samle
Member
Offline
Activity: 184
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2017, 01:38:46 AM |
|
in this project haved explain about many wallet, i like this project because your explain make me believe if this project will success, good luck dev
|
|
|
|
Wolfie
|
|
October 03, 2017, 01:41:01 AM |
|
Good to see verge having a good community indeed. Any info about when the wraith protocol will be enabled? Also what about adding on hitbtc? It's been a long wait I guess.
ROFL why dont you sign into HitBTC and see it there last week lol?
|
@XVG_HypeMan
|
|
|
senseless
|
|
October 03, 2017, 01:45:44 AM |
|
yes i must have missed that. i never FUD'd you either. but since you're being rather combative, how does this sound? Several people are actually running successful set ups of the same software you are trying to (including ccminer.org), with no issues what so ever, and some of the others are actually completely new to crypto and didn't have -any- problem what so ever getting it to work. I'm not a pool admin (anymore) and haven't ran a pool since unomp/mpos was all the craze, so i'm not even sure why you are asking me why you can't get it to work. try asking someone with a successful set up, cordially, and maybe you'll get somewhere. maybe you didn't set the algo properly in the .conf, maybe you aren't accounting for ntime in the blocks.. i really have no idea what so ever, because you've provided no logs, or even errors other than saying the blocks aren't getting signed properly.
I pasted several json response bodies. Current issue is this.. ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock ******* exception encountered ******* VERGEd(+0x1ae86f)[0x55d690ecf86f] VERGEd(+0x4164b)[0x55d690d6264b] VERGEd(+0x90c93)[0x55d690db1c93] VERGEd(+0xc25b0)[0x55d690de35b0] VERGEd(+0xde3ee)[0x55d690dff3ee] VERGEd(+0x589db)[0x55d690d799db] VERGEd(+0x5c076)[0x55d690d7d076] /lib64/libboost_thread-mt.so.1.53.0(+0xd27a)[0x7f2e7ca7c27a] /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7e25)[0x7f2e7b1b9e25] /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f2e7aee734d] Which apparently is an issue with the mismatch of stratum versions (based on other info i've read)? Haven't been able to figure out more than that. I get to spend today figuring this out Here's what I know, every other coin I've worked on was plug and play. They "just work" - without any issues, at all. The only other coins I've seen these types of problems from (when digging for information) all turned out to be useless shitcoins that all died in the end.
|
|
|
|
Dogedarkdev (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1009
$XVG - The Standard in Crypto as a Currency!
|
|
October 03, 2017, 01:58:19 AM |
|
yes i must have missed that. i never FUD'd you either. but since you're being rather combative, how does this sound? Several people are actually running successful set ups of the same software you are trying to (including ccminer.org), with no issues what so ever, and some of the others are actually completely new to crypto and didn't have -any- problem what so ever getting it to work. I'm not a pool admin (anymore) and haven't ran a pool since unomp/mpos was all the craze, so i'm not even sure why you are asking me why you can't get it to work. try asking someone with a successful set up, cordially, and maybe you'll get somewhere. maybe you didn't set the algo properly in the .conf, maybe you aren't accounting for ntime in the blocks.. i really have no idea what so ever, because you've provided no logs, or even errors other than saying the blocks aren't getting signed properly.
I pasted several json response bodies. Current issue is this.. ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock ******* exception encountered ******* VERGEd(+0x1ae86f)[0x55d690ecf86f] VERGEd(+0x4164b)[0x55d690d6264b] VERGEd(+0x90c93)[0x55d690db1c93] VERGEd(+0xc25b0)[0x55d690de35b0] VERGEd(+0xde3ee)[0x55d690dff3ee] VERGEd(+0x589db)[0x55d690d799db] VERGEd(+0x5c076)[0x55d690d7d076] /lib64/libboost_thread-mt.so.1.53.0(+0xd27a)[0x7f2e7ca7c27a] /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7e25)[0x7f2e7b1b9e25] /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f2e7aee734d] Which apparently is an issue with the mismatch of stratum versions (based on other info i've read)? Haven't been able to figure out more than that. I get to spend today figuring this out Here's what I know, every other coin I've worked on was plug and play. They "just work" - without any issues, at all. The only other coins I've seen these types of problems from (when digging for information) all turned out to be useless shitcoins that all died in the end. what pool do you run? why don't you use boost 1.63? whatr platform did you compile verged on?
|
_///// [$XVG] ★★★★★WE ARE ON THE VERGE ★★★★★ [MULTI-ALGO] /////_
|
|
|
|
senseless
|
|
October 03, 2017, 02:10:25 AM |
|
yes i must have missed that. i never FUD'd you either. but since you're being rather combative, how does this sound? Several people are actually running successful set ups of the same software you are trying to (including ccminer.org), with no issues what so ever, and some of the others are actually completely new to crypto and didn't have -any- problem what so ever getting it to work. I'm not a pool admin (anymore) and haven't ran a pool since unomp/mpos was all the craze, so i'm not even sure why you are asking me why you can't get it to work. try asking someone with a successful set up, cordially, and maybe you'll get somewhere. maybe you didn't set the algo properly in the .conf, maybe you aren't accounting for ntime in the blocks.. i really have no idea what so ever, because you've provided no logs, or even errors other than saying the blocks aren't getting signed properly.
I pasted several json response bodies. Current issue is this.. ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock ******* exception encountered ******* VERGEd(+0x1ae86f)[0x55d690ecf86f] VERGEd(+0x4164b)[0x55d690d6264b] VERGEd(+0x90c93)[0x55d690db1c93] VERGEd(+0xc25b0)[0x55d690de35b0] VERGEd(+0xde3ee)[0x55d690dff3ee] VERGEd(+0x589db)[0x55d690d799db] VERGEd(+0x5c076)[0x55d690d7d076] /lib64/libboost_thread-mt.so.1.53.0(+0xd27a)[0x7f2e7ca7c27a] /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7e25)[0x7f2e7b1b9e25] /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f2e7aee734d] Which apparently is an issue with the mismatch of stratum versions (based on other info i've read)? Haven't been able to figure out more than that. I get to spend today figuring this out Here's what I know, every other coin I've worked on was plug and play. They "just work" - without any issues, at all. The only other coins I've seen these types of problems from (when digging for information) all turned out to be useless shitcoins that all died in the end. what pool do you run? why don't you use boost 1.63? whatr platform did you compile verged on? I'm using the YIIMP stratum server and DB, but none of the frontend. CentOS 7 for the OS. I just installed boost from the centos yum repo. I compiled the wallet on centos7 as well as downloading the bins from the website for centos7. Both show the same issues.
|
|
|
|
Dogedarkdev (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1009
$XVG - The Standard in Crypto as a Currency!
|
|
October 03, 2017, 02:36:34 AM |
|
yes i must have missed that. i never FUD'd you either. but since you're being rather combative, how does this sound? Several people are actually running successful set ups of the same software you are trying to (including ccminer.org), with no issues what so ever, and some of the others are actually completely new to crypto and didn't have -any- problem what so ever getting it to work. I'm not a pool admin (anymore) and haven't ran a pool since unomp/mpos was all the craze, so i'm not even sure why you are asking me why you can't get it to work. try asking someone with a successful set up, cordially, and maybe you'll get somewhere. maybe you didn't set the algo properly in the .conf, maybe you aren't accounting for ntime in the blocks.. i really have no idea what so ever, because you've provided no logs, or even errors other than saying the blocks aren't getting signed properly.
I pasted several json response bodies. Current issue is this.. ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock ******* exception encountered ******* VERGEd(+0x1ae86f)[0x55d690ecf86f] VERGEd(+0x4164b)[0x55d690d6264b] VERGEd(+0x90c93)[0x55d690db1c93] VERGEd(+0xc25b0)[0x55d690de35b0] VERGEd(+0xde3ee)[0x55d690dff3ee] VERGEd(+0x589db)[0x55d690d799db] VERGEd(+0x5c076)[0x55d690d7d076] /lib64/libboost_thread-mt.so.1.53.0(+0xd27a)[0x7f2e7ca7c27a] /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7e25)[0x7f2e7b1b9e25] /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f2e7aee734d] Which apparently is an issue with the mismatch of stratum versions (based on other info i've read)? Haven't been able to figure out more than that. I get to spend today figuring this out Here's what I know, every other coin I've worked on was plug and play. They "just work" - without any issues, at all. The only other coins I've seen these types of problems from (when digging for information) all turned out to be useless shitcoins that all died in the end. what pool do you run? why don't you use boost 1.63? whatr platform did you compile verged on? I'm using the YIIMP stratum server and DB, but none of the frontend. CentOS 7 for the OS. I just installed boost from the centos yum repo. I compiled the wallet on centos7 as well as downloading the bins from the website for centos7. Both show the same issues. since boost is throwing an error, i would try using boost 1.63.
|
_///// [$XVG] ★★★★★WE ARE ON THE VERGE ★★★★★ [MULTI-ALGO] /////_
|
|
|
|
HarryAnsour
Member
Offline
Activity: 134
Merit: 11
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:12:02 AM |
|
Ok so the price was 163sat 4 days before Binance, if we didn't dump it back then, what's the point for us to dump today? ? DEV IS PLAYING DIRTY? strong dump on Bittrex and Binance right now on 162 sat. I sold out, waiting to see 120 sat. if you new anything about verge or myself, (which most of the community does) you'd know i don't spend much time trading. everything you have said regarding me is completely inaccurate. i actually only used my binance account once, and that was to vote for verge to be listed there. ill gladly upload screencaps if you like. please don't come in my thread spreading rumors/gossip, this is crypto, not a hair salon. edit: enjoy, now you look like an idiot. Oh okay so we're calling each other what we're look like. Great. Earlier I mentioned we'll have a price drop minimum 10 % , unfortunate for you , we do have 10% decrease. The copy of your Binance trade account, you can show your girlfriend maybe to get something before bed. Is it so hard to create 100 Binance account within few hours and trade with other accounts? Dude you take what I say really personal, but you forget you play with your coins, I play with my money. I think you should act little more responsible to keep the community going, not everyone have to agree every BS you say. Ok you didn't trade , that's nice of you. But at the time when I said it looks like a dump, you had 18000BTC worth of XVG for sale in Bittrex but somehow as soon as i posted, it drop down to 800BTC worth of XVG for sale. Yes I don't know you, but I know my numbers. I know you could be a really good person for many people, but this is business and I'm not an idiot to hand over my money to someone as childish as you. Just grow up dude you'll do fine.
|
|
|
|
senseless
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:15:39 AM Last edit: October 03, 2017, 05:58:36 AM by senseless |
|
since boost is throwing an error, i would try using boost 1.63.
Ubuntu 17.05 .. Same error.. ThreadRPCServer method=submitblock ******* exception encountered ******* bin/VERGEd(+0x1b077f)[0x55ac0626e77f] bin/VERGEd(+0x41dfb)[0x55ac060ffdfb] bin/VERGEd(+0xdb12c)[0x55ac0619912c] bin/VERGEd(+0xe09b4)[0x55ac0619e9b4] bin/VERGEd(+0x59402)[0x55ac06117402] bin/VERGEd(+0x5cf5c)[0x55ac0611af5c] /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libboost_thread.so.1.63.0(+0x1155d)[0x7faa39a7455d] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x76da)[0x7faa385226da] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x5f)[0x7faa3825cd7f] .. Ah, I had accidentally turned txmessage=0. I turned txmessage=1 and back to this error: 05:25:06: ERROR Verge Unable to sign block, wallet locked? 05:25:06: *** REJECTED Verge block 1540665 1 txs debug.log: Sign failed .. Edited the code in rpcmining.cpp that was throwing the error so it would try to ProcessBlock (since SignBlock doesn't really do anything but check if the address is in the wallet). /* if (!block.SignBlock(*pwalletMain)) throw JSONRPCError(-100, "Unable to sign block, wallet locked?"); */ Stratum: 05:55:54: *** REJECTED Verge block 1540716 2 txs 2017-10-03 05:55:54: REJECTED XVG block 1540716 debug.log: ERROR: CheckBlock() : first tx is not coinbase ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
|
|
|
|
trilla666
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:15:59 AM |
|
lmao the drama
|
|
|
|
Wolfie
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:44:58 AM |
|
Ok so the price was 163sat 4 days before Binance, if we didn't dump it back then, what's the point for us to dump today? ? DEV IS PLAYING DIRTY? strong dump on Bittrex and Binance right now on 162 sat. I sold out, waiting to see 120 sat. if you new anything about verge or myself, (which most of the community does) you'd know i don't spend much time trading. everything you have said regarding me is completely inaccurate. i actually only used my binance account once, and that was to vote for verge to be listed there. ill gladly upload screencaps if you like. please don't come in my thread spreading rumors/gossip, this is crypto, not a hair salon. edit: enjoy, now you look like an idiot. Oh okay so we're calling each other what we're look like. Great. Earlier I mentioned we'll have a price drop minimum 10 % , unfortunate for you , we do have 10% decrease. The copy of your Binance trade account, you can show your girlfriend maybe to get something before bed. Is it so hard to create 100 Binance account within few hours and trade with other accounts? Dude you take what I say really personal, but you forget you play with your coins, I play with my money. I think you should act little more responsible to keep the community going, not everyone have to agree every BS you say. Ok you didn't trade , that's nice of you. But at the time when I said it looks like a dump, you had 18000BTC worth of XVG for sale in Bittrex but somehow as soon as i posted, it drop down to 800BTC worth of XVG for sale. Yes I don't know you, but I know my numbers. I know you could be a really good person for many people, but this is business and I'm not an idiot to hand over my money to someone as childish as you. Just grow up dude you'll do fine. ROFL@ "18000BTC worth of XVG for sale in Bittrex " Theres a bigger chance that Israel would keep all its money in Deutsche Bank than Sunerok would keep his Verge on Bittrex
|
@XVG_HypeMan
|
|
|
nick1492
|
|
October 03, 2017, 07:49:46 AM |
|
Verge number 1 asset is its Verge Community. https://twitter.com/VergeAddictVerge Community with its huge followers, if it be united, it can pump the coin up easily
|
|
|
|
|
nick1492
|
|
October 03, 2017, 09:07:17 AM |
|
Thank you very much. It has given me a lot of confidence about verge and crytocurrency. I think everybody should hear this.
|
|
|
|
hdn
|
|
October 03, 2017, 03:16:54 PM |
|
I'm fully trust Dev very well for his good job to develop the coin since few years ago and i still believe and confidence for future of the coin. Still hold the coin for the best n highest price.
|
|
|
|
vrana
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:00:57 PM |
|
electrum-xvg walet is not connecting. Is there any server settings has to be done on wallet.
|
|
|
|
Br.CAT
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:05:12 PM |
|
XVG did take a big hit over the past month or so, but price-wise I truly think we've seen the bottom. We have good solid tech and a dedicated dev team and blow a lot of anon-coins out of the water which are at a lot higher market cap. I'll be honest, I was hoping the price would drop a bit lower so I could scoop up some more but it just refused to break any lower!
|
|
|
|
CryptoGreenT
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:32:49 PM |
|
Guys this coin has a great project behind it, and if you want to see the price rise you have to hold, hold and again hold. This market is based on supply and demand, if there is low supply the market will eventually rise so stop FUDing this coin and just support this amazing project!
|
|
|
|
Dogedarkdev (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1009
$XVG - The Standard in Crypto as a Currency!
|
|
October 03, 2017, 05:57:17 PM |
|
electrum-xvg walet is not connecting. Is there any server settings has to be done on wallet.
are you still using 2.4 or 2.4.1 ?
|
_///// [$XVG] ★★★★★WE ARE ON THE VERGE ★★★★★ [MULTI-ALGO] /////_
|
|
|
|
gdrules
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2017, 07:23:32 PM |
|
Topped up my XVG balance today
|
|
|
|
HarryAnsour
Member
Offline
Activity: 134
Merit: 11
|
|
October 03, 2017, 07:28:49 PM |
|
Thank you very much. It has given me a lot of confidence about verge and crytocurrency. I think everybody should hear this. I must say that was a really nice interview Thank you If 50% of what you say is true, you have my loyalty
|
|
|
|
|