Bitcoin LN
you and certain people want to pretend everything in LN it bitcoin format, where you want to brand tag an altnet as being bitcoin.
I don't think we're going to (nor have to) agree on this
I'd say "Bitcoin LN" makes it very clear we're talking about Bitcoin locked in channels that can be send through LN and later settled on-chain. You say it's not Bitcoin.
if you actually learn the differences of why LN is not bitcoin.
You mean accept a mere philosophical definition.
then you can learn to actually PR campaign based on the differences, and give people some reason to want to use LN for the niche use cases where bitcoin doesnt fit their need.
That's exactly what I always say: Bitcoin LN is great for small low-fee transactions.
trying to call it bitcoin lightning network as if the LN network is the bitcoin network. is just misleading
Agree to disagree: I think it's very clear to most people what it means.
you shouldnt say "dollar visa payment network" or "pound visa payment network". instead its just the visa network that can handle different currencies where visa is not "dollarL2", nor "dollar network"
if you continue to say "visa is dollar" people will laugh at you
Nobody says "Visa is dollar", but everyone says they use Visa to pay dollars! And that's exactly what I'm doing with LN: I use LN to pay Bitcoin.
I noticed you ignored the actual point of my post:
Would you be more okay with Bitcoin LN if the minimum amount would be 1 sat?
But instead, you started talking about terminology again.
For the record, I prefer to just call it "LN", but if I do, you say LN can also be used by Litecoin, so I specify "Bitcoin LN", even though almost anyone already understands what I mean when I post about LN on
Bitcointalk.