I see that there were no mention about arbit anymore, the experiment failed? In fact, I felt like reading a whole different project, like you removed the entire old plan and propose something new. To be fair, I failed to recall correctly as your thread's last active discussion was around 4 months ago, but I don't think it was initially about game crowdfunding?
Thanks for your comment. As you can see we adappated our business model for a solid product, changes are mandatory at any experiment or business on which plans are to deliver a real use case to support people and business, and this is our case. Err... Yeah, business is everchanging, but I don't think a we-propose-an-in-game-token-that-will-also-get-dividend-from-our-untested-arbit-system to we-only-crowdfund-game-now can be considered as adapting market. It's more like developing a whole different project. The only thing that connect you with your "old project" was it's on the same sector (game) as what it become today. For all we know, the dev team (if there any team at all) might be completely different as well with the ones from beginning |
|
|
|
|
I see that there were no mention about arbit anymore, the experiment failed? In fact, I felt like reading a whole different project, like you removed the entire old plan and propose something new. To be fair, I failed to recall correctly as your thread's last active discussion was around 4 months ago, but I don't think it was initially about game crowdfunding?
|
|
|
|
So this not the end? Im in big time. But heavy loss.... New contest or what? And why no website or something? Is there future for $tib
Will be better as we collect 'forces' for next 'take off' Thinking of new contest. Ok, I have to admit I was wrong by thinking that there's a possibility you'll get a scenario where you didn't reach soft cap. Although the pessimistic didn't go too far, it seems. You successfully reached a soft cap for a seemingly PnD token. And what's your solution for that problem again? Oh right, another contest, where people will buy and create pump, then dumped them again once the contest end. Really genius. |
|
|
|
Feel free to have a look at my instagram: https://www.instagram.com/shadowpriestor_68/ -> when you compare the website from the GameUnits Ann Thread you might notice thats its the same account. And yes i was working with a friend on this project, he has the password. I cant reach him at this moment. *Edit: Full Admin Website Link: dbmedia.herokuapp.com
Just deleted the old fotos, im sorry i will replace them with the right ones
Again, quoted for reference. And I'm pretty much sure it didn't work that way, asking for funds with false ID and when the lies discovered, you goes, "LOL, my bad. That's just to see if we don't have to show ourselves to get some funds. I lied. Let me revise that." So which one is still based on truth? You admitted that you use fake team profile, does the statement that you're the original dev of gameunits project still apply? And the instagram profile quoted above is truly yours? |
|
|
|
Updates will be posted on both threads, dont worry you will see it  And yes its because im working on parttime right now thats because i dont have that much time for working on it. As soon the ico started and i can afford money to focus on that project more there will be more activity. Have a nice day GameUnits is under the same name yes but actually its not active anymore so i want to start again
Quoted for reference. So, you're the same admin as the previous one, right? I assume you still have your old account? The username " GameunitSEO"? Why not re-use the old thread, which is more established and known? You can just edit the opening post, and reopening discussion. You forgot the password? Lost the access? How about the other account that appears near the end of the thread? " GameunitCEO"? |
|
|
|
Why do you have to have two an thread? In different section, I notice. Also, using your "proof" thread as the reference, does gamebit and gameunit is the same company?
Its a token, so i needed to post the announcement in the token section aswell. So, on which thread should we follow the updates? You'll also need to answer those accusations, Your project was going under for a while, so my mind got a bit unclear, but I recall I've asked you about that issue too, so I'll also wait for clarification. |
|
|
|
|
Why do you have to have two an thread? In different section, I notice. Also, using your "proof" thread as the reference, does gamebit and gameunit is the same company?
|
|
|
|
We are building a merchant account infrastructure, and integrated token to fiat swap.
Yes, the price can be low upon listing but what is really important right now is the project itself. People can dump their tokens now if they believe the project has no future.
As for the team, VOOM token is issued by Voom Cash UK Limited company, and results is what matters according to us.
True, that a good project development could raise price in a long term scale, but how is your development going, again? I stumbled upon this thread just yesterday and it came to my awareness that your thread were not active for weeks, and before that, also weeks of inactivity. Lack of updates is a major discouragement for people to take interest on products |
|
|
|
Very cheap ! Let's push this coin now
Oh wow, an account with jumping posts encouraging people to buy from a project that's currently questionable as the dev evading answers. Do I have a right to be suspicious? |
|
|
|
And again, it contain ref link, hidden by shortener, which leads us to: https://zla[dot]io/en/got/faucet/? ref=75--snipped--. Posting ref link is discouraged on this forum, I believe you know that. Edit your post and delete the link or I'll have to report your thread to moderator. |
|
|
|
We are proud to announce VOOM token first listing on BITKER exchange. You will be able to start trading VOOM from MONDAY 05/20/2019 at 15:00 (GMT+8). https://www.bitker.com Listed but no utility for the token. Website has no public team profile too. So basically another one out of the million and one tokens that have been issued with no real world utility regardless of blockchain used I won't be surprised if their price got dumped hard once listed, because most of the current circulating supply is from airdrop, with no utility, people won't think twice before selling at whatever price they got. |
|
|
|
|
Everyone loves free token, true. It is good to introduce crypto by giveaway (or airdrop, if you may), also true. But if token has no value, then it'll just be annoying for wallet owners, and gave bad impressions of "it's hard to sell tokens on crypto" to newbie.
Plus, is that a referral on your link? Even if it's disguised with shortener
|
|
|
|
Community manager, I'd really like to know your thought and comment on my previous post, kind of a buzz kill that after waiting for couple of days, you skipped through pages and replied only the recent posts |
|
|
|
I'm... actually not talking about the price, or the token offering mechanism. I wondered about what'll happen if softcap didn't reached. Basically, softcap is an indicator of the minimum funds has to be raised for team to run the project, correct? So if it's not reached, why bother distributing free tokens to top holders?
As long as we consider our offer quite attractive and unique for the market, we strongly believe the softcap minimum will be broken through. Anyway, the tokens were issued and had to be distributed since development of the project and listing is not for free, and this is the Contest rules, which can't be amended. Shall the market fail to accept our current offer we will create more thrilling option. Let's consider it as plan B which should exclude pure dumping but longer term development. Hope you are satisfied with the feedback provided. To be blunt, every project think they're quite attractive and unique, and strongly believe they'll reqch softcap. Yet, there are lots failed. And to be fair, in case market failed to accept your current offer (or in other words, failed to reach softcap), then the ethical steps would be to conclude offering, declqre failure, and return the funds to the respective investors. But as we're trying to entertain the idea here, what's the plan B? |
|
|
|
Which company will be the card (or should I say virtual card) issuer? I mean, like will it be visa? Or MasterCard? Maestro? JCB? And what's your status of partnership with them?
Mike, Hope you're well! Vicpay will issue VISA or MasterCard to users! We have partnered will Debit and Credit Card providers! And how's the position of the partnership? Have you reached an agreement with them, in contact and negotiation, or is it still on a planning phase? |
|
|
|
|
Ahh well, the thread is unbelievably messy, post over posts over repost that sums up the meaning of chaos, so in a way, you're consistent enough with your concept. And congratulations, if your aim was to keep people away from what you propose, you got it
|
|
|
|
Umm... Question here, in case of a softcap failed to be reached (which will initiate 100,000 token to be distributed to 50 holders), what then? What can those 50 holders do with the token that didn't reach soft cap? A trophy coin?
The purpose of the token is initial distrubution with futher trading by holders. The Current contest at Livecoin has been held by the Exchange thus devs neither have oppotunity to manipulate with price nor addon more tokens. As a result, market with holders are the drivers for the price. Pretty fair, isn't it? I'm... actually not talking about the price, or the token offering mechanism. I wondered about what'll happen if softcap didn't reached. Basically, softcap is an indicator of the minimum funds has to be raised for team to run the project, correct? So if it's not reached, why bother distributing free tokens to top holders? |
|
|
|
|
Umm... Question here, in case of a softcap failed to be reached (which will initiate 100,000 token to be distributed to 50 holders), what then? What can those 50 holders do with the token that didn't reach soft cap? A trophy coin?
|
|
|
|
Just to make sure we're on the same page, you offer a crypto powered billboard advertising worldwide? Or being a middleman between the company that owns billboard and the buyers of service?
We will develop our products consistently, we will start with simple technologies (software), as the company develops we will move on to more complex technologies (hardware). - Launch the network through connecting the existing big size billboards to the Ledder Network via NeuroEye controllers. At this stage, we'll create a virtual advertising operator for making transactions in ULD between market players. Also, we'll build an online service for placing ads on ledder.net
- By using a franchise model, we'll create an affiliate network consisting of virtual advertising operators in the targeted countries. Plus, we'll be expanding our network through installing the Ledder Network software on small-size billboards owned by advertising operators.
- We'll connect the Ledder Network to major online advertising platforms, such as Google ADS, Yandex ADV, and Facebook. To amplify the network, we'll engage in remote Ledder Network installations and selling our NeuroEye controllers worldwide.
- Market launch of Digital Blade, a new technology for digital screens. At this stage, we'll start issuing licenses for manufacturing billboards based on our technology. The billboards will be connected to the Ledder Network. This way, the network will grow through substituting outdated billboars with brand new Digital Blade screens.
- Market launch of the technology for manufacturing thin-film chip modules. We'll introduce this technology at the plants of our production partners. The new technology will reduce the cost of producing video screens by 5-10 times and allow to add new billboards of major advertising operators to the Ledder Network.
https://ledder.io/en/whitepaper/roadmapUmm... So in the beginning you'll sell your software to a billboard owner so they can offer a shared-billboard-for-rent to buyers or you'll be renting the billboard and sell your service to end users? Interesting part about anyone can post any ads anywhere in the world, wouldn't it be counterproductive to geographic element of STP? |
|
|
|
A little bit confused here, will the ICO happens before the exchange launch? And will the ICO result affect the said platform launch and anything within it?
Hello Sir, Thank you for your questions. Yes, ICO will be before the launch. BUT our MVP is ready. Please check: https://staging.paramountdax.com/Also, there wont be any impact from ICO result for Exchange launch. Exchange will be alive anyway. So why do you have to have ICO? The result of the ICO, whatsoever, will not affect the project. Honestly, I rarely heard an exchange needs funding before launching their project. We need ICO and investment to become well-known and TOP exchange. Also, to implement the latest top notch technology. So, we can say that we will launch the exchange anyway, because we already have many private connections in this industry and this investment will be enough for initial launching. BUT ofcourse we need additional funds to Become TOP exchange. In other words, you want a shortcut to be a top exchange? By instead of building brands and slowly upgrading your name through convincing people to utilize your token for certain benefits, you sell them altogether on ICO |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
