as long as its shown they give it all to lisk/waves investors and dont use it as a lie to make more for themselves. how will they show transparency

sorry i didnt mean xpy support was from the users marking it. it was the owner of badbitcoin that supported paycoin xpy even when questioned by others and shown red flags. the site is a good starting point but i wouldnt trust the owner especially after they scrubbed their support of xpy after the fact. its still in net archives though

source codes open.

i put byteball on seperate computer in a virtual machine. on my disconnected bitcoin pc i signed the address and put the info in a text file. usb'd that to byteball vm and copy pasted. if he robs me hes good.

since he only has a public address and message and signature if he can do that then any transaction on the blockchain is insecure.

but i do agree everyone should protect themselves.

if they were saying crash to 100USD and you were buying super duper cheap then you had to buy at > 101USD so 4 digits is 1000% which isnt possible since its 800USD now. dont you mean 3 digit %?

i can understand the newbies being uncomfortable but isnt it also dangerous to newbies coming in to see fake promotion by 20 accounts to make a project look good and in your face? such behavior could also turn them off bitcoin in the same way. again i agree its not bitcointalks place to police but shouldnt it be a partial responsibility to ensure the posters are in fact unique and good for the forums quality? eg if you used a dating site do you not expect that the profiles are people and not farmed bots?

haha i suck. im going to stop now before i embarrass myself further thanks so 10% it is so possible 10 rounds. might be worth tony ipdating first post as it still lists 98% in first round and first round is biggest

how many % of all byteball / how many GB are being allocated i. first round tony? first page says 98% but with other rounds i take this isnt correct anymore.

EDIT
-------
apologies on numbers that was a terrible maths mistake to make. 31,000 / 0.31 not multiplied by. that makes
10,000,000,000,000 or 10TB being distributed. is this now correct? 1,000TB total so still looks like 1%? what am i doing wrong

and i agree im not countering that. im saying the level of pollution false farming accounts are making needs to be stopped. i used that leocoin person as an example... he can talk all day about it for all i care but im tired of seeing his 20 fake accounts polluting other posts with 1 liners like

cool idea, leocoin is doing this with a phone soon

the intention is not to provide value but just through his agenda everywhere where its not wanted and ive seen topic starters tell him to piss off. it'd be fine if it was just him he gets a name for his 1 account, but hes doing it with 20 accounts. it dilutes forum value. it needs to be stopped.

thats what i thought so there is no real impressive use. they just take money and try to inject in the market to give that impression. the game infact isnt using ion which kinda defeats the purpose of having gaming linked with crypto.

i tend to disagree with you though as if ion isnt used in games then it does make it useless forits intended purpose. can you explain why you believe it doesnt make it useless in relation to gaming?

sign an address and use that as the link its easier . you could sign the old address to a bb address(different one) then if it doesnt send by xmas you're still covered

@tony just a requote as nobody answered. how many% is this round seems to be 1% by transition bot numbers

just sign your byteball address with your btc address i find easier as no coin moving required

and this is possible how? apple wont allow spending other than through gift cards and credit card. if it sneaks through it will be reported and not trolls but the fact all other apps are bound the same way.

if you spend money to get ions to buy lives ingame then being a transferrable currency ionomy will need a money transmitter licence to service most countries. even in this event you are in fact using fiat to buy lives not ion.

unless you can deposit ion into the game. are you sure you arent mistaken? last video showed electrons purchased for cash which is akin to gems in other games. its a game native currency only usable in that game and not transferable.

until apple and google approve it and it stays up i doubt this.

i do know though if it gets taken down huey will blame trolls and not the fact they didnt adhere to apples terms which will be funny because ionomy expects people to abide by theirs.  thats my prediction

link only works on the live download not test.

download the live install it and try the link again

isnt this what jaxx does without its own coin in the mix?

dont know how trustable badbitcoin is. he was a big supporter of xpy and garza going so far to state on one hand he can spot a scam a mile off then on the other how they dont see any problems with and are invested in xpy. its all in internet archives now as the site scrubbed it off. likely many good advices there but like the scams themselves i wouldnt blindly trust badbitcoins rulings. its a starting point though.

how is that a game....

i mean people are being gamed but thats a special offer its not a game.
is this what they meant by 1 game a month?

honestly i likely wont play it. not by spite not by a stand but that it honestly looks boring. i'll more than likely youtube a review video with live gameplay that will show me everything i need to see. to me what footage ive seen its a jump platformer with a zap gun ive played them on my iphone and they hold little replay value whoever makes them. usually they tack on a leaderboard and some costume changes gun upgrades, add a level map, throw a boss in and offer in app purchases for double exp or double gold. im pretty sure its what i expect gravity to be.

it wouldof been better to invent a new genre or try something that isnt a cookie cutter clone in gameplay. most new indie studios do this and its what defines their success. to me ionomy is just trying to do this add crypto or rather offchain electrons thinking it'll be highly adopted. its a big ask imho. but not cause its gravity i think any clone game adding crypto is the same. look at sarutobi. same deal its a clone vine swing game. boring and btc doesnt make it better.

as to the green/red war if the game is truely just buying stakers that are red green thats a joke.... you play the gameby sending a btc trans thats just pathetic... assuming thats what it is.

the other consideration is banner sponsors. if the board is full of this crap and more leave do sponsors get value for money by being displayed to 100 leocoin spamming alt accounts? moving forward and improving should always be a business consideration and its why new start ups take over and beat existing ones. bitcointalk forum could be replaced by another if over time the members migrate to a better managed platform that are over scams and spammers.

im not saying its bitcointalks responsibility to judge scams but when there are obvious cases like leocoin fake shill accounts all showing up with 1-10 posts at the same time its a fair assumption they arent all unique users and their toxic parasitic nature just dilutes the value of any topics.

id be fine if they stayed in their own but they do 1 liner responses just to add a line about leocoin.

its why i suggested ratings etc. give topic starters some power to not let them post if they choose or can i have a profile option to say hide all posts of people below rating x? without hitting ignore on everyone. you'd probably be surprised how different the forum would look.

im getting the same thing now