As they're already on an exchange (although it's only a DEX), it's sufficient to say there were no ICO or IEO, it was also never mentioned anywhere on their site, WP, and ann thread OP. Nonetheless, I would strongly advise against investing on this project, it seems too shady.

I really need to know the future of this project, I see that you updated the OP with new rounds, stretching the duration of bounty without any prior notice or reason or compensating the extra rounds by allocating more tokens, this can be considered as breaching the initial agreement as the duration should end by this week or even last week (end of May). It was stated by other BM that it'll stretch up to the end of July, which means two more months, which is double the entire initial duration. Also, both BM conveniently leave questions related to this new duration unanswered. This could seriously hurt bounty participants' trust and leave them worried.

Just in case any attempt to deny the initial duration, quoted for reference:

I wonder why your Founder didn't write anything about this project on his LinkedIn, or even mentioned this project on his employment history. Also can't find any other team on this project, certainly this is not an one-manned project?

Do you have a plan to tidy this ann thread? I haven't check your WP and website (other than team details), I found so many typo, poor choices of words, and grammar error that would seriously made investors reconsider to invest.

I know, your team are probably a non-english speaker, etc, etc, I myself don't mind slight error(s) on business proposal, but yours seems... made with very little effort and focus.

And oh, your link to CEO's linkedin has an error.

Replying to your point 1 and 4 Combined, all of the people on the project will need to perform KYC? And I'm very unclear about point 2, ideas about game are not acceptable? So on what category should they build their project on?

Ok, and what wil be the milestone or criteria for the escrow to release funds? In spite of having manually filtering game, there still rooms for unfortunate events like game failed to be developed or worse, fraud that's built on a really neat scheme

Then I'll take this as a confirmation that you'll stick to this model disregarding any future demands from your "community" and proceed to discuss about this model.

First of all, this crowdfunding certainly will work like an escrow where the funds collected will only be released to developer if certain criteria are met?

Ookayyy, so basically you're saying that there's no way to prove that the sudden and drastic change was due to (as you claimed) community's demand? Convenient.

And you're sure you'll stick to this model despite the possibility that your said "community" demand another change?

The system will notify successor upon the predecessor's account running out of fund? Let's see where the flaw in that, other than it's very costly, of course. Yes, despite your claim of "only 36 USD" yearly, I thought they're still very costly. I know one project that runs on similar data storage, with running application and established their name despite only being in business in the past year or so, with rate roughly 36 times cheaper than yours, with a better system. Oh right! I see the flaw now: what if the account holder missed the notification? Emails sent to spam folder happens way more often than you think. Or, the exact opposite way, he invested (for instance) 365 USD, expecting that he'll still be around 10 years from account creation, leave the account and data, then died the next day. Hmm... I wonder how will it be beneficial for the successor, given that there's 10 years gap before your system "realized" that the account owner is not around anymore

There were no mention or explanation about my last question on your WP.

I strongly agree with this. I've tried to bring the exchange topic to their telegram main channel on few occasions, but they seems very unsupportive for such discussion as they never replied.

This made me worried because even if they were silently working on exchange, they should still update on progress. The silence will only raise suspicion and doubts.


Yeah, on https://t.me/matchbillion , but it's also not very active.

And how will your system decide when should the stored info passed to the successor? What's the trigger? And for the case where the predecessor create their... wills rather secretly, what made you sure the successor knows what the private key i about and how to use them?

Aww... Come on, you're not completely honest with this one. Yes, it is likely that your previous thread was deleted due to your airdrop participants flooding it with spam, but it is more because of a violation of forum rules (incentivizing post, to be exact) where you asked them to post here to complete the airdrop. LOL, yes, I know about that.



So,.it'll likely the project can only be used by people who are familiar with crypto? Because to be able to work, your system require possession of private key.

Well ok, which blockchain game event was this? I can't find your project being mentioned on any event, perhaps you can give an evidence in form of your team's nametag on said event(s)?

And I shall assume as the community had decided that this is the best suited model, this is the final and it will not be replaced with other projects anymore?

Ok then, we can wait for them to update their profile. I assume it won't really take long? One week? While we are waiting, I'd like to know how secure and reliable your system will be. What'll be the guarantee that no hacker can bypass the security walls and retrieve client's detailed informations? And please don't answer with simple "we are secure"

I'm curious on why you deleted the entire previous thread, though. Care to enlighten us?

LOL, what happened with the old thread and old account? I noticed that it was nowhere to be found and went hunting for the new one.

Where were we last time? Oh right, two years without any major development and only few of the team listing themselves as the project's employee

Pretty much what usually happens to token with no benefit or feature or utility or anything that brings role to the token other than being PnD token. What do you expect to happen with useless token anyway? Although I'm surprised that you claimed you suffered loss, as it means you play your board wrongly. Mostly dev will get their profits right away from dumping the most from their total supply and then abandoning the project. Or... is that why you planned second contest? So you can use them as your exit strategy? Hmm... i'm really curious, is there any purpose of this token other than for PnD? And yes, I'm seriously asking.

And about denomination, is that scaling or swap?

Initially you said that this project is based on community's feedback, which we can concur that the project's change is due to their request, but there were no evidence of such request, given your medias are all inactive for months before. You also said that the product is based on hard work of a lot of studies and research, which I'll be fair if we agree that the total "reconstruction" happen as a result of poor judgment on previous model (which should allow us to ask why such poor judgment happen in spite of the "hard work" of studies and research or question your competence) or that it happens because you didn't do your self acclaimed hard work of studies and research at all (which should entitle us to ask about team seriousness of the project, thus credibility).

It's also interesting to highlight how you state that experiments are just experiments, and not official product, (because) what you announce here is an official product. Now you became ambiguous. Previous model were explained here, as it used to be announced here, and because it is implied that experiments were not announced here, your statement should lead to a conclusion that the said model is an official product, yet it was totally deconstructed as if it was a failed experiment. There were not even a clear and official info about why the change. You don't even announce the change, you simply went under and resurface with whole different project, and pretend nothing happened previously.

Interesting, you imply that the change happen as a result of community's feedback, thus their request. Can you please tell us on what platform does this request and feedback occurred? Your bitcointalk thread were quiet for months prior to the change, your telegram is far even more concerning, created on January (and unless you deleted every chat prior) only active from the past few days, which is post-change, and topic is about airdrop.

Even more interesting, you mentioned that study and research also took a role on the change. While this is a positive thing for projects to grow, exception can always be made for project that took a whole different new course (and worse, happen before the previous idea even implemented), because we can infer that (because the concept is completely different from previous one) the previous one are not well thought, studied, or researched. Because, if you did your research and study, or even a simple thorough thought, then the change will be around tweaking the project instead of completely change them.

And about team, I'm glad you mentioned it, who are the team anyway? I don't see them anywhere.

Well, now this is a worrying answer. What'll guarantee that you will not change your business activity once more? Deeming this "funding" as another failed test and move to other plan? it'll be troublesome for investors who studied your recent plan, think it is worth investing, buy some tokens, and then you once again go under for two months and resurface with "ok, the funding is not working, now we're proposing a paid online game reviewing".

If that's the only aim of this project, then I'll advise anyone to jump off the ship as soon as they are willing to cut-loss. As I said before, there will be no future for coins that depend on hype and momentary FOMO, eventually all PnD will be dead tokens.