I trust projects that are at least 50% done, I prefer the ones that are associated with payments (some coins with new benefits, e.g. MB8 Coin), drugs and healthcare, AI and, of course, infrastructure. These field are the most demanded, as for me. I also like ICOs in entertainment industry. Top upcoming ICOs within those fields are Ubex, Metabase, One Game and HighVibe.

Investing in bonds in kind of a relic of the past and here you're not taking less risks, than while investing in cryptocurrencies. You know that bond prices fall as interest rates rise, which isn't that easy to predict. I think if you're a crypto and trading master the chances to find the right coin would be much higher for you, than to find the right company (not to mention that scams are possible). Gold and silver - agree with you here, practically safe choice, low risks in losing money. And real estate due to its longevity becomes more unpredictable. You have to invest a lot (you can't invest 500$, as you do in crypto world) and you have no idea what can happen - a war in the country, estate goes on fire, new competitor on the market, etc. And BTC three times yes, the end justifies the means, even the thing that you mentioned (that BTC daily price fluctuations can go up to 25%) is a great advantage, just think how much you can gain on daily BTC trading if you learn the fluctuations consistent patterns.

Really sound like a scam and the fact that he has locked the thread only proves it now, too bad. I honestly wouldn't think that BetKing would cheat people like that. However, there's the investors' fault too. People either don't know what's the idea of ICO about, or just don't want to see it. It never seemed like they're about to start some large and powerful project, so yes, there was no need in the ICO at all.

Something that I find really attractive about Cardano is its team of developers - mostly academics and engineers, people of science plus InfoSec experts. They've created a truly sustainable environment to meet the most important users' needs, so I can agree that it's one of the top coins right now with huge (over $4 billion) marketcap. However, this crypto still wasn't able to avoid the red market and has dropped by 86% since January 2018, the price adjustments don't seem that critical because the initial price wasn't that big, so I wouldn't say that ADA has surpassed ETH.

Cyber attacks do take place, but they aren't that frequent. Just think how many people there are who work for Binance and how many are there hackers out there willing to steal some good money. Also some money losses are users' fault because they don't do some precautionary actions - like don't use the private key to access the wallet, or create mnemonic phrases, even though it is highly recommended. Not to mention that some people are too lazy to even double check the address line to see if it's safe (like it has happened with MEW recently).

I believe that the problem was rather about the agent, than about the online casino itself. Some kind of mistake must have happened and the right thing to do in such a situation would be to give those free 40 spins no matter whose mistake it was just to act civilly and avoid conflicts. Maybe after a year some managers and the team in bitcasino have changed, so now they apologise even about the past conflicts, that were caused by the old team members. They've decided to start a sig campaign all of a sudden, I think it means that change is coming.  

I like the good old moving average trading. Among them I prefer EMA, which is good for coins with typical rapid price changes situations and for fast moving market (not applicable for BTC). Simply determine the uptrend and downtrend lines. As the price goes over the moving average line I buy immediately. When the price goes down below the moving average line I sell. It may be not the most profitable trading technique, as you buy and sell not at the extreme points, but it's the safest one.

I keep them. First of all, a lot of altcoins you get after ICO launches aren't even listed on most of the exchanges. Second of all, I don't know how about you, but the coins I received weren't worth anything. For instance, I got lots of ShiftCash coins, but they all are worth about 1 USD, what's the point in converting them into ETH, to have 0,0021 ETH? On the other hand tokens can increase in price unexpectedly, like it has happened with TTV, and they'll be much more worthy. But, whenever you have a non-popular coin which has suddenly started to increase - I agree that the best thing to do is to sell it off, or convert into top coins, as the chances that such a coin will keep up the price are very low.

Yes, it's 100% rigged, you better check trust for online casinos and betting websites here on BTT. Check this link, here you can find the blacklist of online casinos: https://wizardofodds.com/online-gambling/blacklist/
Some of them may be not rigged and are on the list due to rivalries and conflicts (at least it seemed to me like that), but look through the list anyway, don't want to get scammed.   

IPFS is decentralized and works as a content based addressing, more like BitTorrent works. Thus, they face two main problems - free space and around-the-clock accessibility to files. That's why the IPFS team is working on Filecoin. It's like a blockchain on top of IPFS and it will incentivize people to keep files on their harddrives, because they'll get a reward for it. This will not only be a solution to a space problem, but also it will make nodes go online all the time, so that people will have access to files 24/7.

If all of the fiat money was replaced by digital I think the corruption and criminality would arise. It would be more difficult to track down transactions. No one will know who owes and what money, which might lead to a chaos. How do you expect accountants to do their job, if all they knew about a certain bank account would be a bunch of characters? And, also, if every fiat currency was replaced by digital, but still it would be the government, who regulates the system - then what about all of the alts and BTC, that we use now? Would the governments let people use it then? I don't think so. And what about the taxes? Anyway, I don't think that there's any point in changing all of the fiat money to cryptocurrencies. In such a case - either the whole economics will crash, or cryptocurrencies won't be anonymous and won't have most of the advantages that they carry now anymore.

A lot of people do think so and that's exactly why they can end up poor and with lots of debts. Especially typical situation when playing dice games 49.1/51.9 people feel like if it's been unlucky for e.g. 6 times in a row - the next one must be it, so they keep multiplying the betting amount and eventually lose everything, because you can have up to 16 unlucky bets in succession and more. My point is - you should always remember that past doesn't influence the probability.

Btctalk name ✅
Rank: Hero Member ✅
Bitcasino.io BTC Wallet Address: 3KEqUtcmYzy8kYFHLN2rtHAfQ2biGEqXf2 ✅
Wear Appropriate Signature: yes ✅
Wear Personal Text: yes✅
Wear Avatar: yes✅ 

Hi, I can provide you with RUSSIAN-ENGLISH/ENGLISH-RUSSIAN translation services.
I've participated in the following projects: BIT.AC, TokenCard, Escrow Coin, Torcoin, usbitFlyer, Nexchange, Byteball, JETWIN, YO-EX, CryptoBnB, SHIFT CASH, Nexybit (since 2016).
I also have a 2-year translation experience.

Availability hours: time zone UTC+02:00 (in summer UTC+03:00), can work from 8am to 10pm

Additional skills: puzzle out cryptocurrency world, science and economy terminology knowledge, free word/excel/power point user, social skills, quick internet searching, webdeveloper in past (familiar with html5, CSS, C++).
 
Telegram link: https://t.me/alisa973 (username: alisa973)

 If you have free slots I'd like to apply then. I've participated in this campaign before.

Username: just_Alice
Rank: Hero Member
Starting post count: 1560 (+1)
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=562062;sa=summary
BTC address: 1F2pdAU5ozqadh1Qwro4cCHp47AEnrWFZJ

Btctalk name: just_Alice
Rank: Hero Member
Current post count: 1562 (+1)
bustadice Name: SILENTIUM30
Wear appropriate signature: yes

As far as I understand this game basically turns out to be just about the money? Can you, let's say, but 100% of tickets and win? If the difference in the price of the ticket and the prize is big enough it would still make sense. At the same time it would make the game fair. I mean there are so many people, who bet and gamble when they don't have much money just because of the hope to win. With your rules whose people will see their chances to win and won't get involved eventually.
PvP idea sounds great to me, each one will want to invest more to gain more and that's how the game gets more interesting - the prize cost rises, right?
And about working with you - do you consider paying cash, or is it just the % of a profit, that one will get for work?

Ok, do you mean that he knows who will win? How's that possible? And if that is, is that even legal? Or it's just a list of races, participants, etc. What's the point then? Seems like some kind of a scam to me.

This theory might work for wealthy people, who never feel the need in anything. They, for sure, can play just for fun. But others, whether they want it or not - will have that inside feeling that they can earn a million right here right now and become rich, and this feeling is very difficult to get rid of.

A couple of years ago the situation with sig campaigns was different than now, as less people knew about this stuff. You could've posted really low-quality posts and receive high payments. But now, as more and more people are joining the rivalry increases and now you have to post really quality posts to get a decent salary, no shitposting anymore. With your post you must not only express your opinion, but bring up some new information, which wasn't stated before in that topic. A lot of things made the rules strict: too much megathreads, a lot of competitors, SMAS blacklist, merit system and so on. So now you have to try harder.