I think otherwise, price is important measure for BTC in traders view.  As a matter of fact, I do not care if BTC will scale or not, it is the developers job.  I am here to take advantage of the opportunity that Bitcoin gives.  I will use it or trade it as long as it benefits me.

Day trading take advantage of fluctuation of the coin on its day to day basis.  If you can do this right, you can have a bigger profit than those who just hold their coins for a very long time.  The reason is that, since we are taking advantage of the fluctuation, we buy and sell when profit is seen.  Doing this stuff, we can get profit while increasing our holding of the coin without spending another cent instead we get profit then buy that profit to get more coins.

Since you said that nodes matter, I do think Bitcoin Core had been fair here by bypassing node voting since as far as I can see majority of nodes support/uses Bitcoin Core features.  If they use it (letting node vote than miners) the possibility of Segwit being implemented is bigger than letting the miners to vote for the implementation.  (That is if I understand it right)


I get  this as Bitcoin Core believe that hardfork is not needed for the added update / upgrade for the Bitcoin features regarding scaling issue of Bitcoin.  I also read that even with implementation of Segwit the onchain spam won't be solved is that true?

This thing might have been answered several times but still I cannot understand why do we need a hardfork when softfork is available,  aside from that, is  it really necessary that a hardfork is needed In order to upgrade bitcoin features?  Sorry for being so noob about this but I do believe that there is a strong reason why these exchanges are so against the hardfork.

I do not think Bitcoin and gold are competitor.  They are two different items.  Bitcoin is digital, gold is physical.  Bitcoin is intended to be a currency  thought people called it a store of value while gold, aside from being store of value have several usage in electronics world.  If we look for Bitcoin competitor, it should be in the same field with Bitcoin.  Looking at its field , there are lots but nothing comes close.

Even with all the freebies and bonuses, there is always a catch whenever you avail them.  You need to undergo certain requirements and fulfill a bet in order for you to withdraw your winnings with that bonus.  This simply means that there is no easy way to make a profit from gambling.  Though betting is easy but winning is getting difficult and difficult the longer you play.

At the current dip of Bitcoin price, it is better to hold your Bitcoin.  It is always not wise to sell your holding when every one are in panic.  Best would be buy more. And when it recovers its price, you can sell the Bitcoin you bought with profit.  A simple but effective way of getting profit from trades.

Probably an announcement from several exchanges about the fork.  Because there is no reason for Bitcoin to drop in price until the announcement where made.  But I think people who wanted to buy at a lower price came into the scene and push the button of Bitcoin to recovery.  I hope this recovery will continue until we are back on where we are before this dip.

Both are good.  They are almost done in a chronological order.  If you want to invest in a business and do not have much money to start one then you can start with savings.  Then if you have enough you can invest it to the business that you have planned.  They both have important role in order to secure our future so I think neither of them is better or worse.

Gambling is no way profitable in the long term.  Just think of the scenario where a house have an advantage.  No matter what we do, we definitely cannot beat the house especially when planning to play gambling for a very long time.  House edge always kick in, no matter what strategy we use.

Even with 5% if the 10% is too much especially to those who's salary are enough for their daily needs.  5% of income converted to Bitcoin and hold it for a very long time, 5 to 10 years maybe.  It may not that much today but I am sure this will have a good price after 5 years and what more if 10 years had past.  

I do not have any percentage of my wealth in cryptcurrency since I am not that rich and still trying to grasp about cryptocurrency.  If ever I have the grasp of it and find it beneficial to me, I will have 70% of my earnings to cryptocurrency and just 30% as money for spending.

I do agree that market needs some dumps for more spread.  This is what helps Bitcoin to be stable, by bringing in more hands that will support the network and economy.  Few people cannot sustain the system for very long time so they need much more people involved in it.  With this, there will be more fund to flow in the economy and more people advertising Bitcoin to invite new comer to the Bitcoin ecosystem.

I agree.  You have said it clearly that we have less than 50% chance to make money from gambling.  This is because Casino have house edge.  And mathematically we are bound to lose in the long run.  So I guess it is better to invest in a house bankroll because there is a bigger chance that your money will earn a profit.

Probably you have a point but, I also think that Bitcoin does not need an ETF because as decentralized system, anyone can join Bitcoin economy.  They don't need the approval of SEC to join the community.  After all Bitcoin and regulation does not fit together.

I agree no matter how great is the site and its article if it is not promoted well, it will do only a little.  Aside from that I think you should have translated article in their languages.  Most of South East Asian people have difficulty in understanding English, though translator helps but the sentence structure is way different which can cause misunderstanding.  About Promotion, I think facebook is the best place to promote your site.  SEA are fond of using facebook.

If we are talking about profits, then altcoin has more wild fluctuation that can give you more profit than Bitcoin.  But I do not think people look only to that.  People wants more stable in terms of support crytocurrency that is why, bitcoin is said to be no competitors at all.  But when it comes to technology, there are far more advance altcoins than Bitcoin.

Well if fiat currency is Bitcoin competitor I can say Bitcoin had already lost its battle.  But in terms of cryptocurrency, Bitcoin being the first mover has almost no competitor at all.  Almost those that wanted to overthrow Bitcoin as leading cryptocurrency failed the moment they intend to do so.

I do not think Bitcoin will bring anyone country to its knee.  First it won't be adopted as main currency and if ever acknowledge will always be an alternative.  Nation won't make use of Bitcoin to run its economy so definitely it has not much negative effect on a country's financial status.

At the current situation, I am earning BTC thru signature campaign and the amount I earned from the campaign is planned to be used in trading.  I wanted to venture trading because I heard the opportunity of earning there is boundless once we familiarize ourselves and learned the curves of it.