It would be off-topic because the author of that site is talking about the Bible, and one, basic, specific religion.
You don't stop talking about this bible on this thread! Why stop now? My Bible talk mostly has been in response to people like you who keep on bringing up the Bible when they should be staying on-topic like I was when I produced the proofs for God found at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. Now that I have gone past most responding to Bible questions, why do you bring it up again? It is YOU who doesn't want to remain on-topic. Since you really seem to want Bible answers, read it. Well the scientific angle is a no go, because you keep changing the definition of words on the fly. Scientfic conversation is impossible when a clown starts doing that.
|
|
|
It would be off-topic because the author of that site is talking about the Bible, and one, basic, specific religion.
You don't stop talking about this bible on this thread! Why stop now?
|
|
|
By the way, are you EVER going to present SOME even hint of scientific evidence for or against the existence of God, so that we can start to prove out to ourselves from your standpoint, whether or not God exists.
The OP stated proof of god, not evidence. Sorry, talking about evidence is off-topic I'm afraid. Your rules remember, we must adhere to them.
|
|
|
Since you don't have any proofs or even evidences listed here for the existence of God, your stuff is propaganda. Take a look at the universe full of evidences for God as explained at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. Check out OP's evidence for God found in the first post of the thread. Then see if you can even say your evidences that prove God exists. The joke is wearing thin now, your comedy sketch is getting dull. You need to come up with some fresh material to keep us entertained. You don't think I'm giving you all this attention free do you? It has a cost, my time isn't free. You will pay me in entertainment in return for my attention.
|
|
|
LOL, you can't even keep the story straight. One minute it's proof, next it's just evidence, 10 minutes later it's not evidence just points to some. Keep the comedy gold flowing BADecker.
|
|
|
I already told you, I lean towards believing in a god. What are you talking about? No. What are you talking about? Nobody bullies anyone into anything on the forum. The only people who might do a little bullying are the moderators, because they can insist that people obey the rules, etc. If you feel that you are being bullied, you can always take yourself to a peaceful thread. Other than that, if you are bullied, it is your own doing to yourself. Don't you think that it is time that you grew up? Lying to people threatening them they should "believe in your religion or else bad things will happen" is a form of bullying. Oh wait, don't tell me, you've changed the definition of the word "bullying" today. Obviously it won't work on me. Much to your annoyance. All a bit sad when you sit down and think about it.
|
|
|
But with TOR you have no control over the exit IP.
You can manually choose which exit node you wish to use in your circuit. You will need to manually edit your torrc conf file. ExitNodes server1, server2, server3 StrictExitNodes 1
|
|
|
I already told you, I lean towards believing in a god. What are you talking about?
|
|
|
Your end simply ends yourself, or ultimately will, if you don't change.
BADecker still bullying people into believing his religion I see. Is that the only way they can recruit new members now? Sad.
|
|
|
Watch out for those "trusted" VPN honeypots.
|
|
|
Good. Now that we have cleared up that all this talk about Bible ad trees is off-topic, lets get on with on-topic stuff,
LOL, so this is your Sequoia refute: "Sequoia is off topic, so we'll pretend they don't exist. Let's talk about what I want to talk about!" LOL, thanks for the laugh.
|
|
|
Why not accept the evidence/proof, especially in the light of the posts that suggest that God cannot be proven to not exist?
No, because that would be a logical fallacy. Just because there is no proof of god cannot exist, it would be a fallacy to automatically assume yours is true.
|
|
|
This thread has been entirely beat up with way off topic stuff, not to say anything about the stupid ramblings of Dorksperiment.
Decksperiment cannot save you if you are too frightened to open your eyes.
|
|
|
This only works if the WoT is considered part of bitcoin. If not (as the comments in the thread seem to suggest) then you are just part of the WoT and it ends there. That's fine. Cows don't see the value in eating steak, and derps don't see the value in building trusted online relationships. Keep on "suggesting" with "comments" and see if it'll put food on your plate. This is a strawman. I never suggested the WoT had no value.
|
|
|
This only works if the WoT is considered part of bitcoin. If not (as the comments in the thread seem to suggest) then you are just part of the WoT and it ends there.
|
|
|
Our Sequoia in soil, hallowed be your wood, your branches come, your leaves be done, on earth as in heaven. Give us today our daily oxygen. Forgive us our chainsaws as we forgive those who deny against us. Save us from the time of trial and deliver us from false prophets. For the kingdom, the power, and the glory are yours now and for ever. Amen.
Pmsl.. you have no idea how much this cheered me up this morning Cool. Our discovery of the truth has cheered BADecker up as well. He was always talking about the truth and now he has it. He must be overjoyed.
|
|
|
Our Sequoia in soil, hallowed be your wood, your branches come, your leaves be done, on earth as in heaven. Give us today our daily oxygen. Forgive us our chainsaws as we forgive those who deny against us. Save us from the time of trial and deliver us from false prophets. For the kingdom, the power, and the glory are yours now and for ever. Amen.
|
|
|
Dont take it on faith.. Listen to the treeeeeeeeeeeeee's!!!!
Help's you breath more easily..
Check mate theists. He is not even trying to disprove the sequoia age because he cant Well, checkmate to the bible, not theists.
|
|
|
A person can accept anything or not, no matter how much evidence or proof is proffered.
Sure, but don't get annoyed when others don't accept it. Who's annoyed? God gives you the freedom to choose. I ain't the guy who has the right to take that away from you. How many times have your posted your false proof link? Must be around 20 times now. You got a bee in your bonnet over something. That isn't normal behaviour is it. People keep asking the question about proof for God. Which would you rather have? My link? Or the whole post? It's is up to you to click the link or not, or accept the proof or not. Well I guess if you stopped claiming to have proof, people would stop asking to see it. But of course, that's what you want isn't it. Anyway I don't want to interupt you. Your no doubt busy researching Sequoia trees at the moment. We await eagerly for your lengthy verbose refute.
|
|
|
I didn't prove God exists - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 - to offend a bunch of atheists. I did it for two major reasons: 1. The thread title seems to ask the question; 2. So that anybody who sees it will have hope that he can be saved from death. God is extremely patient with us. Why shouldn't He be? He knows that we only last less than a hundred years. He has all the time in the universe and beyond. Nothing that we do affects Him in the least except that He allows it to. Much of the anger that God has against people, has frustration as its base. God is attempting to save people. He went to the trouble of sending His Son to die on the cross, so that people could be forgiven for their mistakes. And people don't even want to admit that He exists. Sounds frustrating to me. Well, people will get what they ask for. God doesn't want them to have it. But they simply won't turn and acknowledge Him. Rather, they attempt to mock Him. Oh, well. Random, disconnected thoughts aren't proof of anything. Your version of proof is like finding a chocolate egg on Easter, then seeing a chocolate bunny on sale at Wal-Mart, and saying that it proves the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg. Chocolate is good stuff The problem is that my example is the exact same thing you're doing, except I all I did was switch the variables. The egg is some biblical passage about God's omnipotent acts of creation or otherwise, seeing the chocolate bunny is your observation of some totally disconnected event that you don't understand, and concluding the chocolate bunny laid the chocolate egg simpy because they're both chocolate is like you saying that God caused the event because they both share something in common. But, instead of sharing chocolate in common, they are similar in that you don't understand either fucking one of them. Never tried fucking^^ chocolate (or eggs or bunnies for that matter). But the proof for the existence of Gos (as the title of this thread asks about) is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395. The proof for the non existance of God can be found here: http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionhttp://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earthhttp://www.universetoday.com/76509/how-was-the-earth-formed/So what are we going to believe, hundreds of thousands of scientists who studied and use logic or you, mmmm. Those are not proof of non existence of god, as this proof cannot exist. It *could* be proof of against a religion though, which is a different thing altogether.
|
|
|
|