first, learn how to internet; then honey badger maybe |
|
|
|
Doch der Druck steigt, vor allem weil nun anfänglich unbekannte Probleme auftauchen. so?  was hast du ihm denn da wieder erzählt?  |
|
|
|
an ever-haunting rest in peace btw sir  |
|
|
|
|
well his box will have to use open source software so that it can be audited, otherwise he can make promises all day long.
and the hardware will be thoroughly examined i guess.
though i wonder why develop it in secret for so long, and not as an open project á la freedom box etc from the beginning?
|
|
|
|
ner is halt wie bei uns der Chiemgauer und sowas, wahrscheinlich Währung mit Umlaufsicherung, so also regionale Wirtschaft stärkend. |
|
|
|
|
würd gern mal diskutierten mit den Herren
|
|
|
|
|
really? Theymos has the coins that Nefario owes me still?
|
|
|
|
 "Ms Merkel, the NSA is monitoring the People of Germany." - "Aha, pls tell me more." "Ms Merkel, the NSA is monitoring your mobile phone." - "Scandal! There will be consequences!" |
|
|
|
|
you mean the "Holy Grail" Open Transactions + BitMessage system?
|
|
|
|
|
In this context I've been wondering for a while if it is really possible to buy land anymore these days.
I mean, not just buying the right to e.g. build a house on ground that is ultimately owned by someone else as it effectually seems to be the case today. I guess the ultimate owner is the owner of the title register, which would be the government, or following the rabbit hole deeper, in Europe it often seems to be the Vatican.
So if everything was just a question of price, how much would it cost to e.g. negotiate with Spain to buy from them a piece of their land so you can found your own nation on it?
|
|
|
|
How would those landowners passify the plebs if democracy was no longet an option, I wonder?
By installing a state But that's ridiculously expensive! obviously, they had centuries to accumulate wealth, and enough time to come up with the mentioned techniques to pacify the plebs |
|
|
|
I'm not sure but I think the guys in the green quadrant are, generally speaking, for social freedom but against the free market. People in general, and the makers of this quiz, don't see what a contradiction that is. If the market is simply people trading with each other, buying goods and services from each other, then the free market equals freedom.
Well, others argue the other way round: Freedom and capitalism is a contradiction. Why? Because of the acquisition of property (especially land) leads to inequalities, especially over generations. What's the difference between a land owner and a state really. Eventually, someone owning a lot of land will find people needing to live on his land because they'll starve anywhere else. So he rents his land out to those people. Thus, these people will have to pay him rent just to exist. How is this "freedom" anymore? How is it not conceivable that this would lead to different classes of people? And this land owner in most cases didn't even earn it through hard work, but rather through inheritance over generations. To prevent unrest, his ancestors probably invented things like religion to pacify the plebs, and to justify their rule "by the grace of God". Later, in the more educated phase of history, of course "democracy" was invented for the same purpose, to pacify the plebs. |
|
|
|
Und hier Silkroad (das Kamel im Hintergrund ist der Stein des Anstosses)
Die Standard-Erklärung ist, dass es vom DRP selbst stammt, zu seinem Dead Man's Switch gehörend. Oder aber es könnten sich auch nerdige FBI-Beamte ausgetobt haben. Honeypot? Hmmm meiner Meinung nach gibt's Silk Road dafür schon zu lange. Eher wahrscheinlich, dass einer der Nachfolger ein Honeypot ist. Tjo, was sagt dass Occamsche Rasiermesser? Eben, ist schwierig, denn das Rasiermesser war schon immer eine recht subjektive Angelegenheit. |
|
|
|
|
disappointed that this was not a necro thread
|
|
|
|
Can anyone explain what Left and Right means politically without using another political ideology or precept to do so?
In this graph, left means "social" (let's share all the stuff we have), and right means "market" (you gotta work and earn if you want something). 10 BTC to the first successful attempt.
tnx.  |
|
|
|
I notice that, in the example of famous people on that chart, there is no one in the purple section. Likewise, I don't see Ayn Rand on there, or pretty much any business or economist types  disagree though, she likes authority, as long as it's "private". |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
