Wouldn't following Darkcoin on Google, and revealing your identity defeat the purpose of Darkcoin? No? How would it? I thought the purpose of Darkcoin was to be anonymous. Going on Google+ and following it, would thereby sacrifice that anonymity in the sense that your real identity would be linked to your support of Darkcoin. Obviously it wouldn't link transactions on the blockchain to you, but still. oh come on...you sacrifice you anonymity by posting here without a proxy, by mining, by retweeting, by facebook by everything... Obviously you dont have to post your darkcoin wallet address on google+ your transactions are the ones that you may want to be anonymous. not your support for an anonymous coin  thats political and your right to support it. Just saying, if people want to stay as anonymous as possible, it's something to think about. Thankfully I don't use facebook or twitter, so that's not an issue for me. are you using a proxy for bitcointalk? i am just curious... Nope. Then again I don't have my face and all my personal information in my profile. you dont need to have in order for them to find you  |
|
|
|
Wouldn't following Darkcoin on Google, and revealing your identity defeat the purpose of Darkcoin? No? How would it? I thought the purpose of Darkcoin was to be anonymous. Going on Google+ and following it, would thereby sacrifice that anonymity in the sense that your real identity would be linked to your support of Darkcoin. Obviously it wouldn't link transactions on the blockchain to you, but still. oh come on...you sacrifice you anonymity by posting here without a proxy, by mining, by retweeting, by facebook by everything... Obviously you dont have to post your darkcoin wallet address on google+ your transactions are the ones that you may want to be anonymous. not your support for an anonymous coin thats political and your right to support it. Just saying, if people want to stay as anonymous as possible, it's something to think about. Thankfully I don't use facebook or twitter, so that's not an issue for me. are you using a proxy for bitcointalk? i am just curious... |
|
|
|
who will follow Darkcoin on Google+ or FB? instead the point of the coin 'privacy'?  just pointing out the obvious. and as the FED look into what this privacy coin did on drugs, guess who they will look after first? those on that list. :p just saying. you will have better luck on Twitter on a hash #darkcoin channel. its the transactions you want anonymous. Not your political ideas and support of an anonymous coin... |
|
|
|
Wouldn't following Darkcoin on Google, and revealing your identity defeat the purpose of Darkcoin? No? How would it? I thought the purpose of Darkcoin was to be anonymous. Going on Google+ and following it, would thereby sacrifice that anonymity in the sense that your real identity would be linked to your support of Darkcoin. Obviously it wouldn't link transactions on the blockchain to you, but still. oh come on...you sacrifice you anonymity by posting here without a proxy, by mining, by retweeting, by facebook by everything... Obviously you dont have to post your darkcoin wallet address on google+ your transactions are the ones that you may want to be anonymous. not your support for an anonymous coin thats political and your right to support it. |
|
|
|
diff : 10048   Every time this happens they disappear in short order due to KGW, so not really anything to worry about when you see it. Just a whale that finds the pool closing in on him The daemon reported the hashrate at 280Gh for a moment, which is insanity. That can't be true have we surpassed bitcoin hashrate yet |
|
|
|
|
enough with all those ponzi coins...
|
|
|
|
 some 2.5k years old ones |
|
|
|
how could a bacteria create gold without fusing? you cannot "create" something out of nothing. when you break it down into plain chemistry/physics gold is nothing more then electrons, neutrons, and protons. So gold can only be gained by fusing lighter elements (like the sun does, or hydrogen bombs) or split heavy elements. http://fusioned.gat.com/what_is_fusion.htmlFusion of more heavy atoms then hydrogen is even harder to archieve and cold fusion should take a high vacuum (technically not possible till now) or a whole new technology. Fusion of more heavy atoms than hydrogen is easier to achieved. check lithium fusion... and leopard2 comparing dynamos with electrostatic generators is retarded... there were always tiny electrostatic generators... |
|
|
|
what the fucking happen.
I lost 300000RQC.
where is my coin??
9hour mining lost.
fucking coin.
I hate this coin.
the blame is on you. dev is a greedy scammer with 900000 premine that didnt said but put on the first blocks...coin is forking all the time. logo has been build with bitmap... why would anyone mine this shitty coin? Even the randomness of the reward is faulty and you can change it to max... |
|
|
|
We should call dibs I'll just delete mine - hope you intent to keep yours updated, not just collect the bounty. I do! I am searching for a nice cover right now... Any ideas anyone?! |
|
|
|
kuroman, Moore's law will not go on much longer the way it has been advancing by smaller hardware. by ~2020 you reach the point where moore's law requires a transistor the size of an atom. (eg http://www.pcworld.com/article/2032913/the-end-of-moores-law-is-on-the-horizon-says-amd.html) There could a major break through elsewhere, but it would be a coincidence if that happens to match with Moore's. Anything is this area is wild speculation and will probably not get us anywhere. Actually I've already answered this question, there are many ways to extend the moors law, such as 3D transistors and nanomaterials breaktrough such as Graphen and these aren't vaporware, they already exist, it's just that the manufacturing process needs to be generalised and it will not happen till we start hitting Silicon/Copper limits (as it will require to review the whole fab industry from technics to equipement which requires $$$$) http://e2e.ti.com/blogs_/b/thinkinnovate/archive/2013/03/01/graphene-s-potential-to-extend-moore-s-law.aspxhttp://phys.org/news/2014-02-team-aims-graphene-nanoribbon-wires.htmlEventually we will reach the point of quantum mechanics interference, and where the lasers won't be able to keep up, but by that time which is at least a couple of decades ahead of us Quantum computer would operational, todays Quantum computer are still far from it jesus m8. you dont get the point.... it has nothing to do with computers. it has to do with physics limitations. you need energy to calculate whatever and even if you had a 100% efficient computer you would need more energy than the sun will give in its lifetime... |
|
|
|
|
Can i boycott this thread?
|
|
|
|
|
i agree that it must be open source. If it is good it is up to the community to decide if this coin will succeed and help make it better.
people must understand that they should stop supporting stupid clones with nothing new except name and actually support new ideas.
|
|
|
|
I've been thinking...
Something just doesn't add up with the Armory using Darkcoin. There is absolutely no way any legit darknet site would use Darksend while it is still closed source.
What am I missing?
That homeland security run the armoury? Rofl.. Exactly what I was thinking. Just imagine the logistics. Read the interview... The Silk Road model just can't work with guns. The Armory has to be a front. It's not even close to possible. I've been in the LEGAL weapons business for my whole life. If there were a way to skirt the law on it, I'd do it! I'm all about giving back what the government unjustly takes. But there's no way you can mail guns around and not be detected. Utterly ridiculous. The only people who would bother to try are complete idiots, and people who work for the state so they know it'll get there and they catch the buyer... You think you're hiding a gun on an x-ray? Or the obvious pattern of a box of ammo? STEEL and LEAD show up on X-Rays more than anything you can find! There's not a damn thing you can do to block it or disguise it. There is absolutely no way! I would never even consider doing it because I know it can't work! Guns that are smuggled are done knowingly with people on the inside being paid to look the other way. That's how it's done because it's the only way that has any hope of working. And that costs way more money that I have, and way more money than the prices on that site reflect. It doesn't add up. If you watch the screenshot it seems that they have stores/partners in different countries so they can distribute their products. I saw... It might look good to the uninitiated who have no experience in the business... If the desire overpowers limited knowledge... I can see them snatching up a lot of foolish people with that bait. If you want it to be true too much... Bleh, anyways. If it could be done, I admit I'd be doing it. I have all the experience and knowledge needed; and it tells me only a complete retard would even try. No fucking way. Not even close to possible with the model they present. Its just enough to help the clueless make a dumb choice... It'll help law enforcement catch a bunch of low-hanging fruit that would otherwise not even be trying... It'll make fun headlines. They've already busted real darknet sites, now they'll reveal running one... Few people will trust the darknet after that. isnt running something illegal, if you are the police, illegal? i am pretty sure it is... but anyway it can be done...i am pretty sure there are safer ways than buying guns from the internet but still it can be done.. |
|
|
|
|
haha actually the first blocks give a total of 900000 coins or something! not even 90k but 900k
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
