Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?

[Backside walkaround]

For any question of the form "Is X trustworthy?" where X = name of a politician, answer = NO.

[bryant.coleman]

And it does boil down to the DNC wanting to have the first woman POTUS to go along with their first black POTUS. Great plan. Let's not worry about finding the best qualified. No, let's take an affirmative action approach instead. 

If it come down to affirmative action in the end, then why can't Kim Kardashian be the president of the United States? She is married to an African American (Kanye West), and she is about to produce a dozen children with him. Just like Hillary, Kim is also a serial liar and she is even more dishonest, annoying and arrogant.

[stevegreer]

And it does boil down to the DNC wanting to have the first woman POTUS to go along with their first black POTUS. Great plan. Let's not worry about finding the best qualified. No, let's take an affirmative action approach instead. 

If it come down to affirmative action in the end, then why can't Kim Kardashian be the president of the United States? She is married to an African American (Kanye West), and she is about to produce a dozen children with him. Just like Hillary, Kim is also a serial liar and she is even more dishonest, annoying and arrogant.

Don't misunderstand what I was saying. I was not implying that affirmative action is a good thing.

[bryant.coleman]

Don't misunderstand what I was saying. I was not implying that affirmative action is a good thing.

I perfectly understood what you were saying, and my reply was sarcastic. If Obama was not African-American, he would have never been elected to the post of the POTUS. He is inexperienced and doesn't have any of the skills needed to become the POTUS. Still, the liberals managed to place him in the POTUS post, playing the race card.

[galdur]

So, who´s gonna be Hillary´s Vice Prez? Obviously it has to be a total loser and all-around douchebag in order to somehow make Hillary look better. It´s the same as with Biden, he´s an even more of a nobody than Obama, that´s how it works.

[BADecker]

So, who´s gonna be Hillary´s Vice Prez? Obviously it has to be a total loser and all-around douchebag in order to somehow make Hillary look better. It´s the same as with Biden, he´s an even more of a nobody than Obama, that´s how it works.

Spendy?   

[Wilikon]

So, who´s gonna be Hillary´s Vice Prez? Obviously it has to be a total loser and all-around douchebag in order to somehow make Hillary look better. It´s the same as with Biden, he´s an even more of a nobody than Obama, that´s how it works.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-electon-clinton-idUSKCN0S92Q820151015

[galdur]

So, who´s gonna be Hillary´s Vice Prez? Obviously it has to be a total loser and all-around douchebag in order to somehow make Hillary look better. It´s the same as with Biden, he´s an even more of a nobody than Obama, that´s how it works.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-electon-clinton-idUSKCN0S92Q820151015

Yeah, of course. I remember that guy now. But he can´t go with friggin Hillary. He´s more or less sane!

In their shoes, I´d pack her off in the padded room where she belongs and run Julio.

[mtnsaa]

You can't make up these candidates, not even for a movie. It's like House of Cards season 4 or whatever. Hillary Clinton for me is the obvious choice but I find her with a huge thirst for power and a need for establishing her own name because first, she's a woman and secondly she has the Clinton name. So her intentions are not really noble if you ask me, I automatically wouldn't trust someone who is in politics because they liked what they saw or have second intentions like this.

[Wilikon]

You can't make up these candidates, not even for a movie. It's like House of Cards season 4 or whatever. Hillary Clinton for me is the obvious choice but I find her with a huge thirst for power and a need for establishing her own name because first, she's a woman and secondly she has the Clinton name. So her intentions are not really noble if you ask me, I automatically wouldn't trust someone who is in politics because they liked what they saw or have second intentions like this.

Why is she your obvious choice? There is not one good, positive, uplifting thing you said about her in your post... None.

Why not sanders? I can't stand his policy but at least he fits the lefty agenda better.

Why is harpy clinton a better choice than sanders? Just give us 5 things you love about her.

Unless I misunderstood you as she being the obvious democrat choice?

[bryant.coleman]

So, who´s gonna be Hillary´s Vice Prez? Obviously it has to be a total loser and all-around douchebag in order to somehow make Hillary look better. It´s the same as with Biden, he´s an even more of a nobody than Obama, that´s how it works.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-electon-clinton-idUSKCN0S92Q820151015

Scary. This Julian Castro guy is rabidly anti-White (although not as much as Hillary). His parents were Meztizo extremists, with strong ties to the La Raza Unida. On the positive side, he claims to be heterosexual (looks debatable for me), and lists down his religion as "Roman Catholic". If he becomes the VP candidate, then Hillary can say good bye to large numbers of blue collar white votes (especially males).

[galdur]

Yeah, she has to find someone crazy enough for her to appear almost sane in comparison.

Traditionally the VP slot is where you put the crazy one, so he can be the Bad Cop to the Good Cop Prez when dealing in back rooms and closed-door meetings, that sort of thing. So, how do you top already out in space and loony tunes crazy in this situation? That´s going to be a headache.

[mtnsaa]

You can't make up these candidates, not even for a movie. It's like House of Cards season 4 or whatever. Hillary Clinton for me is the obvious choice but I find her with a huge thirst for power and a need for establishing her own name because first, she's a woman and secondly she has the Clinton name. So her intentions are not really noble if you ask me, I automatically wouldn't trust someone who is in politics because they liked what they saw or have second intentions like this.

Why is she your obvious choice? There is not one good, positive, uplifting thing you said about her in your post... None.

Why not sanders? I can't stand his policy but at least he fits the lefty agenda better.

Why is harpy clinton a better choice than sanders? Just give us 5 things you love about her.

Unless I misunderstood you as she being the obvious democrat choice?

Yes that's what I meant. I was also projecting the elections, for me it's clear she will be the next US President. Trump has no chance against her.

[stevegreer]

Don't misunderstand what I was saying. I was not implying that affirmative action is a good thing.

I perfectly understood what you were saying, and my reply was sarcastic. If Obama was not African-American, he would have never been elected to the post of the POTUS. He is inexperienced and doesn't have any of the skills needed to become the POTUS. Still, the liberals managed to place him in the POTUS post, playing the race card.

Ah, I missed your sarcasm. We are in perfect agreement then.

[ACAB]

^^^^^^Hillary couldn't do the job because she was a lesbian and she was chasing after Huma Abedin when Monica Lewinsky was giving blowjobs to Bill Clinton. The Americans already had their first bisexual president in the form of Barack Hussain Osama. Will they have their first lesbian president in the form of Harpy Clinton?

No, it's not first. America saw everything. Check previous presidents, there are a lot of gay, asexual, bisexual people. I might vote for Bruce Jenner! Still better than Crump.
Seriously, I could care less about their religious and sexual preferences. Hillary might be bad in bed, I don't care. She won't sleep with me, but she decides if I sleep well in war-free zone or not.

[J. J. Phillips]

James Buchanan was gay.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SG8WMwda968

[Wilikon]

Roger Stone: ‘Pets Killed, Tires Slashed, Late Night Phone Calls’ to Silence Bill Clinton’s Sexual Assault Victims


Long time political operative and strategist Roger Stone appeared on Breitbart News Sunday, broadcast on SiriusXM patriot radio channel 125, with Breitbart’s senior investigative political reporter Matt Boyle.

Stone who cut his political teeth working for Richard Nixon’s infamous Committee to Re-elect the President, later campaigned for Ronald Reagan, and until recently worked for Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, shared a few nuggets from his new book The Clintons’ War on Women, which he co-wrote with Robert Morrow.

Stone told Boyle that Hillary Clinton promoting herself as an advocate for women and children is hypocrisy. The author reminded Breitbart News Sunday listeners that as recently as last week Hillary spoke about the rape issue and that raped victims should be believed.

“Unfortunately, this doesn’t match her own history,” Stone pointed out. “She has been an enabler of rape. She has been the person to enable the serial rape and sexual assaults by her husband Bill Clinton. Some of which are known publicly: Paula Jones, Juanita Broaddrick, and Kathleen Willey.”

Stone stated that there were “many, many others who were not known publicly.” He charges that the main stream media is protective of the Clintons and supressed the other incidents to the public.

In The Clintons’ War on Women, Stone told Boyle that “We have laid out Hillary’s real record on women.”

Stone accused Bill Clinton of violating the women physically and that Hillary came to his rescue and hired detectives, to gather information on the women. She then used the information to “run a terror campaign to intimidate Bill’s victims into silence.”

According to Stone, Hillary’s motivation is clear. She does not want  anything to get in the way of growing their power and wealth.

Stone added that the book includes not only the serial rapes committed by Bill Clinton and Hillary’s cover up, but the “horiffic things” that were done to his victims. “Pets Killed. Tires slashed. Windshields Smashed in and bullets left in the front seat of cars. Late night phone calls: We know where you’re children go to school,” all of these threats were part of the Clintons intimidation tactics.

“This is very sick stuff.  It is the psychological abuse of women and Hillary is responsible for it. Women voters need to know her real record,” the political firebrand asserted.

Ironically, Stone observes, that Hillary advocates for equal pay, but that “in no job where she was the boss did women make as much as the men.”

“Hillary is really not a friend to women,” he insists. “That is really what this book is about.”


http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/27/roger-stone-pets-killed-tires-slashed-late-night-phone-calls-to-silence-bill-clintons-sexual-assault-victims/

[BADecker]

None of the BIG people in government are honest.

We think that Ron Paul is honest. He has even written books that talk about the dishonesty of government.

But, Ron Paul isn't honest. If he were, he would investigate and publish the simple way that any American can get government out of his or her life.

Politicians can't be honest. It isn't in their nature. They are politicians because they want to rule the world. The rest of us aren't politicians, simply because we don't want to rule the world.

Of course Hillary isn't trustworthy. At least not for the common people of America or wherever she touches the world.

[Wilikon]

Hillary Clinton to Heckler Mentioning Juanita Broaddrick: ‘You Are Very Rude,’ ‘I’m Not Ever Gonna Call on You’


http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/01/03/hillary-clinton-to-heckler-mentioning-juanita-broaddrick-you-are-very-rude-im-not-ever-gonna-call-on-you/

[zenitzz]

Clinton campaign hopes Bill will deliver a New Hampshire 'comeback kid' boost

Bill Clinton has taken a backseat thus far as Hillary Clinton’s national campaign hits its stride, but with a New Hampshire rally set, his impact is anyone’s guess

“New Hampshire tonight has made Bill Clinton the comeback kid.”

So said Bill Clinton himself in February 1992, when a second-place finish behind the now largely forgotten Paul Tsongas in the state’s Democratic primary revived his fortunes. Later that year he would unseat George HW Bush in the presidential election.

Twenty-four years later, “the comeback kid” will return to the stump in New Hampshire on Monday. He will be hoping to administer another Lazarus-like political resuscitation. After the sting of rejection in 2008, when his wife was bested by a young upstart named Barack Obama, he will make the case for Hillary Clinton’s second shot at becoming the first woman in the White House.

This time the former secretary of state appears to be on course, with a comfortable lead in Democratic polls after debate performances that apparently neutralised the socialist insurgency of Bernie Sanders. Her campaign says it raised $37m in the past three months, a record for a non-incumbent, and more than $112m in all of 2015. The Republican field, meanwhile, remains overcrowded and chaotic.

But the Bill factor is the great unknown. Thus far he has taken a back seat, accompanying his wife on occasional campaign stops but not taking centre stage. Even at the Democratic debates, he has travelled with Clinton but has not been inside the arena – often choosing to watch from the hotel.

“His proper role in, and impact on, his wife’s candidacy is unsettled and unclear,” New York Times columnist Frank Bruni wrote last week. “He remains both wildly charismatic and maddeningly undisciplined. He connotes both prosperous times and cynical scheming.”

Now set to be unleashed, Bill’s magnetism and oratory could be the ultimate campaign weapon. He often ranks as the most popular living US president in surveys and his speech at the 2012 Democratic convention gave a major boost to Obama’s re-election campaign. But those very same qualities could also overshadow the former first lady, whom some regard as lacking a personable and relatable demeanor.

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/02/hillary-clinton-campaign-new-hampshire-bill-clinton-secret-weapon