andreas, although he has some bias to pander to certain ideals, is willing to atleast say things as they are most of the time and even be professional when he goes to explain things to even government senates, parliaments and government commitee's

adam back just tweets his desires for bitcoin direction like a typical manager

if gold could be mined for $2 in peoples back yards using a coffee filter and a spoon. gold would only have a lowest spot price of about $4 and speculate $4-$10

but gold costs $900+. with diesel, labour, excavators, sluice machines..
meaning its lowest spot price would be about $1k. and speculate $1-$2k

..
bitcoins mining cost depending on region(nations electric price) $25k(china)-$65k(germany)
with a lowest spot price of like $28k and speculate $28k-$70k

the philosophy (the loyalty the patriarchy) gives strength to mining desire
alot of people store value in bitcoin, which adds more loyalty, patriarchy to the philosophy

other things like strong merchant support from exchanges
well established development team (pro and cons) adds more strength to it compared to alts

many people feel bitcoins protocol wont break. but other altcoins could break due to weak decisions.
..
economically bitcoin is used as the base currency all other coins are measured against. or gatewayed into-out of which adds more strength to the philosophy(demand)

User nodes can delete blockchains. change their user agent.. .. all meaningless
they just become useless to the network

the actual economic nodes (exchanges/merchants) that people actually spend funds with are more important. whatever direction, block, transaction format economic nodes choose:
pools follow them else pools cant spend their rewards/convert their rewards on exchanges.
Users cant spend funds if merchants/exchanges are not on the same ruleset so users follow merchants/exchanges

so the merchants/exchanges are the generals(making orders). pools are the sergeants(organising the grunts). and users are the grunts

i am from the UK and so avoiding the pound(£) has made me out of UK financial jurisdiction.

during 2012-2015 many merchants were happy to accept bitcoin. fee's were cheap to accept, so then they send to an exchange and then for them to get their £ they wanted.

but now. with all the 2017+ cludged code added to stifle bitcoin to promote sidechains/altnets. merchants find these subchains/altnets too crazy to get involved in. (many flaws, and many ways to lsoe funds or have payments bottleneck)

and fees to remain 'bitcoin accepting' too high to accept onchain.

its now been found cheaper to convert my hoarded coin into a fiat debit card thats not the £(avoid jurisdictional tax tracking)
and then spend the fiat and accept the few % forex exchange rate every time i use my debit card in the UK

yep
bitcoin has become so bad onchain due to 2017+ cludge code.
that its actually cheaper to convert to a non native debit card fiat and spend funds using a 'forex exchange rate' (use a dollar debit card in the uk)


these sidechains/altnets that have been the promised solution to the bitcoin cludge.. have been operating for like 4 years. but these other networks are erroneous, flawed bugged and too much hassle to operate and maintain. (payment success rates are not guaranteed for amounts $25+)

and yet 4 years in bitcoin (2009-2013) had thousands of real world merchants accepting bitcoin and even had conversion gateways like bitpay.

seems there has been too much wasted time in the developer land. where they have been concentrating on trying to offramp bitcoin utility and promote to newbies that they should use these other networks.. but not actually do much on these other networks to actually get it working so that those merchants that accepted bitcoin 2012-2015 found it as easy and cheap and without flaw/irritation to accept payment on these other networks as easily as they did accept bitcoin in 2012-2015.

so yea.. for now im using debit cards(facepalm)

you cant ban bitcoin.. just like a bottle of 1920's beer has no brain or eyes to read the law for a bottle to realise it is banned
what governments can do is ban its citizens from using it.
just like prohibition in 1920's it did not ban beer. it banned people from drinking beer.

governments can control their currency by ensuring people are paid wages in only fiat. and pay taxes in only fiat. thus making fiat dependant on peoples income

this is why bitcoin is no threat to developed countries.
however small undeveloped countries like el salvador that doesnt even have its own fiat. is more free to try new things and detach itself from the dependance on the US dollar.

dont think of it as a binary option. bitcoin to replace all fiat or none
think of it as bitcoin is a second choice. take it or leave it

nah. it was many people in the community literally screaming for some onchain transaction count increases. even compromising to 2 4 8.

adams employees and subsequently the employee's fanboys(which carlton was one of them)  then went on a obstruction campaign to fight against on chain scaling because it didnt fit blockstreams business models.

you cant say adam thought of the idea and the community declined. .. it was the community that thought it up and adams employees, clients and fans declined

even the pretend offering of 2mb in 2017 NYA by one of adams investors didnt flourish because once they got their coerced requirement fulfilled(SW) the backtracked on the 2mb offering that came with the coercion

stop trying to twist history. to make adam look like a good guy

edit to respond to below
doomad has not even mentioned anything about adam back or adam backs financial backing.
making doomad the troll here
adam backs affiliation with the barry silbert NYA which flipped 45%to an unprecedented and naturally impossible 100%in just a couple weeks. shows how coercive that action was
and yes its on topic. because it involved Adam backs whipping hand between his financial backing and the devs

anyone that doesnt want to talk about the NYA actions. is obviously siding with adam backs position
very funny doomad always jumps in to dismiss it every time its mentioned. what does doomad want to hide so much.. the proof that it happened is in the immutable blockchain. cant hide it.
the NYA block flag and the subsequent lack of native blocks the NYA threatened to remove.
can be seen in block data. the lack of the promise of a 2mb native limit (without the cludgy /WSF).
 is available in the blockchain.
doomad will always lose his troll game because the blockchain proves him wrong. maybe he should give up trying to dismiss the truth

if jetcash dares thinks for 5 seconds and asks himself
whats the difference between:
a passport
a travel visa
a driving licence.

and understands their purpose
he will realise there is no 'vaccine passport'
there is a vaccine certificate. an official letter that shows the details of the little paper card scribbled with which batch of vaccine someone had

but its not some ID2020 thing with biometrics and photos and life history.

..
also jetcash doesnt leave the UK. so i dont see why he is even bothered by international travel things.
but one thing is for sure. you can still travel without a vaccine certificate. and travel back. all it changes really is if you are going to a virus hotzone your going to have to quarantine. unless you have had the vaccine(again something he refuses to have) so a vaccine certificate(his view of passport) wont even apply to him anyway

those in virus 'warm' zones. dont quarantine. they just have to be tested. well again no odds to jetcash.
being tested to get a certificate or being tested without certificate. doesnt affect jetcash. it doesnt change the experience either way

there is no vaccine passport

jetcash is british and never travelled outside the UK
and shops, pubs, restaurants dont request anything.. even masks are not mandatory..

jetcash really needs to get out of his campervan and actually realise this.,.
yep go to the grocery store. go to a restaurant. go nightclubbing. go play a sport
go do normal things..

those shouting out "vaccine passport" are idiots that imagine there is some special ID card(ID2020 fallacy) they have to apply for that puts their life story into some  certificate attached to their photo and address and vaccine status
sorry but there is no passport

the beauty of english (not american) is true english does not require grammar nazi's to point out that they will ignore a post because it is not punctuated with capital letters at the start of sentances.

real english doesnt care about accents(in speaches) or grammar(in written conversation). for instance cockney, mancunian and other real english languages(in england) care more about the context than trying to appear all posh like the queen

yep i said it .. we do not speak like the queen or mary poppins

if you care to only read capital letters and full stops then you have a ignorance that will not play well in any social situation

but it is funny when idiots ignore posts 'coz grammar' as their only rebuttal

its funnier when badecker and tvbof blame english as their reason to ignore. especially when they say it will take them 3 days to read american english science literature..
.. that to me shows they cant comprehend anything above 3rd grade american english

you posted a conspiracy site. that misquoted a yahoo site. which took a out of contect extract of a cdc statement

sorry badecker that is not "medical stuff"
your natural news has totally twisted, ignored and then made a opinion piece based on their bias. not based on medical stuff

nope
firstly your conspiracy sites summary is wrong.
the vaccine does not cause more viral loads than a unvaxxed person.

what you find out if you actually cared/bothered to learn about the truth.. heck even learning commons sense would help you.. here il use simple numbers for your simple mind to understand

is that if someone unvaxxed passed say 100,000,000 particles of the alpha strain
is that if someone unvaxxed would pass 200,000,000 particles of the delta strain
(^ no respect for personal space, no social distancing, no mask)

and same situation but with a vaccined person
is that if someone vaxxed would pass say 5,000,000 particles of the alpha strain
is that if someone vaxxed would pass 10,000,000 particles of the delta strain
(^ no respect for personal space, no social distancing, no mask)


now unvaxxed people that respect personal space and follow the 2 metre rule.
mean they only pass 2,000,000 particles of alpha instead of 100mill particles if they didnt respect personal space(4mill particles with social distance instead of 200m of delta)

now unvaxxed people that respect personal space and follow the 2 metre rule and wear a cloth mask.
mean they only pass 1,400,000 particles of alpha instead of 100mill particles if they didnt respect personal space and didnt wear a mask(2.8mill of delta if they wore a cloth mask vs 200m delta without mask/distancing)

now unvaxxed people that respect personal space and follow the 2 metre rule and wear a surgical mask.
mean they only pass 600,000 particles of alpha instead of 100mill particles if they didnt respect personal space and didnt wear a mask(1.2m of delta instead of 200m without mask/social distancing)

so in comparison..
if the vaxxed done social distance
that 10mill delta becomes 100,000
if they wore a surgical mask thats then further reduced to 30,000



if a vaccinated person then went back to normal living habits of not social distancing. no mask. they could pass 10mill..
still alot less than if they didnt get a vaccine and went back to normal living.(200million)

the conspiracy blog is trying compare socially distancing and mask wearing unvaxxed numbers.. to back to usual unmasked non distance respecting vaxxed.

its got nothing to do with the vaccine causing more viral load. its about the lack of social distancing/lack of mask that vaxxed people can do.
but all in all its still alot lower then the ignorant unvaxxed who disrespect others by not distancing/not masking up

vaccines do not create a forcefield/shield to prevent infection. a vaccine trains body to fight the virus quick and limit/prevent the disease in the person and reduce/prevent the symptoms.. and reduce/prevent the viral load they pass on

by fighting it quick.... not by having some star trek forcefield bubble that keeps viruses away


in short..
badecker as a person that hates social distancing rule and hates masks.. he would be passing around 200mill particles of delta when he gets it and pretends its of no problem and no need to change habits

but someone vaxxed that wants the same normal living will only be passing around 10mill.
if the vaxxed continued respecting personal space and wore a mask it could be as low as 30k

in both cases less than unvaxxed personal space disrespecting badecker

nope

you are wrong in every sentance you made
you know the links by now it might actually be worth you spending a few days to read them instead of spending months avoiding them and then asking for them..

you will find they took samples from many people with similar symptoms and where their xrays and scans showed same lung damage.
they then PCR tested the samples and found similarities
they also compared the sample to known previous viruses to find the familial ancestry
and realised it was a corona virus and not for instance HIV or eloba or zika

once knowing it was part of the corona family they then compared it more to samples of certain corona
and found it was less near the NE or the ME strains (the netherlands and mers) and found it was more near/similar to the 2002 sars strain.
but even this most similar was only 95%

this 5% differential is what made it novel and where the body is not already immune to it. its different enough to not be fought off quick. thus causing symptoms

they then injected it into other animals like mice, chimps, rodents, and see if those animals then showed symptoms... they did.. so they found the partical that caused the symptoms

they also used human cell cultures to see if it would do damage under the microscope they can witness with their eyes. .. and the seen it did too

they seen the corona shaped viruses go into a cell, replicate to the point the cell bursts open

and no they didnt just put mucus into animals/ testtubes. they actually used equipment(like the one you said last year needed to be used, (centrifuge)) as one but not the only separation method to separate out the materials until all thats kept is the stuff that looks like corona virus

what they also done was take mucus samples from people without virus symptoms. separate the parts to see if they too had these corona shaped things. and people without it didnt.
(dismissing and debunking your insane thoughts of whats injected is just human cells/exosomes)

you already admitted it passed the the koch postulum last year(check your memory and post history)
it has also passed the rivers.. and even the bell test.

so stop with your ignorant and forgetful brainfarts. and realise you got debunked over a year ago now.
so find a new topic to talk about

your dementia is not proof the world has not isolated it. your dementia is proof you forget you been debunked time and time again

more like tvbcof thinks people are programmed to die before 50 if they have a vaccine..

yet history proves tvbcof wrong.
before vaccines were even a thing average life span was 50
after vaccines became the norm.. life spans averaged 82

even now countries that dont do regular vaccinations still have lifespans of average 50
vs all the countries that do do vaccines.

the reason is that diseases do kill people. .. its why they are defined as diseases!!! and not just temporary irritations
vaccines stop/reduce diseases to small percentage levels. and in many cases eradicate it

vaccines are not the major cause of death. and have never been the causes of death.
quite the opposite disease with no vaccination leads to high causes of death

EG how many people die of polio after having a polio vaccine
vs
how many people die of polio before vaccines were a thing

bitcoin is currently trying to shift out of the "digital cash for the unbanked"
meaning away from anyone able to use it freely/cheaply

to be come a reserve currency asset for institutions to use as gateways to their own currency
where their own currency is pegged to bitcoin

it wont become a world replacement of fiat reserve.
but a secondary international option(choice) away from fiat reserve

the only issue is that these sidechain/subchains altnets with pegs to bitcoin. are at the moment showing signs of centralisation to big players at the expense/loss of the little guys
(little guys just wanting to buy pizza are finding its expensive on bitcoin and a 3 fold annoyance on the sidechains/altnets suggesting to be the solution to pizza price transacting)

that said
we could see an era where say paypal and starbucks become the bank2.0 with their own sidechain/altnet pegged/bridged to bitcoin reserves(locked funds) to compete side by side with fiat.

and yes even some countries could make their own sidechain/altnet pegs to bitcoin. as their digital fiat
(these are small under developed countries)

but bitcoin will never fully dispose of all world fiat reserves
the main developed countries(US/UK/EUROPE/AUSTRALIA) want full control of all aspects of their currency

bitcoins VALUE is based on cost of obtaining it. mainly it vibrates around the mining cost..(currently $25k china-$34k usa)
same as gold (mining cost is about $900)

bitcoins PRICE is value+ speculation.
same as gold (mining cost +speculation= spot price)

do not confuse value vs price

many times the speculation layer will bounce the price up 3x of value.. EG the $62k price while the value was more of the $20k-$30k range

if gold could be mined in peoples back yard using a spoon and a coffee filter for $2 per ounce. people would sell it speculatively all the way down to a support of about $4-$5
but because its $900. speculatively it goes above $1k but stays below $2k

bitcoin is the same.. if it cost $2 to mine 1 btc.. the price would fall the the $5 area

value is not price and price is not value.
the difference between the two is the speculative bit.. but that does not mean bitcoin is only specuiative

remind me again. how many lines of code adam back contributed to bitcoin.
yes adam back became the purse holder of a company that paid devs. and the whip master of the devs..
but how much code did he actually write
(kinda rhetorical i already checked the github contributor list)

maybe just maybe you dont care about anyone unless they are big names with big pockets that have big whips to actually get devs to do stuff..
EG because say andreas is loud but has no dev whip. you dont respect andreas

assumptions you can make. that can help(no prediction model. just some assumed bases of economics

imagine you know 4 people around the world.
one in china. one in america. one in the UK and one in germany..

you can work out if they are going to be buyers or miners wishing to sell

heres how it works
calculate their mining costs for mining in their region based on electric cost per country stats and mining calculators.

heres the numbers i get using the most efficient hashing miner per hours electric .. plus hardware cost(spread over year)

germany 36cent/kwh = $55k mining cost per btc - not mining but buying
UK 24cent/kwh = $44k cost per btc - not mining but buying
US 13cent/kwh =$34k cost per btc - was buying last week. now mining to potentially sell
                                                                             (market price shift from $30k-$39k)
china 4cent/kwh =$25k cost per btc - mining all throughout to potentially sell

you can now work out some things
no one can mine coin anywhere on planet cheaper then $25k
so every miner would switch off hardware and just buy if price ever went that low
this buy pressure then holds the price up, lack of sell pressure holds price up

no one can mine more expensive than $55k. so if the price went up. people will have no reason to buy and would be mining to sell
the sell pressure holds price down. the lack of buy pressure holds price down

this becomes the window of value... $25k-$55k
the potential top and bottom

you may sometimes get shortlived spikes and cliffs that dont even last a few hours or a day. beyond those windows. but on a day long-week measure the numbers always fit
above the top window. is definitely BUBBLE speculation territory. never expect it to sustain

and if you think about the main countries interested in bitcoin
america, europe asia
you can start forming bases of settling points
(mainly america is considered mid-point of good support)

in january. the window based on that gens asics was $21k-$72k
and as always. it never deviated outside that window

in 2018 the window was $3k-$25k

so.
for instance. for germany to even consider buying coin above $60k long term
the network hashrate has to be above 125exahash long term and for germans to want to buy coin more then other countries below them want to sell

the higher the hashrate the more countries join in on wanting to buy rather then mine. meaning less countries want to min to sell


TL:dr;
dont expect $60k sustainable right now. no chance
dont expect $20k sustainable right now. no chance
$25-$55k is reasonable expectation window.

blockchain is not an AI
its a ledger with rules

automation is not AI
intelligence is not staying on a fixed logic. but able to change the logic and make its own new rules/functions

AI is where the rules change all by themselves purely because of the data results of previous actions it has itself generated without human input.

bitcoin only functions due to human input.
humans decide to put more ASICS to mine.
humans make transactions
humans archive the data by deciding to be fullnodes

an example of an AI blockchain would still NOT be this:
when the first generation block is created. the initial settings are
1difficulty
500byte blocksize
1 fullnode

.
at the first block. the code has some functions. to spend the reward to an API shoppingcart to purchase cloud storage. and upload a copy of fullnode software to that cloudstore (no human decision)
then the 2 nodes compete to make the next block.
(thus a simple self generating sybil virus replication is not AI)
as all of this was programmed into it by a human. and the code is still the same.
automation(not need human maintaining) is not AI

the code then has to have the ability to change its own code and create new purpose. new end results

the changing of the code is not just parameter changing like self changing the difficulty or blocksize.
it actually has to change its function.
EG make its own decision to create a new transaction format all by itself
EG find new cloudstore vendor all by itself
EG negotiate better cloudstore subscription deal
EG create a new mining algorithm all by itself
EG recognise a bug/flaw and create its own fix

high blood pressure is caused by many things.

too much fluid.. not enough fluid
too much salt. not enough salt
too much cholesterol
heart failure

let explain each.. as separate incidences. separate causes of high blood pressure

heart failure
your heart has 2 pumps. a pump in and a pump out. if one of these fail/weaken. then the other has to work twice as hard. they do this by pumping harder to get the fluid in your veins/arteries to move around your body more. meaning more fluid pressure

salt.
your body does need it. just not too much of it
too much of it causes your body to 'dry out' (retain too much water in your cells leaving less free fluid in your veins/arteries)
which with more water in the cells swells and tightens the walls of your veins and arteries. this effect makes it harder to push fluids around freely along with the lack of free fluid to move around your body causing your heart to work harder thus push/pump more per heartbeat.

this also triggers your body to say you are thirsty.. to try getting more water ingested. and also sends signals to retain fluid(tells kidney/bladder to slow down)

to much fluid
either just drinking excessively and not urinating enough. or the imbalance of the salt example
so now you have more fluid in your veins and arteries. which means your heart is pushing more fluid around in narrow veins/arteries. thus. higher pressure if you have excessive water.

not enough fluid
also not having enough fluid(water) means the salt your body does need is not being diluted to preferred amounts. causing more drying out.
and separately because there is not enough fluid your body has to try sucking(pumping in) harder to get the fluid back to the heart, and then blowing(pumping out)  harder to get that limited fluid around your body.

too much cholesterol
this is the build up of fat in the vein/arteries that make less fluid able to pass freely making your heart have to pump in harder and pump out harder to get fluid around your body

your body does need water. fat and salt. but your body has to have the right balance.
salt is needed for nerves and muscles
without it salt inside a muscle/cell wont retain water it needs to function. meaning it just becomes lose water
which then is not in the muscle where needed but in the vein where not needed. so you urinate it out. leaving your muscles weak and demanding more water. so you need salt. for muscle function.

yes low salt can also cause high blood pressure
its all about balance. mostly your water and salt intake and your urine output

in short.
dont cut out all salt your muscles, cells, and nerves need it . but if you have the recommended salt amount.
if you have a healthy heart and healthy liver/kidneys. more water is better than less salt.
(your will just urinate out any excess water to regulate the balance)
if you have a damaged heart and/or damaged liver/kidneys. less salt is better than more water.
(as you cant regulate the water aswell)

but in either case dont go excessive on salt. still have the recommended salt amount. but dont deprive yourself of salt below recommended amount

the human cell lines used as incubators for the MA's are not from any abortions occuring 1980-2021
doctors are not ripping fetuses out of women today to then use for other things without consent

what happened was a woman decided to have a abortion in the 1970's.
for her own personal reasons

and for the heck of it gave permission for the tissues removed to be used for science.

those cells are then replicated. and its the replicate that is then used for science

there is no fetus used. its cells from like 6 replications away from what was fetal tissue
the fetus died in the 1970's and is not sitting in some lab somewhere

in short
its like if someone 50 years ago was going to die and the family signed permission slip that when they die. they want the body donated to science
in the 1970's the body has a biopsy and they take some tissue out of it.
its not THAT tissue thats used in 2020.
the body is then buried/cremated. and the body is no longer in a lab

as for the biopsy tissue extracted..
THAT tissue is replicated. and new tissue is created call it T1
T1 tissue is replicated. and new tissue is created call it T2 created in the 1980's
T2 tissue is replicated. and new tissue is created call it T3 created in the 1990's
T3 tissue is replicated. and new tissue is created call it T4 created in the 2000's
T4 tissue is replicated. and new tissue is created call it T5 created in the 2010's
T5 tissue is replicated. and new tissue is created call it T6 created in the 20XXs

its T6 tissue that is used. (its actually more like T2500 by now but you get the idea)
in short your corpse in 2021 is not being experimented on when you had a biopsy in 1970's. the tissue extracted from you in the 1970's is not the tissue being experimented on
your body is long gone and buried/cremated 50 years ago