At the moment, izooomrud account is fully unblocked. He can withdraw or sell his funds.
Looks a great initiative to end the drama, or at least help things cool down. One more thing: I think you should claim that a new signature campaign run by @Livecoin Manager (just assume it is a new one from Livecoin) is an official campaign from Livecoin. There is drama that it is run by scammers, whom are not from Livecoin team. I don't think Livecoin exchange need another drama. |
|
|
|
Wth, I've always used abbreviations like BTT.
Sure! People can use whichever abbreviation they want. It is an endless discussion. 
Four months ago, there was a poll to choose which abbreviation should be used to call bitcointalk.org forum. You can check it here, if you have time: [POLL] BTT - BCT - BTCT?. In short, there are different perspective, people supports BTT, BCT, BTCT, but there are actually a considerable proportion of supporters for the full name: bitcointalk.org. Additionally, inside Flag Box, theymos used the term 'Bitcointalk.org' too. Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Check their trust page to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
|
|
|
|
The 3 websites I tried all want me to upload ID such as passport and driving licence.
Binance don't ask for KYCs if your withdrawals don't exceed 2 bitcoin per day. Here you go: https://www.binance.com/You can get other top exchanges there: https://coinmarketcap.com/rankings/exchanges/USA-based exchanges ask for KYCs for sure, please remember that. |
|
|
|
I see you're on your way to Hero status! Although they say not to ask excessively, would you consider blessing me with a single merit point, in appreciation of your progress to Sr. status and in anticipation of your projected furthering of seniority?  Thanks for your time. I am not a merit-earning beast, but you can read my guide here: Promotion with merit system and new rank requirements. It's possible.Inspirational stories from self-made promoted users
Lastly, based on your post history, if you keep posting that way, you will never get a single merit, I believe. Read stories, learn from them, improve your post quality, and wait for your first merits. |
|
|
|
Theymos is slave to the community. His todo list could be made public for all the forum to do. Distributed work is done faster with more nodes.
Theymos' todo list can be found there: Community generated suggestions to improve the forum (+ eventual voting on them)Sometimes, theymos run contests to improve the forum, but it is not too often. The forum has nearly one-person-coded by theymos. The Epochtalk forum, the new forum software has been here for too long, but there are limited developers help to test it. I don't think we should ask for more public sources if don't join and help the new forum software testing procedure. I am sorry but I am not a developer, so I can not join it, but if you or anyone else can and have spare time, you all should do it. |
|
|
|
For Milkyway101, The thread title is incorrect, somehow, because the forum is bitcointalk.org, and you should call it only as bitcointalk.org. Or if the title has limited characters for you, you should call it as the forum, then everyone will know you actually implied about bitcointalk.org. There are bunches of fake sites that clone the forum and try to steal accounts of forum users, and more valuable related things. I don't remember, but theymos at somewhere, wrote clearly that it is bitcointalk.org forum, not bitcointalk, BTT, BCT, BTCT, whatsoever. I found it, there: Welcome to bitcointalk.org, the Bitcoin Forum!
|
|
|
|
Update: Our new nonce based provably fair system is live, for easier verification.
It is a good demonstration that Bitvest team have never stop upgraded their platforms in order to make them better, stronger, and more attractive. More games, easier vefication with newest nonce for provably fair system. KENO game in the long term, will help BitVest have more gamblers. |
|
|
|
I watched the video which reminds me about izoombies, honestly. |
|
|
|
For shortened links, you can check them using the website: https://redirectdetective.com/Or you can add a plus symbol (+) at the end of links to move to pages at which you can get final destination pages by redirect links. For suspicious phishing links, you can check links by scrolling computer mouse above the link, then you will see link at the bottom of the web browser (right or left, it depends on browsers, but mostly on the left bottom). You can check this by scrolling computer mouse on the link to my post. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin prices gave us a termpory boost as it’s come down again to $10600 on preev, though this volatility is normal but I do hope in coming days it tries to reach $13k again. The market is yet volatile I don’t think that we’re witnessing stable prices yet as bitcoin prices seems to be stuck in $10k - $11k range. I’m currently waiting for bitcoin prices to rise then I can use less Satoshis to bet with, so currently I’m not gambling but it’ll be interesting to read other people’s strategies and learn from them.
I am happy to see bitcoin moves up, but I don't think that Bitcoin will hit $13,000 soon. Bitcoin, in reality, has been on its re-consolidation phase, that will take a lot of time to finish. In my opinion, Bitcoin might have serious movements in the end days of this month, before more positive ones might occur in early days within first two weeks of August. Retesting the range around $9,000 or even below it a little bit is a possible scenario. |
|
|
|
Because there are overlaps inside the @wwzsocki's story, including his journey in real life and with bitcoin & blockchain technology. On the other hand, the story tells about his journey with merit system, from Senior Member rank to Hero Member rank now. That's is the main reason why the thread can be fitted with Meta board. For other stories, for example, solely tell about rank achievements with merit system's challenges, I still think they are more fitted with the Beginners & Help board. Not sure, but I kept my story in that board, not in Meta. Promotion with merit system and new rank requirements. It's possible.Most of other stories are in Beginners & Help board, too: Inspirational stories from self-made promoted users
Any ideas (hope that I am not wrong with it)? |
|
|
|
I was Hero member when merit was introduced (1.5 year ago), I feel very happy because with today's date I have received 1000 merits which made me, like some users like to say, "self-made legendary member".
I am a self-made Senior Member, and I actually started as a Junior Member with merit system. Now, I have been on my way to your beginning rank, Hero Member, and I am proud of myself that I am not too far to that target. I achieved more than 80% of merit requirement for that next rank. |
|
|
|
< ... >
I am not sure about you, but based on your posts and contribution in ANN threads of Stake.com and PrimeDice, I believe you are from team of Stake.com and PrimeDice. Hence, I have a recommendation for you, and two teams, that you should spend a little time to consider. I think teams should announce in both threads that there are some core members of two sites posted in those threads: Stunna, SteveStake, and Symphonized (if you actually are one of the team members). I suggest this because I believe it will be helpful for new visitors, help them to know which accounts will spread official information for them, and stay away from potential scammers. How about this? |
|
|
|
We now have 15 coins with the addition of BCHSV Bitcoin Cash SV. We are seeing an increasing number of players use their mobile phones for both casino and sportsbook play and we will continue to improve both displays as well as a forthcoming mobile app.
The more good coins (with some good features, like fast transaction speed, and cheap transaction fees) added, the more convenience the PlayBetr site will give gamblers. It is amazingly and interestingly to see such a young casino like PlayBetr added 15 coins in total on their platform, that is much more than other old casinos. It means the approach (expansion more acceptable coins on the site) might help the site become bigger. Consequently, current gamblers will stick playing on the site, and new gamblers might join the PlayBetr to play. |
|
|
|
Update:Time series plot of median and interquartile range
Dataset for median, interquartile range of intraday merits. list week median q1 q3 merit
+------------------------------------------+
| week median q1 q3 merit |
|------------------------------------------|
1. | 2018w26 733 609 991 4457 |
2. | 2018w27 715 598 979 4253 |
3. | 2018w28 707 592 963 4239 |
4. | 2018w29 693 589 922 4159 |
5. | 2018w30 684 577 902 3652 |
|------------------------------------------|
6. | 2018w31 682 575 891 3798 |
7. | 2018w32 675 567 880 3994 |
8. | 2018w33 667 559 867 3618 |
9. | 2018w34 652 555 848 3789 |
10. | 2018w35 642 537 844 3065 |
|------------------------------------------|
11. | 2018w36 639 528 838 3574 |
12. | 2018w37 634 528 829 5630 |
13. | 2018w38 641 530 846 7825 |
14. | 2018w39 640 531 839 4388 |
15. | 2018w40 639 528 829 4271 |
|------------------------------------------|
16. | 2018w41 637 528 808 3800 |
17. | 2018w42 639 530 807 4821 |
18. | 2018w43 639 528 801 3945 |
19. | 2018w44 628 521 796 3339 |
20. | 2018w45 630 522 789 4513 |
|------------------------------------------|
21. | 2018w46 626 521 786 3722 |
22. | 2018w47 626.5 521 782 4558 |
23. | 2018w48 626 521 774 3750 |
24. | 2018w49 621.5 517 773 3560 |
25. | 2018w50 619 517 768 3782 |
|------------------------------------------|
26. | 2018w51 618.5 515 766.5 3753 |
27. | 2018w52 616.5 509.5 762.5 3278 |
28. | 2019w1 616 510 766 4793 |
29. | 2019w2 618.5 513 773 6624 |
30. | 2019w3 620 514 774 5306 |
|------------------------------------------|
31. | 2019w4 621.5 516.5 770.5 4659 |
32. | 2019w5 620 516 773 4474 |
33. | 2019w6 619.5 517 768 4318 |
34. | 2019w7 618 519 767 4207 |
35. | 2019w8 618.5 518.5 766.5 4507 |
|------------------------------------------|
36. | 2019w9 619 518 766 4625 |
37. | 2019w10 623 521 764 4901 |
38. | 2019w11 623 521 761 4318 |
39. | 2019w12 625.5 521 759.5 4598 |
40. | 2019w13 626 522 764 6120 |
|------------------------------------------|
41. | 2019w14 626 523 760 4418 |
42. | 2019w15 628 526 761 5259 |
43. | 2019w16 630 528 762.5 4680 |
44. | 2019w17 628 528 761 4450 |
45. | 2019w18 628 528 761 4756 |
|------------------------------------------|
46. | 2019w19 632 530 761 5434 |
47. | 2019w20 636 531 765 5202 |
48. | 2019w21 636 531 764 4571 |
49. | 2019w22 637 531 760 4336 |
50. | 2019w23 636 531 760 4678 |
|------------------------------------------|
51. | 2019w24 638 532 763 5294 |
52. | 2019w25 638 532 761 4710 |
53. | 2019w26 638 531 761 4356 |
54. | 2019w27 637 531 760 4214 |
55. | 2019w28 637 530 760 4105 |
List of median, q1, q3 of intra-day merits over weeks, in descending orders of medians.. list week median q1 q3 merit
+------------------------------------------+
| week median q1 q3 merit |
|------------------------------------------|
1. | 2019w1 616 510 766 4793 |
2. | 2018w52 616.5 509.5 762.5 3278 |
3. | 2019w7 618 519 767 4207 |
4. | 2018w51 618.5 515 766.5 3753 |
5. | 2019w8 618.5 518.5 766.5 4507 |
|------------------------------------------|
6. | 2019w2 618.5 513 773 6624 |
7. | 2018w50 619 517 768 3782 |
8. | 2019w9 619 518 766 4625 |
9. | 2019w6 619.5 517 768 4318 |
10. | 2019w3 620 514 774 5306 |
|------------------------------------------|
11. | 2019w5 620 516 773 4474 |
12. | 2019w4 621.5 516.5 770.5 4659 |
13. | 2018w49 621.5 517 773 3560 |
14. | 2019w11 623 521 761 4318 |
15. | 2019w10 623 521 764 4901 |
|------------------------------------------|
16. | 2019w12 625.5 521 759.5 4598 |
17. | 2019w13 626 522 764 6120 |
18. | 2018w48 626 521 774 3750 |
19. | 2019w14 626 523 760 4418 |
20. | 2018w46 626 521 786 3722 |
|------------------------------------------|
21. | 2018w47 626.5 521 782 4558 |
22. | 2019w17 628 528 761 4450 |
23. | 2019w18 628 528 761 4756 |
24. | 2018w44 628 521 796 3339 |
25. | 2019w15 628 526 761 5259 |
|------------------------------------------|
26. | 2018w45 630 522 789 4513 |
27. | 2019w16 630 528 762.5 4680 |
28. | 2019w19 632 530 761 5434 |
29. | 2018w37 634 528 829 5630 |
30. | 2019w23 636 531 760 4678 |
|------------------------------------------|
31. | 2019w20 636 531 765 5202 |
32. | 2019w21 636 531 764 4571 |
33. | 2019w22 637 531 760 4336 |
34. | 2019w28 637 530 760 4105 |
35. | 2019w27 637 531 760 4214 |
|------------------------------------------|
36. | 2018w41 637 528 808 3800 |
37. | 2019w25 638 532 761 4710 |
38. | 2019w26 638 531 761 4356 |
39. | 2019w24 638 532 763 5294 |
40. | 2018w42 639 530 807 4821 |
|------------------------------------------|
41. | 2018w40 639 528 829 4271 |
42. | 2018w43 639 528 801 3945 |
43. | 2018w36 639 528 838 3574 |
44. | 2018w39 640 531 839 4388 |
45. | 2018w38 641 530 846 7825 |
|------------------------------------------|
46. | 2018w35 642 537 844 3065 |
47. | 2018w34 652 555 848 3789 |
48. | 2018w33 667 559 867 3618 |
49. | 2018w32 675 567 880 3994 |
50. | 2018w31 682 575 891 3798 |
|------------------------------------------|
51. | 2018w30 684 577 902 3652 |
52. | 2018w29 693 589 922 4159 |
53. | 2018w28 707 592 963 4239 |
54. | 2018w27 715 598 979 4253 |
55. | 2018w26 733 609 991 4457 |
- From LoyceV's weekly data dumps. - From my converted datasets in the topic: Time Series Analysis on Distributed Merits in the forum (daily, weekly, monthly)
|
|
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Intra-day merits:
Notes:
- The part of the asbstract describes figures of intraday merits over the period from 19/2/2018 to 15/7/2019 (truncated dataset);
- Days from 24/1/2018 to 18/2/2018 truncated due to highly potential outliers; and days after 15/7/2019 truncated as well due to incomplete week (the 2019w29);
- Statistics presented in the post are for truncated dataset
(1) Potential outliers are days that have intraday total merits beyond 186 or 1104;
(2) Median of intraday merits over the period is 637;
(3) 50% of observed days have their intra-day merits range from 530 to 760 (the interquartile range);
(4) Friday [in GTM time] is the day over weeks has lowest intraday merits in terms of both median and mean, at 571, and 608, respectively.
(5) Monday [in GTM time] is the day over weeks has highest intraday merits in terms of median and mean, at 681, and 740.
(6) There are 29 potential outliers in total, and there is only five potential outlier days happened in early weeks of 2019, on 09/01/2019, 14/01/2019, 27/3/2019, 13/5/2019, and 11/6/2019, at 1161, 1127, 1249, 1150, and 1187, respectively.
(7) Minimum and maximum of intraday merits (full dataset) are 312 and 13018, on 11/2/2019 and 24/1/2018, respectively.
Intra-week merits:
Notes:
The part of the abstract use full dataset, only dropped last two days due to incomple week (2019w29).
(1) The median of intra-week merits is 4527;
(2) 50% of observed weeks (77 weeeks in total), have total merits in the range from 4159 to 5259 (the interquaritle range of intra-week merits).
(3) Minimum and maximum of intraweek merits are 3065 and 30949, in 2018w35, and 2018w4, respectively;
(4) Ten potential outliers [beyond 2509 or 6909], all of them occurred in the year 2018.
|
|
|
|
Update on intra-week merits (from 24/1/2018 to 15/7/2019)Converted dataset:. list merit week
+-----------------+
| merit week |
|-----------------|
1. | 30949 2018w4 |
2. | 19958 2018w5 |
3. | 13304 2018w6 |
4. | 11722 2018w7 |
5. | 8758 2018w8 |
|-----------------|
6. | 8806 2018w9 |
7. | 7253 2018w10 |
8. | 7309 2018w11 |
9. | 6941 2018w12 |
10. | 6707 2018w13 |
|-----------------|
11. | 6415 2018w14 |
12. | 5487 2018w15 |
13. | 4631 2018w16 |
14. | 4585 2018w17 |
15. | 4953 2018w18 |
|-----------------|
16. | 4753 2018w19 |
17. | 4346 2018w20 |
18. | 3854 2018w21 |
19. | 4183 2018w22 |
20. | 4527 2018w23 |
|-----------------|
21. | 3818 2018w24 |
22. | 4921 2018w25 |
23. | 4457 2018w26 |
24. | 4253 2018w27 |
25. | 4239 2018w28 |
|-----------------|
26. | 4159 2018w29 |
27. | 3652 2018w30 |
28. | 3798 2018w31 |
29. | 3994 2018w32 |
30. | 3618 2018w33 |
|-----------------|
31. | 3789 2018w34 |
32. | 3065 2018w35 |
33. | 3574 2018w36 |
34. | 5630 2018w37 |
35. | 7825 2018w38 |
|-----------------|
36. | 4388 2018w39 |
37. | 4271 2018w40 |
38. | 3800 2018w41 |
39. | 4821 2018w42 |
40. | 3945 2018w43 |
|-----------------|
41. | 3339 2018w44 |
42. | 4513 2018w45 |
43. | 3722 2018w46 |
44. | 4558 2018w47 |
45. | 3750 2018w48 |
|-----------------|
46. | 3560 2018w49 |
47. | 3782 2018w50 |
48. | 3753 2018w51 |
49. | 3278 2018w52 |
50. | 4793 2019w1 |
|-----------------|
51. | 6624 2019w2 |
52. | 5306 2019w3 |
53. | 4659 2019w4 |
54. | 4474 2019w5 |
55. | 4318 2019w6 |
|-----------------|
56. | 4207 2019w7 |
57. | 4507 2019w8 |
58. | 4625 2019w9 |
59. | 4901 2019w10 |
60. | 4318 2019w11 |
|-----------------|
61. | 4598 2019w12 |
62. | 6120 2019w13 |
63. | 4418 2019w14 |
64. | 5259 2019w15 |
65. | 4680 2019w16 |
|-----------------|
66. | 4450 2019w17 |
67. | 4756 2019w18 |
68. | 5434 2019w19 |
69. | 5202 2019w20 |
70. | 4571 2019w21 |
|-----------------|
71. | 4336 2019w22 |
72. | 4678 2019w23 |
73. | 5294 2019w24 |
74. | 4710 2019w25 |
75. | 4356 2019w26 |
|-----------------|
76. | 4214 2019w27 |
77. | 4105 2019w28 |
+-----------------+
- 50% of observed weeks ( 77 weeks) have total intra-week merits above 4527, whilst the rest 50% of them have total intra-week merits below 4527. 4527 is the median - p50. - 50% of observed weeks have total intra-week merits fluctuated in the range from 4159 to 5259 (the interquartile range, from p25 to p75, in raw statistics below). - Min - max: 3065 - 30949. . tabstat merit, s(n mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max)
variable | N mean sd p50 p25 p75 min max
-------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
merit | 77 5501.636 3798.32 4527 4159 5259 3065 30949
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. di 5259-4159
1100
. di 1100*1.5
1650
. di 5259+1650
6909
. di 4159-1650
2509
It means that potential outliers are weeks that have intra-week merits beyond 2509 or 6909. How many weeks are potential outliers? . count if (merit >= 6909 | merit < 2509) & merit != .
10
weeks are outliers, in total. List of those ten weeks: . list merit week if merit >=6909 | merit <= 2509
+-----------------+
| merit week |
|-----------------|
1. | 30949 2018w4 |
2. | 19958 2018w5 |
3. | 13304 2018w6 |
4. | 11722 2018w7 |
5. | 8758 2018w8 |
|-----------------|
6. | 8806 2018w9 |
7. | 7253 2018w10 |
8. | 7309 2018w11 |
9. | 6941 2018w12 |
35. | 7825 2018w38 |
+-----------------+
All of them occured in the year 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
