Dear Adam, fuck you if you think your fake scamcoin counts as "contributing something to the world". You're a fucking delusional piece of shit.  Ps. It's "would have" you retarded fuck. ion doesn't contribute anything. A contribution is a service or new use case for crypto. I detest the use of words on these projects.. revolutionary, ground breaking, latest technology... they just take something someone else made clone it then pump it up with buzz words. They don't make the services that will give coins value because there is no sources to clone for these services. Notice how all altcoins that come out say dice site, blockchain explorer and sometimes a shitty web wallet? Its because that crap is open source somewhere that can be changed with a couple of parameters.. Ion is garbage. The games don't launch on start up.. its just some wannabe self proclaimed developers wanting to feel important and play the role of their self titled "director"ship. Nobody in the industry would take ion serious if they tried to sell it as an idea in mobile gaming... so they float it to the community. Sad... |
|
|
|
So adam matlack aka huey asks that kid to answer questions and has time to be trolled in slack but won't come here and answer? Such a hypocrite. What i love about this whole thing is its 1 scam after another... when it gets bad it becomes a changing of the guard... There is always a smaller fish waiting to be the next in line to milk the cows. |
|
|
|
Carmelo's son (or someone doing a really good impression of him) showed up on iontalkslackthingy. Paycoiners ripping into each other is quite hilarious. Read from around here: https://ionomy.slack.com/archives/general/p1463540348024620if you have a login. Sorry, too lazy to screenshot it all, here is the beginning:  Oh the irony here You mean o the ironomy  |
|
|
|
Sprouts are growing. Deep roots keep project strong lasting long. A roadblock has happened the evil powers try to stop our fight, makes new challenge. Solution finding done, help is found, updates made, news for details everyone quickly. Do not chop the tree down that gives fruit. Water it, show care, have fruit for many years.
where have you been why the update now? |
|
|
|
The only rule i break is posting multiple times in a row. I do that when I quote multiple posts at a time, and no mod has ever said anything because I don't have a sig campaign. I will refrain from doing that to keep your panties unbunched.
People have accused me of trolling before, for calling out scams that were obvious to me and all ended up being scams, so if that's why you quoted the rules, you are the one he is posting off topic, and you are keeping some excellent company like all the genius investors of successful companies like Neo and bee, Active Mining, GAW, BFL, and so on.
Back on topic.
Adam Matlack is a developer of ION. Adam Matlack either lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in Paycoin, or was heavily involved in the scam. In one situation he is too stupid to successfully run a coin, in the other he is too scummy. Invest at your own peril.
I regularly sleep like most normal people and when 4 pages are new i comment on new posts... not my fault i end up with 4 replies to different posts that end up one after another just because a post isn't active when i reply. Its all pertinent to the conversation. |
|
|
|
So they are releasing a coin without any use....? So its just any other alt coin with expectation that customers drive it...? They should of just used hyper, dgb, gamecredits. All are gaming coins and established... they wouldn't have had chain issues etc. O wait they couldn't control those coins sorry my bad... im sure huey could explain why any of those coins wasn't sufficient... prolly lacking hybrid flex or something. It surely can't be anonymous transactions because they like transparency....? im lost as usual but then again i'm prolly a silly person, uneducated etc... maybe i can listen and god slap me upside the face or something. |
|
|
|
Rumor has it that the launch has been postponed.  Im changing my opinion. When you are the only one mining your coin to build the chain... and after months of testing.... HOW THE FUCK can you have ISSUES this close to RELEASE. You were the only miners and fucked the chain? If there is no real POW why didn't they give themselves a starting amount at a pregenerated address and then start only on POS... @ 1 minute being the only address with staking weight they win... there is no need for POW on a POS only coin... my guess is they used code for POW->POS coins and fooked something up.. Just to recap... HOW THE FUCK DO YOU BREAK A COIN ONLY YOU ARE MINING?  |
|
|
|
CryptoBuds; i'm almost sure I read Team ION saying that the masternode(s) to fund the Ionomy platform stakers are the first to be on the network. The funds for the masternode are lend by the staker-investments, maybe that means what you say Team ION doesnt own the masternode, but it's grey area. Where did you get the info that Team ION will not own any masternodes? Sounds a little bit strange to me.
While running a few masternodes to fulfill their staker obligations sounds ok-ish (if you ignore the whole idiocy of making coins out of thin air as an incentive to keep coins in a web wallet) it still doesn't explain how they're going to handle the mismatch between staker payouts and masternode revenue. Masternodes produce a variable amount of coins, which depends on how many other masternodes are active. Stakers are paying a certain percentage (i.e. don't depend on how many other masternodes are active), which can be doubled by electrons. So how would ionomists ensure than only the required amount of coins is generated? What if they don't make enough? What if they make too many? It's not just about the excess coins (they could say "we will not dump them" as an excuse). If they run more masternodes than needed then they're robbing other masternodes of their part of the stake. Don't forget they use customer purchased coins to compete with investors to drop investor masternode rewards. They make money from customer funds for doing nothing. An honest company providing this feature would take an admin fee and pass the rest to the customers. If they were serious they'd combine the coins of the customers into exact masternodes take the admin fee and make the return variable based on masternode profits e.g. Stakers will produce a % based on customer funds in.... ionomy takes 5% of masternode generated profits for admin fees and pays the rest to the customers with the invested funds. We anticipate on initial calculations <insert them here> that we hope to achieve 100,000 ion in this time frame. This will be apportioned out to investors based on their percent of funds invested compared to total invested funds. We will take 5% of this entire ion generated (anticipated 100,000 thought could be more or less) as an admin fee. Then when the yearly stuff comes around they report it... this is how a transparent company would operate. |
|
|
|
I retract my statement that Matt Eden is a part of ION. I miss read the link. But looking that link over it does look glaringly obvious that Matlack was involved in the planning of XPY. That should be very worrisome.
that is good. so i must point out your mistake again. the paycoinfoundation was not part of the paycoin launch. this came many months after. if you are saying matlack was behind launch of paycoin then you are totally wrong. but he was behind launch of foundation which was not behind launch of paycoin. it came much time after wards. If I am wrong, could you please prove that Matlack wasn't involved with the launch of Paycoin? well he just was not. so, your information source is just wrong. maybe just point us to your information source as you just passing on incorrect information. Maybe someone should open an thread about it , suchmoon, what do you say, is it an thread worth? I bet it is You both ask each other for proof, to proof that the other one lied. Now I would like to see proof of both of you if you continue this useless "prove me" thing. Beside that it is offtopic, but thread creater seems not to be very experienced What was Adams involvement in the launch except that he invested 6 numbers? You can bring up this meeting that they had, an lunch. Would be an lunch really proof? Come on, you need something better and I hope this lunch was not your proof. It definitely isn't off topic. How is Matlack involvement with early Paycoin no relevant? Second, is there blockchain proof that Adam did indeed make those purchases through GAW? Or is him saying what he says good enough for you? I disagree with you. This thread has only with IoN to do and everything paycoin related is offtopic however you twist it. That these two stories have commons or anything like that, is not making an ontopic of it. Actually announcements on bitcointalk should include mainly technical information and not be pretty. Thats why I said, someone could open an thread, "Was A. M. involved in Paycoins launch or not". Then all discussion that has with that title would be there offtopic. I never claimed one or the other thing, why do you ask me if it is good enough for me? Your assumption is not good enough for me to be an proof, it is just assumption which I did not deny or discuss. Do you agree? How much money was spent, who payed what, .... probably you could ask the court to publish some informtaion that is not confident, but I am sure all cases against ganza do have some specific numbers. The last that does not tell me that he is involved in paycoins launch is, he sues ganza and he went to the court where I do not see investigations agains Adam which should be there for sure if he is involved. But on the other side I have same dillema about Joe, why isn't anybody investigating about him and his contribution, what actual status of the lawsuit? Joe provides info and thats how he gets out clean, WTF, isn't it? But this is happening for real and your warnings here have much less effect than it would have if you warn/talk to correct people about it => court => judge => lawyers. I hope you understand why I say assumption. The same is for @madness, if you have information that you can publish that will prove your words, please post it. If not, please say that you do assume and do not know. you are wrong. if the actors in ion were in xpy then their role in xpy is relevant in an ion topic as their motives, ethics and business practices from past ventures they were involved in are pertinent to ionomy. So links from "any" past venture showing connection and intention is important. The links are what makes it important. You can't be dishonest in 1 venture then start another and expect that the past doesn't matter. If you think so then i suggest any venture you look at you don't listen to any facts from their past failures... whether they are con people in past ventures or embezzling. Its like saying person a changes his name to brett. Now brett is a new person so just because he was matt 2 weeks ago means you shouldn't discuss things that matt did... he's brett now it doesn't matter.... WRONG. |
|
|
|
I retract my statement that Matt Eden is a part of ION. I miss read the link. But looking that link over it does look glaringly obvious that Matlack was involved in the planning of XPY. That should be very worrisome.
that is good. so i must point out your mistake again. the paycoinfoundation was not part of the paycoin launch. this came many months after. if you are saying matlack was behind launch of paycoin then you are totally wrong. but he was behind launch of foundation which was not behind launch of paycoin. it came much time after wards. If I am wrong, could you please prove that Matlack wasn't involved with the launch of Paycoin? well he just was not. so, your information source is just wrong. maybe just point us to your information source as you just passing on incorrect information. Thats a defence now? He just was not.... so you are saying you know matlacks life in depth? Can you 100% say without a doubt he had no links, ties, investment sheep queued up for garza from the start? You know matlack that much that you 100% know outside him just telling you so that there is no chance not even 1% i mean you are 100% sure that he was not so? Can you confirm this as that is what you are saying. |
|
|
|
I retract my statement that Matt Eden is a part of ION. I miss read the link. But looking that link over it does look glaringly obvious that Matlack was involved in the planning of XPY. That should be very worrisome.
ionomy is richard nelson confirmed by ionomy handle and adam matlack.... thats still 2 of 3 |
|
|
|
CryptoBuds; i'm almost sure I read Team ION saying that the masternode(s) to fund the Ionomy platform stakers are the first to be on the network. The funds for the masternode are lend by the staker-investments, maybe that means what you say Team ION doesnt own the masternode, but it's grey area. Where did you get the info that Team ION will not own any masternodes? Sounds a little bit strange to me.
Please do some research on masternodes from dash and darknet. Unless they made additions to the code to prevent multiple masternodes on the same ip address (why would they?) it is very cheap and easy to run a gazillion vm's from 1 pc with sufficient ram and dynamic resource allocation. small xp vms with only the wallet daemon going and then a cheap single laptop as the masternode controller. Now my question is this... the funds to create the masternode are lent by the customers. Why are the customers only getting the 20% or 25% or whatever rate for their funds? With the controlling portion of masternodes over that period of 9 months ion team make much much much more. I showed values in my masternode quick calc and i don't feel like doing one for this if nobody is interested to listen. Ionomy make out they are doing a favour when those customers could pool together and make their own nodes. Ionomy gives the customer chicken scraps and takes a big portion of the funds... and for what? running a daemon with a bash script to run a masternode-restart command every now and then if some drop out? So team ion sell you ions... then you put your ions together and give to them to make masternodes... which they give you what 30% of the masternode reward generation and keep 70% themselves but you think you are doing well because you are staking at higher than 10%? o come on... |
|
|
|
Hi guys, long weekend. Had some family stuff to deal with, getting back to it today.
As to guy behind the Ionomy handle. I'm Richard Nelson, support director for ionomy.
We'll try and work through the thread today and get some of the more outstanding questions resolved.
The business registration is still stuck in government limbo, we're working with them and our local contact to get it sorted.
Aaaaaaahh okkkkkk ....... Richard Nelson ........ But ? Wait ? Yes, I'm not wrong !!   @ionomy You must have had a big day that day and even bigger fortnight. You never actually got back to resolving the more outstanding questions. Or was the intent to reply to say you would do it to quiet the questioners in mean time. You are free to revisit the topic and answer them all especially mine about the masternodes. |
|
|
|
hi!, a couple of months or a month and half i guess i sold my sprouts to 9 and the next day they went up to 27 satoshis,  , now they are a t 5 or 4 , but the diff is greater, i wanted to ask how big does a block mus be to stake on 5 days?, 500K?, 1M, 2M? and how do you think the hakving will affect te coin? to stake on day 5 you'll want 25-35 million. By halving i believe you mean bitcoin halving and i suspect people will sell to get more bitcoin. Sprouts price is going down. Being realistic and truthful this coin has no buy support at present and hasn't for a while. Its all selling and the lower prices on buy side getting sold into. If there was buy support there would be difference in bittrex 24 hour high but thats just an occasional little buy from sell side that is likely bot behavior. Check the bittrex history out. If you want to stake for decent returns you'd want 50m min but there is no telling if you would break even or if the coin would advance. wow, 50mil , that is alot, and yes i was wondering about the bitcoin halving, its my first time on a halving ..lol... i wonder what would happen in general. 50 millions only like 3 bitcoin... less each day if the sats drop. The question is will you make it back? The coin seems non-existant dev wise.. yeah yeah milly has posted a few little fixes and comes back but there hasn't been a solid actual change to the coin or communication showing working towards this. I'd be smart with your money though but your call on your investments. But to answer your questions 50 million to stake on day 5 though not promised but it should.. (this value will increase as more coins enter the market) current buy is 4 sat almost hitting 3 sat on buy side current min sell is 5 sat mostly sells into the buy side with the occasional 0.3btc placed on the buy side. avg is < 1.0btc volume a day |
|
|
|
Bittrex has 190 million DGB sitting in an account but this one is frozen as its the proceeds of paul vernon stealing from cryptsy customers. Bittrex won't confirm or deny they are pauls coins in an attempt to sell but they came in as 1 deposit of 190 million and have sat there for over a month now. Nobody leaves that much on an exchange.
You'll recall there was that DGB high paul was attempting to sell that 190 million to generate approx 300-400btc but they got frozen. Silver law will get them eventually after proof and somewhere between 3 months time and 1 years time there will be some sells occuring to return to btc and cash to make customers as whole as possible so beware this possibility.
In the interim don't let that address spook you into buys or sells or rather any trading on bittrex. But i do suggest people watch the cryptsy news on crypto news networks to guess when you might be able to get some cheap dgb as it gets sold. Im not sure if it'll be one hit or if it'll be a slow leak out.
Why wouldn't Bittrex confirm it like they did with UNO? i think someone want to dump the dgb price before the next waves lollll 190M DGB is not a lot. i bought 10M this last days. i dont think the price will go 50% down. but maybe 50% high. i'm waiting to see and if it go another time at 30 sat i will buy millions more ahah Don't be so sure there is a few people with over 200 million coins, it might not be Paul Vernon, Paul could easily use shapeshift to sell the digibyte without risking putting it on the exchanges. shapeshift limits what you can sell per time. Paul would have to do many many many sales to achieve that. He was doing a dump on coins he had before silverlaw was able to move the funds. He did it with ethereum and didn't use shapeshift in any way. He did it with doge... same deal. dont panik... buy now before it's to late lolll im not panicing... just saying for people to be aware what that 190m account is on bittrex |
|
|
|
Myself i would like to know and research a person when visiting such things in the financial space which is what crypto is.
If you can't think for yourself, no one can help you, but you. Thats a catch 22. If i think for myself and say its this people counter and say you didn't read it right and are wrong. Im being polite and was hoping you'd answer the question but its too cryptic. I'd encourage others wanting to use the site to ask this question and research first. Taking things purely on your own thought and believing or not is what caused garza and others to succeed. Willingness to answer questions that are asked and transparency is what makes for a good community / business. |
|
|
|
Bittrex has 190 million DGB sitting in an account but this one is frozen as its the proceeds of paul vernon stealing from cryptsy customers. Bittrex won't confirm or deny they are pauls coins in an attempt to sell but they came in as 1 deposit of 190 million and have sat there for over a month now. Nobody leaves that much on an exchange.
You'll recall there was that DGB high paul was attempting to sell that 190 million to generate approx 300-400btc but they got frozen. Silver law will get them eventually after proof and somewhere between 3 months time and 1 years time there will be some sells occuring to return to btc and cash to make customers as whole as possible so beware this possibility.
In the interim don't let that address spook you into buys or sells or rather any trading on bittrex. But i do suggest people watch the cryptsy news on crypto news networks to guess when you might be able to get some cheap dgb as it gets sold. Im not sure if it'll be one hit or if it'll be a slow leak out.
Why wouldn't Bittrex confirm it like they did with UNO? i think someone want to dump the dgb price before the next waves lollll 190M DGB is not a lot. i bought 10M this last days. i dont think the price will go 50% down. but maybe 50% high. i'm waiting to see and if it go another time at 30 sat i will buy millions more ahah Don't be so sure there is a few people with over 200 million coins, it might not be Paul Vernon, Paul could easily use shapeshift to sell the digibyte without risking putting it on the exchanges. shapeshift limits what you can sell per time. Paul would have to do many many many sales to achieve that. He was doing a dump on coins he had before silverlaw was able to move the funds. He did it with ethereum and didn't use shapeshift in any way. He did it with doge... same deal. |
|
|
|
Bittrex has 190 million DGB sitting in an account but this one is frozen as its the proceeds of paul vernon stealing from cryptsy customers. Bittrex won't confirm or deny they are pauls coins in an attempt to sell but they came in as 1 deposit of 190 million and have sat there for over a month now. Nobody leaves that much on an exchange.
You'll recall there was that DGB high paul was attempting to sell that 190 million to generate approx 300-400btc but they got frozen. Silver law will get them eventually after proof and somewhere between 3 months time and 1 years time there will be some sells occuring to return to btc and cash to make customers as whole as possible so beware this possibility.
In the interim don't let that address spook you into buys or sells or rather any trading on bittrex. But i do suggest people watch the cryptsy news on crypto news networks to guess when you might be able to get some cheap dgb as it gets sold. Im not sure if it'll be one hit or if it'll be a slow leak out.
Why wouldn't Bittrex confirm it like they did with UNO? i think someone want to dump the dgb price before the next waves lollll 190M DGB is not a lot. i bought 10M this last days. i dont think the price will go 50% down. but maybe 50% high. i'm waiting to see and if it go another time at 30 sat i will buy millions more ahah 190 million is a lot. Look at the sell side... to buy such an amount would throw the price up. To sell such an amount would drop it a lot. |
|
|
|
Bittrex has 190 million DGB sitting in an account but this one is frozen as its the proceeds of paul vernon stealing from cryptsy customers. Bittrex won't confirm or deny they are pauls coins in an attempt to sell but they came in as 1 deposit of 190 million and have sat there for over a month now. Nobody leaves that much on an exchange.
You'll recall there was that DGB high paul was attempting to sell that 190 million to generate approx 300-400btc but they got frozen. Silver law will get them eventually after proof and somewhere between 3 months time and 1 years time there will be some sells occuring to return to btc and cash to make customers as whole as possible so beware this possibility.
In the interim don't let that address spook you into buys or sells or rather any trading on bittrex. But i do suggest people watch the cryptsy news on crypto news networks to guess when you might be able to get some cheap dgb as it gets sold. Im not sure if it'll be one hit or if it'll be a slow leak out.
where did you find this ? When the UNO hit bittrex i sent bittrex an email as i noticed a large dgb single deposit come in. Bittrex returned the email with thanks. Bittrex accounts totalling $100,000 were frozen in the cryptsy wallet but bittrex doesn't confirm or deny outside that as its a legal thing. If you go into bittrex dgb and click distribution tab you'll see the 190 million. Its not someone ready to dump it hasn't changed in value. It started as a 200 million DGB deposit but they sold 10 million. After that it was frozen at 190 million. |
|
|
|
So you will answer questions or just respond with troll comments? I have a few serious questions or are you not keen on this unless they are praise statements? Im being serious here.
If your question is whether Crypto-city.com will change our set-up to allow for trolls to run rampant? Then the answer is absolutely not. Some trolls has even gone as far as creating smear campaigns because they have an axe to grind with certain members and want Crypto-city to kick them out. We will not. So as far as trolls go, they're not welcomed nor are they needed @ Crypto-city. No my question isn't about your setup or how you administer as whilst i might not agree with the way its run it is not my place other than not to utilise it if i disagree. You can dismiss this as trolling if you like but its an important question as when running businesses these such organisations keep business operators in check. Can you please verify this information? Its a straight forward question that i would appreciate an answer to. You are free to confirm or deny it and provide your side as i am interested. ah. OK. The finra statement is pretty straight forward, there is nothing to verify, it's neither confirm or deny just as it states, which all boils down to a non-event. So, you can interpret that however you like. The person that commented, however, did make an inaccurate comment which he has since been notified... but hardly seems important as that was ages ago. As far as Crypto-city is concerned, it's very simple, you either use it or you don't. It has no bearing other than the future of crypto. Nothing complicated there as the trolls make it out to be. Can you please elaborate on what a non-event means in this respect? Dictionary.com only states for me that its non-event
noun
noun: non-event; plural noun: non-events; noun: nonevent; plural noun: nonevents
an unexpectedly dull or insignificant event or occasion.
"despite the pre-match publicity, the contest turned out to be a non-event"
•an event that did not happen.
"they sent out false announcements of art events to the media, getting reporters to show up for non-events"
From your reply im unsure if you mean it didn't happen, its not you its another by that name or its considered by you to not be not that important. Can you specify which it is? I don't want to read into it as i like as you suggested as this then opens me to people saying its misinterpreted. A persons past history and how situations are handled etc do have an impact on future business and endeavours. Myself i would like to know and research a person when visiting such things in the financial space which is what crypto is. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
