Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy?

[galdur]

'Who Let the Dogs Out' - featuring Hillary Clinton

Published on Feb 16, 2016
Hillary Clinton barks along to Baha Men's "Who let the dogs out".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgCP9vOUd1o

[xht]

Hillary Clinton Should Just Say Yes to a $15 Minimum Wage

On the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton has eloquently defined workers’ rights as human rights. She could assert both more forcefully by championing a stronger federal minimum wage of $15 an hour.

So far, Mrs. Clinton has proposed lifting the federal hourly minimum to $12, from its current level of $7.25 an hour. Bernie Sanders is pushing for $15. Under both proposals, the increase would be phased in over five years, which means 2022 at the earliest, assuming that legislation to raise the minimum becomes law in 2017, the first year of the next president’s term.

Reasonable people can disagree about the ideal level for the minimum wage. There is no doubt, however, that the longer it takes to get to a new minimum, the higher it should be, and that by any political or practical calculation, 2022 is a long way off. This alone argues for Mr. Sanders’s more generous proposal.

Mrs. Clinton has argued that $15 might be too high for employers in low-wage states, causing them to lay off workers or make fewer hires. There is no proof for or against that position. There is solid empirical evidence showing that moderate increases in the minimum wage do not harm employment. But there is no similarly rigorous research on the effects of large increases, mainly because there haven’t been very many, either in the United States or internationally.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/opinion/hillary-clinton-should-just-say-yes-to-a-15-minimum-wage.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=0

[Moloch]

Hillary Clinton Should Just Say Yes to a $15 Minimum Wage

On the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton has eloquently defined workers’ rights as human rights. She could assert both more forcefully by championing a stronger federal minimum wage of $15 an hour.

So far, Mrs. Clinton has proposed lifting the federal hourly minimum to $12, from its current level of $7.25 an hour. Bernie Sanders is pushing for $15. Under both proposals, the increase would be phased in over five years, which means 2022 at the earliest, assuming that legislation to raise the minimum becomes law in 2017, the first year of the next president’s term.

Reasonable people can disagree about the ideal level for the minimum wage. There is no doubt, however, that the longer it takes to get to a new minimum, the higher it should be, and that by any political or practical calculation, 2022 is a long way off. This alone argues for Mr. Sanders’s more generous proposal.

Mrs. Clinton has argued that $15 might be too high for employers in low-wage states, causing them to lay off workers or make fewer hires. There is no proof for or against that position. There is solid empirical evidence showing that moderate increases in the minimum wage do not harm employment. But there is no similarly rigorous research on the effects of large increases, mainly because there haven’t been very many, either in the United States or internationally.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/opinion/hillary-clinton-should-just-say-yes-to-a-15-minimum-wage.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=0

If the minimum wage had kept up with inflation... The number you are looking for is $20+

The cost of living has outpaced minimum wage by more than double

[squatz1]

I don't think she is at all, I just can't stand her in anyway, shape or form she just bothers me and makes me cringe.

[Wilikon]

I don't think she is at all, I just can't stand her in anyway, shape or form she just bothers me and makes me cringe.

I don't think it is wise to elect someone who's sick as an old dog... Health issues that is, not just the lies.

Those are not reading glasses...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2268073/Hillary-Clinton-Does-Secretary-State-double-vision-blood-clot-scare.html

[galdur]

I´m beginning to think that they´ll drop her. A product that becomes the less of a sell the more you know about it is hopeless in the market. There´s too much info out there and garbage media doesn´t have the clout it used to have. Maybe they´re resigned to Bernie, it isn´t like he´s any communist. I guess he´s pretty similar to the social-democrats in Europe, maybe a little more to the right.

[AliceWonderMiscreations]

Well there are no untrustworthy emails sent on her government email address .  Then again no emails were sent there.

On the other side thinking of computer security.  Each person having their own email server does make it hard to compromise everyone at once.  So she did add some security by doing it.

No no no no NO.

It's frustrating how many people don't understand this.

SMTP is an insecure protocol. To be RFC compliant, an e-mail server MUST accept e-mail from another e-mail server that is not encrypted.

Within the .gov network they can do refuse connections that don't have encryption but when connecting outside the .gov network and accepting mail from outside the .gov network, they have to accept connections that are not secured by TLS.

By running her own mail server outside the .gov infrastructure, she opened all of her e-mail up to potential MITM attacks.

What she did was incredibly stupid.

---

Edited for typos

[hugoworld]

I would guess that 99% of politicians are not trustworthy.  I think the problem is that they work for their donors which are usually lobbyists for big corporations, oil companies, insurance companies, etc.  Hillary is no exception.

thats right.. all the politicians make some evil plans with horrible blood sucker behind closed doors...

[AliceWonderMiscreations]

I would guess that 99% of politicians are not trustworthy.  I think the problem is that they work for their donors which are usually lobbyists for big corporations, oil companies, insurance companies, etc.  Hillary is no exception.

thats right.. all the politicians make some evil plans with horrible blood sucker behind closed doors...

They don't start out that way, but those that don't make those deals end up not getting the funding they need to make it at the national level.

[Wilikon]

Well there are no untrustworthy emails sent on her government email address .  Then again no emails were sent there.

On the other side thinking of computer security.  Each person having their own email server does make it hard to compromise everyone at once.  So she did add some security by doing it.

No no no no NO.

It's frustrating how many people don't understand this.

SMTP is an insecure protocol. The be RFC compliant, an e-mail server MUST accept e-mail from another e-mail server that is not encrypted.

Within the .gov network they can do refuse connections that don't have encryption but when connection outside the .gov network and accepting mail from outside the .gov network, they have to accept connections that are not secured by TLS.

By running her own mail server outside the .gov infrastructure, she opened all of her e-mail up to potential MITM attacks.

What she did was incredibly stupid.

... Or in purpose.

[vero]

Hillary Clinton Should Just Say Yes to a $15 Minimum Wage

On the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton has eloquently defined workers’ rights as human rights. She could assert both more forcefully by championing a stronger federal minimum wage of $15 an hour.

So far, Mrs. Clinton has proposed lifting the federal hourly minimum to $12, from its current level of $7.25 an hour. Bernie Sanders is pushing for $15. Under both proposals, the increase would be phased in over five years, which means 2022 at the earliest, assuming that legislation to raise the minimum becomes law in 2017, the first year of the next president’s term.

Reasonable people can disagree about the ideal level for the minimum wage. There is no doubt, however, that the longer it takes to get to a new minimum, the higher it should be, and that by any political or practical calculation, 2022 is a long way off. This alone argues for Mr. Sanders’s more generous proposal.

Mrs. Clinton has argued that $15 might be too high for employers in low-wage states, causing them to lay off workers or make fewer hires. There is no proof for or against that position. There is solid empirical evidence showing that moderate increases in the minimum wage do not harm employment. But there is no similarly rigorous research on the effects of large increases, mainly because there haven’t been very many, either in the United States or internationally.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/opinion/hillary-clinton-should-just-say-yes-to-a-15-minimum-wage.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region&region=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=0

I would love to see a check on how much money Hillary Clinton has collected from foreign contributors and I remember the last time she ran for president, her campaign accused the Republicans of being heavily funded by foreign interests. But when a fact check was done, her campaign pulled back from that claim when it was learned her campaign was the one receiving the bulk of foreign contributions.

[bryant.coleman]

Hillary Clinton barking... the newest internet meme

Trump Laughs At Hillary Clinton Barking. Arf Arf Arf!

You people don't know about her true intentions. Hitlery Clinton is a very intelligent lady, whose actions are well planned and managed. I strongly suspect that this "barking incident" will be used by her for claiming the "insanity plea", once she is tried for the war crimes committed by her in places such as Bosnia, Serbia and Libya.

Meanwhile she has already signed an advertisement deal with KenL:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JXz_gvnxMA

That bitch is like Flint water supply: Hazardous to your health and fits perfectly into any space or container

[galdur]

Hillary Clinton barking... the newest internet meme

Trump Laughs At Hillary Clinton Barking. Arf Arf Arf!

You people don't know about her true intentions. Hitlery Clinton is a very intelligent lady, whose actions are well planned and managed. I strongly suspect that this "barking incident" will be used by her for claiming the "insanity plea", once she is tried for the war crimes committed by her in places such as Bosnia, Serbia and Libya.

Meanwhile she has already signed an advertisement deal with KenL:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JXz_gvnxMA

That bitch is like Flint water supply: Hazardous to your health and fits perfectly into any space or container

Yes, psychopaths aren´t lacking in the intelligence department. Which is why the classic excuse for them is incompetence and even stupidity.

[galdur]

Lie-Sniffing Dogs Needed

It appears it's time to teach Hillary's old lap dogs a new trick...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-21/lie-sniffing-dogs-needed

[Wilikon]

Trump: As president, I would prosecute Clinton

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eivpdmXfebY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWgnz5rTw48



Donald Trump said Monday night that he believes Hillary Clinton will likely get away with her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state, but said that as president, it's only fair that he'd look to prosecute Clinton.

Fox News' Sean Hannity asked Trump in front of a live Nevada audience if his attorney general would go after Clinton should an investigation find she broke the law while serving in the Obama administration.

"You have no choice," Trump replied. "In fairness, you have to look into that."

"She seems to be guilty," he said. "But you know what, I wouldn't even say that."


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/trump-as-president-i-would-prosecute-clinton/article/2583925

[Spendulus]

Hillary Clinton Should Just Say Yes to a $15 Minimum Wage

On the campaign trail, Hillary Clinton has eloquently defined workers’ rights as human rights. She could assert both more forcefully by championing a stronger federal minimum wage of $15 an hour.

So far, Mrs. Clinton has proposed lifting the federal hourly minimum to $12, from its current level of $7.25 an hour. Bernie Sanders is pushing for $15. Under both proposals, the increase would be phased in over five years, which means 2022 at the earliest, assuming that legislation to raise the minimum becomes law in 2017, the first year of the next president’s term.

Reasonable people can disagree about the ideal level for the minimum wage. There is no doubt, however, that the longer it takes to get to a new minimum, the higher it should be, and that by any political or practical calculation, 2022 is a long way off. This alone argues for Mr. Sanders’s more generous proposal.

Mrs. Clinton has argued that $15 might be too high for employers in low-wage states, causing them to lay off workers or make fewer hires. There is no proof for or against that position. There is solid empirical evidence showing that moderate increases in the minimum wage do not harm employment. But there is no similarly rigorous research on the effects of large increases, mainly because there haven’t been very many, either in the United States or internationally.....

I can tell you what either "minimum wage" will do.  They will increase incentives for robotization of labor.  Lot of people will be out of work in the fast food industry.

[craked5]

Lie-Sniffing Dogs Needed

It appears it's time to teach Hillary's old lap dogs a new trick...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-21/lie-sniffing-dogs-needed

Well, no doubt about that.

But after all, an election is 90% media control. People will statistically vote for the candidate they heard the most of... That's why Trump gots his chance as his stupidity makes the whole world talking about him.

[QuestionAuthority]

Here's a picture of her political science professor.

[Wilikon]

Spy Agencies Say Clinton Emails Closely Matched Secret Documents…



U.S. spy agencies have told Congress that Hillary Clinton’s home computer server contained some emails that should have been treated as “top secret” because their wording matched sections of some of the government’s most highly classified documents, four sources familiar with the agency reports said.

The two reports are the first formal declarations by U.S. spy agencies detailing how they believe Clinton violated government rules when highly classified information in at least 22 email messages passed through her unsecured home server.


http://news.yahoo.com/spy-agencies-clinton-emails-closely-matched-top-secret-213108714.html

[Wilikon]

Here's a picture of her political science professor.

The detail that's most truthful is how harpy clinton is nowhere to be found in the image...