5 million shouldn't be too bad stake time. Should go off between 5-12 days i suspect.

wallet has to be open to stake... any amount has a chance... its just lower chance with small weight and size of block.

Shouldn't their experienced programmers know how to debug this? If its a reliable time crash they can wait for the crash in the debug build drill in to the crash exception in their compiler find out what caused it and trace back right?

Matlack is probably unplugging different devices in his pc and house 1 at a time thinking maybe the toaster in the house caused the fault exception?

One thing i do like about them is their persistence though its not hard to be persistent if you can drag in $500k from an ico. Wonder who wil take over when ionomy fails? maybe there will be an 8:1 trade of ion to i dunno rocketshipcoin or something?

I've got it... maybe the level of niceness is proportional to the wallets uptime? Maybe Adam hasn't been nice enough of a guy lately which is causing a cascading effect in all ion wallets? That or maybe the wallet ran out of atoms or electrons or protons or whateverthefucktrons and crashed.

There is no definite "time calculation" the only definite is that the block is mature @ 5 days.

There are many variables then such as all the other competing stakers block sizes, weights and the fact that there are only x blocks per day they all compete for. There could be stakers that have 140 day old smaller blocks and the weight modifer wil beat someone with a 10m block.

The code would have this in it but with sprouts high stake rate etc when we are talking people with between 20 million and 180 million coins and varying sizes its negligible to find this out.

50 million coins should fire off on day 5 at current difficulty this will go up in time. Your 2.4 million taking 8 days if its consistent will slowly rise as well so you need to build bigger blocks or wait longer.

I think he should rename himself as MrFortuneCookie. I don't understand what motivational sentences have to do with coin dev either....

He posted that ages ago claiming sprouts on heads in china was their doing. Eggman doesn't actually post anything of use now just some words he found in a fortune cookie while eating dinner and a twitter post etc. Nothing of value

so is the wallet fixed now? didn't the old paycoin wallet crash after the new foundation people went into bug fix mode?

I'll buy all yours at 40 sat each. I'm waiting till it hits 40ish sat. A lot of altcoins are getting hit hard now and will continue to be hit hard until after the bitcoin halving hype stabilises. then people will move back to promising alts like its been done a million times before.

We are still waiting for around 200 or according to josh wasn't it 300,000 people to come and apologize here as they were wrong. Cause they said if its a scam but its not... paycoin will be the future. Sure ion isn't paycoin as in the coin isn't the same source but many of the red flags identified with logic are being done the same here with ion. The fact you refuse to consider the beneficial questions going unanswered shows your ignorance on the topic and investment you have. Tunnel vision my good chap... open your eyes and see the entire world and not just the train coming towards you. (btw this isn't the train that takes you to the moon).

The wallets not broken. You need to electrify it with electrons after 12 hours so it keeps going. Its by design, stop fudding.

www.winkdex.com

Theres your answer... lots of other coins go down now because bitcoin is $511 up from $450 the other day. People transfer to btc take the profits buy back in and get their alt coins back cheaper. Watch the markets.... its not always just about what the coin is doing or not. I suspect ltc, eth etc are also down.

True... but microsoft have publicly listed info on their company name and registration. Ionomy says they are registered and trust us but don't show. You are stating transparency and total transparency incorrectly.

Transparency is honesty for a company operations.. trade secrets are the tech dev. You are taking it to extremes.
The problem with ionomy is that they take funds sell an ico and show no transparency on the supposed fund spending.

Tell me this how are they able to sell coins and stakers for btc past the ico? None sold ico coins were to be burned and not used correct? So how are they able to sell coins now? Wouldn't be that dev fund premine they aren't telling people how they are spending would it?

I thought that was for bounties etc? The selling of stakers now and coins doesn't have a number for how many are available in their supply. If you don't see a problem with this transparency then you are not thinking well on this investment.

And seriously? They are in full on implementation mode? I heard others say they can't answer questions because they are too busy coding... seems they have plenty of time to hang in slack and talk bs general chat... can't be that busy then so that comment is a cop out.

Is there any mechanism for community members to mark said people as scammers? I.e. community members to warn other community members like a normal community does?

Im just curious because when someone asks something or states something you reply with an authoritive comment like you are the point of truth or lie for everything. You reply like everything you say and know is right and nothing you say can be wrong. Interesting none the less as you promoted cryptsy at times and said they were legit. But we all make mistakes. You glossed over and didn't reply to my other question i'll repost it below, can you please answer it as it will be helpful to users of your community.

-----

I have one other question too which is legitimate. As crypto city is for people to establish connections how do you filter or how does the community filter scammers or not? Can you confirm how this is policed and how scammers are found?

I'm legitimately curious as most companies and sites have a way of moderating content as no community wants to have proper scammers onboard. E.g. if Joshua Garza launched a paycoin community on crypto city prior to being outed as a scammer but there were high hints of it how would crypto city handle this?

How do you define trolls, scammers etc and how does the site differentiate between trolls and scammers and just ones they suspect are.. i.e. how do you eliminate false positives?

So even if its a scam people are bad for warning because being stupid and invested in a scam they are stopping you from profitting. So basically you are saying people shouldn't expose scams because the people invested in them need to pass their bad investment onto others?

So you are saying even though paycoin was a scam people shouldn't of said anything so their investors could make money? Idiot logic. Those exposing paycoin for what it was saved MANY from being pulled into a scam and thus saved money. You're a big boy... invest with confidence and don't come crying when it fails and looking for a fudder to blame for your fuck up.

You really are a moron.

Hint : If an investment is sound and good then no amount of comments against it will stop it. Google, microsoft etc take bad press everyday. They still grow in share price.

You are either incredibly nieve or a bad person in real life. I encourage you to lodge a lawsuit when you lose your money to this investment. Subpoena bitcointalk for ip addresses and then lodge a lawsuit for lost investment due to forum comments. You'll be laughed out of court... particularly if its judge judy.

Do you not see whats wrong with your comment?

Maybe Adam could agree with this comment or tell you how wrong you are or korvas could show you the error of your statement. You come here as an angry shill but you damage your beloved previous with stupid statements like that.

Yep its awesome when you appoint a director through a service that has nothing to do with you.

It also instills nothing but confidence that they don't stand by their product and or service enough to run it from their own country. Says to me we are running our company elsewhere so if bad shit happens we are covered as we committed a crime in some country we never intend to visit. Look we can scam from the us but receive no punishment!!!

Big deal didn't work for vern he had to run away to china even though he had some dipshit belieze company. Shows the confidence he had in not being prosecuted.

Every day i think about it more and more i believe when starting ionomy adam matlack went to google and typed

"How to setup a company from america and if shit goes wrong not be liable"

And it returned some idiots guide to setting up in another country.

I have one other question too which is legitimate. As crypto city is for people to establish connections how do you filter or how does the community filter scammers or not? Can you confirm how this is policed and how scammers are found?

I'm legitimately curious as most companies and sites have a way of moderating content as no community wants to have proper scammers onboard. E.g. if Joshua Garza launched a paycoin community on crypto city prior to being outed as a scammer but there were high hints of it how would crypto city handle this?

How do you define trolls, scammers etc and how does the site differentiate between trolls and scammers and just ones they suspect are.. i.e. how do you eliminate false positives?

Ok gotcha that was the post i was referring to and i didn't remember the /s so with the sarcasm then its either yes its you and you don't care or no its not you and you are playing along.

I'll take option #2... fark finding satoshi is easier these days

Aren't you trolling trolls so therefore by that definition a troll yourself?

Just curious.. people often accuse others of a nature but not rise above it themselves... Just concerned for your site as if you are trolling trolls and thus a troll you should avoid crypto-city as trolls aren't welcome. Logic at its finest.