The news report says they found "an item of significance" in the guy's apartment.
It will all come out within a few days. Obviously, it's impossible to suppress his religion and personal life since his name is known.
They found a suicide note. No. They found torn up sick notes. |
|
|
|
I dont understand one thing , if pilot can eject , why not people ? Also I have heard that the co-pilot wanted to crash the plane making it an Intentional Plane Crash
There are no ejector seats on A320s. Dont you think there should be ? It wouldn't work anyway. Hundreds of seats flying up at once, parachutes all getting twisted up. |
|
|
|
I dont understand one thing , if pilot can eject , why not people ? Also I have heard that the co-pilot wanted to crash the plane making it an Intentional Plane Crash
There are no ejector seats on A320s. |
|
|
|
From what I've seen and read, the pilot tried knocking and then kicking the door down for 8 minutes. I wonder why he didn't try to get others to join in - a la United Airlines 93? Granted, the doors leading up to the cockpits on modern planes are stronger nowadays due to new safety regulations passed since the 9/11 terrorist attacks but surely three or four people + a drink cart or fire extinguisher would have afforded a better chance of breaking the door down?
I heard on a news report that cockpit door was designed to withstand a grenade blast. |
|
|
|
The flight recorder revealed the passengers were calm until seconds before the crash
I know that's what we've all been told, but I don't really buy that. After a minute the captain would of been hammering hard on the door, his voice raising every second. There's no way the passengers wouldn't of realised something was very wrong early in the 8 minutes. The flight attendants wouldn't of been able to hide the fear from their faces. Also the plane was descending fast, the passengers would of known this. Let's hope I'm wrong though. |
|
|
|
BADecker is now going into full meltdown.  Hate Islam.
Spreading his poisonous hate all over the forum now. |
|
|
|
Words are easy, especially when you decide to write a simple line or two.
I'm typing on a phone. Compared to a proper keyboard it's slow and hardwork. |
|
|
|
The thing that really has me stumped is, why do these people want to disprove God? Or if they aren't trying to do that, why would they want to hide the truth of God's existence?
Science cannot prove or disprove god. I wrote this way back on page #3 all those months ago. Shame you ignored it. Would of saved you a lot of typing. You'll learn. I think your confused between the difference of believing in a god and believing in a religion. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think he's trolling. It seems to me he fancied himself as some sort of important Bitcointalk religious guru, anyone can goto for advice. Obviously this plan exploded in his face.
I think he's dug himself into such a deep hole, that confused and frightened, he's just saying anything that pops into his head now.
|
|
|
|
The Bible is accurate.
Except the parts in it that are the same as the Quran. Your words, not mine. Since you take it all out of context, and don't even express what context you might be referring to, your interpretation could be anything, and is simply your interpretation.  Well obviously your going to try to weasel out of your folly. ...Quran is perfection of mistakes. In other words, it is entire mistake. So if the Quran says the sky is blue, it is wrong in your opinion. If the bible also says the sky is blue, logic says the bible must also be wrong on that part as well. There is no "out of context". If the Quran says the sky is blue, even if the sky is blue, it is wrong because it was the Quran that said it, because the Quran is a wrong writing. Oh dear, Quran - "The sky is blue." BADecker - "No, no, no, that's wrong." Bible - "The sky is blue." BADecker - "Yes, yes, yes, that's right." I'm giving up the will to live. |
|
|
|
The Bible is accurate.
Except the parts in it that are the same as the Quran. Your words, not mine. Since you take it all out of context, and don't even express what context you might be referring to, your interpretation could be anything, and is simply your interpretation. Well obviously your going to try to weasel out of your folly. ...Quran is perfection of mistakes. In other words, it is entire mistake. So if the Quran says the sky is blue, it is wrong in your opinion. If the bible also says the sky is blue, logic says the bible must also be wrong on that part as well. There is no "out of context". |
|
|
|
The Bible is accurate.
Except the parts in it that are the same as the Quran. Your words, not mine. |
|
|
|
BADecker having a desperate swipe at the Quran now. Give him enough rope, he'll hang himself. Extremely difficult if not impossible to find mistake in Quran. Why? Quran is perfection of mistakes. In other words, it is entire mistake. Quran, the perfect mistake. No mistakes in it. It all mistake. And he conveniently ignores that the Quran and the Bible are virtually identical up until the house of Abraham. Just tryin' to get me to say something, eh? Why? After all, you know the Quran didn't even exist until more than 500 years after the Bible declared itself to be the all-time Word of God, up to and including the end of our universe in the lake of fire, and the beginning of the new universe that God is creating. The only way that my info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 doesn't prove the existence of God, is a future thing. When this universe is gone, it won't be remembered or brought to mind by anybody, not even God (although He could dredge it up if He really wanted). That's the only way my stuff won't be evidence that proves the existence of God. I was curious if you realized that you implicated Genesis as "all mistake." I'm glad BADecker has indirectly conceded his Young Earth theory is untrue. I feel we are finally getting somewhere at long last. |
|
|
|
|
Vod should setup a helpline and employ some staff to deal with the mountain of incoming claims.
|
|
|
|
The only way that my info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 doesn't prove the existence of God, is a future thing. When this universe is gone, it won't be remembered or brought to mind by anybody, not even God (although He could dredge it up if He really wanted). That's the only way my stuff won't be evidence that proves the existence of God.We don't have to wait that long. We can just use some simple level 1 beginners logic and "your stuff" evaporates into non-proof. The part about not having to wait that long is true. You will die within a short hundred years. The next thing you will see is Jesus calling you out of the grave (even if you are cremated). Then you will take your place in the afterlife, and my link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 will have been proven true with finality... all in short order... probably less than your 100-year lifetime. We are all praying you can pull through this BADecker. Remember we are on your side. We are here to help you. |
|
|
|
The only way that my info at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 doesn't prove the existence of God, is a future thing. When this universe is gone, it won't be remembered or brought to mind by anybody, not even God (although He could dredge it up if He really wanted). That's the only way my stuff won't be evidence that proves the existence of God.We don't have to wait that long. We can just use some simple level 1 foundation style beginners logic and "your stuff" evaporates into non-proof. |
|
|
|
|
I got a puncture in my front left car tyre today.
I'm blaming you Vod. It's all your fault.
|
|
|
|
BADecker having a desperate swipe at the Quran now. Give him enough rope, he'll hang himself. Extremely difficult if not impossible to find mistake in Quran. Why? Quran is perfection of mistakes. In other words, it is entire mistake. Quran, the perfect mistake. No mistakes in it. It all mistake. |
|
|
|
|
Best antivirus?
The best antivirus measure is to install a decent OS in the first place.
|
|
|
|
Would you like to explain how to scientificly measure your ''evidence'' because im a bit lost, thanks. To translate, because he's that brainwashed BADecker has rewritten the definition of a scientist so it fits his religion better, kind of like how religious people try to re-write history and everything else in order to make the world try and fit in their respective religions, why do you think that they always try to wipe out other cultures' and beliefs? Too bad for him the real world doesn't ever work like that, otherwise why would all these other religions and beliefe systems exist in the first place if his was so perfect? It's mostly that standard modern scientists don't WANT to explain that they are proving God exists, more and more all the time in the things of science that they prove. The ones who DO express how science proves the existence of God, are ignored by the universities, or worse, ostracized. It's all a political ploy to tear down the strength of our religious nation, so that the politicians can more easily control the wealth of the people, and take over the world. Yet the proof for the existence of God is here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg8331233#msg8331233. My professors at Indiana beg to differ. "Can science and religion coexist" is a common theme here. You seem to be using a definition for "science" that the joint would not agree with. Of course, true science and God coexist. God made the universe. Thus, the things of true science exist right along side of God. What isn't correct among scientists is often the fictional stories that they make up about science. For example. The Big Bang theory is a fictional story. There is absolutely no scientific basis in fact for it. Why not? Because there are too many unknown variables that could negate the whole BB theory. One would need a proper kind of time viewer to say BB was anything like fact. Outside of the actual proven things of science - the lab work, the observations - the rest of it is almost pure fiction. Bible is eye witness reports. You realize that everything you've said so far has been wrong and everyone that took part in this thread has also told you that? Everything about the bible, science. Literally everything. It's amusing to watch you type pure nonsense and lies with such false confidence. Ignorance is bliss, lol. I can see that you are saying what you are saying. And, you are a little bit scientifically accurate. The branch of science that makes you accurate a little, is political science. Why political science? Because political science approves of propaganda and lies, like you are using. Did you notice how you said "lol" above? This is because you want to show that you are happy in your ignorance as well as your propaganda, even if the lol you use is not the truth. The question asks itself. Are you really laughing? Or is lol part of your propaganda as well? I was really laughing at your behavior. People like you know their wholly wrong, but continue argueing their false points anyway in hopes that if they repeat it enough, someone else even more ignorant than themselves would believe it. You are laughing at yourself, because you know that I have presented clear evidence at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.msg10718395#msg10718395 that proves God exists. All the world can see it. But only those who are on God's side will let themselves believe these undeniable facts. Just so that you can see that you are wrong, in your statement, above, you used "their" incorrectly, and you spelled "argueing" incorrectly. What's the matter? Can't afford a grammatical checker or a spelling checker? Never mind worrying about other peoples spelling. You just concentrate on repairing your own logic circuit malfunctions. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
