uefa has unveiled the match ball for euro 2024 in germany. its called 'Fussballliebe' (Football Love) - and contains a technology that is being used for the first time at a european championship final.
according to uefa, the ball contains 'connected ball technology', which will be used for the first time at a uefa euro round. the association speaks of the 'unprecedented insights' provided by the technology. the movement and position of the ball will be tracked more precisely, which should also benefit the decision-making processes of the var assistant...
This is the part that I wonder the most, we all remember some balls are not loved by the players all that much, some of them hated some of the balls and it doesn't fit them and not feels natural. So I am thinking, since this is a new thing, will this ball be liked by the players and make them play normally? Or would it be something that would be horrible and make the players hate it and they would all play much worse then they normally play? I am not sure, but by the looks of it the ball will have different feeling without a doubt, it doesn't look like it will be good at all. I believe that we are going to have some sort of situation that has to be changing like some alternative ball, a normal regular ball, you can paint the outside similar, but have that alternative ready. Why? Because these are not players who like toe b tested and not really hate the ball the yare given, if the ball is terrible and hated by everyone, players could riot about it and ask for a change. |
|
|
|
Just arriving in France and carrying out a training session before the Euro 2024 qualifying match, Camavinga suffered a knee injury after colliding with Ousmane Dembele. It is clear that this news is very detrimental to Real Madrid, which needs Camavinga's role to stabilize the midfield and it is reported that Camavinga has returned to Madrid to carry out tests and receive treatment. This is why sometimes international breaks always take their toll and for the team that is disadvantaged it will certainly be a deep loss for the squad. It looks like we won't see Camavinga playing for Real Madrid in the next match and we hope that Tchouameni, who has previously been injured, will recover quickly at the right time and replace Camavinga. Source: https://www.instagram.com/p/CzrSdv9vkqV/Holy Shiiiiitt!! This ain't no good news for Real Madrid, they'll be without another proper defensive midfielder who's responsible for shielding the defenders or defense. Having Eduardo Camavinga and Tchouameni Aurelien absent will cause head ache for Carlo Ancellotti when making selections. Daniel Ceballos who can fill up for em too having same Injury conditions. They don't too much difficult fixtures coming up though, Cadiz and then Napoli, but I'm sure they'll concede goals if these players are absent. They'll be forced to use either of Toni Kroos or Frederico Valverde to come up in midfied and replace either of these players. Arda Guler should also get his chances of playing since some players ahead of him in the selection other are absent. I think, this a good timing to showcase what he's got! To be fair, it is the best that they could hope for from a position. They have plenty of positions that they are lacking, and it's clear that they do need a player that would be a lot different in a position. Camavinga is a midfielder and Real Madrid has a ton of midfielders, from modric and kroos to jude to valverde to tchouameni, they have 5 players there if they want them to play at midfield, so losing camavinga will not be an issue for them. If they lost a goalkeeper for example, that would be hard because they already lost one, and losing another would mean that they would not be ready for what's to come. Or maybe right back, carvajal is sort of backup-less in his position and that would be hard for them. If that team must lose a player then I would say that midfield is the place to lose that player on, plus they had that young kid as well, who is also injured but not really, I think the yare going to be fine without a worry for sure it's not going to be a big deal. |
|
|
|
Rudi Garcia has been sacked, they called back Mazzarri after 10 years.
Conte is rumored to have refused them, twice.
Well, it was the right decision to fire Rudi Garcia but isn't there another better option for Napoli's new coach? considering that they really need a coach who is very experienced in winning titles to get through this season. Walter Mazzarri was their previous coach and now he has returned after more than 10 years and I think this is an immature decision from Napoli. The last time Walter Mazzarri coached Cagliari was in the 21/22 season and there is no other good record apart from having coached Inter in the 13/14 season. I feel that Napoli will not be able to find their goal this season and they are unlikely to be able to survive the Scudetto competition. Wow. So quickly and decisively, But is it the right choice? In June this year, Luciano Spallettti parted ways with Napoli. A breakup leaves many regrets because they are at the peak of fame. Currently, Garcia and his students are ranked 4th in Serie A with 21 points after 12 matches, 10 points behind leading team Inter. A difficult person like Aurelio De Laurentiis cannot accept this. He then decided to fire Rudi Garcia as head coach. And Welcome back, Mazzarri, but Mazzarri will be the temporary replacement before Napoli finds a more suitable coach next season. Even though he is only temporary, the question is whether Mazzarri has enough courage to withstand pressure from President De Laurentiis. De Laurentiis' hot-tempered nature always makes unexpected dismissal decisions. I would say it was the right decision not just because of the results but because he had a clash with the team, the chemistry was just not there and when that is the situation you can fire even the first place teams manager. I mean we should also look at the fact that they fired the manager that won them the title, so not like it would be based on success for them, it has to be a bit about the owner as well I suppose, he has to like the manager and if the manager is not following his orders then even wins do not save their seat. I think Mazzari will not be permeant deal though, I think they are going to get someone else and hired him for temporarily checking the team, by this summer I think they will find someone else and hire that person for next year, but it is November, most of the managers are already at a team, and there are very few people who could take over and still be good, which is why they probably got the best they could get at the moment. |
|
|
|
|
Basically we still have some mathematical calculations left, but in the end it all depends on the games that will be played. The ones who are going up are already decided, and if we ignore the others, the ones who have a chance, will fight to the last minute, to the last whistle of the game. We are going to definitely see games that will be fun to watch, it is going to end up being great.
I understand that we are not going to see it be that difficult at times, like some teams that need a win may end up losing terribly, they are behind for a reason. For example Wales, good team, but they are not qualifying right now because of a reason, they are not first or second for a reason, so they should play all game as hard as they can to win, but if they lose, that may not be a shock neither. That type of thing happens all the time, and we need to realize that it's either going to be an incredible win, or an expected loss from them when the game ends.
|
|
|
|
Lewandowski is starting to get sharp again, but Barcelona must improve performance on all fronts. Especially the defense line which has been a little fragile lately. Luckily they have a goalkeeper like Ter Stegen.
Yes, Barcelona should work more on performance to upgrade the team. It is true that Lawandoski is a better striker, but now Barcelona should also work on him to provide some assistance from the midfield. Guys, I noticed from about 5 matches recently that in the absence of Frenki De Jong, Barcelona has shown extremely poor performance, and even tactic had the effect of Frenki de Jong, but at the same time I noted that Lawandoski also had an effect. Hua de Jong's absence. Because De Jong, Pedri is the one who mostly raises his assest to aim Lawandiski, meaning he mostly passes it to create chances. It's not going to work without sending money to Barcelona. They need to spend more money and invest more in this team and because of the financial issues they have this is hard for them. I think Barcelona needs to hire another forward and finisher like Lewandowski as soon as possible but they can't and that's why this team will have even more problems in the next years because Lewandowski is getting old and he can't have good performance in Barcelona like old days. I agree with Lewandowski bit, but during the time Xavi played, he was used to having at least one proper striker, doesn't have to be the top scorer, but he is the dude that knows Barcelona tactic, and in that tactic there is one pure striker who aims to score. Surely, Messi scored a lot, while not being a striker, so they know that it's important to have star players all around, but players like eto'o and henry and so forth all played during xavis time there. I believe that he wanted to replicate that with Lewandowski but seems like it's not really going all that much. I hope that people could realize that we are going to have something that will change for the long term, and in that regard I believe that we are going to end up with a bigger change in the end. |
|
|
|
I believe that people who are in profit may end up staying if it is a good coin, but when it is a risky one then getting out is more important. Like for example if you invest into bitcoin and not sell when it peaks, that's fine because it may peak again a few years later, like lets say you didn't sell at 68k, you could have bought a lot more if you did, so it is smart to sell at peak but let's assume you didn't, doesn't mean that you are going to lose all your money, you could still end up holding it and sell at the next peak when the bull run happens.
You didn't sell at 68k? Then you can hold for 10 years and sell at 500k, it is still possible and will give you a greater return. But at low stuff like doge, that's not possible.
If you sold not at 68k but at 50k, you would still have an excellent chance of increasing the number of your bitcoins. But the eternal hold strategy may not work all the time, what if something changes after this bull market, what if this is the last bull market? I’m not saying that this is so, I just want to say that it always makes sense to take profits, this can give you advantages in different situations and maintain your profits. Of course, to successfully carry out these actions, you need to have a good ability to analyze the market, otherwise you can make too many mistakes, due to which you can miss out on big profits. That is a whole another topic of discussion. That means we need to question if the price will keep going up in the future or not. Like for example, in the next 2 years people assume that the price will go up, maybe you do not think that it will, maybe it won't, maybe the price peaked at 68k, and it will not reach that again, or at least for another 10 years, who knows? In that case, yes you are right, eternal hold forever logic will be a terrible one and you should not be doing that. I personally disagree with that mindset, I think in the next 2 years the price will go above 68k, and then in another 6 years or so, it will go more than that too, every cycle it happened like that and I do not see a reason why that should change. I am not saying it will, because "will" is a big word, I am saying that's what I believe, as a personal opinion. If I am wrong, I will lose money, if I am right then I will make a profit, totally based on my own moves and not anyone else's. |
|
|
|
You cannot help a person who doesn't want to be helped. Absolutely nothing you can do. Even if you go for therapy, the therapist will tell you that. The best the family could have done was to put in in a situation where he would see that gambling addiction is damaging and can ruin his career. If I were the boy and my family treated me in that manner, they would probably not hear from me again for a long time to come. I would hate them for life.
We can lend a help but they could reject it. Maybe for now, because there are problematic person who soon realizes their own fault, so we should not give up easily. Helping someone can still give us a good unexplainable feeling, aside from the money that they can give to us. If we are the ones who are suffering from that condition, we shouldn't think in advance because our thoughts are for sure not correct. Therapy is built that way in the first place to help people like us and they are also going to get paid, so they will never ignore us. Part of curing or preventing to get addicted in gambling is to show its side effects. Everyone knows this already. |
|
|
|
It was always obvious that Harden was the issue, since Rockets period as well. I mean in normal cases, like for example with Dame and all, I understand players being upset and wanting out, because he played over a decade there and they did not build a good team around him, and that looks like there was no desire by the team to win anything, they are happy to just spend as little as possible and make the team worth go up thanks to inflation, NBA getting more popular means their team worths more and they are happy owners. However, Rockets was never like that, all those calls about them getting Howard, getting CP3, getting Westbrook, and him still wanting out and not getting anything with that team was obvious. That famous 27 shots missed in a row was the demise of Harden, ever since that day, he never went back to being a star player, he just became a cry baby that wanted things all the time without actually giving anything back for getting what he wants. A player may want to get traded, but if he keeps making teams pay for him, and he doesn't do anything for them, then why would any team want him again?
And this could be the last straw on James Harden, if the Clippers didn't go to the playoffs, or at least relegated to 6th spot in the West and then have to go to a play-in just to make the playoffs, then we know who should be the problem with the Clippers. They are just started to have a season with their big 3 of Kawhi, Paul George and then Westbrook. Unfortunately, the management decided to get James in return and they lost a good defensive player in Nic Batum, who can also shoot 3 in crucial minutes. Just because Harden wanted to go to Clippers that Steve Ballmer gave in to the request and think that Harden is a good addition. Harden has a history already and the teams should learn from it. Now the curse is on the Clippers right now, they've lost a bunch of future picks as well so for now we can definitely say that the risk is not paying off. I believe that the biggest example of why Harden is not good for teams would be how Sixers are doing right now. It's been very few games so I am not saying those are the ones that matters the most, but they are leading the eastern conference right now, and they are 8-1 and that should show you how Harden is not all that helpful. Imagine you have a "star" player in your squad, and you do better without him than you did with him, would you still consider that player a star player? I personally would stop considering that player as a star player. In 2016 or in 2018 this Clippers squad would have been insanely good, everyone was great, but when we are talking about 2023, these are all has been that used to be good but no longer good at all, they are not even remotely good. The squad is also lacking size, they are all "guards" if you think about it, sure PG and Kawhi could be considered wings, but still no Power Forward at all, a pure small ball line up. |
|
|
|
We can say already that Ajax are done in the Europa League this season. Losing against Brighton 2 times in a row brought their end. They still have a mathematical chance of course but isn't much realistic considering how many points Marseille and Brighton have collected so far.
They need Brighton to lose their remaining matches while they are winning against Marseille away and AEK home. I can't trust this Ajax even in that AEK match honestly. They just need to regain their strength as soon as possible. They had better focus on the Eredivisie with everything they have got to finish the season in a decent place.
Honestly, Ajax had a very difficult group, I understand them not getting it. I feel like a third place would make sense for them, not sure if third place goes to conference league like how in UCL third place goes to europa, but if that is the case then it's fine, they will keep on fighting. Think about it, we are talking about both Brighton, who are having a great season, and Marseille, which is not a bad team at all. So when you combine those two together, it becomes obvious that they are going to end up not being in the top two. Ajax could have, I mean not like it would be impossible, but they are having a bad season, their league is not that awesome neither, not too bad though, so it's understandable that they would finish the group third place. Fourth place would be difficult to handle though, that is not really all that fair and I think it is going to end up being a little different and difficult for them to handle in the end. |
|
|
|
Although only their last two games have looked promising but honestly I will not fully believe that Chelsea will really change for the better, but on the other hand yes maybe the success in the last two games is enough to indicate that there are signs of change from Pochettino's squad, although I will first fully believe but at least this is a good sign. Last season was indeed as we saw that they really slumped by only being able to finish 12th in the standings, but let's just say that it was their time of change that we some good signs have begun to be quite visible.
Yes that's right, that indeed now what most Blues fans hope is that they expect Chelsea to be able to maintain their performance like this, they hope that there is consistency created for the next few games, although it might be quite hard to expect to win the title or even enter the top five of the standings because the season time is not long anymore, for this season yes maybe I won't have too much hope for them, but for next season I don't think there is any reason for them to slump again, after all it's time for them to restore the prestige of the club in the Premier League.
I agree with you that this season is really difficult for Chelsea to finish in the top four of the standings, so they can qualify for the Champions League next season. The most reasonable target for Pochettino squad is to finish in the Europa League zone, because we know these two matches are promising but we cannot fully believe that this is a turning point in their performance. On the other hand, I am quite sure that this season The Blues can finish in a more decent ranking than last season, I can't imagine their spending in the transfer market being so large if they fail to improve their performance so that they can finish in a better ranking. However, Pochettino efforts should be appreciated, perhaps his tactical qualities are now better than Ten Hag. Although we will never know in the future the Blues might slump again when faced with a mediocre club. I honestly do not think that Pochettino has anything to do with this, players were just sick and tired of being labeled a failure and they played a lot better, they played with their heart out, they played like it was the UCL finals or EPL championship decider, they played with 100% and not an ounce lower. When you play like that, it is obvious that you are not going to get anything bad, you are going to get some decent results. Chelsea will not continue to get these results forever, they did it, and they played well, but players won't play with 100% for every game, this was a City game and they did their best, and they did manage to score 4 goals against City, which not many teams could say in the last 5 years or so. |
|
|
|
Whenever you feel rushed and find yourself making decisions without considering your strategy, step back and take a break. Return when you can approach your decisions in a deliberate manner.
Perhaps all you need is a short coffee break, or maybe you should step away for a day or even a week. Your portfolio will still be there when you return. Remember, you're not a day trader. You don't have to react to every minor market swing. Not a single day in the market should make you feel like you're racing against time.
One of the advantages of the Dual Investment Strategy, which I've discussed before, and it doesn't really demand constant attention. You can set up your portfolio, step back, and live your life, checking on your investments when it's convenient for you. Let your life schedule when you review your portfolio, rather than letting the market dictate your life. There's nothing in this strategy that necessitates an immediate reaction to market movements. Just because the market is moving rapidly doesn't mean you have to follow the crowd blindly. The same holds true for the Dollar Cost Averaging (DCA) method.
I believe that people who are in profit may end up staying if it is a good coin, but when it is a risky one then getting out is more important. Like for example if you invest into bitcoin and not sell when it peaks, that's fine because it may peak again a few years later, like lets say you didn't sell at 68k, you could have bought a lot more if you did, so it is smart to sell at peak but let's assume you didn't, doesn't mean that you are going to lose all your money, you could still end up holding it and sell at the next peak when the bull run happens. You didn't sell at 68k? Then you can hold for 10 years and sell at 500k, it is still possible and will give you a greater return. But at low stuff like doge, that's not possible. |
|
|
|
So what was bitcoin supposed to do? Shut down because FTX also went down? This wasn't going to happen even if all the centralized exchanges shut down at the same time.
So this isn't much proof of anything. It's just proof of weakness for centralization. The important point here is that while bitcoin is indeed resilient, many services associated to it are not up in par with its level of trustlessness and could collapse from day to day.
Given how much FTX was advertised, it makes sense that many have come to think that bitcoin and centralized service failures like FTX fall under the same category. We should strive to change that by educating people on the differences.
Weirdly enough, there are some people who think that was possible, yes it makes no sense at all and I would not expect it to do something like that neither, but weirdly enough some people thought that after BILLIONS are gone in there (not all crypto, as a valuation) they thought that bitcoin would never recover. To be quite frankly this has been going on since mt.gox, when that went down, people said bitcoin was dead, and ever since those days, whenever something happens, people keep saying that bitcoin will die because of it, and it never does. People never realized that we do not care about what's going on, we are going to keep it going and that is the greatness of bitcoin, it will always end up going strong in the end. |
|
|
|
I doubt that Betfury will do this in mear future now that they have a working casino that gain profit for them consistently without spending money for their token promotion. They rather spend the budget for buy backs to casino advertisements and promotion instead of boosting the token price that they are only using for rewards for their casino users.
I once a believer of casino utility token but BFG makes me doubt in this kind of investment since token holders doesn’t gain anything aside from staking using the liquidity from the investors initial investment and new token holders while the casino owner is the only one benefiting on the casino profit. They should give BFG tokens some exclusivity on the casino if they really value this token.
Any crypto you but always has some risk, so the same is valid for casino tokens. While I still like the BFG tokens (mainly because of the dividend), I wouldn’t buy any because, as you mentioned, they are not focused on promoting their tokens or doing things to increase the price. I would say that as long as they keep being a strong casino, which they are, the dividends will increase, and the more that increases, the more people will want to invest. I mean think about it, if something pays you one dollar per month, do you think that the price will stay at one dollar per token? It will be 100+ easily, people overhype that type of thing. So, it is clear to me that we are going to end up with a situation where the price will be very different, and will be very difficult to keep it low. I understand that you may think that they do not promote their token, but they do promote their casino, and that's what will make the token go high. I believe that we are going to end up seeing a higher price there. |
|
|
|
~snip~
Milan wasted opportunities to win and failed to defend well, the match was a draw, and the biggest loss was that Pioli lost Rafael Leao in that match. Losing Leao in Milan's main squad is absolutely like losing ¼ of their attack power, because after all he is the main part of Milan attack this season. Dortmund will be very comfortable when facing the Rossoneri without having full strength, even though I also know that the German club is fearless against its opponents. But this time it made things a little easier for their defense without Leao, so they were at an advantage. But on the other hand, I still hope that the injury is not serious, so that in the match between Dortmund versus Milan we will have a fierce game because both clubs are playing with intact squads. Not only did they lose Rafael Leao but AC Milan also had to lose Olivier Giroud in the next few matches because of the red card he received. These two players could cause Milan big loss because these two players have become the key to Milan strength and in the match against Dortmund there may be series of pressures experienced by Milan. Stefano Pioli had to rack his brains by using several ways to use other players to fill the void left by Rafael Leao and Olivier Giroud. Now there will only be squad with limited players, in fact I not sure Milan can have maximum results in the match against Dortmund. But the match against Dortmund is still at the end of the month so there is chance that Stefano Pioli will have quite long time to prepare everything. Losing Rafael Leao must be a big hit to the team and to the squad because he is one of the best players of that team if not for the best player, but they lost Giroud to red card as well which means that he is going to miss the next game as well. I do not know what they are going to do, because next game they are going to play is Fiorentina, who may not be as good as they used to be, but not a team to striffle with neither, they are still pretty decent and could end up with an upset. I think Milan needs to bring in all the rest of the players and do a proper training to rest them, there are ways to make the players rest better at the club and feel better, then just let them sit at home, because most of these million dollar players do not actually "rest" when left alone, but when you bring them to the club they are forced to rest, and massaged and basically all around relax. They need to put 100% in order to get the win without a doubt. |
|
|
|
|
Bayern having that type of odds is normal but definitely not make it worth betting on. When the reality and fair become the compacting two results, you do not end up with anything that is decent. I mean is it fair to say that 1.07 would be a normal odds for them for this game?
I do believe that it is normal, after all they do have a huge chance to win this one, there is nothing wrong with that, I think it is fair to give them those kinds of odds right now and that's important. I believe that the best case we could do right now would be getting to a point where we could end up with something that can chance the results. We believe that we are going to end up with a situation that has to be fair but not worthy of betting.
|
|
|
|
Liverpool are already their group leaders and will be qualifying with first position,and what I can say about that match was that they did not take it seriously since they are already topping the group,they thought it was a match they were going to just win convincingly without stress,but they didn't know Toulouse were well prepared for that encounter,and wanted to qualify by all means.So a win for them has given them a chance in qualifying.Liverpool will be facing Brenthford in the EPL,and it is indeed going to be a tough match for them because we all know what Brenthford are capable of doing.The reds had a draw in their last match against Luton,and would want to bounce back with a win by all means,so I think they will thrive towards getting three points in this one.
Did not expect Liverpool to lose this match at all. The funny thing is Liverpool actually dominated the match in terms of having possession of the ball. But Liverpool was unable to do much with it. They were able to make things interesting in the end by scoring in the 89th minute of the match. But I have to say performance from the Liverpool was below average. The accuracy needs to be better from Liverpool. I don't know what to say then the fact that this is a match probably nobody expected Liverpool to lose. And at the same time, I have to give credit to Toulouse. Certainly would have been better, but at the same time. I also agree that it is not the end of the world for Liverpool. They have another competition to think about. And Liverpool is a team that will consistently have to think about both the English Premier League and the Champions League as well. So probably if Liverpool actually ends up losing in matches like this, where it will not matter if Liverpool wins or loses, I think we can actually overlook the results not being in favour of Liverpool. But I think as soon as we enter the later stages of the competitions, Liverpool is not going to have that luxury for sure I think getting the europa cup is more important for them, because it would be highly unlikely for them to get the premier league title, and considering how good other teams are right now, it would be very difficult compared to getting europa, FA cup is another one they "may" win, but even that is too hard. This is why I think it is important for them to focus their talents here, so that they would win at least one title. In a season given the chance of winning EPL or FA or Europa, the biggest chance for them is clearly Europa. However, if they do think that resting their players is more important, then they know what they are doing and Klopp is a far better manager anyone here can ever be, so he must know what he is doing and he is making calculated decisions. This means that he wants his players fresh, and that is understandable, after all being top four is important for them as well, it does bring in a lot of talent for the people for sure, and a lot of money. |
|
|
|
People often misinterpret the word "free" when giving examples or trying to provide guides and stuff. They think that "free" only means that you do not have to spend money to get something, while they ignore the fact that when you put some effort into getting something, you are not getting it for free. When you are employed, you don't spend money from your pocket to finally get a salary at the end of the month, but you provide your services, you work for the company or firm or anything it is you are working with, and they pay you for your efforts and time and the work that you've done for them.
Similarly, when you are completing a certain task to get something in return for it, you are not getting it for free but you are earning it with your efforts and time. Free is something that you get for doing nothing. I'm sitting on my couch watching TV and I receive an SMS that I got some reward from a giveaway or something from somewhere I might have shopped or done something that wasn't specifically for that purpose, now that can be called getting something for free.
Yes that is such a correct way to approach this, "free" doesn't mean free, it means that you are not spending your money for it, in this case. If I am working at a job and getting money in exchange of my efforts, then in most these cases they are like a job, I am spending my time in exchange for money, and that's an important difference. I guess that most people are fine with it, they think that their time is not worth that much money so they take the risk, but that's not really a smart idea if you ask me, I think it should be noted that these people should try to make sure that they are doing better with their time. Maybe you can't make that money today, but if you spend some time, you could try to make some profit some other way. |
|
|
|
Join the BTC discussion and let us know where you think it's headed! Will it skyrocket past 35K 🚀 or experience a dip 📉? Your insights matter, so cast your vote and share your crypto wisdom with the community! 📊
The votes has been casted and the winner is the first one https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/ showing how it grows from your time frame October 27 up to now? Bitcoin is heading to 40k as it is sitting at 37 thousand USD this time I posted. for same reason I believe that as we approaching December there are more runs coming , expected to be at least 45k before the 2023 close the record. what we need to talk iN December is how much are we going to lose from that period till January first . I do agree that it is going to be something that will benefit everyone, we should be doing something that will be doing great on the long run. I understand that we may not end up with a greater return that we desire or at least wish, but the return so far has been great. Realizing that what you are going to think or assume or predict may not be what really happens, as long as we give it some time the result will show itself. The current situation shows that we are going above 37k and that means it is not going to go down under 35k, and that should be the most important thing. I wouldn't know what to say outside of the fact that right now we are doing as well as we could hope for. I believe that is the most important thing of it. |
|
|
|
I am a high school student. I learned about Bitcoin, but it's too late. I was so young. Because I was 4 years old in 2009. But as history tells us, bitcoin killer will emerge one day. I want to find out such coin, but I don't have enought knowledge and ability to do that.. I want to ask the smart people here. Is there a coin that is similar to Bitcoin now? something that is perfectly decentralized. I want to invest there. If there's a coin you're making, is fine too. Just let me know. I hope this post becomes a legend.
Now that you are old enough to understand bitcoin then why having this second thoughts? why looking for next bitcoin when the original is still existing and still profitable? bitcoin even shows great growth weeks after your posting ? and what I am seeing here is your not interested in having conversation here in your own thread and I am afraid that you have just created this for spamming. How much are you going to invest if ever? are you trying to say that you wanted to put 1 dollar and after 10 years to become a Million like what early adopters earned? There will always be young kids who are going to get a lot more excited that we would ever get, they will want to get the most out of their life and for that to happen they will want to get rich quicker. When I was younger I wanted to be wealthy before I was 30 years old, so that I would live a life like kings, things I couldn't do or wouldn't be bale to do without money, I wanted money for all those things. When I grew older nowadays, I realize that the only thing that matters is to have enough money for when I am unable to work, I wouldn't want to be someone who is 75 years old and has to work in order to survive, that would be quite terrible because you would be possibly unable to work, and you would need money for those days. |
|
|
|
|
Honestly, the top two are ahead even while missing games, because of game results like this. Al Ahli ended up getting a draw, and that should show you how everything is looking, and could be the most important thing. I understand that it may not be all that crazy to handle, but that is definitely not the way to go, not in the slighest. We should be considering the situation a little bit more important to handle, and that means we are going to end up with something that could be a little bit different and difficult.
Hopefully, people could end up realizing soon enough that we are talking about just two teams here, rest of the league is there for these teams to play against nothing more. I understand that teams like Ittihad also had some good transfers, but we are seeing their results, even fired the manager too if I am not wrong, but still they are not going to be good. Al-Nassr may still end up losing too, they are just a little bit behind, but if they lose one more, it will be big enough difference to not cover.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
