xD

Again you're the best at making quotes mate.
Cheers.

I like how every time you point out a capitalist that private companies aren't more efficient than public companies in such huge areas as healthcare they still say it's because of governments and regulations...

Anyway, private can't be more effective than public as to anything private and public can do, private has to add the profit costs. It's obvious and even a 5 year old could understand this but well...

It's supposed to be balanced by "competition" but you don't need a big brain to understand that competition disappears as soon as market has reached a monopoly point which always happens. You can't keep a tensed and competitive market forever it just isn't sustainable (like the whole capitalist system btw).

If you want to act like a FIAT casino then dont come into crypto market expecting a warm welcome.

We hate fiat uses here, there is a reason why we use cryptos.

Didn't you see the hint in BitcoinTalk forum name ?

Give me one example where commercial companies are more efficient than public funded companies.

Cause when I look at USA healthcare and French healthcare, all I see is US healthcare costs 50% more without bein more efficient or fair...

Confirmed and removed trust!

Thanks for your business.

Very wrong analogy because the Vegas casino has a building, can't be copied or faked.

BTC gambling site is, by default, a scam project.

You start on the wrong foot, we will always assume you're a scammer unless you prove the contrary. That's the difference with a fiat casino with real estate when you assume it's legit because otherwise it couldn't have opened a business in the city or at least has too much to lose (the buildings) to scam people.

I don't know if you can consider this a scam...

I mean technically he's just late and assured me he would repay tomorrow. It's not like he stopped answering.

I've put the deal on hold. If he repays tomorrow he gets the collateral back and you can say he's not a scammer. But indeed I have high doubts.

Hey,

Just to update I did grant the loan, which seems to have been a mistake.

Still I was interested in the ICO so considering the collateral it had a good value to me at least.

In the end loan is still not repaid, the newbie is saying please wait before selling the collateral but he's late.

I'm striking a deal with the colateral for about 25% more than the loan value so I can't really say I've been scammed xD
If he doesn't rapay today i'll just make it worth it by selling the collateral. But unless he repays shortly he indeed doesn't seem like he was planning to repay.


Moral of the story: Only lend what you're willing to lose for a colateral you're willing to keep at this price

Well that's logical ^^

Anyway thanks for answering. The simple fact that you're involving your community means you're actually addressing the subject.

I'll register tonight, thanks a lot for your answers

How having a crib and a yellow vest can be a provokation towards police? Oo
If there is insults or attack from the woman just to have her arrested and being able to post a photo of a woman with a crib arrested on a website that's sick.

Took about a day but consolidated my 5 wallets at a 1 sat/byte rate 

Considering the price at peak market prices it's probably more than 10mBTC saved here. Thanks Loyce!

I approve this consolidation campaign. It's good for everyone.
You because it saves money.
The others because it means cheaper fees at crowded times.
The network because it means less stupid data stucked in mempool because you got too many inputs.
And of course BTC because it proves we're smart enough to self regulate and optimize the tech.

Even if the woman had it for protest reason it's not right.

You at least have the right to say you no longer want to be fucked over by banks and your government.

d - m0gliE

Automatic ban of players with impossible fold preflop ratio.

Those multi accounts essentially sit at a table and falsely bet and fold befor flop, simulating false bluffing games and all. When a table has nearly 0 flop in 1000 hands you can most certainly ban all the accounts at the table.

Also, automatic ban from multiple connexion from same IP adress. Of course they can use a VPN but it's still another obstacle for them.

Plus tracking of funds going too smoothly from an account to another. It is not normal for 300mBTC to be constently exchanged between three players...

And a report option would be cool too.

You're a lack of respect on yourself.

You got any right to consider anything better than anything.

You got the right to consider white better than black, men better than women, dogs better than cat and even sex dolls better than women.

That's free will for you.

Small house edge means you can gamble more actually... Otherwise why not just make a 100% house edge if you just like the gambling? xD

nevertheless it IS an honest statement.

Surprising but I guess if you find clients it means you offer something valuable to them, as you don't try to trick them

02 - 12 - 22 - 52 - 82

No never. I'd like to play poker with my BTC cause that's one of the few things I'm not too bad at :p
But never heard of it and your comment isn't reassuring.

Multi account is the biggest threat of crypto poker. There is no KYC so it's incredibly easy to just play with 5 accounts and completely rip off anyone entering a table of 6. You imagine how that would go? One player having 5 hands instead of 1? You talk about information advantage here lol.

No thanks.

You just explained you can't give any details of anyone and expect us to believe your trusted professionals.

Foesn't work that way.

Good luck.

Yeah and if they ask for KYC what's the point of using crypto?

I mean there are thousands of legit casinos using fiat where you have 0 chance of getting scammed because otherwise they would be brought to court. Why going with the sgady brother if ha asks the same thing than the fiat casinos?