[ANN] Ħ [HODL] No Staking, 1% Standard Interest per Day, 750% APR For HOdlers

[Fishmaster42]

the price is dirt cheap since new version wallet. 

Actually price is rising on C-CEX. Should ignore YObit as their tokens are not convertible to HODL.

I was speaking with C-CEX about the delisting -

They need to see 6 BTC here -

https://c-cex.com/?id=stat&d=30

Currrently we're at 5.07, so not far off. Another 1 BTC of trading and they should take us off delisting notice.

I been yelling at yobit. I can confirm they got the message. word on the street is Black smith was working on it. Im not sure how they would fix a month running on the wrong chain, but anyways they have at least acknowledged the problem. Fish

[joehoebot]

what up hodlas?
 

[VanLan]

Hi, to help HODl about C-Cex I made a (first) transaction today from local wallet to C-Cex. Seems it didn't arrive there?!

My HODL-client shows TX f2a0bc1f7bfbde32cc3314aa6b480bec52e37d2193beb98c8d5586f0a34693ae and has more than 100 confirmations.
To my surprise, there is no such TX in block explorer.

Anybody any idea what went wrong

[BigBoom3599]

Hi, to help HODl about C-Cex I made a (first) transaction today from local wallet to C-Cex. Seems it didn't arrive there?!

My HODL-client shows TX f2a0bc1f7bfbde32cc3314aa6b480bec52e37d2193beb98c8d5586f0a34693ae and has more than 100 confirmations.
To my surprise, there is no such TX in block explorer.

Anybody any idea what went wrong

What version of the wallet are you using? You might still be on the unforked chain, if so just upgrade your wallet and resend your transaction.

[VanLan]

[/quote]
What version of the wallet are you using? You might still be on the unforked chain, if so just upgrade your wallet and resend your transaction.
[/quote]

Ah, ok. Was still using v1.0. I've just upgradet now to v. 2.0 Please tell me how to resend the TX.
thanks!!

[BigBoom3599]

Ah, ok. Was still using v1.0. I've just upgradet now to v. 2.0 Please tell me how to resend the TX.
thanks!!

Just do what you did before, send a normal transaction

[baileys2611]

Any news on the new wallet build and binaries? I'm running windows x64 and Ubuntu 64bit ATM and block finding has sloooowed down a lot.

[coinstash]

For the past month Yobit exchange have been committing a fraud. They have kept HOdl in trade while having no HOdl to exchange. If you buy HOdl from them they cannot be removed into your wallet for interest.

I have been patient with them until now, but it has become apparent that they do not intend to fix it. As a major hodler I feel it necessary to issue the following warning:

YOBIT IS A FRAUDULENT EXCHANGE. DO NOT TRADE WITH THEM UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE.

See HOdl slack channel for further information and proof. Apparently I cannot upload it here.

[FreeTrade]

"Paying YObit to list is like paying somebody to punch you in the face"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1581013.0

[FreeTrade]

Please try https://github.com/Optiminer/HOdlcoin/commit/d31e02e856a0a44fe6a722c8420c843f51f5b0b3

Got the following error trying to build on win32 - any suggestions?

mingw32-make[2]: Entering directory 'c:/ewb/HODLCoin/src'
  CXX    libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512Compute32b_parallel(uint64_t**, uint64_t**)':
sha512.cpp:122:60: error: 'htobe64' was not declared in this scope
     context[0].w[15] = _mm256_set1_epi64x(htobe64(totalSize));
                                                            ^
sha512.cpp:138:63: error: '_mm256_extract_epi64' was not declared in this scope
         digest[0] = _mm256_extract_epi64(context[0].h, 0);
                                                               ^
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512ProcessBlock(Sha512Context*)':
sha512.cpp:21:90: error: 'ulong' was not declared in this scope
 #define ROR64(a, n) _mm256_or_si256(_mm256_srli_epi64(a, n), _mm256_slli_epi64(a, sizeof(ulong)*8 - n))
                                                                                          ^
sha512.cpp:16:20: note: in expansion of macro 'ROR64'
 #define SIGMA2(x) (ROR64(x, 14) ^ ROR64(x, 18) ^ ROR64(x, 41))
                    ^
sha512.cpp:155:20: note: in expansion of macro 'SIGMA2'
     T0 += (h[0]) + SIGMA2(e[0]) + Ch((e[0]), (f[0]), (g[0])) + k; \
                    ^
sha512.cpp:166:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512'
     ROUND512(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
     ^
sha512.cpp:174:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512_0_TO_15'
     ROUND512_0_TO_15(a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h); \
     ^
sha512.cpp:215:5: note: in expansion of macro 'R512_0'
     R512_0; R512_0;
     ^
makefile:3508: recipe for target 'libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o' failed

[Sharky444]

0.33% seems like extreme inflation. Why do you think this coin could hold its value?

[c00p3r]

Please try https://github.com/Optiminer/HOdlcoin/commit/d31e02e856a0a44fe6a722c8420c843f51f5b0b3

Got the following error trying to build on win32 - any suggestions?

mingw32-make[2]: Entering directory 'c:/ewb/HODLCoin/src'
  CXX    libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512Compute32b_parallel(uint64_t**, uint64_t**)':
sha512.cpp:122:60: error: 'htobe64' was not declared in this scope
     context[0].w[15] = _mm256_set1_epi64x(htobe64(totalSize));
                                                            ^
sha512.cpp:138:63: error: '_mm256_extract_epi64' was not declared in this scope
         digest[0] = _mm256_extract_epi64(context[0].h, 0);
                                                               ^
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512ProcessBlock(Sha512Context*)':
sha512.cpp:21:90: error: 'ulong' was not declared in this scope
 #define ROR64(a, n) _mm256_or_si256(_mm256_srli_epi64(a, n), _mm256_slli_epi64(a, sizeof(ulong)*8 - n))
                                                                                          ^
sha512.cpp:16:20: note: in expansion of macro 'ROR64'
 #define SIGMA2(x) (ROR64(x, 14) ^ ROR64(x, 18) ^ ROR64(x, 41))
                    ^
sha512.cpp:155:20: note: in expansion of macro 'SIGMA2'
     T0 += (h[0]) + SIGMA2(e[0]) + Ch((e[0]), (f[0]), (g[0])) + k; \
                    ^
sha512.cpp:166:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512'
     ROUND512(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
     ^
sha512.cpp:174:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512_0_TO_15'
     ROUND512_0_TO_15(a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h); \
     ^
sha512.cpp:215:5: note: in expansion of macro 'R512_0'
     R512_0; R512_0;
     ^
makefile:3508: recipe for target 'libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o' failed

I faced them when compiled hodlminer 

for this

Code:

sha512.cpp:122:60: error: 'htobe64' was not declared in this scope
     context[0].w[15] = _mm256_set1_epi64x(htobe64(totalSize));

I put implementaion of the function htobe64


this error

Code:

sha512.cpp:21:90: error: 'ulong' was not declared in this scope

I fixed by putting

Code:

typedef uint64_t ulong

and for this error

Code:

sha512.cpp:138:63: error: '_mm256_extract_epi64' was not declared in this scope

I guess you need to install some dependencies, I haven't faced this

[wisebc]

So what's on the horizon for HOdl?  We have a pool, we have a website, we're holding on by a thread on an exchange, price is effectively flat at half a penny USD, and we're all looking expectantly towards late Winter/Spring when the 12 month HOdl's start to come out of hibernution.  What's the gameplan there devs?

[wisebc]

For anyone using the pool, you can control the number of CPU threads used by the miner by adding -t [number] to the end of: hodlminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://hodl.optiminer.pl:5555 -u HODLADDR -p x

as in: hodlminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://hodl.optiminer.pl:5555 -u HODLADDR -p x -t 4

this was likely obvious to everyone but me but I thought I would throw it out there.

[adamvp]

the price is dirt cheap since new version wallet. 

Actually price is rising on C-CEX. Should ignore YObit as their tokens are not convertible to HODL.

I was speaking with C-CEX about the delisting -

They need to see 6 BTC here -

https://c-cex.com/?id=stat&d=30

Currrently we're at 5.07, so not far off. Another 1 BTC of trading and they should take us off delisting notice.

now it's only 0.92 BTC
Fork and rewards hodling was wrong I am afraid

[optiminer]

Please try https://github.com/Optiminer/HOdlcoin/commit/d31e02e856a0a44fe6a722c8420c843f51f5b0b3

Got the following error trying to build on win32 - any suggestions?

mingw32-make[2]: Entering directory 'c:/ewb/HODLCoin/src'
  CXX    libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512Compute32b_parallel(uint64_t**, uint64_t**)':
sha512.cpp:122:60: error: 'htobe64' was not declared in this scope
     context[0].w[15] = _mm256_set1_epi64x(htobe64(totalSize));
                                                            ^
sha512.cpp:138:63: error: '_mm256_extract_epi64' was not declared in this scope
         digest[0] = _mm256_extract_epi64(context[0].h, 0);
                                                               ^
sha512.cpp: In function 'void sha512ProcessBlock(Sha512Context*)':
sha512.cpp:21:90: error: 'ulong' was not declared in this scope
 #define ROR64(a, n) _mm256_or_si256(_mm256_srli_epi64(a, n), _mm256_slli_epi64(a, sizeof(ulong)*8 - n))
                                                                                          ^
sha512.cpp:16:20: note: in expansion of macro 'ROR64'
 #define SIGMA2(x) (ROR64(x, 14) ^ ROR64(x, 18) ^ ROR64(x, 41))
                    ^
sha512.cpp:155:20: note: in expansion of macro 'SIGMA2'
     T0 += (h[0]) + SIGMA2(e[0]) + Ch((e[0]), (f[0]), (g[0])) + k; \
                    ^
sha512.cpp:166:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512'
     ROUND512(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h)
     ^
sha512.cpp:174:5: note: in expansion of macro 'ROUND512_0_TO_15'
     ROUND512_0_TO_15(a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h); \
     ^
sha512.cpp:215:5: note: in expansion of macro 'R512_0'
     R512_0; R512_0;
     ^
makefile:3508: recipe for target 'libbitcoin_crypto_x86_a-sha512.o' failed

Can you try adding #include <endian.h> and replacing ulong with long as in
https://github.com/Optiminer/HOdlcoin/commit/1b532b7237ec2bbc5068c5269b92f6a475c9a48b or just update to head on that branch?

The missing _mm256_extract_epi64 I do not understand. It should be declared in "immintrin.h" which is included already:
https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#expand=2259,5074,2259&text=_mm256_extract_epi64
Other AVX intrinsics seem to be found which makes it even stranger. Which version of mingw?

[Fishmaster42]

the price is dirt cheap since new version wallet. 

Actually price is rising on C-CEX. Should ignore YObit as their tokens are not convertible to HODL.

I was speaking with C-CEX about the delisting -

They need to see 6 BTC here -

https://c-cex.com/?id=stat&d=30

Currrently we're at 5.07, so not far off. Another 1 BTC of trading and they should take us off delisting notice.

now it's only 0.92 BTC
Fork and rewards hodling was wrong I am afraid

if you click that link and scroll down to Hodl it says 6.19 btc vol we should be ok.

[optiminer]

I faced them when compiled hodlminer 

Maybe whoever managed to build the holdminer under windows can help then?

[optiminer]

The missing _mm256_extract_epi64 I do not understand. It should be declared in "immintrin.h" which is included already:
https://software.intel.com/sites/landingpage/IntrinsicsGuide/#expand=2259,5074,2259&text=_mm256_extract_epi64
Other AVX intrinsics seem to be found which makes it even stranger. Which version of mingw?

I rewrote the code to work without _mm256_extract_epi64. It should even be faster now. Hope it compiles with mingw now, please try the latest head.

[tomahawkeer]

is HODL still getting delisted or has that been changed?