I see you citing US code 241. What are you gonna do with that? Are you filing a criminal complaint in federal court? Using the same law book you think you can circumvent? What AUSA is going to approve your complaint ? Furthermore, that' code isn't even being used in the right context. Here's its intention and proper place for use https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3239&context=dljYou can't just pick a code/section that you think applies to a circumstance and say "see, there it is...that's law." There's so much more to it. Other conflicting sections, criminal definitions, case law, rules of criminal procedure. I can show you a state and federal law making it an offense to burn a flag. But, it cannot be charged or enforced. just because it's printed in black and white in a law book doesn't mean there aren't other factors at play. |
|
|
|
|
Good thing I'm not in Nuremberg.
And when I give you a lawful order as a police officer, I'm doing it as an agent of the state. Your "as a man" theory doesn't work. It may work just fine theoretically in your internet cult of secret legal words, but in real world legal practice, it does not.
|
|
|
|
|
I have 3 miners running in the garage. They are ducted from the exhaust and dump directly outside.
Now that outdoor temps are 50-60 during the day, 30-40F overnight, i unhooked the exhaust duct off one unit and turned it facing into the garage. Garage is now holding a steady 72°.
The garage footprint is about half the house, with all 4 bedrooms above the garage area. Unfortunately, I don't have forced air HVAC, so I can't really spread the heat throughout the house. But hoping the warmer garage will help overall house heating. With a "bleed-out" effect.
The garage is not temp controlled like the rest of the house (split level) and in the deep winter can get down to another 45-50°.
I currently have a houseguest living temporarily in the other half of the basement. If/when she moves out, I can open the interior garage door and basement door, and simply run a box fan to move the heat upstairs.
Another month or so, and temps may allow un-ducting of a second miner.
|
|
|
|
im still laughing
while BD thinks he has found a free money tree of invoicing cops, and suing judges by provoking a car stop by having no licence...
.. the reality is while BD is trying to waste courts time with his money grab the courts found him guilty of no licence and ordered him to pay a fine, with further penalty if the fine is not paid.
ok. so guess what.. karl lentz is not a milionaire from all the invoices and suits
BD definetly aint rich for the same
and BD especially has no first hand experience and is just trying to repeat scripts he heard from people who heard scripts from people who were just running scenarios out without truthful/full detail explanation
i am loving this comedy from BD.. and he still dont realise its comedy
A tree of money? No. Just simple trade. If you have a job somewhere, and the boss orders you to do anything, he pays you. It's the law. If a cop attempts to be your boss, and you obey, he must pay you. Why? Because he is another man giving you orders, and because the 13th Amendment says no involuntary servitude. Cops get away with all kinds of nasty doings these days, simply because people don't use the 13th Amendment and collect their pay from their cop-boss.  Qualified immunity. Look it up |
|
|
|
Go search for "Sovereign Citizens Getting Owned And Arrested" on Youtube. Imagine it's BADecker in every video.
Cop: license and registration please Driver: I'm not driving, I'm traveling in accordance with some maritime law from 8 centuries ago. Cop: (chuckle) (Cool, one of these). In radio- got another one, bring the window punch Cop: license and registration please. Driver: Hey man, is that an order? Cop: Yes. Driver: And since you gave an order as a man, here's your invoice for $500 (or State max that the cop would have charge) for stopping me from going from point A to point B. See you in court. Cop: Oh sure. But sign here (the ticket). Driver: By: Signature, agent, man.
IN COURT ANSWERING THE DA'S INDICTMENT: Driver: I, man, am present. I require to face my accuser (first call). Driver: I, man, am present. I require to face my accuser (second call). Driver: I, man, am present. I require to face my accuser (third call). (STATE-OF-XXXXX/CITY-OF-XXXXX doesn't come forward.) Driver: I require State/City $max for wasting my time, etc. Judge: Case dismissed. (Driver sues the State/City for false complaint.)
DRIVER SUES COP IN HIS CAPACITY AS A MAN FOR STOPPING HIM FOR NOTHING: Jon Doe (cop) is on the stand. Driver: When you stopped me, had I done any damage or harm to anyone. Cop: No. Driver: Pay me the $max for false stop. Judge: John Doe, guilty as charged. Pay the man. Thats frickin adorable..... Has this really ever worked for you? In my 18 years of experience in court, as either an affiant, prosecutor or witness.... this has never, ever, happened one single time. Several have tried, all have failed. |
|
|
|
Can't legally do that. Unless you falsify the shipping/import documents, they will charge you 27.6% since it was manufactured in China. Doesn't matter if it stops in Canada.
Thats what i was afraid of. |
|
|
|
Go search for "Sovereign Citizens Getting Owned And Arrested" on Youtube. Imagine it's BADecker in every video.
Cop: license and registration please Driver: I'm not driving, I'm traveling in accordance with some maritime law from 8 centuries ago. Cop: (chuckle) (Cool, one of these). In radio- got another one, bring the window punch |
|
|
|
|
I have 3 units on order, due to ship in the next 2 months. No idea whats gonna happen with tariff.
But I have a friend in Canada I just thought of. Maybe future orders i can have shipped to him in Canada to avoid tariffs, and then he can forward to me.
|
|
|
|
You have the right to travel on the public rights of way. You have the right to take your property with you as you travel on the public rights of way. If you take your car property with you as you travel on the public rights of way, you have that right without licensing, because it is a right. If you don't agree with them that you were driving, but rather, say that you were going from point A to point B with your property, you aren't using any of their legal styled words. You aren't doing what they say you are doing. If you haven't injured someone, there is no cause for them attacking you to take you to court or make you pay a fine. But... you have to take it to court when they attack you, unrepresented, requiring your accuser to show his injury that you did. This is standard law. But nobody who does it this way insistently maintains his innocence of injuring anyone. Rather, he is talked into accepting what Judge Judy says in whatever she says it. Or he is represented by an attorney, which makes him a ward of the court without the ability to officially say anything in court unless the judge lets him. Mr Decker, you can certainly choose to believe what you want to, and I'm not going to argue with you about your misled beliefs. Sir, carry on, do your thing. But to every other human reading the words he writes....... PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, do not believe his words at face value. YOU WILL END UP IN JAIL IF YOU BELIEVE THE STUFF HE WRITES. Do your own research please. |
|
|
|
well we aint gonna live in a zero tax world..
so what would you consider as things to spend funds on
but i do find it funny how people think offering free food = trapping people into some prison.
yea the school may offer a free sandwich but you can still give your kid pizza if you want
You say you agree, then try to justify it again and again. This program is not "helping the needy".... we already have those programs. This one is literally feeding every US human three meals a day during for 13 years. When only 20% of the people need help (which they already get). And I know I'm not going to get a lower tax bracket. The US loves penalizing those who strive to better themselves. But I would like to see an abatement or wasteful govt spending and useless expenses on our budget. This is one of them. Maybe I'm in a unique situation where I see the abuses of the welfare system on a daily basis. You cannot even begin to imagine how many people I see with new cars, $1000 cell phones, rolls of cash in their pockets, and a welfare ebt card in their wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Make it $50.
There's my problem. Some people are paying 10%.
I'm paying 32%.
And that's just of my income.
Then throw in maybe another 6k of property tax. Add this tax, that tax, etc.
Politicians keep wanting to add more and more welfare programs costing millions or billions. Never once do they consider MY welfare, or the tax inequality I suffer.
You may pay $2 towards that program, while I pay $6.
You are already taxing the ever living crap out of the people that make good money, but then complain that they make good money.
This is another unnecessary program. In the OP it states "1 in 5 children" are hungry or can't afford meals. That's 20% of the population. So now we're gonna introduce a bill to feed ALL children, 3 meals per day.
So if 80% of the population is being responsible enough to feed their own kids, you are essentially introducing a bill that is 80% wasteful and unneeded. For every $100 that goes into that program, $80 is wasted.
We already have school lunch programs for the poor.
|
|
|
|
|
It's quite apparent some who post legal info on here have never spent a day in the courtroom.
If you do all your legal studies on the internet, you'll learn the hard way.
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of complaining about the wealthy folks, who pay in most of the taxes, why don't you strive to be one of the wealthy ?
When it comes to my taxes, I hear all the time... it's only $2... 3... $6. But that adds up quick. It never ends. You guys keep taxing the crap out of me, and I receive such a smaller share of the tax benefits.
|
|
|
|
No. Just no. Implement policies that make it so that the children's parents can bloody well feed their children properly.
Dont breed them if you cant feed them. Feeding a child is the parent's responsibility.
what if.. what if parents have a child. the parents work and feel their job is secure..... but by the time the kid is born and then later reaches the age of say 4. the parents lose their job or a parent loses their lives affecting the families income. lets just pretend its just the lose the job scenario. are governments to then still refuse to feed the kids. and have the kids on a waiting list to be assessed and eventually when assessed as having parents that cant afford to feed the family. have the kids removed from the home and treated as criminal child abusers.. purely for losing their job or the $2 a meal that would have paid for the kids food, could then go towards job searching where the parent can concentrate on trying to better the families life knowing the kids are healthy oh and before bringing up the whole 'tax payer' crap no where no time no place will you ever see a government void peoples responsibility to pay taxes. there will never be a tax free country. so its better that tax money went towards peoples health and not corporations CEO wealth. id rather see a kid got fed and not some scumbag office worker buy a lambo because he is some pen pushing government employee that does nothing but watch porn on his office computer from 9-5 yep you may say you hate a socialist concept of tax. but your wrong. tax is a thing of all concepts including capitalist.. the thing you probably would hate/do hate if you sat and deeply thought about it. is you hate the capitalist use of the tax funds for corporate benefit not social benefit or are you on of them type of people that love pepsi more than another human Still, NO. Your kid is not my problem. If the school wants to discount that poor kids meal by 50%, sure, let the parent apply for the discounted meal. But what happens when you make the families dependent on the schools for feeding the kid? Now the school has to be open during summer vacation to feed kids? Increased wages and expenses for opening another 25% of the time? What happens when everyone becomes dependent on the government taking care of them? Why would anyone bother to better themselves, better their job, better their situation...When you can just sit around and collect handouts? You slowly make everyone a govt dependent, less people enter the workforce, less workers to pay taxes, raise the tax rate to counter the lower number of taxpayers. Eventually it becomes more beneficial to suck off the govt teat than to work. Tax revenue drops to a level insufficient to support all the handout programs. It all collapses, and we go back to where we were 300 years ago, fending for yourself with little to no govt services |
|
|
|
|
Dont breed them if you cant feed them. Feeding a child is the parent's responsibility. I can get behind some discounted meals for low-income families, but strongly disagree with the govt (tax payers) assuming the feeding cost of literally every child in America.
|
|
|
|
|
ATF changes rules all the time. Thats where this story ends up being almost comical. As someone who owns a lot of ATF governed toys, I laugh at their constant changes to definition on a whim.
I have solid core "green-tips". Remember they were almost banned by the ATF.
I have several AR pistols. Remember all the nonsense from the ATF over braces and "shouldering" them.
I have an AR pistol with a binary trigger. The epitome of exploiting an ATF definitions loophole.
They change definitions all the time. Guess they couldn't change one in time here for this case.
Surprised they didn't try.
What I really want them to do, is enforce existing laws on those who break them, rather than constantly making it harder for those who abide by the law to continue to do so.
|
|
|
|
Here's the reason they stopped the prosection of him: Federal authorities preferred to let Roh go free rather than have the ruling become final and potentially create case law that could have a crippling effect on the enforcement of gun laws.
Under US District Court Judge James V. Selna's interpretation of the law, convicted felons and other people prohibited from possessing firearms would be allowed to legally acquire all the parts necessary to assemble an AR-15-style rifle and other weapons
So yeah. Let one guy go free who isn't going to cause much more harm because he now knows that he is under constant surveillance -- instead of letting tons of people acquire parts who are convicts. Or... ATF could change a definition, and correct both issues. |
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/m7XZmugtLv4Above is the link to the video. CNN employee tapes conversations of the bosses who no longer give a crap about honest reporting with integrity. They only want to bash Trump and republicans. This is no surprise to anyone. But offers confirmation about their reporting motives. CNN is a far right media, not leftist. |
|
|
|
I’m guessing we’ll be seeing a wave of Tesla Powerwall advertisements in California in the near future.
Very green of them. With the Lithium pit mines, and recharging those batteries with juice from coal burning power plants. No coal in California. Natural gas though which is still bad but not nearly as bad as coal. Yes, lets all pretend the massive amounts of resources required to mine all those rare Earth materials for the batteries are not expended, not to mention that electric cars are less efficient. But they can recharge them with a diesel generator in a pinch I am not saying they don't have advantages, but they are actually LESS environmentally friendly than a classic fossil fuel based vehicle. I was being a smart-ass. Using a DIESEL generator to recharge the "oh no, fossil fuels are bad" eco-friendly car |
|
|
|
I’m guessing we’ll be seeing a wave of Tesla Powerwall advertisements in California in the near future.
Very green of them. With the Lithium pit mines, and recharging those batteries with juice from coal burning power plants. No coal in California. Natural gas though which is still bad but not nearly as bad as coal. Yes, lets all pretend the massive amounts of resources required to mine all those rare Earth materials for the batteries are not expended, not to mention that electric cars are less efficient. But they can recharge them with a diesel generator in a pinch |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
