Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 11:17:34 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 [61] 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 »
1201  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Top 5 Concerns About Bitcoin ? on: November 30, 2018, 11:41:31 PM
My buiggest concern is that I don't have enough, and I may not be able to build my holding before the next bull run.

People have been reporting my posts for the exact same level of sarcasm! Which it probably isn't, right? Cool
1202  Other / Meta / Re: How recognized are you in the bitcointalk world? on: November 30, 2018, 11:24:00 PM
I am at 777. That's like the Number of the Beast but not quite.

I think that theymos guy has been bribing all members of the jury.
1203  Other / Meta / Re: LIST OF THREADS GIVING AWAY MERIT POINTS FOR QUALITY POSTS on: November 30, 2018, 11:14:08 PM
You could add mine which is in the Dutch community forum. Only for Dutch-speaking people. Not only a way of rewarding quality posts but also to put some life into the Dutch community forum which suffers from people speaking English too well and therefore not spending their time on their mother tongue's forum. Wink

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3494821.0

Google Translate people will get shot or hung. Well, at least, they won't receive any Merit from me and I will report them.
1204  Local / Nederlands (Dutch) / Re: De grote "Crypto Quo Vadis" thread on: November 30, 2018, 11:10:32 PM
Ik kan mij beter onthouden van uitspraken over prijsverwachtingen. Toch verwacht ik nog steeds veel van Icon.

Ja ik heb ook mijn favorieten, zoals SYS - dat het overigens onnoemelijk slecht doet. Never change a losing horse. Roll Eyes

Maar ik was ook niet echt op zoek naar concrete voorbeelden, en al zeker niet naar extreem optimistische standpunten, maar enkel "gefundeerde" toekomstvisies over waar de cryptowereld cq de prijs heen gaat. Ik volg het nu geruime tijd, maar in de huidige marktsituatie is het spoor mij compleet bijster.
1205  Local / Nederlands (Dutch) / Re: De grote "Crypto Quo Vadis" thread on: November 27, 2018, 10:57:45 PM
Ik weet het echt niet meer. Ik las wat over holochain, onder meer hier: https://www.tijd.be/tech-media/technologie/holochain/10073644.html en het jaagt me schrik aan. From an investor's point of view, bedoel ik. Zouden we de trein gemist hebben? Ik hoop van niet. Ik heb niet extreem veel geld in crypto geïnvesteerd maar wel veel tijd en energie (en geloof) en ik zou me eigenlijk belachelijk voelen mocht ik van mezelf moeten vaststellen dat ik me door de hype heb laten verblinden.

Maar zo ver zijn we nog niet! Cool
1206  Local / Nederlands (Dutch) / De grote "Crypto Quo Vadis" thread on: November 27, 2018, 07:14:13 AM
Ik had graag eens gehoord welke visie de Nederlandstalige community heeft op de toekomst van crypto en het verdere verloop van de prijs. Ik tracht met aandacht deftige topics te vinden op de Engelstalige threads, maar veel verder dan de usual spam en ongefundeerde voorspellingen gaat het niet. Dat hebben we dan weer voor op de Engelstalige fora.  Smiley

Nu zouden we natuurlijk met z'n allen het liefst de prijs de lucht in katapulteren, maar met hoop alleen zullen we er niet komen. Iemand enige visie over de oorzaken van de actuele crash? Enige toekomstvisie, zelfs al is die negatief?
1207  Local / Nederlands (Dutch) / Re: Betaalrekening wordt opgeheven vanwege cryptos, advies voor nieuwe bank. on: November 21, 2018, 11:29:02 PM
Hoe zit het hier intussen mee, BioMike? Heb je al meer informatie die ons verder kan helpen? Leek me toch een belangrijk topic.
1208  Other / Meta / Re: Report plagiarism (copy/pasting) here. Calling for Mod action: please permban on: November 21, 2018, 08:44:42 PM
I am not sure in which category you should put this one spamming CoinMarketDaddy all over the boards and bumping threads for coins that were extinct years before mankind even existed:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2223110;sa=showPosts
1209  Other / Meta / Re: Report plagiarism (copy/pasting) here. Calling for Mod action: please permban on: November 21, 2018, 12:15:57 AM
How about this one? Am I missing something? Copy-pasted parts of whitepapers:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1765056;sa=showPosts

I discovered it by coincidence after translating one of the WP and noticing the guy posted exactly the same content. Clever way of increasing your activity.
1210  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] FACTOM - Introducing Honesty to Record-Keeping on: November 20, 2018, 11:58:17 PM
There will be announcement at AWS conf in some weeks.
https://sphereon.com/solutions-document-processing/solutions-for-alfresco/

Factom is not explicitly mentioned but it is the BC behind this integration.

Alfresco is a massive ECM company. Thanks to Sphereon, Factom solution will be integrated within Alfresco solution on top of AWS infrastructure.

This all sounds very interesting. But can you explain what BC and ECM stand for?

ECM= Entreprise Content Management - check it out on Google or Wikipedia

BC is probably blockchain. Cool
1211  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [BOUNTY][SCU] SECURYPTO - ENCRYPTED DATA TRANSFER & STORAGE on: November 20, 2018, 11:47:42 PM
#Proof of authentication
1212  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ⚒ Syscoin-Blockmarket 3.0-World 1st Decentralized Marketplace/Masternodes/Assets on: November 19, 2018, 10:06:59 PM
I'll leave this quote you stated that could certainly also apply to the overall downtrend today:

Ha the joke is on me! Cool But don't worry, I wasn't planning on selling even though it's horribly frustrating. I do not curse very often on this forum. Embarrassed

Good luck, you have my continued support. It is quite clear that the current prices have nothing to do with SYS in particular. Let's hope the market calms down soon.
1213  Economy / Speculation / Re: bitcoin still dipping. What should we do? on: November 19, 2018, 01:07:14 PM
The whole thing reminds of one of my posts from about a year ago. Panic sellers, get out and don't come back.

Seems like they didn't listen to me and didn't get out back then. But they might be, right now. :-) Bye bye panic sellers!
1214  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: ⚒ Syscoin-Blockmarket 3.0-World 1st Decentralized Marketplace/Masternodes/Assets on: November 19, 2018, 09:16:19 AM
all in sys now expecting 10x soonish
Can you explain Why you think this is going up from here. I was a strong supporter of SYS when they where working on their Blockmarket web but have backed off considerably when they put it on they Way Back Burner.

What other real time uses are they working on for SYS ?


the scope of sys has increased by 10x atleast with assets and masternodes

Looks like it will go to 0.01$ first - if we're lucky. After that it can do x10 back to 0.1$. Roll Eyes I have no idea what's going on.

edit: on the bright side, the lower it goes, the bigger my chance of buying a masternode...

edit 2: what the F*CK is going on with SYS ?? ?? ?? ?? This was my project number one I believed the most in!  Angry
1215  Other / Meta / Re: Merit against spam: reward spam reporters & punish spammers on: November 16, 2018, 08:11:17 PM
This would only be a temporary phenomenon, until all spam and all spammers are out forever.
The more spamming is going in ANN threads. All the bounty hunters are not spammers but all the ANN threads bumpers are spammers. Therefore, you can't remove spammers at all, ever.

OK.

So in conclusion, if getting rid of ALL spam is not the plan, please remind me why I should continue to report ANY spam.
1216  Other / Meta / Re: Merit against spam: reward spam reporters & punish spammers on: November 16, 2018, 07:42:03 PM
Now imagine this:
-bots create 10,000 accounts
-bots start spamming "great project" with 10,000 accounts
-1000 bots start reporting the other 9000 accounts
-1000 bots turn Jr. Member and continue spamming with signature
-Mods run away screaming
For now, helping one another to report spam post and the plagiarist users would be a great form of help for the forum. This could not be easily done with few users to attain a good discussions for the forum. I can be a help of this too OP do not worry tine will come that the reporting habit will make a way cleansing the forum.

Indeed everyone should report, and rewarding reporters and punishing spammers would be the best way, I think, to clean up all that spam.

Of course there would be A LOT of reports. But that's because there are A LOT of spammers on this forum. This would only be a temporary phenomenon, until all spam and all spammers are out forever.

They are here, spamming for bounties, well then, as I said in the OP, attack them where it hurts: take away their Merits so they cannot participate in bounties (as long as they keep spamming).
1217  Other / Meta / Re: Merit against spam: reward spam reporters & punish spammers on: November 14, 2018, 10:11:32 PM
(...)
You speak spamer, is this post below yours?
(...)
Have you included one of the people who didn't do a spamer?
All there are important rules to read: [Topic: FAQ: Everything you need to know about forum 'activity, account ranks and merit] all spammers are lost.


Wow dude, that's the first time someone reminded me of those posts! Shocked

Oh wait, it's not! I've responded to this before, but you didn't really bother to actually read the threads or even the OP, did you? Reading is exhausting, isn't it, so I'll quote my post for you.

(...)

Hmmm yes. That's spectacular investigative journalism, man. Did it occur to you (even for a second) that replying to these nonsense posts with complete sarcasm was exactly the purpose? Roll Eyes

Surely you did notice that, back then, I couldn't even participate in signature bounties, because I was still a Newbie. Cool Eventually I quit the sarcasm and started reporting these posts. Mostly not because it was spam, but because people like you didn't understand my replies were meant to be sarcastic.

Oh but please go on with your list. Surprise us.

You are probably living in one of those countries where sarcasm hasn't been imported yet, so I forgive you. Please also tell me what a spamer is. My dictionary doesn't recognize it.

So, do you actually have something useful to add to my proposition for getting rid of spam? Or do you just like cutting of the heads of people who stick their necks out?

Oh and don't forget to report my posts to the mods!

(DISCLAIMER I've hidden a bit of sarcasm in this post)
1218  Other / Meta / Re: Merit against spam: reward spam reporters & punish spammers on: November 14, 2018, 07:15:43 PM
Isn't it demeaning for a newbie to try to earn one single merit for reporting a mammoth/gigantic 500 posts, I'll rather stay on the forum without merits,and read,learn and report spam posts without really witch hunting for them..

Removing merits from spammers is impossible,there is currently no Demerits system in place in the forum,though @Loycev has made a thread proposing it, but it's yet to be approved..
So no matter what a user does,his/her merit remains with'em, even if they get banned...

I can't really see the advantage of this suggestion,as we'll simply be getting tons of bad reports from noobs who find it hard to earn one elusive merit the "right" way

Reporting spam posts is simply ones own voluntary way of contributing/giving back to the forum

Reporting 500,000 to enable potential legendary sounds like a strange and hard to remember number. I would suggest keeping things simple and making it 1M.

If you want to get Merits fast, write useful posts. That's what Merit was meant for in the first place.

If you are not able to do so but are not a spammer either, get your hands dirty and help us clean up this mess. So yes, I think 500 per Merit really is an acceptable amount. It's that, or writing useful posts, or nothing. Can't complain about an additional way of earning some Merits, right?

(But hey, we could test it and see if lower amounts give better results)
1219  Other / Meta / Re: Merit against spam: reward spam reporters & punish spammers on: November 14, 2018, 06:59:35 PM
Can you imagine how much mod have to recruited only for checking the reports?
People specially the people who aims to have merit onoy and rank up will start to report a lot of posts daily. If 500 users do that, at least 50 mods will be needed to check those only, IMO.
I believe it will boost up the ratio of reporting useless posts but the ultimate output will be worse than ever.

Of course it would boost the reporting ratio. That's the exact purpose.

I mean, why should we even have a "Report to moderator" button altogether, if we don't want to get rid of ALL spam? Is the "Report" link only there to report "some" spam "now and then"? We could as well remove the report function then and get the mods out.
1220  Other / Meta / Merit against spam: reward spam reporters & punish spammers on: November 14, 2018, 06:37:12 PM
As I have reported before in this thread, I've continued to report spam posts on a daily basis. It sucks. You feel like cleaning other people's houses, but without being paid for it. It also feels like you're losing the battle cuz every time you clean out a thread, there's new spam the day after. My respect for the mods who do this constantly has been grown even huger since.

Keeping in mind how many - if not all - spammers only do this only for the signature bounty campaigns, I (modestly) think I might have found a way of using the Merit system to actually get rid of new spammers as well as to clean the threads from the spam that's already there, and I believe it might even be quite simple to implement.

This idea no doubt needs to be refined, and I am quite curious to hear the other members' opinion about this.


1. REWARD PEOPLE FOR REPORTING SPAM

For every 500 reported posts, which are evaluated and confirmed as "Good" spam by the mods, users get 1 Merit.

To avoid inaccurate reports (meaning posts that are not actual spam and are qualified as "Bad" non-spam posts), the user only receives this if his accuracy is at least at 99%. If he goes lower than 99%, he loses his number of reported posts and firstly has to continue reporting to get back to 99% from which the counting to 500 restarts from zero.

At the end of this post, I explain why I believe the system should be so severe.


2. PUNISH PEOPLE WHO SPAM

You know those 1 Merit Junior Members? You know those long-membership Full and Senior Members who post nothing but shit? Does "You sir project very unique I follow" ring a bell?

I say: hit them where it hurts most.

Every time 20 posts from a member have been rightfully reported (meaning 20 posts qualified as "Good" spam by the mods), those members lose 1 Merit.


3. ADVANTAGES OF THE SYSTEM

- It would be appreciated by those good-willed Newbies and Juniors who are actually trying to do something useful for the forum, even without necessarily posting rocket science or Nobel Prize in Literature quality, to get a little bit higher in rank. You just can't expect people who are new to crypto, to post HQ topics and replies but at least they can earn some Merits while they are growing and learning. The reward would be nice but not disproportional, because if they wish to grow in rank, they will actually need to report 500 posts which is A LOT. So they will be helping to keep the forums tidy whilst being discouraged to post spam for which they risk to lose Merit again.

- It would be appreciated by those good-willed higher ranked members who are always wondering if it wouldn't be better to get a life, instead of spending hours reporting spam on their favorite forum. At least you'd feel like you're not doing this for nothing. Yes, that includes myself, too Roll Eyes. (don't worry, I will continue to actively report even without Merit Cheesy)

I believe nonetheless that it would especially help newer members, as the reward decreases "relatively" while your rank grows.

Let me use an example to make myself clear:

I have now over 1000 reported posts with 100% accuracy. To me, this would mean 2 Merits, which is nice but modest for a Full Member and even more modest for higher ranks. To a Newbie or Junior Member, however, this is huge, and their participation and involvement in the forums would increase.


- It would be appreciated by those good-willed higher ranked members (this also includes myself), who have been searching endlessly for those lower-ranked good-willed members "who most certainly are out there and deserve to receive sMerits but can't seem to be found nonetheless". Of course, these low-ranks will still be able to receive sMerits for their high-quality posts, but this extra "Spam Reporting Merits" will at least guarantee them a bit more visibility and credibility.

- It would be appreciated by those good-willed mods who do not like to ban people easily. The system would not "kill" or "ban" members but these members would be forced to respect the very minimum low-level requirement of participating in the conversations in a normal people's way to be able to receive Merit and participate in bounty campaigns.

- It would be appreciated by those good-willed members who do not want bounty campaigns to disappear but hate spam nonetheless. Indeed, you've guessed it: this also includes myself. This system would not only clean the existing spam posts, as these would be reported and deleted by the mods. It would also avoid new spam as you risk losing Merits every time 20 of your posts are accurately reported as spam.

- It would be appreciated by those good-willed members who do want to learn more about crypto or other subjects on the forums: by reading, scrolling and reporting spam, you also get to see interesting replies and OP's.

- And to those goldseekers who don't care about interesting topics, involvement or participation, and who came here only to get bounty signature money we now could say: you are most welcome to this forum and can stay a Newbie forever, but if you want to get a higher rank, you'll have to get your hands dirty and work for the forum by reporting spam.

- Keeping the numbers high and the accuracy demands very strict will avoid making a whole new level of Merit accumulation by members who are trying to report posts untruthfully.
Pages: « 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 [61] 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!