--snip--
Trying to recover your losses is easily the most addictive form of gambling and it leads to the house earning consistently and the player losing consistently majority of the time.
But while gambling, if I decide not to spend over $10-$20 per session and if I lose during that session, I won't gamble for a few days, a week or a month (depends on each gambler's choice), then I believe I'm far away from addiction and would never commit any mistakes that a highly addicted gambler would do once he loses his mind after losing in gambling. |
|
|
|
But in slot games it takes a long time in the game to find big multipliers and jackpots, but sometimes there are people who only briefly even once in a round but what I experienced it took a long time in slots to win big. But still, we have to give the session how much time it has to spend so that it can be controlled and don't forget so that this can cause your financial chaos. It is true that I also prefer soccer in betting only once and waiting for the results is quite simple.  Recoveries are highly possible and way easier in sportsbetting and games we know better like BlackJack, Roulette, Poker, etc. than in slots because let's say that after 1000 spins, if I remain under a loss then what's the point of playing it. I don't remember when I last played slots TBH because I have already clarified that I don't like losing more and only play games which have higher probabilities of recovering losses. |
|
|
|
well a Buck or 2 per roll in slot is already a Big amount of bet mate, because imagine how many roll you will have in your entire playing time and how much money you will at least win or lose?
--snip--
I never spinned more than 10-20 times during a session so to keep myself controlled and not to lose a lot. I won a very few times in slots which is why it's not my preferential gambling type and I rather go for sportsbetting and other casino games where chances of winning are way higher than slots. I believe slots need a lot of luck in order to make us win big, and sometimes even a jackpot.  |
|
|
|
+ But first, may I know some more details about this? Thanks for the opportunity. |
|
|
|
|
@OP, if it becomes possible, the happiest person on Earth will be me because of an opportunity to open a long position from very lower support level but that's not going to happen. I think that max BTC can fall is till $20k (least chances but possible) and when we get BTC so cheap, it's a steal deal for everyone of us to get on the train before we miss it again.
|
|
|
|
A good control i must say but comparing it to my behavior then i do still proceed in spite of the consecutive loss no matter what game im engaging on but luckily i do able to stop completely when
my allocated budget for gambling is already out and never intend to go past beyond that limit because im not really that rich enough to spend more. By understanding my calculation, you may have understood that for a specific day when I gamble on slots (I don't do slots gambling too often), I have a fixed $10 budget and I hardly cross it when I've got funds in spare and I can play more. I mostly use the remaining funds in sportsbetting or live casino games like BlackJack where my luck works like a charm as I also have good knowledge about it. But slots don't require any skills, just pure luck. Mostly with slot betting base bet then i cant afford $1-2 per roll so i do stick out on the minimum.
Even I used to do the same way by betting just 5-10 cents but then, after seeing that the wins aren't worth it, I thought that I'd keep my bet sizes higher (but without any changes in any of the bets ahead) and the number of bets fixed to 10, no more, no less. |
|
|
|
20k is a bearish prediction for the end of the bear market if it comes to it. Price usually touches somewhere around the last ATH, so for us to go to 20 thousand we'd need many months of bear and before that we'd need a 50% drop followed by a dead cat bounce so something like your 36000 followed by a recovery back to 50 and a deeper drop to 30? If you see something like that we won't go to 100 thousand before 2023  And I do believe you won't see a $100k BTC so soon because it's not about you and me, it's about those who are actually manipulating the markets. I didn't know there were so many negative investors lurking around.
Also, meme tokens are worthless shit popular only because it's a next trendy thing.
It's so funny when we lose like 20% from ATH and people start talking about rock bottom. You should know better after so many cycles.
Lol, things have never been the same after all, man. Everything in crypto has changed like hell, one day you see BTC touching an ATH, the other day it drops down 20%? Remember those old days? You better be. I'm not a negative person (nor bearish at all) but I'm just saying what I'm witnessing. Do you believe the manipulators of the markets will let BTC get over $100k so soon? Think at least a hundred more times because Elon Musk is one such personality, who, when starts talking shit about BTC, BTC becomes shit and the value of that shit drops down so quickly as if he flushed it. He's got enough manipulative powers so to play games in crypto. Do you think he didn't take advantage of his powers and didn't short BTC from the very top so to surprise everyone after saying that they are not going to accept BTC payments anymore? Meme tokens were just an example of how to create fear in a community (and I gave that example just because it's a perfect example for all those community-driven coin holders so to make them understand that they must not invest in those shitcoins which can be worth 0 one day soon). And you thought I was talking about rock bottom after losing 20% from ATH? Let the weekends speak, mate. I eagerly want that guy to get scrutinized by SEC soon and get lodged a lawsuit against him too. |
|
|
|
So. Elon Musk dumped BTC?
lol, that man is a hustler.
we don't need him. buy the dip.
Mark my words here mate, Elon Musk is doing no good to crypto because when he dumps BTC markets with his shady tricks, it's not just thousands but billions of dollars get liquidated. He's literally not good for crypto as he's making crypto look bad in the eyes of officials and regulatory bodies which, if start banning BTC, will definitely not listen to any of us just because of that one guy. 😔😐 |
|
|
|
--snip--
Having that inside you the chance is better and there's always room for improving your opportunities each time you play.
Whenever I used to play slots, I tried to keep my bet sizes very low (not in cents, but not more than a buck or two) and rolled it. If I lost like 10 bets, I left the slot and got back to sportsbetting to recover that loss and if I lost $5 there (which is my base bet for sportsbetting), I stopped there and took out all the funds so to control myself and didn't play again that day. I simply wait for the right time and mood so not to take any wrong decisions due to bad mood. |
|
|
|
|
The fact is that even the player doesn't really know how much was the exact loss if he doesn't keep track of the session he's playing because he's too much lost in the game itself. I hope that the winner didn't lose much and won huge profits out of this win. I remember Bitinity posting about one of his wins where he played 4 "buy a feature" games out of which one was a big win, so it happens sometimes that you might get lucky and won't need to play too long to win a higher amount.
|
|
|
|
I might be late in this thread but it is just a common idea that any government would prohibit companies and businesses that lets people be anonymous with their transactions. US government is only concerned that they cannot track people with huge profit from cryptocurrencies especially if they use tons of mixers for their holdings and transactions. Hence, if a country is developing laws and regulations with cryptocurrencies and its holders/users, then it is a clear no doubt that mixing can gain a little spotlight on the way.
TBH, mixing can only be helpful for treasurers who love to hodl their BTC for a very, very long time no matter the price, but they don't want other people to know/trace their transactions to their fresh addresses where they want to hodl their coins. Or it can be helpful to those who want to hide their money from their government. No doubt it can also be helpful to other dark deeds committing people which I won't like to discuss, but I believe they will hardly keep any money in BTC because its value gains and drops a lot and their deals can't wait for such gains to recover their losses. The fact is, a person needs to know and understand how much private is normalcy and how much private is too much private for them. If privacy means everything for someone, there's no doubt they won't give a damn to the transaction fees (paid to miners) and would still use mixers to privatize their funds, but if they simply want to abide by their jurisdiction, then they may not go with this and will simply keep doing what they had been doing before. |
|
|
|
|
My target 1 is of $42k and target 2 is at $36k, after which if the fall continues like a freefall, then it may reach $20k as predicted by one of my friends and that's just because the liquidity being eaten up by the selling pressure that caught fire through a spark by Elon Musk and Tesla. And not just that, even ETH saw a huge dip not just following BTC alone but for the fact that Vitalik dumped all of his SHIB tokens (50% of total SHIB tokens supply was gifted to Vitalik) which made the price fell down to under half of its high. So I believe that the traders are in huge fear that if he'd do that with all the meme coins (I believe he was also involved in AKITA and PIG), then what if he comes up with all his ETH and starts dumping on the markets? What will be its impact? I know he's not stupid to do that, but that what everyone may be thinking right now.
|
|
|
|
Username: Stedsm Current amount of posts: 3895 BTC Address (must be SegWit): bc1qtptadathchmmtynzd6t80ml4646986hzsj20v7 Hope I'm not late this time. |
|
|
|
--snip--
Wait, you got ETH at Binance or Metamask? Because as the image shows, the ETH must be in Metamask I guess because as it's not showing you your ETH balance from Binance, it means it's trying to fetch your ETH balance from Metamask. |
|
|
|
|
I've been following this project and can see that their current marketcap is just $58M which is very less compared to many shitcoins (one even reaching a few billion dollars marketcap). I think $BLES (BlindBoxes) have great potential for a rise in price as they even have their own staking portal available with very huge APR. Do you know anything about this project? Please share.
|
|
|
|
It has been said that this has become Roobet's policy which is part of the law, so the implementation of KYC may be necessary.
I'm sure roobet gamblers will win a big multiplier and then after that they will withdraw now will the drawer do KYC? of course with big money they will do anything for me it's safe if roobet hides the user's identity safely for me this is nothing wrong roobet will definitely do its best
That will be their business because no one knows in the future whether the popular crypto gambling site will be the same as roobet because of the existing regulations?
That's the problem that even highly reputed casinos face whenever they start asking their customers for KYC as customers start thinking that the site is not interested in paying him and is doing everything against him to stop him, but that's not the case with every site out there. There are some decent websites which even try to hide each of their customer's personal identity but what can even they do when the pressure is too high from the higher authorities? |
|
|
|
Your Metamask is set to testnet but not mainnet? I guess you should check a few details and verify: Network Name: Smart Chain
New RPC URL: https://bsc-dataseed.binance.org/
ChainID: 56
Symbol: BNB
Block Explorer URL: https://bscscan.com Let me know if the above details are correctly implemented in your Metamask while adding BSC network in it. |
|
|
|
I don't understand how and why stake still comes up with Multiple account accusations when countless people have them too . They admit it here, in stake chat and so on and so on, even in the forum .
If a gambler is suspected of having multi-accounts, he may be asked for KYC or be given another alternative by the team to recover their main account (the one in use) in case the gambler has not abused any types of freebies, promos, etc. So if a gambler is in problem related to a specific site and comes here or takes it to their chat, doesn't mean the site is guilty of anything. The gambler feels worried and no doubt he'll try his best to recover his account because it has his funds in it. Would you suggest any other ways than to connect with the team through all the means available? |
|
|
|
|
The fact is, nobody's a sheep in crypto. If you've got a lot of patience to hodl your crypto no matter what happens to its price just because you "only put money that you can afford to lose", then I guess there's absolutely no perfect time nor perfect entry, and every entry is perfect and valid. Though, I'd suggest you should wait for a dip rather than buying the top.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
