Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 02:43:43 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 186 »
1161  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: orphan blocks on: January 12, 2015, 05:21:09 AM
I read, after 100 blocks, the branch is abandoned...
The biggest branch wins.
And all the transactions in the abandoned branch, need to  reconfirmed in the winner branch?

Transactions in the abandoned branch can be put inside other branches immediately. No need to wait 100 blocks.
1162  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Users of Bitcoin Core on Linux must not upgrade to the latest version of OpenSSL on: January 10, 2015, 07:32:40 PM
You can check if your compiled binary is working correctly by executing the command "make check" in the source code directory. This will then iterate through tests. It will return either pass or fail.
1163  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Making PoW usefull on: January 10, 2015, 02:54:12 PM
"Bitcoin seems like a complete waste of resources".

Quote from the bitcoin wiki:
"No more so than the wastefulness of mining gold out of the ground, melting it down and shaping it into bars, and then putting it back underground again. Not to mention the building of big fancy buildings, the waste of energy printing and minting all the various fiat currencies, the transportation thereof in armored cars by no less than two security guards for each who could probably be doing something more productive, etc."
1164  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Users of Bitcoin Core on Linux must not upgrade to the latest version of OpenSSL on: January 10, 2015, 11:16:31 AM
Arch Linux just updated to 1.0.1k so this affects my node.
Think I'll just shut my node down till the patch.
1165  Other / Off-topic / Re: Don't try to format a partition of the usb on: January 10, 2015, 08:55:09 AM
Because it will format the whole drive.

You tried to format part of a drive?   I've been MCSE certified for 15 years, and I've never heard of that!

If you have a device on /dev/sda, with say two partitions /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda2, it would be possible to just format a single one with the command "mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda2" for example.
Don't know how to do it on Window though.


I don't do it through command but normally I am sane enough to use Gparted which works pretty well but I thought SDC will only erase the current selected partition but I was wrong. Learned it the hard way.

Gparted is a good tool if your not comfortable using the command line. You can format individual partitions using that. /dev/sdc means the whole drive, /dev/sdc1, sdc2, sdc3..... are the individual partitions.
1166  Other / Off-topic / Re: Don't try to format a partition of the usb on: January 10, 2015, 08:22:32 AM
Because it will format the whole drive.

You tried to format part of a drive?   I've been MCSE certified for 15 years, and I've never heard of that!

If you have a device on /dev/sda, with say two partitions /dev/sda1 and /dev/sda2, it would be possible to just format a single one with the command "mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda2" for example.
Don't know how to do it on Window though.
1167  Other / Off-topic / Re: Don't try to format a partition of the usb on: January 09, 2015, 11:22:52 AM
When you say formating, do you mean you tried to put a fresh file system on one partition and inadvertently messed up another partition your coins were on?
1168  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Cheapest way to run a full node ? on: January 02, 2015, 01:41:54 PM
Thanks for your answers. So I'm lead to the conclusion the cheapest option (without much tweaking)
would be to rent out a virtual server. They can be had for a couple of $'s and should
be sufficient ram-wise and traffic-wise (usually at least 50-100 GB/month is included in these
contracts). Did someone try that?

Mine [1] is a VServer (single core, 2 GB Ram, 50(?)GB SSD) and its fine as a node. Its a bit slow from time to time for the analysis of the mempool I want to run, but Im working on another baremetal server at home for that.


[1] http://213.165.91.169/

What program did you use to get those stats?
1169  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Cheapest way to run a full node ? on: January 02, 2015, 01:38:18 PM
What is the cheapest way to run a full node. I do have a few external HDDs and rasp pi laying around.
No unused laptops though.

Suggestions ? ideas ?
You'll have difficulty running a full node on a pi. It doesn't have enough ram and will end up using swap.
With some configuration, it is possible to reduce the memory footprint to as low as 200 or lower megabytes.

Can you show me how to do this? I would prefer to use a Pi instead of an x86_64 motherboard setup.
1170  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Cheapest way to run a full node ? on: January 01, 2015, 11:19:31 PM
Can you say something
about the "realistic" minimal requirements? I'd also interested in how much traffic this would cause
per month.
My full node is currently using 660MB of ram, connected to 54 peers.

Not sure how much bandwidth I use each month. I have an unlimited home broadband package, so I don't worry about it.
1171  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Cheapest way to run a full node ? on: January 01, 2015, 07:22:34 PM
What is the cheapest way to run a full node. I do have a few external HDDs and rasp pi laying around.
No unused laptops though.

Suggestions ? ideas ?
You'll have difficulty running a full node on a pi. It doesn't have enough ram and will end up using swap.
1172  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin was just an investment? on: January 01, 2015, 07:15:27 PM
Bitcoin doesn't get the recognition that it deserves. Most people who are part of the Bitcoin community only see it as a way to get more fiat. The fiat is the end goal and Bitcoin is just a speculative means to achieve that. Well folks, Bitcoin was supposed to be more than that. It was supposed to be the first decentralized currency and payment network outside the control of centralized banks and governments. But the people don't care about that. They just care about the dollar bills. Unfortunately, I admit I fit in this category too.

We have betrayed Satoshi. Cry
You don't real want the dollars. You just want the stuff you can buy with them.
1173  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Google is blocking me from searching for terms that have Bitcoin in them. on: December 31, 2014, 04:21:09 PM
Use https://duckduckgo.com/

I knocked all that Google nonsense on the head ages ago.
1174  Economy / Lending / Re: I need loan on: December 30, 2014, 02:32:13 PM
Maximum can be 10000+.
LOL, yeah thanks for the laugh. Cheesy
1175  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin Core 0.10.0rc1 has been released on: December 29, 2014, 10:00:57 PM
But still I am waiting for final version. Smiley
You mean the stable version of 0.10.0 I'm assuming?
1176  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Retina Scan Or Thumb Print Authorisation on: December 28, 2014, 09:20:38 AM
How would the Bitcoin community like retina scan or thumb print authorization? (Most new cell phones already have these features built-in)
Unless you want your retina or print uploaded to some NSA database somewhere, I would avoid using these features.
1177  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Adding Hardware RNG on: December 27, 2014, 07:52:50 PM
www.entropykey.co.uk as an example
They have been out of stock for months and months.
I emailed them for a date, but they never replied.
1178  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: why unconfirmed this transaction? on: December 27, 2014, 07:48:05 PM
i hate the added fees Tongue
Better hope miners don't start hating transactions with no fees attached then.
1179  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Hashing everyone's desktop screen and insert the hash in the blockchain on: December 27, 2014, 08:55:52 AM
I placed this idea into /dev/null for later review.
1180  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can you explain why the transaction output has text message ? on: December 24, 2014, 06:23:21 PM
Do you know why it's working ?
1 OP_RETURN (with up to 40 bytes of data) output per transaction is allowed inside a standard transaction.

OP_RETURN outputs are provably unspendable.
Pages: « 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 [59] 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 ... 186 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!