TRUE anonimity and not cloned tech.
mpool didnt impress either. default nomp.
You want tru, complete & 100% anonymity why? Are you a drug dealing money laundering dope smoking degenerate of life or something? Or just looking for negative attention from strangers on the internet due to your horrible & gross lack of social skills? That's what I used to think then I realized its about your rights to privacy and freedom from anyone knowing your wealth etc.. I would use an anon coins no questions asked now I get it. This tech look amazing! Well.. eheemm.. NEWS FLASH, no one would know REGARDLESS unless you posted your wallet address with your SSI # and your full name.. too much tin-foil hat annonomus BS these days.. more than likely all provicated by paranoia, potentially from drug use. True, although some added layers of anonymity is a nice added feature for those worried about it. I like the dynamic interest myself, that is original and the only innovation I have seen with all the POS coins coming out. Adding the other stuff just gets VRC more attention, but it was undervalued as it was. |
|
|
|
It is amazing how disgusting some people are, but what is even more amazing is that this person was dumb enough to think that he was going to fool anybody? I'm not too surprised at the desperation though, considering how badly XC is dying right now.. The best thing that we can all do is correct the misinformation, as was already done, and then just let it go. Fight the trolls with simple facts, not strife, and they quickly run out of fuel. Otherwise, we just prolong the negativity. Yes, that is all people are looking for, the facts. The rest is a distraction at best. |
|
|
|
The bounty for the logo is now 200XC
a Logo design in 99design website is 299 Dollars: http://99designs.com/launchI would give the 200 plus XCs to them rather than Amateours if nothing good is found and it seems you can organize contests there Why we just do not move the Contest in that website so? and we can give exposure to the contest to more designers that hopefully are professional as well? What do you think? We need a full identity package not just a logo. Something that is put together as a whole and not piecemeal. I am sorry but you are not going ot get that with a contest nor do I think we will get that from 99design. I work with people who do this on a daily basis and have the means to deliver what we need. I have extended an offer to the dev to have this done at no cost to the community or the dev and am awaiting his reply. I agree on this also would be nice to hear from ATC and the community maybe they can enter the contest for the logo as a start? I have a friend as well that I contacted but he is not into crypto and busy as shit Dude the devs aren't open to a name change, I've been trying to push this idea. 'that other coin' name changed FROM our one currently, and fucking did very well. Like seriously XClouds sounds damn good, its marketable, easily design able, and revolves around the idea of decentralization and mesh networking. Also you could have a motto on the coin/logo that said 'XClouds ... Transfer Anonymous' to hit BOTH key points of the coin. Nah yo fuck that, well call it two letters, xc like what? No disrespect I'm sure the developers have a grasp on the situation but I mean come on. +1 it s not good that we cannot discuss a namechange openly. there might be a lot work to do but without identity who knows what u are workin on? xcloud is pretty cool if it wasn t taken already. X cloud sounds retarded. And the dev team makes executive decisions not the community. XC name was already decided, so stop bringing it up and move on Look just as you are entitled to your asinine opinion, as is everyone else, which is why having a community vote for anew name is a good idea. In a way you're right, the developers should issue executive orders for issues relative to the technology and infrastructure. But simple things such as the name and logo should be left to the hands of the community, as these common people are the ones putting money into the coin in the first place. And these same people are the ones that are would be investors. those aren't simple things, as i remember the community already decided for xc but i don't know how big that vote was, i think it sounds cool and doesn't limit itself to a specific feature, perhaps working anon is just the beginning so it should be neutral name wise, i think names like dark or black are a mistake, even positiv brands like liberty limit you in your ability to grow in the future. as stated befor , xc is sexy One thing to keep in mind is if something is insanely successful, as XC is (it is compared to most), don't mess with the branding more than you need to. Obviously they/we need a new logo, and that is underway. The tech is being advanced. Changing the name is rolling a lot of dice for no reason at all. If your coin is ranked #97, think about a name change, sure, otherwise, don't screw it up. "Xcloud" sounds awful. XC/X11coin/Xcoin - Obvious tie in with the original Darkcoin name, leave it as is. FYI: I was debating people that wanted to change the name "Darkcoin" in the past. So it could lose all momentum and be forgotten. Good thing Evan didn't listen to the bad ideas. |
|
|
|
Why do you have X11 algo in the OP, it's scrypt!!!
lol... |
|
|
|
|
Derek Zoolander: Well I guess it all started the first time I went through the second grade. I caught my reflection in a spoon while I was eating my cereal, and I remember thinking "wow, you're ridiculously good looking, maybe you could do that for a career."
Matilda: Do what for a career?
Derek Zoolander: Be professionally good looking.
|
|
|
|
|
Zoolander is my favorite comedy movie of all time. Where are the pools? lol..
|
|
|
|
Price hasn't been boring like this loong time... no fireworks, no nothing ? What's up with the bet  ? I guess all the power is at DRK now... It took months for DRK to get where it is. Really, just look at where XC is in weeks. Impressive is an understatement! Additionally, the FUD on all sides is annoying, to put it mildly, and I actually own DRK and XC as they have the most potential right now. DRK will either be even more successful and eventually people will be too afraid of the price, and XC will be a great choice, or DRK falls some and XC is a great choice. Easy for me to diversify in the best coins out there since that is always what I do. FYI: Cryptonote clones are not even in the race as anyone can clone another one, and "Bytecoin" will never win anything. |
|
|
|
i put my rigs here, but dont know what to say... people now leaving pools, hashrates lower than few hours ago... that something mean.
It means "Darkcoin." I don't know, I like this coin for some reason. Going to mine it... |
|
|
|
 Some other logo... I like that a lot. |
|
|
|
Hello people, So i started an xnode via the batch file for main net on a wallet with 1500 coins.. its synced and just sitting there. I didn't expect much action. Anyways i remember the sendfrommixer command so i was going to try some sample mixes. first issue, the wallet created like 5 addresses, so i chose to send from the first, vanity gen'd up a receiver address so i can verify in the blockchain its anon and import the key after to make sure it came back to me  anyways it says code 6 insufficient funds. does the xnode use more than 1000 coins if they are available to it? label the address and use "sendfrommixer" <label> <receiving address> <amount> I believe they do not want you to specify your address for a reason. thanks, sent fine, 5xc broke up into 6 transactions, theyre unconfirmed (4 of 6) i cant check them because the blockchain explorer isnt correct yet. I imported my private key for the other address and am waiting for them to arrive (did rescan / reindex) On my test it appeared that the transfer did not show on the other end until it confirmed from the sending end. Not sure is it will stay this way atcsecure will have to let us know. It kind of makes sense to me though as the node should probably not send it on until it knows for sure the transfer is good. Maybe I ma wrong but I believe that is what is happening. I cannot believe this is still only at 0.002 that is just crazy in my opinion. We have anonymous transfer with Xnode tech which is easy to setup for anyone. This is an amazing amount of progress in a very short time. Holding myself, and I am going to set up my own node later. (Once everything is perfect) I think this coin will do very well. The low price is just a good entry point for people that want to make a lot of profit, so in one way, that is better than being near the top with a long ways down to fall. |
|
|
|
Just want to confirm that the xnodes seem to be working as expected. I have sent a transaction from one wallet to another through the xnodes and in reviewing the transaction on either end cannot see the sending or receiving address. The block explorer is still down and when it gets back I will check it out further with it.
One thing I noticed is the normal fee is added to the sending transaction. The anon fee which is 0.00001 is then subtracted from the amount sent. So the receiver gets the amount sent - 0.00001. Might we want to have this fee included in the amount so the receiving end gets the full amount sent?
I know the above is a very small concern. The key is the nodes are running and my trans action went through without a hitch. I know Atcsecure is going to give us more info tomorrow but thought this was great news and should be shared.
Great work by the dev!
edit: This was on the live network, with real funds, sent to and from non xnode wallets
Nice! |
|
|
|
My analogy - and in no way am I comparing these two. Because they are simply chalk and cheese.
But it is from time spent on BC months ago. I had never before seen so much B.S. control over a forum/Irc/reddit
"The people only know what you tell them" rule is all BC turned into.
So its all FAKE, and manicured B.S.
XC is going great atm. No need to get all privatised lol.
Sure we get the occasional troll, but that's cool, this is what makes the crypto world turn as in the real world.
Its how you deal with them that's the issue.
Screaming Troll, Or having a controlled forum, is just avoiding the problem.
You need to simply set them straight with the truth. They simply make themselves look stupid for you with a little diplomacy.
I agree. Don't try too hard. All that matters are results. |
|
|
|
Both XC and DARK should do well, despite the idiotic impact their partisan trolls are having in driving potential buyers away.
We need a couple anonymity coins using different methods. We don't want all our eggs in one basket if/when some vulnerability appears. So consumers, businesses and so forth should welcome the competition and support all serious anonymity coins. No FUD, just duke it out competitively and may the best coins win.
Well said. The FUD really hurts both coins in the end. It drives away new people and creates blowback. |
|
|
|
|
Darkcoin has a great name and logo. The downside to Darkcoin, slightly, is the name itself, as is bit scary for some. As it is for the Darknet it really doesn't matter much though, and I think it has great branding. The DRK master nodes are a great idea as well but will require networking experts only, or they will be hacked as we have already seen. I am confident Evan and his new team will be successful in time with the tech and get everything working smoothly. Instamine for DRK, or XC using some temp code, whatever, the end results for each coin are what counts most.
The advantage XC could have is if the Xnodes end up more user friendly or more secure. If they do, and everyone can run an Xnode, that could increase demand and scarcity for XC. Certainly most can't afford to run a Darknode and most lack the skill, so to me this could increase the popularity of XC. XC does has an innovative coder that *is* making something entirely new. (using existing tech in innovative ways) The next phase being tested now is what will matter. Not the mixer that isn't that special obviously. (isn't that special for DRK either, without everything else)
Dark has a big lead, but also a very inflated market cap. It has farther to fall it something goes really wrong. XC *potentially* could gain more if it ends up with a comparable or superior solution. Is Evan a better coder than Dan? Is Dan more creative? Who knows... Dan has 20 years experience and seems fully capable though. I have worked with small teams of creative techs, and underestimating his abilities is likely an error some are making. Evan has a had a lot of time to polish things up and make it not as sloppy as it was when it started. Besides, if Dan wasn't for real he would have already given up. He doesn't seem to be giving up at all.
Anyway, Darkcoin already sort of won, so, more a matter of if XC will win as well.
|
|
|
|
"REV2 will have a solution to the bad actor problem. Using a dynamic learning trust system"
Create Xnode - steal coins.
Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode
steal coins.
Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode
Rinse, repeat.
Cant wait to get started.
Lol, good luck with your uber hax skillz /facepalm Can someone explain if that is a potential risk? I know it's probably FUD, but it seems somewhat "logic", anyone to explain? He wants people to sell XC and buy DRK, read his previous posts. XC and DRK are the two strongest anon Alts. XC appears to be developing tech very quickly however. Oh, someone already stole 1000 DRK, so people should not be throwing stones. There is no risk, the trust system is designed to prevent this and other potential attack vectors Isnt the point of this crypto to be "trustless" - not trust...the minute you place trust in an entity - the decentralization aspect of the coin diminishes. Decentralized, you would trust in the code, like Bitcoin. (my understanding of it anyway) |
|
|
|
"REV2 will have a solution to the bad actor problem. Using a dynamic learning trust system"
Create Xnode - steal coins.
Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode
steal coins.
Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode
Rinse, repeat.
Cant wait to get started.
Lol, good luck with your uber hax skillz /facepalm Can someone explain if that is a potential risk? I know it's probably FUD, but it seems somewhat "logic", anyone to explain? He wants people to sell XC and buy DRK, read his previous posts. XC and DRK are the two strongest anon Alts. XC appears to be developing tech very quickly however. Oh, someone already stole 1000 DRK, so people should not be throwing stones. There is no risk, the trust system is designed to prevent this and other potential attack vectors That is great, thanks for the information. |
|
|
|
"REV2 will have a solution to the bad actor problem. Using a dynamic learning trust system"
Create Xnode - steal coins.
Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode
steal coins.
Shutdown Xnode - Move Coins to new Xnode
Rinse, repeat.
Cant wait to get started.
Lol, good luck with your uber hax skillz /facepalm Can someone explain if that is a potential risk? I know it's probably FUD, but it seems somewhat "logic", anyone to explain? He wants people to sell XC and buy DRK, read his previous posts. XC and DRK are the two strongest anon Alts. XC appears to be developing tech very quickly however. Oh, someone already stole 1000 DRK, so people should not be throwing stones. |
|
|
|
|
Updated the Mac wallet, just did the delete everything but wallet.dat deal, synched up fast and perfectly. Everything is working.
|
|
|
|
Hi guys.
Do you have some problems with deposits to Cryptsy and Mintpal ?
Mine are stuck for hours now.
Same. Price rise is due to people unable to dump their coins for a profit - I also have 360 coins that i'm waiting for over 2 hours now from wallet to mintpal - Why is it that whenever there is a big pump our transactions take HOURS longer than they otherwise would? I've noticed several times now that whenever there is a big pump the transactions take at least a couple of hours to confirm making it impossible for us little fish to sell. Smells mighty fishy. Either that, or maybe related to technology being implemented that will vastly increase the value? My coins are on an exchange, certainly not dumping them if they can pull this tech off. |
|
|
|
3.33% per year... I would imagine the reward for xnode would be per transaction - not per year. and if ur a good node doing lots of transactions u prob going to do more then your stakes 3.33% worth in transaction fee rewards
I imagine its way more, maybe even 20%. Otherwise why are Dark holders all begging to run a node and the ones that cant afford it are crying. If my nodes got 10,000 transactions per day with a fee of 0.0001 per transaction thats one bitcoin per day. Though I am basing that on around 20-30k XC so probably be way less for a 1k XC node. If running an Xnode is profitable it would also push up the price of XC as well as create good publicity for the coin since people around the world will be earning `Xnode` income and telling people about it, there has never been a stranger way to earn rewards in the world than running an Xnode. It will create a rush to buy XC and beat out Bitcoin  One obvious advantage, I think, is most of us are not networking experts - and I assume with Xnodes later we won't have the same requirements as DRK master nodes? If it is more accessible to run by non techs, then more people would run them. That takes a lot of coins out of the supply, fast, increasing scarcity. (Maybe Xnode is just as complex, not sure, but the impression I am getting is that it will be easier to run?) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
