Flat Earth

[notbatman]

^^^ I'm saying that 3 nautical miles is the maximum distance a 6 foot observer can see a 1 foot object and, that the sun is 32 nautical miles wide.

Did you know that Joe Rogan being so short, has his horizon closer than yours? The man literally lives in a smaller world than everybody else.

[HI-TEC99]

@HI-TEC99,

   The test relies on a landmark of known distance. I could pull the sensor from a PXL-2000 and still fail the globe with a lens made from coke bottles.

Proving the earth is flat with a P1000 is like exterminating a mouse with a rail gun.

Whitney (shot in Pixelvision) PXL 2000 -- https://youtu.be/bSu7NjC51Xs

The Fisher-Price PXL2000 toy black-and-white camcorder is superior to your shit P1000. It was produced in 1987, and over 30 years later they still work.

Your shit P1000 broke within a month of this reviewer buying it. Your shit camera's lens is probably defective, and that's why it passes your flat Earth "test".

https://www.consumeraffairs.com/cameras/nikon.html

Purchased Coolpix P1000 on Dec 3, 2018 and within a month lens seemed loose. Sent in for repair. Came back after 3 weeks. No problem found and factory reset. After receiving it back still same, lens loose and unable to zoom past 1200mm as picture was blurry and then it started to not turn off or lens retract.

The PXL2000 would probably fail your flat Earth "test" because it's not a shit defective camera.

Your camera is shit.

[TwitchySeal]

the sun is 32 nautical miles wide.

Did you use a sextant measure the sun? lol

^^^ I'm saying that 3 nautical miles is the maximum distance a 6 foot observer can see a 1 foot object and, that the sun is 32 nautical miles wide.

Did you know that Joe Rogan being so short, has his horizon closer than yours? The man literally lives in a smaller world than everybody else.

Did you know Joe Rogan is taller than the average human?

[notbatman]

@HI-TEC99,

   Can you do better than 120x optical zoom that you can hold in one hand for under $1k? How many units can you produce and for what price? The game is super-zoom, can you play? Nikon is selling a first gen product in a space with zero competition.

Also Nikon seems willing to remove the infrared filter if you send it in, expect to pay for that as it's too small to DIY.

Quick question, if I'm observing a horizon at 50 miles with a modded P1000 at an elevation of 1 foot, how big is the ball?



Welcome to 50x super-earth, that 50x gravity is just crushing isn't it?

[HI-TEC99]

@HI-TEC99,

   Can you do better than 120x optical zoom that you can hold in one hand for under $1k? How many units can you produce and for what price? The game is super-zoom, can you play? Nikon is selling a first gen product in a space with zero competition.

Also Nikon seems willing to remove the infrared filter if you send it in, expect to pay for that as it's too small to DIY.

Quick question, if I'm observing a horizon at 50 miles with a modded P1000 at an elevation of 1 foot, how big is the ball?



Welcome to 50x super-earth, that 50x gravity is just crushing isn't it?

Your camera is shit.

[ðºÞæ]

Interesting now the BBC shows topographic map of Antarctic in line with this one only from globe view point.
https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-50753113


Mount Vinson is the highest peak in Antarctica, at 4,892 metres (16,050 ft)
Dome Argus  elevation of 13000 feet
Lake Vostok, "warm"  fresh water lake (38 °Fahrenheit  / 3 ° Celsius)
Queen Alexandra Range and Queen Elizabeth Range.......

Edit
https://ibb.co/PNB34Vp

[notbatman]

@HI-TEC99,

   Do better, I only need to identify two objects to fail the globe i.e. the horizon and a landmark of known distance. Image distortion including but not limited to severe distortion, artifacting and partial obfuscation are irreverent so long as a positive identification can be made.

You've got miniature spherical cows.

[HI-TEC99]

@HI-TEC99,

   Do better, I only need to identify two objects to fail the globe i.e. the horizon and a landmark of known distance. Image distortion including but not limited to severe distortion, artifacting and partial obfuscation are irreverent so long as a positive identification can be made.

You've got miniature spherical cows.

For the last time, the cows in the hand are small, but the cows eating grass are far away.



This sun is small



This sun is far away



Your camera is shit.

[notbatman]

^^^

[HI-TEC99]

^^^

Your camera is shit.

[notbatman]

^^^ You lack perspective.

[HI-TEC99]

^^^

Your camera is still shit.

[BADecker]

^^^ You lack perspective.

But your perspective is skewed.

The line is the horizon.
The hand is far away.
The cows on the grass are small.

Maybe the hand with the cow in it is simply a plasma projections on a screen.

[notbatman]

^^^ How is the hand large and far away, there's no vertical compression? There's also no refraction, the focus is too sharp for a loomed hand.

fail.

[BADecker]

^^^ You are finally getting the idea about essentially everything you post.

[notbatman]

To the moon!

[HI-TEC99]

To the moon!

But you claimed there is no moon in the flat Mars thread.

@Cnut237,

The moon is a 32 mile wide disc of sonoluminescent electrical plasma in an upper atmospheric plane.

The image of the moon is reflected off of a concave mirror creating a projected hologram. The mirror is a golden glass-like oxide layer on a nickel-iron composite steel dome that covers the earth; the firmament.

[notbatman]

^^^ The plot thickens...

The moon is still an object, a holographic one with a location, it has length, width and height. The atmospheric plane that contains the plasma used to display the moon is a gaseous fluid, a liquid crystal.

[TwitchySeal]

^^^ The plot thickens...

The moon is still an object, a holographic one with a location, it has length, width and height. The atmospheric plane that contains the plasma used to display the moon is a gaseous fluid, a liquid crystal.

Why did god make a holographic moon?

[Cryptotourist]

~ He's a prankster god.

He sure is, he gave us Batty ffs.