Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?

[Coinonomous]

Is answer: she is as trustworthy as her husband Bill - good enough? When he lied about not having sexual intercourse with Monica? These people do anything for power. Don't be fooled.

Didn´t she act dumb and lie about being in the dark about his endless infidelity. These people are habitual liars and certainly no exceptions in politics in that regard.

so. whats new? All countries leaders and candidates have flaws and issues. I tend to follow predictwise.com, it's been about 90% correct in most things it tracks.

[galdur]

Is answer: she is as trustworthy as her husband Bill - good enough? When he lied about not having sexual intercourse with Monica? These people do anything for power. Don't be fooled.

Didn´t she act dumb and lie about being in the dark about his endless infidelity. These people are habitual liars and certainly no exceptions in politics in that regard.

so. whats new? All countries leaders and candidates have flaws and issues. I tend to follow predictwise.com, it's been about 90% correct in most things it tracks.

Well, it´s one thing to have flaws and issues and quite another to be mentally deranged.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtH7iv4ip1U

[BADecker]

http://www.gunlaws.com/

The Uninvited Ombudsman notes however that:

Revealed for the first time at the Benghazi hearings, America learned that Hillary Clinton had lied all along, because she wrote to the Egyptian prime minister on the night of September 11, 2012: "We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack, not a protest." This is a direct quote from her email, revealed for the first time at the congressional hearing. She said essentially the same thing to the Libyan prime minister, and even her daughter, in emails revealed at the hearings.

Previously, she claimed for weeks it was all caused spontaneously by a protest and a hysterically funny amateurish video tape on the web.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2015/10/22/clinton-survives-benghazi-committee-hearing-n2069674
http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/22/hillary-told-daughter-chelsea-that-terrorists-were-behind-benghazi-attack-the-night-it-happened-video/#ixzz3pbEpLP8M


Why is this important?

Six weeks before the presidential election of 2012, when the Benghazi attacks occurred, Obama was campaigning on what turned out to be total myths -- he was strong, he had destroyed al Qaida, Libya was pacified and safe, and the attack in Benghazi was the result of a video on the Internet that sparked a demonstration, for which we would find and prosecute the troublesome film maker.

Hillary Clinton knowingly promoted this baloney. It turns out these were flat out lies, and she knew it.

If it turned out al Qaida was getting stronger, we had not beaten them at all, Libya was not pacified and was on the verge of collapse, about to become an islamist jihadi stronghold, that the video story was a total lie, it was fabricated to coverup the ineptitude and weakness of Obama, that there was no demonstration, and Obama was weaker than we ever imagined and lying about it all -- he would never get elected.

Obama was a fraud, the story was a fraud, the election was based on a fraud. That's why it mattered. Black lies matter.

The Benghazi hearings revealed the truth -- Obama was hopelessly weak, defeated no one, Libya was a basket case, the Benghazi assault was proof, and Hillary Clinton lied about it all.

She knew since the night of the attacks -- her three emails were the smoking gun hidden for years. Indirect proof was everywhere. Now direct physical proof of the truth was out. She had sent the truth to the prime minister of Egypt, Libya, even her own daughter. Her lies to Congress are subjects of interest to the FBI, who is investigating her on other charges.

In cooperation with Obama, to preserve his chances for his re-election, she flat out lied four days later when the bodies of our murdered Americans were returned and said we will hunt down the video stooge, knowing he had nothing to do with it, to preserve the false story.

She and Obama sent out Susan Rice to lie, bald faced, on five Sunday news shows that a funny video (it was funny, I watched it, no way people with an IQ above their shoe size could be bothered) had instigated the attacks. It was Obama's inability to cope and the lies he had fabricated to cover his inept handling of the situation.

It was a disgrace. She was a disgrace, along with him and all their cronies. This all came out, for the world to see, in the long hearing. Why did it run long?

It ran long because she only agreed to appear once -- she ran Congress instead of the other way around. She holds no office. She is a "former" this and that. The fact that she is running for office is superfluous. More than 200 people have filed to run for president (you didn't know that, did you).

So the truth came out. She lied. She helped Obama get elected under false pretenses (again I might add). The "news" media is complicit in the deception. In the presence of a smoking gun, they declared, no smoking gun. And no one gets fired or brought up on charges. Reporters' permits don't get cancelled -- because they don't have any.

With all the smoking guns for her destruction of government property, lying and obstruction of justice with the top-secret emails, if the FBI does indict her, who will run on the democrat ticket? Unlike the Republicans, they have no bench. Just one woman under investigation for multiple felonies, one socialist, and a few nobodies no one has heard of, who are dropping out like flies (and crazy uncle Joe, who has left the game).

Republicans have 9 governors, 5 senators, 2 Hispanics, 2 doctors, 1 CEO, 1 black man, 1 business mogul, and 1 woman running. And they call us the ones lacking diversity. The people calling names are the names they call.

[yunuzov]

I think she is not trustworthy at all. Well it is actually no brain to trust any politicians.

[KokiFurihata]

I did not trust Bill so I would not trust her. She is a wolf in sheeps clothing for the naive liberals.

[Chef Ramsay]

POLITICAL STRATEGIST: HILLARY CLINTON IS “AN ABUSER OF WOMEN & GIRLS”

Roger Stone says Hillary hired private investigators to terrorize Bill Clinton's rape victims

During an interview with Larry King, political strategist Roger Stone asserted that presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s pro-women stance was a fraud given her past role in hiring people to terrorize women who alleged they were raped by Bill Clinton.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q3vaV6EYZ0

Stone, who now describes himself as a libertarian, just released a book entitled The Clintons’ War on Women and was previously a political advisor for Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, although Trump subsequently fired him.

“The narrative of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, that she has been an advocate for women and girls, is just bogus,” Stone told King. “She is, in fact, an abuser of women and girls.”


Stone said the assertion was justified based on Hillary covering for her husband’s behavior.

“Bill is a sexual predator, very much like Bill Cosby,” said Stone. “I tracked 27 women that he has either assaulted or raped.”

When Larry King challenged Stone to identify the women, charging that they had “never come forward,” Stone named names.

“Many of them have…He doesn’t drug them, but he does attack them. He does assault them, and you know some of these names,” said Stone. “You know Juanita Broaddrick, you know Kathy Willey, you know Paula Corbin Jones, who he paid $850,000 in a settlement for. But you don’t know Liz Ward Gracen, Eileen Wellstone, Becky Brown, Helen Dowdy, Dorothy Kyle Browning, Christy Zercher. This list goes on and on and on.”

Stone emphasized that he was talking about the women Clinton had sexually abused, not his one night stands or mistresses, which Stone says would fill an encyclopedia.

Stone noted Hillay’s culpability for this behavior by asserting “she’s not just an enabler….she’s the one who hires the private detectives who wage a veritable terror campaign against these women to silence them.”

...http://www.infowars.com/political-strategist-hillary-clinton-is-an-abuser-of-women-girls/

[Coinonomous]

Is answer: she is as trustworthy as her husband Bill - good enough? When he lied about not having sexual intercourse with Monica? These people do anything for power. Don't be fooled.

Didn´t she act dumb and lie about being in the dark about his endless infidelity. These people are habitual liars and certainly no exceptions in politics in that regard.

so. whats new? All countries leaders and candidates have flaws and issues. I tend to follow predictwise.com, it's been about 90% correct in most things it tracks.

Well, it´s one thing to have flaws and issues and quite another to be mentally deranged.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UtH7iv4ip1U

I wasn't putting up for anyone in particular with that statement, but nice way to twist it your way.

[Faradey100]

I guess,she is illuminati member:(

[BADecker]

I did not trust Bill so I would not trust her. She is a wolf in sheeps clothing for the naive liberals.

And a lot of the time she is simply a wolf.   

[bryant.coleman]

I think she is not trustworthy at all. Well it is actually no brain to trust any politicians.

If you don't trust any of the politicians and don't participate in the elections, then people such as Hillary Clinton will be able to win. That is because all of her low-IQ supporters will be voting for her, no matter who happens to be the opponent. And indirectly, that makes you one of her supporters, who helped her to win the elections.

[BADecker]

I think she is not trustworthy at all. Well it is actually no brain to trust any politicians.

If you don't trust any of the politicians and don't participate in the elections, then people such as Hillary Clinton will be able to win. That is because all of her low-IQ supporters will be voting for her, no matter who happens to be the opponent. And indirectly, that makes you one of her supporters, who helped her to win the elections.

Who told you to participate in elections? Did you learn it in government schools? Why might government want you to vote? Do you think that maybe they are hiding the way to beat them when they make you into a slave?

Get back to the basics and see that we rule by common law. Government is nothing without our support, and if government takes us to court for ANYTHING, they better be prepared to get on the stand and show how they were harmed or damaged and that we were the ones who did it to them.

According their own law, the plaintiff government must take the oath, get on the stand, speak with their own mouth into the record the harm or damage they received. Plaintiff government can't do this, because plaintiff government is simply paperwork. Government loses.

Of course, if we let them do it their way, they will win or lose as they wish.

[Wilikon]

FBI steps up interviews in Clinton email probe
Questions focus on whether State officials improperly sent classified material.


Even as Hillary Clinton tries to put questions about her private email server behind her, the FBI has stepped up inquiries into the security of the former secretary of state's home-made email system and how aides communicated over email, POLITICO has learned.

The FBI’s recent moves suggest that its inquiry could have evolved from the preliminary fact-finding stage that the agency launches when it receives a credible referral, according to former FBI and Justice Department officials interviewed by POLITICO.

“This sounds to me like it’s more than a preliminary inquiry; it sounds like a full-blown investigation,” said Tom Fuentes, former assistant director of the FBI. “When you have this amount of resources going into it …. I think it’s at the investigative level.”

The FBI declined to respond to questions about the scope of its ongoing work.

But POLITICO learned that around early October, the FBI requested documents from a company involved in the server arrangement after Clinton left State. It also interviewed a former high-ranking policy official at State about the contents of top Clinton aides’ emails.

The official, who spoke to POLITICO on condition of anonymity, said the questions explored whether anyone at State was concerned about classified information being put at risk by communicating via email. The source did not know of any such concerns.

Confirmation of the interview and document requests is the first public indication that the agency is moving ahead with its inquiry – and possibly expanding it.

The former State official interviewed by the FBI, for example, had little to do with the Clinton server set-up or any approval process allowing her to use personal email for work — suggesting the FBI’s initial inquiry about the actual physical security of Clinton’s home-made server now also includes looking at the content of messages shared by staff.

Former FBI and Justice officials familiar with the investigative procedures on such matters said the agency must determine two main things: whether the use of an outside email system posed any risks to national security secrets and, if so, whether anyone was responsible for exposing classified information.

FBI Director James Comey acknowledged in October that his agency was probing the server matter generally and believed it had the resources to look into the issues, though he didn't give specifics.

Over the summer, the Department of Justice said it received a referral from the Intelligence Community Inspector General about potentially exposed classified information on Clinton’s home-made email server. The referral, Justice said at the time, was not criminal in nature but focused on the counterintelligence law governing national security secrets.

The matter at the time was considered a “preliminary” inquiry.

Clinton’s campaign and lawyers have said they are cooperating, turning over her server and a thumb drive backup of her messages to the FBI. They’ve also said they’re encouraging everyone who worked on the server issue to do the same. Platte River Networks, the Denver-based company that housed her server since she left State in 2013, for example, has said it’s cooperating; so has Datto, another tech company that provided a cloud backup of Clinton’s messages.

But exactly who they’re talking to at the staff level has been unclear. For example: Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s former chief of staff at State and lawyer who helped determine which of her emails were personal and work related, wouldn’t say in a recent Washington Post interview whether she had been contacted due to confidentiality surrounding the FBI’s work.

The FBI ultimately decides whether to take a preliminary inquiry to a full-fledged investigation — and if it does so, it is under no obligation to say so publicly. The classification level of any compromised information "may be a factor in determining whether an FBI investigation is warranted," reads an overview of FBI procedures.


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/hillary-clinton-email-fbi-probe-215630

[Wilikon]

Clinton Goes after Laugh Factory Comedians for Making Fun of Her


In what appears to be a first for a serious presidential contender, Hillary Clinton’s campaign is going after five comedians who made fun of the former Secretary of State in standup skits at a popular Hollywood comedy club.

A video of the short performance, which is less than three minutes, is posted on the website of the renowned club, Laugh Factory, and the Clinton campaign has tried to censor it. Besides demanding that the video be taken down, the Clinton campaign has demanded the personal contact information of the performers that appear in the recording. This is no laughing matter for club owner Jamie Masada, a comedy guru who opened Laugh Factory more than three decades ago and has been instrumental in launching the careers of many famous comics. “They threatened me,” Masada told Judicial Watch. “I have received complains before but never a call like this, threatening to put me out of business if I don’t cut the video.”

Practically all of the country’s most acclaimed comedians have performed at the Laugh Factory and undoubtedly they have offended politicians and other well-known personalities with their standup routines. Tim Allen, Jay Leno, Roseanne Bar, Drew Carey, George Carlin, Jim Carrey, Martin Lawrence, Jerry Seinfeld and George Lopez are among the big names that have headlined at the Laugh Factory. The First Amendment right to free speech is a crucial component of the operation, though Masada drew the line a few years ago banning performers—including African Americans—from using the “n-word” in their acts.

The five short performances that Clinton wants eliminated include some profanity and portions could be considered crass, but some of the lines are funny and that’s what the Laugh Factory is all about. The video features the individual acts of five comedians, four men and a woman. The skits make fun of Clinton’s wardrobe, her age, sexual orientation, the Monica Lewinsky scandal and the former First Lady’s relationship with her famous husband. The Laugh Factory has appropriately titled it “Hillary vs. The First Amendment.”

Masada told Judicial Watch that, as soon as the video got posted on the Laugh Factory website, he received a phone call from a “prominent” person inside Clinton’s campaign. “He said the video was disgusting and asked who put me up to this,” Masada said. The Clinton staffer, who Masada did not want to identify, also demanded to know the names and phone numbers of the comedians that appear in the video. Masada refused and hung up. He insists that the comedy stage is a sanctuary for freedom of speech no matter who is offended. “Just last night we had (Emmy-award winner) Dana Carvey doing Donald Trump and it was hilarious,” Masada said.


http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2015/11/clinton-goes-after-laugh-factory-comedians-for-making-fun-of-her/


------------------------------------------
Funny bone...

[galdur]

Well, psychopaths aren´t exactly known for something called "self-depreciating humor". Of course moderation and humility isn´t among their strong suits either, I´m sure there´s a connection.

[avw1982]

Is answer: she is as trustworthy as her husband Bill - good enough? When he lied about not having sexual intercourse with Monica? These people do anything for power. Don't be fooled.

Yeah she not at all trust worthy for her own hubby and she ll not trusty person for the world. here there is no fools to believe hilary and her thoughts. she can do some other works instead of her fake proposals.

[Tusk]

A book I intend to read, the 50 shades of polotics



The Clintons' War on Women - by Roger Stone (Author), Robert Morrow (Author)
http://www.amazon.com/The-Clintons-Women-Roger-Stone/dp/151070678X


Although Alex Jones tends to be too hysterical, but this is a good interview on the Clintons talking to Roger Stone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tveor3jjM7k

[Wilikon]

A book I intend to read, the 50 shades of polotics



The Clintons' War on Women - by Roger Stone (Author), Robert Morrow (Author)
http://www.amazon.com/The-Clintons-Women-Roger-Stone/dp/151070678X


Although Alex Jones tends to be too hysterical, but this is a good interview on the Clintons talking to Roger Stone

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tveor3jjM7k

Cool link. 

[galdur]

I checked out The Laugh Factory and didn´t find much that should have offended the nutbag. They did wonder who looked better in a shoulder-padded waist suit Hillary or that fruitcake from the Kardashians, the one who had her dick chopped off. And they wondered how well it would work out for a whore to be descended from four  nationalities,  I didn´t get that one but maybe someone else did.

[galdur]

Too deep.

The Dalai Lama walks into a pizza joint and says, "Make me one with everything."

http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=3199

[paradoxum]

I find her trustworthy when she's unconscious - happened a few times when she was secretary.