. no deadlines. just free open choice.
This type of behavior is inconsistent with Core/Blockstream ideals.
|
|
|
Yep. It is the fucking Russians. Confirmed: Scam.
|
|
|
Well you are assuming there will be a network split...
You assume there won't?
|
|
|
People who title themselves "Worlds First Bitcoin Investor" are WAY bigger assholes than this guy.
Say that again dude, these fame whores are doing anything to share in bitcoin's glory and I hope they don't succeed. They are rather making fools of themselves. They think people on LinkedIn will read their profile and believe they are the boss of the whole Bitcoin thing. What kind of people do they think are reading their profile? Idiots?
|
|
|
...and you guys like this open source bullshit? The fighting is insane. The disorganization is insane. The progress is zero. BU/SegWit is a total impasse.
I think Microsoft should deploy a Bitcoin version and organize a team of coders with a board of directors who know how to get shit done and take decisions. The love for 'decentralization' is nonsense. This idea to fight it out in the wild is the least efficient thing I have ever witnessed.
Bitcoin is fucked.
|
|
|
Nobody here gives a fat fiddler's fuck about your goofy economic theories. I was asking about Samson Mow.
Nobody in this thread understands what economic theories are. Please, it is high time for you to stop being an idiot.
|
|
|
OK - we are now stuck on 36.8% and a bit less than that for Core. So, there will be no fork and no change. Blockstream wins.
We need to make the rules such that the parties that don't vote, don't count. It will be very hard to get over 50% when so many miners are not indicating SegWit or BU. When throwing away the non-voters, we are presently at >51% for BU. Enough for a fork today.
|
|
|
m. Smart people can be evil too, and Adam Back is demonstrably evil. I don't care if he's smart or not.
its really not fair that Greg's been getting all the attention here in this thread ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) Glad you brought this up. Can you explain more? Don't forget vain. Adam Back is vain too. He thinks his HashCash is more or less Bitcoin. Whadda fucker. These Blockstream pieces of garbage have to be stopped.
|
|
|
|