I thank you, LoyceV for the week's data dump. It is clearly that intra-day merits over last seven days rose a little bit. I believe it is partially caused by several merit source applications in Polish board.
Converted intra-day merits for days in 2019. . list id merit date day month2 year week month dofw if year == 2019
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| id merit date day month2 year week month dofw |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
343. | 343 603 01jan2019 1 1 2019 2019w1 2019m1 Tuesday |
344. | 344 526 02jan2019 2 1 2019 2019w1 2019m1 Wednesday |
345. | 345 394 03jan2019 3 1 2019 2019w1 2019m1 Thursday |
346. | 346 1082 04jan2019 4 1 2019 2019w1 2019m1 Friday |
347. | 347 835 05jan2019 5 1 2019 2019w1 2019m1 Saturday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
348. | 348 783 06jan2019 6 1 2019 2019w1 2019m1 Sunday |
349. | 349 570 07jan2019 7 1 2019 2019w1 2019m1 Monday |
350. | 350 782 08jan2019 8 1 2019 2019w2 2019m1 Tuesday |
351. | 351 1161 09jan2019 9 1 2019 2019w2 2019m1 Wednesday |
352. | 352 987 10jan2019 10 1 2019 2019w2 2019m1 Thursday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
353. | 353 878 11jan2019 11 1 2019 2019w2 2019m1 Friday |
354. | 354 711 12jan2019 12 1 2019 2019w2 2019m1 Saturday |
355. | 355 978 13jan2019 13 1 2019 2019w2 2019m1 Sunday |
356. | 356 1127 14jan2019 14 1 2019 2019w2 2019m1 Monday |
357. | 357 813 15jan2019 15 1 2019 2019w3 2019m1 Tuesday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
358. | 358 880 16jan2019 16 1 2019 2019w3 2019m1 Wednesday |
359. | 359 1018 17jan2019 17 1 2019 2019w3 2019m1 Thursday |
360. | 360 611 18jan2019 18 1 2019 2019w3 2019m1 Friday |
361. | 361 643 19jan2019 19 1 2019 2019w3 2019m1 Saturday |
362. | 362 658 20jan2019 20 1 2019 2019w3 2019m1 Sunday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
363. | 363 683 21jan2019 21 1 2019 2019w3 2019m1 Monday |
364. | 364 618 22jan2019 22 1 2019 2019w4 2019m1 Tuesday |
365. | 365 735 23jan2019 23 1 2019 2019w4 2019m1 Wednesday |
366. | 366 715 24jan2019 24 1 2019 2019w4 2019m1 Thursday |
367. | 367 615 25jan2019 25 1 2019 2019w4 2019m1 Friday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
368. | 368 587 26jan2019 26 1 2019 2019w4 2019m1 Saturday |
369. | 369 655 27jan2019 27 1 2019 2019w4 2019m1 Sunday |
370. | 370 734 28jan2019 28 1 2019 2019w4 2019m1 Monday |
371. | 371 612 29jan2019 29 1 2019 2019w5 2019m1 Tuesday |
372. | 372 510 30jan2019 30 1 2019 2019w5 2019m1 Wednesday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
373. | 373 450 31jan2019 31 1 2019 2019w5 2019m1 Thursday |
374. | 374 595 01feb2019 1 2 2019 2019w5 2019m2 Friday |
375. | 375 940 02feb2019 2 2 2019 2019w5 2019m2 Saturday |
376. | 376 571 03feb2019 3 2 2019 2019w5 2019m2 Sunday |
377. | 377 796 04feb2019 4 2 2019 2019w5 2019m2 Monday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
378. | 378 776 05feb2019 5 2 2019 2019w6 2019m2 Tuesday |
379. | 379 559 06feb2019 6 2 2019 2019w6 2019m2 Wednesday |
380. | 380 548 07feb2019 7 2 2019 2019w6 2019m2 Thursday |
381. | 381 611 08feb2019 8 2 2019 2019w6 2019m2 Friday |
382. | 382 623 09feb2019 9 2 2019 2019w6 2019m2 Saturday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
383. | 383 559 10feb2019 10 2 2019 2019w6 2019m2 Sunday |
384. | 384 642 11feb2019 11 2 2019 2019w6 2019m2 Monday |
385. | 385 585 12feb2019 12 2 2019 2019w7 2019m2 Tuesday |
386. | 386 671 13feb2019 13 2 2019 2019w7 2019m2 Wednesday |
387. | 387 649 14feb2019 14 2 2019 2019w7 2019m2 Thursday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
388. | 388 607 15feb2019 15 2 2019 2019w7 2019m2 Friday |
389. | 389 523 16feb2019 16 2 2019 2019w7 2019m2 Saturday |
390. | 390 607 17feb2019 17 2 2019 2019w7 2019m2 Sunday |
391. | 391 565 18feb2019 18 2 2019 2019w7 2019m2 Monday |
392. | 392 637 19feb2019 19 2 2019 2019w8 2019m2 Tuesday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
393. | 393 696 20feb2019 20 2 2019 2019w8 2019m2 Wednesday |
394. | 394 504 21feb2019 21 2 2019 2019w8 2019m2 Thursday |
395. | 395 509 22feb2019 22 2 2019 2019w8 2019m2 Friday |
396. | 396 657 23feb2019 23 2 2019 2019w8 2019m2 Saturday |
397. | 397 608 24feb2019 24 2 2019 2019w8 2019m2 Sunday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
398. | 398 896 25feb2019 25 2 2019 2019w8 2019m2 Monday |
399. | 399 736 26feb2019 26 2 2019 2019w9 2019m2 Tuesday |
400. | 400 553 27feb2019 27 2 2019 2019w9 2019m2 Wednesday |
401. | 401 707 28feb2019 28 2 2019 2019w9 2019m2 Thursday |
402. | 402 508 01mar2019 1 3 2019 2019w9 2019m3 Friday |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
403. | 403 412 02mar2019 2 3 2019 2019w9 2019m3 Saturday |
404. | 404 1001 03mar2019 3 3 2019 2019w9 2019m3 Sunday |
405. | 405 708 04mar2019 4 3 2019 2019w9 2019m3 Monday |
406. | 406 677 05mar2019 5 3 2019 2019w10 2019m3 Tuesday |
407. | 407 787 06mar2019 6 3 2019 2019w10 2019m3 Wednesday |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
For days in 2018, please get it there |
|
|
|
there is no active connection with the dogecoin network. Can someone help pls?  Please stop kidding, noob. If there is no active connection on the Dogecoin network. There are bunches of online casinos will start crying as well as gamblers and investors. Dogecoin has been one of oldest coins in crypto, it has been there for ages, and strongly survived thoroughly so many most terrible crashes in more than 10-year history of crypto.  |
|
|
|
I think Mt. God hack was very surprising.
Of course, Mt. God hack is a big surprise. I have never heard or seen Mt. God hack, before seeing your post. You obviously made a typo, fella. It should be Mt. Gox, not Mt. God.  |
|
|
|
LOL. It looks like that I started a hot topic, that might long-last over weeks or months.  To be honest with you all, I don't really care about Trust system, because it is too complicated to me. Of course, for someone who are famous, reliable in the forum, with or without Trustscore, they will always be well-known. Trustscore is only make sense when I see some accounts the first time, I don't know who are they, how about their reliablity. In such cases, Trust score makes lots of sense. |
|
|
|
Do a true black one like this and you will have my merit.
It does not make sense for that guy when you send merit and he can not see the merit due to totally black. |
|
|
|
Congratulations cryptovigi, promoted to a Senior Member!Merit source boosted him / her so fast, but he / she deserves to get such promotion.
|
|
|
|
You are likely wrong at this point. So far, no one knows that bitcoin was created more than ten years ago by a person, a group, or an organization. No one knows. The only one thing we known and have to admit is bitcoin created by outstanding guy/ group/ organization. That bitcoin was created by only one person.
I agree with Jet Cash that the biggest achievements and biggest surprise is when bitcoin set up its few cents for the first time. Everything have to start from somewhere, for bitcoin, it started for a few cents.
Even the pizza's buyer, he probably deeply regreted with his decision years later, but all crypto enthusiasts should give him a round of applause. Without his decision, we would not see bitcoin hit nearly $20000 last year. |
|
|
|
|
Appreciated the OP's works.
However, I don't think that your theme is good, or at least user-friendly.
Personally, the current interface of the forum is good. I like its simplicity.
Simplicity of the forum interface should be maintained.
I have only one suggestion:
- If theymos care about that, he should allow forum users two options for global font styles:
(1) Time News Roman, as we currently have.
(2) Fonts without serifs or san-serifs.
I would prefer to vote for the second option.
At the moment, threads/ posts composers can choose font styles for their works, but I want to see option for the whole forum.
|
|
|
|
I known. I don't know how the graph creator made it, but the graph should have two x-axis scales, right? The current one is likely for un-banned newbies, I guess. There are two graphs overlap each other, but it should have two x-axis scales. Only the lighter color represents banned Newbies, so the small top of the graph.
It would indeed be better to draw them at the bottom of the graph.
Or if only one x-axis scale used, the graph (lighter color) for banned newbies should be in the bottom, below the darker one, as you said. |
|
|
|
You are welcome, my friend. I known you due to we are in the same campaign, nothing more. Moreover, I admired you so much due to your earned merits. That's why I created the topic. Thanks tranthidung for posting this.
Back and forth red trust tagging should never be used. It is trust abusement, even trust is not moderated in the forum. Hhampuz had a good point about not leaving "back and forth" trusts, so I won't do that going forward. The situation seems to be resolved. And thanks to everybody else for coming to my Reputation thread.
|
|
|
|
Great initiative to dig deeper finding what happened due to the demotion of Junior Members in September 2018. In the chart above, there is a break point in mid of September. I think that it makes lot of sense. After the demotion implemented, there were massive merit abusements in the forum, lots of Junior Members demoted got promoted again due to merit abusements. Personally, there is a hypothesis that massive newbies got their first merits due to merit abusements after Sep. 2018, or due to their successfully pseudo-quality posts. Eventually, most of them got banned.
The chart probably presents wrong x-axis scale, you stated there are 1934 newbies got banned, but the chart shows nearly 10k newbies got banned. You should clarify it a little bit if the chart is right, or should correct it if it is wrong. |
|
|
|
RIP BITCOINTALK.
Once upon a time, gold firstly used as mean of asset storage. Once upon a time, bitcoin created by Satoshi Nakamoto. Once upon a time, bitcointalk forum created. Gold has still been here, and will be here for ages. Bitcoin has still been here, and will be here for ages. Bitcointalk forum has still been here, and will be here for ages. |
|
|
|
Nope, iCEBBREAKER made repeatedly trolls in Monero, and others (DASH, for instance) for ages. He also really hate BCash. iCEBREAKER likes XMR. nutildah made fun of XMR.
For nutildah, it seems that his case solved for now. I don't know how his issues solved, but looks good for now, even there is no neutral trust/ feedback. However, I thought that Hhampuz raise reasonable potential forces, his former red trust likely 'back-and-forth' trust between nutildah and iCEBREAKER. That is at somewhat extent, Trust Abusement, in my standpoint. I also asked nutildah to remove the negative feedback they had left for iCEBREAKER since at that point it only becomes a back and forth where everyone will lose.
Furthermore, it looks ridiculous to see someone got red trust due to support one of top altcoins, DASH. |
|
|
|
|
Please focus on the case of nutildah, because I really want to known that this case is Trust abusement or not.
If it is trust abusement, the case should be use in official guideline to leave + / - trust feedback.
Criteria to leave positive feedbacks, as well as criteria to leave negative feedbacks.
With official criteria for Trust Feedback, the forum might be cleaner due to less topics created to complain about their red trust.
|
|
|
|
|
Three weeks after the beginning day of the sMerits give-away challenge, there are so limited applicants.
I will open the challenge one more week, if nothing change dramatically, I will close the challenge and lock the topic.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
For nutildah's situation, I'm reading the history of his feedback.
I waited for your final personal judgement on the case of nutildah as well as from others DT members. Trust System is too complicated to me. To be honest, I don't care too much about the Trust System, because I don't run services, and make deal with others here. And, I only feel really trust someone when they have big amount of Trust points, above +30. Too little positive or negative trust points might be abused, so should not be taken into consideration, seriously.
Despite of my limited understandings on Trust system, I still felt that current Red Trust on nutildah is a wrong one. It's something like personal assasination. |
|
|
|
Congratulations CryptopreneurBrainboss, promoted to a Senior Member!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
