Look at it again you dick the entire main file is the same structure as bootstrap!!!! Adding your stuff on top of bootstrap doesn't make it a custom site!

A custom site is from the ground up creation i.e. start with an empty main.php or main.htm and blank .css and start coding.

You're a dick and caught out. Might want to define what you think is custom. You're backtracking now after a showed the bootstrapmin.css link!

Your turn

You fucking retard how can you invest money on a pdf file called whitepaper.pdf without a source showing intention.

If you would look at the source code you'd fucking know its boostrap.


This is bootstrap structure you fucking knuckle head. Google grid-container and other divs and structure styles in the view source of the site.

I have a site that uses bootstrap.. its a great rapid app dev tool for sites. And themes make development easy. But i don't pretend i don't use it.
Try again.... do your research its bootstrap durrrr not a custom site unless you mean taking bootstrap and then adding a theme and some meta data that makes it custom...


incase you want some more proof because you're a moron


But hey maybe they have a custom site that uses the bootstrap.min cascading style sheet right... do you even read the shit you write?

AGAIN... who is ionomy. Seems funny they don't want to state this... is it because they don't want people to know? Seems funny when they want to be transparent?

Just checked it... your analysis is off. The transaction occured on the 5th of march 2016 so its over a month old so that send occured back then.


Saturday 5th of March 2016 02:39:34 - 1 transaction(s) in - 0 transaction(s) out

You are mistaking the date for the stake combine


SY4DTUBAyqS5oRZSB4WHucGQybBpGwHmbq 29597186.65 SPRT
SY4DTUBAyqS5oRZSB4WHucGQybBpGwHmbq 29597186.65 SPRT
SY4DTUBAyqS5oRZSB4WHucGQybBpGwHmbq 29625660.29 SPRT
SY4DTUBAyqS5oRZSB4WHucGQybBpGwHmbq 29625660.3 SPRT
 
SkA6V8quHjs5ismXFM5WYsqXvUseC3Rywj 118445693.88 SPRT
 
Thursday 21st of April 2016 10:57:39 - 0 transaction(s) in - 1 transaction(s) out 

That was yesterday.

I'll second this... i guess they thought replying and saying i'll look into this and get back to you was sufficient an answer. Seems unprepared for a team dedicated to their project... you think each team member would have this on hand... maybe they don't which means they are just as setup and gullible for the next scam. Only this time it won't be garza scammed me i was innocent it'll be matlack scammed me i was innocent? h,mmm? Whats the hold up for a simple link? Surely you know who regiestered it ionomy? maybe you could slack them to get the info?

and another 1 post account... who are you really and where do you come from and you interest in ion? Background tells all.

You didn't answer his question. So how are you actually going to do it. I'll add an addition as apple want to keep their financial control of their ecosystem. When they plug that hole how are you going to ensure it continues? Since you seem to doing it under handedly?

Second question and i doubt you will answer this but i'll keep repeating and posting it until you do.

1) WHO are you? I.e. you are posting as ionomy but who are you behind that handle. Failure to state this means you are hiding and not wanting to be transparent as ion states since you are moving on from the garza bad times. So again. WHO ARE YOU?

durrrrrr i concur If he's not team why else the fuck would he say


He's clearly invested in their dates and times and know how of the inner circle so clearly a team member. Its hilarious. They could come as themselves and hold at least some ethical debate answer but still they choose to use new fake accounts. Much like the garza times... they haven't learnt. As if they are dumb enough to think others would believe they are the next industry breakthrough and have zealots that crazy.

Adam your a fuckin idiot grow up. If these are your team mates tell them to pull themselves in line. If its you well the devil has an appointment for you at 3pm to shove a pineapple up your ass... leaf side first.

What are you like fucking 6 years old.. you don't think it i do so we'll just see *pokes tongue out.

Provide some fucking proof of your conviction if you believe it. Not just you think no i think yes so na na na na n na we'll see.
God all these 1-10 post accounts showing bullshit. Its clear to see you are all coming from either
a) xpytalk, hashtalk whateverthefucktalk.com
b) paid shills from some service that sells positive comments

if thats not the case stop hiding tell us who is behind the account linking to your hashtalk name etc. If you say im x and new then fuck me you aren't qualified to comment due to not being involved or experiencing the scam as it unfolded.

Retort?

Please tell me how a 1 post user with the name Rick_James that seems made up from 2 common names and no history to ion / xpy or being against it can be a voice of authority. How about you piss off and provide some real counter other than trying to discredit someone that is in agreeance with the majority with some lame attempt to discredit them. How about you show some proof of ionomy claims rather than the usual political bullshit of trying to discredit the other side. Showing proof of the ion team beats discrediting others you know?

wow fuck me im in... its like zen market all over again where i can click the red rocket. Only this time im sure i'll be clicking an electron or some shit to supercharge the nucleus of my ion staker. Did Moe Jordica help on this as CTO?

So what you are saying and recommending is that all potential investors pay a lawyer possibly $1000 to make sure you are legit. I think thats good advice. Can you please put that on ionomy.com? And the first topic here. Because you seem completely legit and want nobody to lose after josh garza scam. I think its right that if you give this advice you should also make it clear in your main topic and site. That is unless you don't want people to go to lawyers first? I'll take the fact you don't post this warning on your post and site that you do want people to invest without advice first.

Also... who are you. Don't give me this multiple people use the account thing. If thats the case identify yourself and all users of this ionomy account. If you are changed and transparent you will have no issue. I suggest each reply also you end with a -name... e.g. -adam matlack to show that you are posting as ionomy on behalf of adam matlack. Its how it works with send on behalf in email. Surely you are new and transparent and honest now and can do at least that? yes/no?

How about we take 2 trains of thought

1) He was with garza in the orchestration or if not orchestrating in some capacity new it was bs but rode it because he made some sort of money

2) He's unaware. However this makes him completely stupid and irresponsible and not someone you would want to be part of a core project. He couldn't spot garza so his future faith is just as bad knowing he'll fuck something up due to being "unaware" of shit happening.

Both are valid points and both are red flags.

Now onto ICO's. They are bullshit.
If adam matlack is such a great guy and so invested as per the other people then why can't they go find an angel investor? Answer is its easier to milk $100 out of 1000 sheep than it is to convince one $100,000 whale. Crowdsourcing is a joke and its the turn to thing to get money without any single responsibility being had.

Mr coins think about it. If ionomy fails adam and co lose nothing. All you morons investing do. They are playing with your money. If adam and co had to put up $100k each of their own money this wouldn't be happening. They have nothing to lose... in fact each attempt they do is you funding them in a job for 12 months at a time.

Ask adam and the core to put something of their own up as collateral incase shit goes wrong. Then we'll see how much they believe in their vision. Their whitepaper is bullshit. I can go do one up now with my vision... they call these people like adam the "ideas man". He's the moron of every IT project... he has no skills but has "the vision" that he wants everyone to work to. Adam has no value in anything other than a potential profit.. o fuck me he seems like a nice guy.. there is millions of them in the world.... grow up.

Stop and think for once. If you were making a project you wanted to succeed with YOUR OWN MONEY would you just do a white paper and ask bounties etc knowing your investment is ticking down every day? There is none of their skin in the game... no $$$$ they cloned a source did an xpy swap have a premine they pay themselves with and hope it goes to whatever value even 1 satoshi cause its free printed money.

Read what i just stated carefully... its actually constructive and valid points. Ask yourself what they have to lose from this and if you can't come up with a money sum that gives them any kind of detriment to themselves financially then you should rethink your position.

The reason they have you all on this is xpy was a scam... sure if your scam coins are worth 0 and someone offers you something im sure it seems like a good thing. But.... is it? If you come out ahead from it but 10 more people fall in the next scam really is that ethical OR something you want to stand by? Me? fuck that im trying to save some people from these terrible assholes.

Here's the next thing you can address. If they believe so much in their vision and detested bitcointalk but post an announcement here.... answer the follwing
1) why the new ionomy account without referencing who uses it? Its a generic unknown linked person account so no accountability
2) where is matlack using his own name to talk here if he so believes in this project. Is he that scared or not believing enough to talk with people here regardless of opinion they give? If thats the case i consider him a poor ass member of the team. Can't even face the crowd... a coward of his own conviction.
3) the other members? where are their accounts here and identifying themselves.. same question do they NOT believe in thier project? Will they not stand to answer and have the likes of you and others do it for them? Wow a slack channel a den for our exclusive already believers... we come to btctalk to just get more people in but won't address questions.

The above are valid whether you agree or not. So... bring matlack and the team over to identify themselves and ANSWER everything without dancing around.

Their website looking cool isn't hard. Its bootstrap with a theme. I haven't looked at the source but i suspect its a theme from themeforest with an author that charges the usual rate of per site around $20 to use the theme. bitlend.io used oneui a good theme template thats $23. It is very very very easy to make a professional looking clean site nowadays so i wouldn't take that as meaning competency.

I suspect if you search theme forest you will find this exact rocket ship animation. They have done some artwork modifications to include the bitcoin symbol on the cup and the ion icon on his shirt... it'll be a modified purchase.

Didn't matlack get screwed for less but he roped in his friends and scam them for their money? Matlack and the others in Josh's circle knew cmon. I bet mordica is hiding in the background somewhere under a new name.. maybe Moe Jordica?

Sure they do... its the one with josh garzas face on it in the middle isn't it?

Hey remember that time paycoin was so technologically advanced that even josh didn't know what the fuck it did or how it worked? How he posted up on hashtalk nobody has guessed or come close to the entire paycoin ecosystem and he offered a btc reward to who explained it the best. Was amusing that it wasn't a red flag to people ... take their money then ask them to guess what it does so you can take the best ideas and say yeah you guessed it even though josh had no fucking clue.

Remember how paycoin was so innovative and way faster than all other coins but no code changes were done it was a fork and just a block time change.

Once this is all over we'll have to have a rememberance day where we have a drink and tell all the fun old stupid stories about the time josh garza thought he was intelligent. Man i bet unclue stu, josh's mum and pretty much everyone whos ever met him feels embarrassed to be scammed by someone who was so obvious that it wasn't funny.

People posted that stuff on hashtalk... they were called fudders there everyone on that forum including you saw it. Also the shadow bans and shit and josh's constant o this is a glitch that is a glitch. remember when his emails came out and people still weren't believing? Calling them fake etc

People talked facts at the time with GAW and you ignored them.. how do you respond to this. Some facts people raised at the time

1. No pool or individual new pool increased the hash rate needed on the claims garza made.

2. No proof was shown when requested of the actual hashing facility minus and after a lot of time a dark warehouse single row that clearly looking through showed no other rows (btw mordica knew this... he was on that xpy.io or dev or whatever shit that everyone on hashtalk followed after)

3. after requesting proof of amazon, target, etc garza reneged and the shillers i.e. you criticised accusers for garzas lack of proof without questioning him.

4. After all the requests of proof for the actual stories going out i.e. time, cnn, forbes etc we saw some shitty wall street journal paid advert etc. Even after these requests by people and none coming you all still said these publications take time.

Those were all facts and many more and you ignored them back then.... how would you respond to actual facts now? You come here trying to act reasonable yet want to forget your past placing all blame on garza... take some responsibility. I doubt with any such fact acqusations you'd even listen or consider. Correct me if im wrong. Seems the same old shit to me.

pm me your offer and how you want to do it to ensure neither loses out i.e. ripped off scam wise.