You always presume people would speak up when they realize their doom awaits them but it looks like I am either wrong about this issue or people are more scared then I thought to address this thread. I watched the views and think its the first of the two and I sadly have to submit to "Uncle"!
Was going to check those that came in to see what their post histories where like but now I just need to face facts that a majority of the signature careless or as you say are guilty of spamming the forum.

Here is my take/issue on this and it runs around in a bit of a circle of issues that have been addressed.

If you set the cut off for signatures at Full Member it would be a good starting point to curtail the issue.
Once this is set you can kick every one from their signatures and have them apply again,this time they get scrutinized closely form spam.
It would be a slow process but people will be easier to pick off with a posting history already established.
You can see a change from well written posts to garbage on entry and tell them to come back and apply again if they had a recent password change.

The selling of accounts off site you can do little about but you would stifle the flow some what by having people to question if the guy they are dealing with can be trusted and they would also most likely try to join a campaign right away,which means you can note their account for extra scrutiny when the password change disappears and they are permitted to join.

There will always be a angle you can not kill but it would address the stampede effect we had with spammers after getting their 30 posts.
I think there has been a drop off since Yobit changed to member and would expect more so once implementing 120 as a bar.


So rewinding to my earlier posts,I know I was wrong but at least we gave the people a chance to be heard.

He wants to stomp his feet and show what he knows about economics well coming off like a complete douche bag.
Made it to 1:13 and had to turn him off,it was to much and I scrolled down to see him arguing with people.
These platforms allow little arrogant pukes to spout off and then argue with people till the cows come home and never grasping anything from the opposing view.
Glad I do not have to live a life where I am unable to see the other side of a issue and stay transfixed like a moron.

Finally played some cash with the freerolls and enjoyed the action at the tables.
The freerolls I am still missing because you do not post them in the lobby so I can establish when to play.
Like just now I logged in and the one I was catching is no longer in the lobby,seems the majority of these are running well I sleep.
Will look to you guys I guess for late evening action,have noticed my mornings the play is dead but the evenings pick up.

Can I suggest the following time slots:

10 pm UTC
12 pm UTC
2 am UTC

If you run those times consistently you will start to draw more action at those times. Think cancelling tournies just causes people to move on to other sites.

Trolling is about a need for attention, I have given you this time. Now do the right thing and remove that negative trust from this guys account.
Ask that you transfer it to me as well if you stand behind it, otherwise it serves no good to bully a account.

There are bad apples but this is all aspects of the forum. Think punishing those caught in the crossfire is wrong and we should be addressing more moderation of those abusing the perk.

As for lack of voice coming from the campaign, not everyone likes to put their ass out to be flogged.
We have had 2 months now of house cleaning and its not always clear if discussions like this one are something that the signature wants.
But there is something to the echo I hear from myself in this discussion. Least we can validate the point if no one comes thru.

You are clearly trolling me now as I have addressed something you are still pointing as the issue.
Till you figure that aspect out, we are done trading barbs as I do not see anything positive coming from it.

Best to keep this thread on topic Luptin, as discussion here would not be appreciated by all and Hilarious already has his hands full with campaign issues.
You can address the issue in the thread I point yobit members to or through pm.
We do not get paid for posting here, just to clarify as you stated "also" in reference to joining the discussion in meta.
Hope you understand the issue with clogging this thread.

Are you saying I have multiple accounts in a campaign or multiple accounts in general? Please post the evidence of such accusations or stop talking out your ass and smearing my account.

To stay current on the signature issue,newbie accounts are no longer allowed in the yobit signature so you are talking past tense and therefore should not be a talking point with the current situation. The rest of the post is throwing lines at a wall hoping that they stick to take away any merit from the discussion.
I must say you threw this accusation at me in your Racial and IQ thread and then proceeded to get into a pissing war with another member,derailing your own thread. Does it not seem like a bias to dismiss anyone in a signature as a spammer? I also read those links you provided but decided not to say anything when I came back to two heads butting against each other for who was the smartest. Was a tad ironic being the subject line.
You have your opinion and thats fair but do not label me unjustly if you really feel I am a sig spammer you can always lay it out in a reputation thread where you and I can discuss the issue,seems only fair.

I think that if no one from the signature comes in to defend themselves I will have to join the rest of you in reasoning.
Should be interesting to see though if people do care. Was debating posting something similar in other signatures as well but thought it might cause a flood of posts,looks like I am way off in how I viewed the potential response here,will give it the day to see.

The comment I was making about posts was in reference to signature members making long posts with little substance.
I know there are a lot of users posting one to three word dribble responses,think those are easier to hunt down and get rid of with raising the cut off to full member. I am not a full member and have no problem waiting till then if that becomes the new criteria.

Willing to show I am wrong,no big deal for me but would like due dilgence on the issue because I do feel it is a game changer in many aspects that could be detrimental to the forum. Starting to think my philosophy is also something that can only be found on the darkwebs away from government.

The line of thought appeals to me and I will make a effort to choose my words more in line with how I perceive the world.
Its funny I never really thought to much about the choice of words but I have spent a lot of time thinking about the dynamics.
One of those blinder issues I guess,thanks for pointing that one out to me.

Do you need to check in on these bots every couple hours to make sure they are not glitching and losing you money?


@ Amph how much do you talking about when you reference .1 as small profit for a days work?
Thats pretty decent if we are talking less than 10 bitcoins in trade,something I might have to look into farther.
Its about the difference I make working downtown as opposed to closer to home. If I could bring in that profit I would kiss the downtown job goodbye and work 10 minutes from home.

Facebook has gotten way to big for its britches,was going to post this as well but was thinking their was already a similar thread on the topic of facebook censoring their platform. The bigger they become the more we are going to see them using their to push discussion down a planned narrative. Always get a kick out of the left when they end up just as bad as the far right.
They seem to suffer from what is good for you is what we allow you to see.

http://www.wired.com/2016/05/sweden-cashless-economy/


Its to bad a story like this does not draw on bitcoin but think they the argument is now that they can track all transactions back to the owner and presuming this will limit crime more than the bitcoin setup. Interesting take on the issue.

Lack of signature members is a issue for me and think that this discussion as become very lopsided, so I have pointed Yobit towards this thread to voice their concerns here. Tired of seeing the same people clapping each other on the back acting like their is no other opinions in a discussion. So we shall see if the signature is meek,timid and voiceless in due time.

Before I get full hog tied,I endorse the idea of Full member and up for signatures but a out right ban seems short sighted and with out stats can not be discussed with a rational mind.
Lets not forget that one of the favorite tactics in this forum is to state "You have a signature,therefore your opinion is paid for and is just spam"! Dismissive and a tad arrogant because we are all equal human beings and this need for a dynasty of 1% seems like a game where the forum will not prosper. I know a lot of you feel the opposite but wheres the proof?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This seems to be the talking point as of late about signature users talking a lot but saying nothing. Can it be more that you do not agree with what is being stated and this is a way to cut the person off? Can you show me some examples of these type of posts because I think the people still posting crap are not changing the format. May be a handful of users that are doing this but as a whole very few are posting pages.

Would like to point some of you towards the Meta subforum since it is being discussed that signatures should be stripped away and there is a lack of signature users in the thread to counter the view point that signatures are mostly spammers.

As it stands the vocal mods and crew are acting like this is a done deal and are talking about how they should proceed.
Speak up now as the days of saying nothing and business as usual are drawing to a end.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1462756.120

Let them know that we are not all a bunch of spammers with English issues!

This is just one thread there are others where we are under attack as well.

This is a forum issue, does not relate to this sub forum. So the thread is trollish in nature.

We are straddling prejudicial grounds by attacking people with second language issues and the sig spam issue can be contained in meta, where like minded folks dwell.

Thanks. Was just about to ask you if you had a link to show how this is done. Appreciate the link.

Does it not make sense to flag the main account as well if you are going to make a allegation like the one you left on this guys account?
Your evidence is thin but will wait for you to flag me as well before I tag you for being a troll.
Show your proof, flag me and we can open a thread in reputation to sort this out or continue to show you are a troll.

The one connection I would love to see that will never happen, is getting Blizzard Entertainment on board.
Just with World of Warcraft it would allow more fluid exchanges and create dynmics like PvP betting or player purchases. Have not played in years but know bitcoin could benefit, its just convincing Blizzard it would help their bottom line.
Gaming industry looks to go virtual as the next big step I believe and bitcoin needs to beat the front gate when that happens to solidify its self.