BNB is on its run since the bull run began and even broke its ATH when BTC, ETH and other major as well as minor alts were not performing so good. Binance also burns millions of dollars worth their BNB coins so to keep their word and go with the protocol. CZ turned Binance into a grand success and made enormous changes in the app to keep its users stick to it till date, as well, launchpad is one main reason why BNB can rise a lot more. $950 is nothing to me if you ask what is BNB's potential.

I've had been a fan of RSK which helped me "pay very less BTC" while getting my transaction getting confirmed way quicker than BTC's main chain, but now the problem is that I need to pay a bit more to get my transaction through compared to BTC's Blockchain. Though, the transactions are very fast and success ratio of confirmations is much better and it can really help scale BTC at a much better pace. It's true that they've brought their own coins but have they stopped serving the purpose they were made for? I guess not, they're still serving BTC to run on their chains to be sent quickly to the other party.

Please don't believe that you can never incur losses while trading because without losses, a trader can't become professional in his trading as he learns from his mistakes. And with that said, I'd also emphasize more on patience, if you'd have bought crypto with spare money during previous years (take any year) and hodl till now, then that spare money would have been worth a fortune now as you could have something that'd be worth more than your next 10 years of collective earnings.

So them being the reason behind a user's negative tag is fine for them, knowing that those users will never get their tags removed and got their account ruined while also trying to enroll more in order to get their cheap advertisement done at the cost of those accounts' ruination is truly unacceptable and should be stopped because some good members may fall for this, at most for the reason of any specific IRL emergency or whatever reasons. Pity for them who join such campaigns.

Anyways, I don't think there's any reassessment needed for busted accounts as well as spammers and scammers because even if trusted and given another chance, the greed in them so provoke them to continue committing the same "mistakes" they've done so far. I believe that those who got active recently, got their email or password changed immediately after that should be scrutinized and checked because many of such accounts were found guilty as bought accounts in order to participate in signature campaigns (or if an account is bought that has green trust, it can be much more dangerous to the community).

Lol why won't someone with an intact mind buy BCW's premium and give that a shot while making hell lot of money, but instead go for your ^finicial^ advices?

I believe there are enough big names in crypto whom I follow, and they don't charge a penny while serving their users completely for free. Instead of taking your advice, I'd give you a free tip here - simply start following some good names like D Man, Sumit Kapoor, Harshawardhan, etc. and you won't need to "ask people here" in order to get money for your so-called predictions with which you'll trade on them with it, that you'll lose later.

Mate, I've already clarified that it's a question based on a thought and what would happen when such connections are found? I believe you're correct in your findings, which is why I didn't point fingers on that at all. But still, how will "user A" prove his innocence without any evidence if such a scenario takes place where "user B" takes advantage of "user A's" personal use of a telegram chat without "user A" knowing anything about what's happening behind his back? I've only taken telegram here because it's a place where many of us hang out and even talk, but facebook isn't something where even if "user A" joins, "user B" would use it as bounties need advertisement in the form of posts and not likes alone I guess.

I have a question bitbollo (I'm clearly not taking anyone's side TBH, but just something that came out of my mind to ask you and it was truly not invincible's dirty case what I'm going to ask you about).

If for instance,  (as invincible said, so this came to my mind that what would happen when) user A has joined a telegram for his own convenience to learn more about a project of which a bounty is going on here at Bitcointalk but he is unaware of it, then user B who is an ultimate spammer and bounty cheater, goes beyond limits to check thoroughly whether user A (a specific target of user B) has joined that bounty or not (here, I'm taking an example of a single user A only), and if not, user B uses his telegram username in the bounty to cheat them but user A remains unaware of it, what will happen? I repeat, this is not invincible's case but could happen with any user(s) who remain unaware of the fact that their data is being misused for these cheaters' sole monetary benefits.

I'm amazed to see this huge farm, some with 99+ accounts (nice bust guys), some with over 500 (IIRC), and most of them got caught due to bounties. It's ridiculous how people try to cheat these campaigns, and when new campaigns stop taking place, they start complaining when it's their fault only that they cheated.

Volatility would have to fall?
How can BTC even move a cent without volatility?
And how will BTC reach there without enough volatile action?
They think BTC will be $146k straight without a correction? And once it reaches there, won't there be a possibility of a crash due to being so high in price? Volatility is the beauty of crypto trading and investors love it because they get to earn money from both the sides. So, if BTC stabilizes at any point, then the sporting spirit and joy that every investor have in their hearts will fly away.

Solana has been breaking records while having so many IDOs taking place on its ecosystem and NFTs being one of the major sectors with which those projects are associated. Just like every other Blockchain's IDO that needs its own specific coin to go ahead and participate, IDOs on Solana Blockchain also need SOL tokens to participate and buy other project's tokens. Investors are also hyperbullish on Solana as they believe it can replace BNB and take the number 3 spot very soon during this bull run (due to which BNB investors are also trying to boom BNB to give a harsh competition and take it to a new ATH everyday while BTC and ETH are struggling to move).

I take your words about his loyalties and him being useful to Binance. But does that make any change if Binance is the culprit itself? Have you seen unusual behavior during trading at Binance? I've seen it many times. There were unusual highly quick crashes I don't believe any whale would be behind it but the exchange itself because such wicks took place on Binance alone. And if this guy comes with an expertise in money laundering section too, I believe that his contacts and sense of humor will be enough to trace at least some culprits through evidences he may have already found earlier but are also linking to Binance.

This issue isn't going to be resolved anytime soon because governments have given full control to oil companies to decide the prices as well as they also add additional VATs and taxes which are killing the hopes of a common man regarding any nearing signs towards fall in petrol and diesel prices.


We pay around Rs.108 ($1.46) per liter for petrol and Rs.98/Ltr. ($1.32) for diesel. Electricity prices are increasing due to the mass adoption of electric vehicles that are replacing petrol and diesel oriented vehicles, but due to this, we are going to see a huge boost in the price of electricity too as when we pay Rs.20 per 20 liter bottle of R.O. purified water and the same is paid for a 1 liter Bisleri water bottle with added minerals, then I don't think they will leave electricity behind and will even slap huge bills on our face on the name of "loss recovery that are caused due to pandemic".

My view is still the same old option that we need to sell at least part (if not full) of our BTC because nobody knows what may happen this December. And crashes don't take place in December but the retests take place in January, and the trend tends to go bearish, then the market crashes. This time, it may be different but for a healthy growth of our parent cryptocurrency, we must see a correction and a retest of $52k and even $42k once BTC breaks its ATH in December. BTC is not yet done with its run but will definitely see a downside move in January (history will repeat again this time).

It isn't something that can be commented on TBH because what lies in the future can't be told as nobody knows it. If this officer proves to be proficient to Binance, then he'll definitely roll out things that will save Binance from the legal matters they are facing ATM. Though, if he still "remains an IRS Agent" by heart, then the story will be different and he may become a destroyer of Binance's business too as the proverb goes - "A small leak will sink a great ship".

Exactly going to be my point here.
I mean, how can someone even adjoin two completely different matters into one subject? How can segwit or taproot become the reason for a major price change when both of them doesn't even belong to the genre of speculation and are rather more technically connected? Something that reduces the size or cost of a transaction is only helping users to transact in a much efficient and cost-effective ways, so there isn't anything that connects it to price speculations.

Scammers have found various ways like creating new accounts at telegram with the name of projects that are going to launch, and send messages immediately at the time of launch with a contract address inside. If someone who has not read the official Ann channel or didn't even go to their official chat, immediately copies the contract address of that message (without even realising that it was a message and not an Announcement channel), and buys the coins from that contract, is left no choice but to forget about his money because the scammer not only takes his (the victim's) coins but as he's the one with almost 100% liquidity, immediately dumps the coin's value and takes away all the money. Be careful and highly aware while going to telegram and reading such messages because it takes only one decision for you to become a scammer's next big fish.

After reaching an ATH of ~$50 in May, 2021 and a decline to $10 in July, DOT managed to get back up and running towards a new ATH and it crossed the $55 mark till now. But while seeing many shit projects making even 100x, I believe that DOT has a chance to make at least 10x of that $10 decline and continue its parabolic run until it reaches $100 based on the recent PolkaDOT Parachain (Slot) Auctions being conducted. Below is the weekly chart posted which looks like an amazing opportunity in this coin and can give great returns during these two months. I'm parabullish (parabolic-ally bullish) on DOT, what are your thoughts?

I guess not. Because if they add Blockchain to CBDCs, there opens an opportunity for people to try and hide their transactions if any loophole is found by them.


True, because people need food to live, the same way they need something new in terms of news to learn about what's going on in the world. So even if these are not cryptocurrencies, they're still being advertised as the same.


According to my belief, people will be entrusted to believe that these are cryptocurrencies while they won't be, because there won't be any cryptography involved if I'm not wrong as all they're planning to make is an e-wallet with their country based currency which you won't be able to send outside your country (remit in simple words) to people in other countries so not to evade the fees that are chargeable, i.e.; sending fees, forex fees, etc.

Extremely happy to get some free MLT tokens at joining.
I'd like to know whether the KYC checking process has begun or is it scheduled for some time later? I've already applied for the same because of the benefits that we are getting to buy MLT tokens cheaper. I'm somewhat confused that even after being whitelisted, why can't I purchase the tokens and it still asks me to register for the whitelist? As well, will MLT wallet be a custodial one?

Don't believe too much on your predictions as they may hurt.
I'd never say what you said for ETH, because there are many things to note which stop ETH from going high:

• Centralised cryptocurrency
  ETH can never fly high like BTC as it is being run by a person who governs everything in it and there is no governance in the hands of people.
• Extremely high fees
  Its fees are highly unmatched with almost any crypto (/s) and paying such high fees to get our money sent to exchanges like uniswap, for not missing the buying opportunity in an IDO or even a token that's listed there, is not something I'd like to do at any cost.
• Scalability issues
  Even after sending it with high fees, are you rest assured that your transaction will go through? And even if it does, what's the guarantee that it'll be instant after paying enough?

@finaleshot, you're true that we must be very much thankful to this forum for giving us all types of opportunities like campaign participation as well as management jobs, moderation jobs for various projects available, art related jobs, writing jobs, contests as well as other different sort of jobs that don't even relate to crypto. I believe that if we keep our eyes open, we don't need to go anywhere out of this forum to find anything as this has now become a home to many.