 think it may even be lower then what maxcoin was when it was delisted from bittrex
|
|
|
|
|
you're under no obligation to give to ICOs and there is no need in the community to have ICOs.
plenty of solid cryptos out there without the need to run ICOs.
save alot of hassles with ICO (infact they go against the main reason for p2p currencies in the first place), just avoid them, and support good solid fair cryptos.
|
|
|
|
But hey I still happily have some of both coins, old coins are #1 for me... How many times can they re-release "anonymous" and "smart contracts"? If the function is the same, who cares that you've invented a new way to do it.....sorry tangent rant.
+1 (ton of snake oil salesmen plugging this is "all original code" as if original code automatically makes it better then btc/ltc/ftc etc  , personally i'd rather tried and tested improvement on btc's original code/idea) |
|
|
|
 tis missing the original videos, which where a good sell  |
|
|
|
Doubloons already exists why make another  |
|
|
|
Let's all remember kelsey tried to scare you into selling at 900 sats. We'll see how that turns out.
and 1 month later |
|
|
|
It is very simple.
I do not respect ICO coins.
Not buying, not trading, just completely ignoring those.
+1 something i certainly agree on. |
|
|
|
I think with LTC and other older coins potentially adopting segwit FTC is in a great position. BTC miners aren't going to switch, the high fees are too profitable and I don't see them wanting to risk messing around with a more complicated code. Their refusal will force us to wait until solutions to scaling and such happen without hard forks. But solutions will come, and one day they'll be running the same BTC core with DAOs and millions of transactions per second. Today BTC isn't being used for commerce anyways, its being used for investment and international transfers- neither of which require a faster network.
Looking 10 years from now. BTC is worth a ton and scalability is solved without hard forks. No one remembers segwit, unlimited or whatever else except that certain older coins adopted them and permanently changed. Whereas FTC not taking any of these hard forks can remain using a simpler code, and then adopt bitcoin's non-fork solutions when they come. Which coin will you want at that point? FTC which stuck to bitcoin's simpler method, or the old coins that adopted betamax?
mostly agree of this possibility. tis not out of the question for ftc to replace ltc. |
|
|
|
This was one of my worst crytpo investments
seems to be a repeating pattern for anyone following a Keiser coin  ...well with the obvious exception of Keiser |
|
|
|
|
almost the entire point of p2p currency is to be indifferent to gov.........but that's lost on most the current crypto crowd.
|
|
|
|
By the way, people had been recommending XEM for years and hardly anyone paid attention or listened.
hardly any ie none of the XEM pushers mention the fact that XEM distribution was scammed by the distributor., in a big way. Not really scammed just 1/4 people just didn't redeem them on time and most coins were divided by 1000 bttusers some coins are locked in development fund under multisignature keys. NEM was low price long time before it got pumped some distribution part take over year. Some early adopters dumped some stay like me and keep stake. Allways some distribution could be better but it was ok at that time and possible solution. actually many stakes where claimed by the 1 users ie one of the devs who even later admitted to it (something the devs continue to sweep under the rug)., it was a scam and sadly for crypto it still ticks on. |
|
|
|
Conqueror, though i think at this point the sell orders hinder a pontential pump, i do agree that a pump of ftc is very likely (almost a no brainer) at some (if not multiple) time in 2017. I personally think ftc should be way higher then current regardless of pumps etc in summary i agree with your ftc pick. now what i'm curious is why UIS? i've read your reasoning, research it, even done a small play daytrading it. however still i don't see why UIS would be a pick over 1001 other coins around its total marketcap level not trying to insult or argue just curious, what am i missing? |
|
|
|
Regarding the FTC, isn't it better to just wait for the pump and buy the pullback?
Recently those 2 large pumps had 2 smaller ones prior.
But it also had a 3rd small pump that didn't work.
Because it seems like an awfully long time to wait for the pump, could be in 6-12 months or pump might never come and coin will go to 1 Sat.
yeah i also spotted what we call sucker rallies early in the previous pumps (ie pullbacks/dumps early in the rally only to later go even much higher). tis a textbook way to draw in early those who are holding just waiting for the rally so the rally can continue higher. so yes a way is to wait for that first pullback, however what if that's the end of the rally? |
|
|
|
i for one welcome our new chinese overlords  |
|
|
|
About Feathercoin, do you think there is too many Buy order for a big pump ?
10 btc for 1000 sat
30 btc for 2000 sat
90 Btc for 4000 sat
Last year, Was it the same thing last year?
this is no issue at all, those walls are there for a reason and that reason is easy accumulation when whales decide, 10000 sat is no problem i disagree, those sell orders aren't by any potential pumper, they are by people assuming there will be a pump. the conditions atm are very different from what they where last pump. |
|
|
|
Innovation is irrelevant.
The consensus so far seems to be that the altcoin era is not over but that there is some question regarding the role innovation plays in its future. Please elaborate. crypto needs adoption not innovation. those pro innovation; tell me what innovation is needed? imo the only innovation needed in crypto is simplification (to help with adoption by average joes), and all the innovation i'm seeing is doing the opposite; mostly making crypto more complex and further out of reach to average joe's. i think altcoins are needed because btc went off the rails and doesn't match the promise its original potential showed. |
|
|
|
Let's all remember kelsey tried to scare you into selling at 900 sats. We'll see how that turns out.
lets  Went to 1300 after that. You lose! Sold some, rebuying lower. Now you're telling people to sell at 700-800? That'll work out even worse. nice so you're one of the ones selling on every little rise preventing it from rising and people should trust you  |
|
|
|
none |
|
|
|
Let's all remember kelsey tried to scare you into selling at 900 sats. We'll see how that turns out.
lets |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
