|
1248
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: NYC reserves 100 rooms for homeless, gets banned by hotel
|
on: November 23, 2014, 07:48:08 PM
|
A love base society removes disease, poverty, hunger, homelessness, war, cartels and most else of what you listed. The world is plentiful. If a handful of humans didn't claim ownership - or more accurately, if we didn't acknowledge their claimed ownership of our planet - life would be abundant and enjoyable for all.
Remove money and remove fear and we are free. All it takes is unison.
I assume your talking about something like the venus project? One of the many problems with that is who does the crappy work that needs to be done, no one wants to do and robots can’t do? Share it? Doesn't work if it's a one off job. Also there will always be natural leaders in society that will take charge and gain power, intentionally or not. This behaviour is natural and would still happen, this is not influenced by our current society. How would these people be "artificially suppressed"? |
|
|
|
|
1249
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: NYC reserves 100 rooms for homeless, gets banned by hotel
|
on: November 23, 2014, 04:35:56 PM
|
"A New York City hotel was not pleased when it set aside 100 rooms for a “government group” only to find out that scores of homeless people were going to occupy them for more than a week." If this sounds familiar, that's because it's illegal to feed the homeless in Florida. Why? Because things like homelessness, poverty, sickness, rape, etc is God's will http://rt.com/usa/207475-nyc-hotel-homeless-rooms/Can't expect the hotel operators to let the homeless ruin other customers vacation. As long as the rooms are paid for and the DHS agree to pay for any room damage if any, I see no issue with them staying. |
|
|
|
|
1250
|
Other / Politics & Society / Re: NYC reserves 100 rooms for homeless, gets banned by hotel
|
on: November 23, 2014, 09:25:22 AM
|
Poverty is a result of capitalistic society.
There are many reasons for poverty, here is a list I've grabbed from Wikipedia. Of course, there could be more. War Disease Declining union influence Economic structures Lack of education Parents leaving the family Divorce Teenage pregnancy Domestic abuse Employment abuse Immigrant status Minority status Physical and mental illness and disability Loss of job Low wage rates High medical bills Fraud Oppression Theft Disasters Fires Flood Poverty Imperative Lack of or inability to afford adequate health insurance Lack of awareness of government policy Industrial change Apathy Greed Overpopulation Inequality Dictatorships Racism Globalization Social Factors High taxation High growth rate of population Lack of job opportunities in secondary sector Lack of land resources Lack of industrialization Over dependence on agriculture Inflationary pressure Unemployment Drug abuse Income inequalities Accidents Stolen money Natural disasters Vulnerability Government |
|
|
|
|
1253
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Would you sell your soul for BTC?
|
on: November 20, 2014, 09:28:02 PM
|
Greed satisfies a temporary illusion of attainment while oneness with yourself provides an eternal fulfillment of peace.
Infinite peace can give you any manifestation you desire. Material is finite and confounded to limitations.
Sounds like you've found out the hard way that giving away your soul due to your greed was a bad idea. How will you get it back? Dank Soul Guarantee - Danksurance
The Dank Soul Gurantee is my karma based system of insurance. I acknowledge and respect that karma would play a negative role on me if I were to steal anybodies deposit, thus, offering an incentive to not perform such an action. Dank Bank, as with many other investment opportunities, is largely trust based. I hereby give my word and my soul that I will perform as an honest trader, no exceptions.
Anyone want to know what it's like to sell your soul? Ask dank. He'll deny it of course, but then that's to be expected.  |
|
|
|
|
1254
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Do We Owe Falllling an Apology?
|
on: November 20, 2014, 06:16:39 PM
|
|
I can be 100% right as well. Here's how:
I open two accounts. One account I scream price will fall, the other account I shout the price will rise. I then abandoned the account I was wrong in and keep the winner and collect my ill earned praise.
A very very old confidence trick that one.
Surprised so many got sucked in.
|
|
|
|
|
1255
|
Other / Off-topic / Re: Scientific proof that God exists?
|
on: November 20, 2014, 06:07:03 PM
|
This whole debate is stupid.
1. Human science is soooooo premature that humans don't even know how big the universe is, how does gravity and electromagnetism work and many other very very simple and basic parts of physics. If science can't even understand the physical world that is observable, it really has no business commenting on the unobservable (yet), and anybody trying to use it to prove or disprove God's existence probably doesn't realize how silly they look.
I posted this back in the summer: God cannot be proved or disproved.
Shame it was ignored. Would of saved months of pointless arguing and anger. |
|
|
|
|
1256
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin protocol questions
|
on: November 20, 2014, 05:18:55 PM
|
I think we have a kinda misunderstanding. I'm trying to understand how it works in the details: in the code.
Because if the code/software (of the miner) has such the function : Create25BTC()
Then you can easily hack this software and write sth like:
while(true) {
Create25BTC()
}
And you don't need any mining since then. You will be rewarding in the amount of 25BTC every microsecond.
But I guess this is not how it works. So there must be some protection mechanism. This is what I'm asking about.
I could easily change the source code and courageously award myself 1000000BTC. Easy. But... I must persuade everyone else to change their source code to my new version. If they don't (which they won't), my unearned coins will just be ignored. |
|
|
|
|
1257
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin protocol questions
|
on: November 20, 2014, 05:04:31 PM
|
Forgot to mention: I guess it uses OpenSSL? If this is the case then there an interesting thing I read about it: it contained some specially made bug that allowed somebody to read ALL the encoded internet.
That was the heartbleed bug. It wasn't ALL encryption at all. It was serious though. |
|
|
|
|
1258
|
Economy / Speculation / Re: Do We Owe Falllling an Apology?
|
on: November 20, 2014, 03:26:14 PM
|
What, you think he's not still here?
I like how he posts from different usernames with varying typing styles.
Sometimes he's Indian, sometimes he somewhat intelligent, sometimes he shows a small hint of bullishness in an attempt to throw off the scent.
Fallling is still here...and we don't owe him an apology.
Most of you people haven't been around BTC long enough to know that this sort of "bear" market has already happened before...and will continue to happen. These "markets" are cyclical.
People on here make me want Bitcoin to fail with your get-rich-now expectations.
They banned the poor guy's IP. He's gone, and the people you're describing aren't fallling, they're entirely different posters who merely share a similar sentiment. You think he's the only guy in the world bearish on bitcoin? Clearly you have no idea how easy it is to spoof an IP address. |
|
|
|
|
1260
|
Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin protocol questions
|
on: November 19, 2014, 08:10:16 PM
|
No. Only those that are running "full nodes" (which store and share the entire blockchain) have to verify every transaction. There are lightweight wallets that don't store the entire blockchain, and services that can provide wallets with an interface.
Let's imagine that every1 uses only "full" wallets. Does it mean that if the network includes 1million members, each of them has to verify the transactions of 999,999 members? All nodes on the network assume that any data received from another node is malicious. That's why every node independently checks all incoming transactions/blocks. It doesn't need to trust any data from anyone else as it can verify the data is valid itself. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
