[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[battbot]

XC will rise to $4 this week.

Ya, that is likely, possibly higher.  Once people start to test and review the anon wallet + xnodes and realize this is the real deal.  

[provenceday]

XC will rise to $4 this week.

no need to worry about the price if the technology is working.

[evtrmm]

Hello people,
So i started an xnode via the batch file for main net on a wallet with 1500 coins.. its synced and just sitting there. I didn't expect much action.  Anyways i remember the sendfrommixer command so i was going to try some sample mixes.  first issue, the wallet created like 5 addresses, so i chose to send from the first, vanity gen'd up a receiver address so i can verify in the blockchain its anon and import the key after to make sure it came back to me  anyways it says code 6 insufficient funds.
does the xnode use more than 1000 coins if they are available to it?

label the address and use
"sendfrommixer" <label> <receiving address> <amount>

I believe they do not want you to specify your address for a reason.

[almond]

XC will rise to $4 this week.

no need to worry about the price if the technology is working.

well if the price works, I'll stop fretting about the technology.....
....I would be happy with either a chicken or an egg..

[BADASS]

I would be happy to be above 300 in two days.

Their are a lot of people locked up atm, because price was pushed far too low.
They will mostly get out at 250, but they will come back in above 300, once they know the coast is clear.

Seriously this is the best tech coin out their and if your not on board yet, well, we know you will be back!
We've had a few kicks in the guts this week, you know who I mean, but look at all WE are achieving!

[Pizpie]

XC will rise to $4 this week.

no need to worry about the price if the technology is working.

well if the price works, I'll stop fretting about the technology.....
....I would be happy with either a chicken or an egg..

What about a machine that creates both?

[CryptoClub]

My analogy - and in no way am I comparing these two. Because they are simply chalk and cheese.
But it is from time spent on BC months ago. I had never before seen so much B.S. control over a forum/Irc/reddit
"The people only know what you tell them" rule is all BC turned into.

So its all FAKE, and manicured B.S.

XC is going great atm. No need to get all privatised lol.
Sure we get the occasional troll, but that's cool, this is what makes the crypto world turn as in the real world.
Its how you deal with them that's the issue.
Screaming Troll, Or having a controlled forum, is just avoiding the problem.
You need to simply set them straight with the truth. They simply make themselves look stupid for you with a little diplomacy.

I agree. Don't try too hard. All that matters are results.

[Thrash]

Just want to confirm that the xnodes seem to be working as expected. I have sent a transaction from one wallet to another through the xnodes and in reviewing the transaction on either end cannot see the sending or receiving address. The block explorer is still down and when it gets back I will check it out further with it.

One thing I noticed is the normal fee is added to the sending transaction. The anon fee which is 0.00001 is then subtracted from the amount sent. So the receiver gets the amount sent - 0.00001. Might we want to have this fee included in the amount so the receiving end gets the full amount sent?

I know the above is a very small concern. The key is the nodes are running and my trans action went through without a hitch. I know Atcsecure is going to give us more info tomorrow but thought this was great news and should be shared.

Great work by the dev!


edit: This was on the live network, with real funds, sent to and from non xnode wallets

[CryptoClub]

Just want to confirm that the xnodes seem to be working as expected. I have sent a transaction from one wallet to another through the xnodes and in reviewing the transaction on either end cannot see the sending or receiving address. The block explorer is still down and when it gets back I will check it out further with it.

One thing I noticed is the normal fee is added to the sending transaction. The anon fee which is 0.00001 is then subtracted from the amount sent. So the receiver gets the amount sent - 0.00001. Might we want to have this fee included in the amount so the receiving end gets the full amount sent?

I know the above is a very small concern. The key is the nodes are running and my trans action went through without a hitch. I know Atcsecure is going to give us more info tomorrow but thought this was great news and should be shared.

Great work by the dev!


edit: This was on the live network, with real funds, sent to and from non xnode wallets

Nice!

[jasemoney]

Hello people,
So i started an xnode via the batch file for main net on a wallet with 1500 coins.. its synced and just sitting there. I didn't expect much action.  Anyways i remember the sendfrommixer command so i was going to try some sample mixes.  first issue, the wallet created like 5 addresses, so i chose to send from the first, vanity gen'd up a receiver address so i can verify in the blockchain its anon and import the key after to make sure it came back to me  anyways it says code 6 insufficient funds.
does the xnode use more than 1000 coins if they are available to it?

label the address and use
"sendfrommixer" <label> <receiving address> <amount>

I believe they do not want you to specify your address for a reason.

thanks, sent fine, 5xc broke up into 6 transactions, theyre unconfirmed (4 of 6) i cant check them because the blockchain explorer isnt correct yet.  I imported my private key for the other address and am waiting for them to arrive (did rescan / reindex)

[Thrash]

Hello people,
So i started an xnode via the batch file for main net on a wallet with 1500 coins.. its synced and just sitting there. I didn't expect much action.  Anyways i remember the sendfrommixer command so i was going to try some sample mixes.  first issue, the wallet created like 5 addresses, so i chose to send from the first, vanity gen'd up a receiver address so i can verify in the blockchain its anon and import the key after to make sure it came back to me  anyways it says code 6 insufficient funds.
does the xnode use more than 1000 coins if they are available to it?

label the address and use
"sendfrommixer" <label> <receiving address> <amount>

I believe they do not want you to specify your address for a reason.

thanks, sent fine, 5xc broke up into 6 transactions, theyre unconfirmed (4 of 6) i cant check them because the blockchain explorer isnt correct yet.  I imported my private key for the other address and am waiting for them to arrive (did rescan / reindex)

On my test it appeared that the transfer did not show on the other end until it confirmed from the sending end. Not sure is it will stay this way atcsecure will have to let us know. It kind of makes sense to me though as the node should probably not send it on until it knows for sure the transfer is good. Maybe I ma wrong but I believe that is what is happening.

I cannot believe this is still only at 0.002 that is just crazy in my opinion. We have anonymous transfer with Xnode tech which is easy to setup for anyone. This is an amazing amount of progress in a very short time.

[battbot]

Just want to confirm that the xnodes seem to be working as expected. I have sent a transaction from one wallet to another through the xnodes and in reviewing the transaction on either end cannot see the sending or receiving address. The block explorer is still down and when it gets back I will check it out further with it.

One thing I noticed is the normal fee is added to the sending transaction. The anon fee which is 0.00001 is then subtracted from the amount sent. So the receiver gets the amount sent - 0.00001. Might we want to have this fee included in the amount so the receiving end gets the full amount sent?

I know the above is a very small concern. The key is the nodes are running and my trans action went through without a hitch. I know Atcsecure is going to give us more info tomorrow but thought this was great news and should be shared.

Great work by the dev!


edit: This was on the live network, with real funds, sent to and from non xnode wallets

Thanks Trash.

[BADASS]

Dam block explorer, get working already will ya!
 

[Thrash]

You can use gettransaction in the console and get the transaction details. I agree though I would like ot look at it in the block explorer.

The dev delivers again. 

[Pizpie]

You can use gettransaction in the console and get the transaction details. I agree though I would like ot look at it in the block explorer.

The dev delivers again. 

Thanks for taking a closer look and detailing your results!

-XC Community Mod.

[520Bit]

Somebody are absorbing XCs in Mintpal.

[7vpo]

Some other logo...

[KeyserSozeMC]

Hi guys I have received last transaction from mintpal in my wallet 27 minutes ago still 0 confirmation is this normal? before wasn't that slow...

Ok now it went on balance 3 confirmations out of 6 after 37 minutes... why so slow?

Yes - could someone address this pls - this will be improved , yes?

Well, that is the kind of product you get for 0.8 BTC. loljosh is also not known for providing top quallity.

It's obvious that you're a dude.
Also, it's obvious that you're in love with that loljosh guy. 90% of your messages contain the word "loljosh" lmao

[CryptoClub]

Hello people,
So i started an xnode via the batch file for main net on a wallet with 1500 coins.. its synced and just sitting there. I didn't expect much action.  Anyways i remember the sendfrommixer command so i was going to try some sample mixes.  first issue, the wallet created like 5 addresses, so i chose to send from the first, vanity gen'd up a receiver address so i can verify in the blockchain its anon and import the key after to make sure it came back to me  anyways it says code 6 insufficient funds.
does the xnode use more than 1000 coins if they are available to it?

label the address and use
"sendfrommixer" <label> <receiving address> <amount>

I believe they do not want you to specify your address for a reason.

thanks, sent fine, 5xc broke up into 6 transactions, theyre unconfirmed (4 of 6) i cant check them because the blockchain explorer isnt correct yet.  I imported my private key for the other address and am waiting for them to arrive (did rescan / reindex)

On my test it appeared that the transfer did not show on the other end until it confirmed from the sending end. Not sure is it will stay this way atcsecure will have to let us know. It kind of makes sense to me though as the node should probably not send it on until it knows for sure the transfer is good. Maybe I ma wrong but I believe that is what is happening.

I cannot believe this is still only at 0.002 that is just crazy in my opinion. We have anonymous transfer with Xnode tech which is easy to setup for anyone. This is an amazing amount of progress in a very short time.

Holding myself, and I am going to set up my own node later. (Once everything is perfect)

I think this coin will do very well. The low price is just a good entry point for people that want to make a lot of profit, so in one way, that is better than being near the top with a long ways down to fall.

[CryptoClub]

Some other logo...

I like that a lot.