No, is it interesting?

Bitcoin has an impressive 'legacy'.  It succeeded in achieving things that I always considered theoretically possible but not very likely, but it could easily tumble into the abyss.  As a citizen of the United States of America I am keenly aware of such tragedies.

I also own the domain name 'bitcoin-legacy.org' and will happily give it away with no strings attached to a number of the people I know to be associated with Blockstream if they can make use of it.  The same offer might be extended to others if I can achieve a similar level of confidence in them that the likes of Maxwell and Wuille have earned over the years.

I own the domain because the threat of a hard-fork and the subsequent nearly inevitable subversion of Bitcoin have been realistic and ongoing threats for a long time.

Fact : Mircea (and friends) will try to dump their Gavincoins and buy Mirceacoins

'bitcoin-legacy'

There won't be any way. Why are you getting so crazy about it?

If you send your old bitcoins to someone after the fork but without splitting them yourself, you will effectively give him both your MPcoins and your Gavincoins, because he will be able to broadcast the transaction on the other chain at any time.

When the war starts, you will have to either keep your coins, or split them by sending them back to you, mixed with newly minted satoshis.

Only after having split them you will be able to dump the one you value the less.

It will not be trivial to end up with separately-spendable coins on both chains.

At first, every transaction broadcast on the 1MB network will be a valid transaction on the 20 MB network.

In fact, there would most likely be many nodes listening to both and intentionally relaying transactions from the 1 MB network to the 20 MB network to make sure they get included in both.

In order to double your coins, you need to get one transaction mined in the small chain and a conflicting transaction mined in the large chain.

It's a race with a low probability of success.

do you mean like double spend the coins on both chains at the same time or just freedom to choose either chain ?

People were treated like animals. He had killed almost 2/3rd of jews. What do you think about this ?

How the hell can it drop any further

Sure, pulling numbers and guesstimates out of your ass, that's much easier.

tl;dr: MPEx worked. That is where the money is.
MP et al. saved his investors and some of us eejits from Pirate, Gox, Stamp, Ethereum, GAW, the lot of them...
Then he put his foot down again, and said Gavin, bitcoin core, Vessenes, the phoundation all that crap too is a scam, a United fucking Soviet fucking States fucking Government scam.
And it shall not pass.
Whatever 'we the community' think or want, he can outspend us, and he will if he needs to.
So let's all stop twittering as if our say mattered; get our heads down and study the code that's so royally fucked up by USSG; and keep our axes sharp for the real life and death wars to come.

Maybe you should err on the side of doing the actual fucking math instead.
With 1mb blocks you can do roughly 7.76 tps when a transaction spends one output to two adresses: the payee, and the change address.

Ok lol.

A good estimate for the network throughput when limited to 1MB blocks would be 2 to 4 tps depending on how optimistic (naive) you want to be.

In theory this is correct, however I don't think comes off as smart enough to do something like this.

Isn't it time for satoshi to come back and bring some consensus?