1202
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin
|
on: August 16, 2011, 09:16:37 PM
|
holy shit did I just get decimated. All my blocks disappeared.
Some people are reporting the same thing. I saw a few of my blocks disappear too, even ones that had confirmations. But now that I think about it, it didn't make sense that I had mined 80 blocks out of 240 so far lol
|
|
|
1204
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin
|
on: August 16, 2011, 07:22:23 PM
|
Well, I can't start the client: i0coind: main.cpp:1566: bool LoadBlockIndex(bool): Assertion `block.hashMerkleRoot == uint256("0x01f79e95511e638325c288818ed10d95cdfb30bb775c8f024f380a4c9bcd8d4e")' failed.
This was from git. Solution was posted 3 thread pages back. So are you currently mining I0coins?
|
|
|
1211
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Coin forks
|
on: August 16, 2011, 05:49:04 PM
|
So IXCoin is off and running already, now I hear something about IOCoin? Perhaps someone could collect information about the coin forks in one convenient location? How they're doing, who is using them, why they exist, etc.
I believe it's called the "Off Topic" sub forum, sir
|
|
|
1216
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: I0 Guild - I0Coin Pool from BTC Guild
|
on: August 16, 2011, 03:24:50 AM
|
Most miners take longer than 10 seconds to find a hash, but the blocks are getting solved faster than that. So by the time your miner tries to submit it's hash, the pool is already working on the next block (or 2). I was seeing 80% stale. Once the first jump in difficulty and the blocks start taking longer than a minute to solve, the stales will go way down.
TY for the explanation In the 16 minutes I've been mining on the test pool, I have mined about 83 i0coins so far with 330 MH/s (what i0guild reports, but it's actually 410 MH/s in my DOS window).
|
|
|
1217
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: New Ixcoin fork -> I0coin
|
on: August 16, 2011, 03:20:57 AM
|
I'm currently mining the i0.btcguild.com test pool, and there's an unusually high number of rejected shares (like 50%!). Anybody else seeing this?
Too be expected to much hash power pointed at low diff is way too much for the *coin client to keep up it is designed for the 6 per 10 minutes ideal not per second like is happening now with that chain. Ah, so we're "overrunning the buffer" so to speak?
|
|
|
|