[0Th]Ozcoin Pooled Mining |DGM 1%|Stratum+VarDiff port 80|NEW CN mining|

[Graet]

welcome to the pool spiccioli,
I see you have found us a block already - nice work

I have had reports of similar issues on small screen devices. What resolution are you running?

cheers
Graet

[1714846034]

1714846034

[spiccioli]

welcome to the pool spiccioli,
I see you have found us a block already - nice work

I have had reports of similar issues on small screen devices. What resolution are you running?

cheers
Graet

Graet,

Unbelievable! A block in less than a day.

I'm on a 1280x1024 monitor right now with firefox using a little smaller (1216x952) window, see this:



and this



spiccioli

[420]

welcome to the pool spiccioli,
I see you have found us a block already - nice work

I have had reports of similar issues on small screen devices. What resolution are you running?

cheers
Graet

Graet,

Unbelievable! A block in less than a day.

I'm on a 1280x1024 monitor right now with firefox using a little smaller (1216x952) window, see this:



and this



spiccioli

SOLUTION:

get a bigger resolution screen

[spiccioli]

SOLUTION:

get a bigger resolution screen

420,

as you can see there is ample empty space to the left and to the right of the page, so there is no need to use a bigger monitor.

spiccioli.

[420]

SOLUTION:

get a bigger resolution screen

420,

as you can see there is ample empty space to the left and to the right of the page, so there is no need to use a bigger monitor.

spiccioli.

it is a solution. site runs good on large resolution screens

[freshzive]

Are you still planning on increasing the data on the luck section? 15 blocks is only like 16 hours for us now.

I was thinking it would be cool to have 1,30,90 day luck percentages like p2pool. Or at least something more long term.

Thanks Graet

yes it is, I had hoped to have an all time graph up by now.
ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio:   98.87% shows we are doing ok since we switched to DGM, though it was closer to 96% a few weeks ago.

Oh I had forgotten about this stat. Where is this located again? Thanks Graet

[Graet]

Are you still planning on increasing the data on the luck section? 15 blocks is only like 16 hours for us now.

I was thinking it would be cool to have 1,30,90 day luck percentages like p2pool. Or at least something more long term.

Thanks Graet

yes it is, I had hoped to have an all time graph up by now.
ø Shares/Difficulty Ratio:   98.87% shows we are doing ok since we switched to DGM, though it was closer to 96% a few weeks ago.

Oh I had forgotten about this stat. Where is this located again? Thanks Graet

https://ozcoin.net/content/overview-bitcoin < that page
Just under "Current difficulty"

[Krak]

it is a solution. site runs good on large resolution screens

I have a 1680x1050 monitor and I get the same thing.

[roomservice]

@spiccioli: could you take a look at the frontend again? i changed some stuff on the layout, it should use the whole width of the screen for content now.

[os2sam]

@spiccioli: could you take a look at the frontend again? i changed some stuff on the layout, it should use the whole width of the screen for content now.

I like it better.

I can go back to 800X600 now
Thank you,
Sam

[LazyOtto]

could you take a look at the frontend again?

It is an improvement.
ty, roomservice

[spiccioli]

@spiccioli: could you take a look at the frontend again? i changed some stuff on the layout, it should use the whole width of the screen for content now.

roomservice,

it works OK now, both when showing graphs or tables with data, thanks a lot!

spiccioli

[420]

it is a solution. site runs good on large resolution screens

I have a 1680x1050 monitor and I get the same thing.

1920x1080 is the way to go

[rjk]

it is a solution. site runs good on large resolution screens

I have a 1680x1050 monitor and I get the same thing.

1920x1080 is the way to go

Naawwww, 3840x2400 FTW.

[Graet]

thanks roomservice

in sadder news

To ensure the stability and long term viability of Ozcoin it has been decided to introduce a 3% fee in the near future.
We will do a mass mail out to all members 7days before the fee is introduced, consider this early warning

This decision has not been taken lightly and will ensure Ozcoin's continued stability and needed development is done in a timely manner.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank all donors and volunteers that have supported the site so far, without you we couldn't have come this far

Best Wishes
Graeme Tee
Graet
Managing Director
Ozcoin Pooled Mining Pty Ltd
ACN:152 509 272

[Gladamas]

thanks roomservice

in sadder news

To ensure the stability and long term viability of Ozcoin it has been decided to introduce a 3% fee in the near future.
We will do a mass mail out to all members 7days before the fee is introduced, consider this early warning

This decision has not been taken lightly and will ensure Ozcoin's continued stability and needed development is done in a timely manner.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank all donors and volunteers that have supported the site so far, without you we couldn't have come this far

Best Wishes
Graeme Tee
Graet
Managing Director
Ozcoin Pooled Mining Pty Ltd
ACN:152 509 272

Can we set a donation % above that?

[Graet]

for sure
and the instant payout and orphan block payouts will remain for 5% donors
cheers

[Tittiez]

I've just thought of something interesting, and maybe one of you would be able to answer it. Looking at the hashrate graph, you can easily tell when gpumax kicks in and users drop off the pool (That is what causes the hashrate drops right?). Couldn't in theory, this be a hopping strategy? Maybe not with dgm (or maybe?), but if you hopped onto a pool when gpumax starts buying shares and then the pool found a block.. wouldn't you make more?

Hell, maybe people that aren't using GPUMax and mining the pool 24/7 are making more then the gpumax users!


Or maybe I got the wrong idea about all of this.

[organofcorti]

I've just thought of something interesting, and maybe one of you would be able to answer it. Looking at the hashrate graph, you can easily tell when gpumax kicks in and users drop off the pool (That is what causes the hashrate drops right?). Couldn't in theory, this be a hopping strategy? Maybe not with dgm (or maybe?), but if you hopped onto a pool when gpumax starts buying shares and then the pool found a block.. wouldn't you make more?

Hell, maybe people that aren't using GPUMax and mining the pool 24/7 are making more then the gpumax users!


Or maybe I got the wrong idea about all of this.

If you were using GPUMax as a signal that a round began on a proportional pool, and it was reliable (from what I've read, GPUMax can't pool hop), then yes. Otherwise, after the "hop point", you'd earn less.

Moving with GPUMax on a DGM pool lets you share a proportion of a reward. You might get the reward sooner, but you'll earn less from it. I'm just guessing here, but I think you might see less variance if you only mined a fair pool when the hashrate was up, but then you can do the same thing by spreading your shares across several pools.

PPS and variance protection schemes will reduce the variance per submitted share to zero, but at a cost.

[kano]

I've just thought of something interesting, and maybe one of you would be able to answer it. Looking at the hashrate graph, you can easily tell when gpumax kicks in and users drop off the pool (That is what causes the hashrate drops right?). Couldn't in theory, this be a hopping strategy? Maybe not with dgm (or maybe?), but if you hopped onto a pool when gpumax starts buying shares and then the pool found a block.. wouldn't you make more?

Hell, maybe people that aren't using GPUMax and mining the pool 24/7 are making more then the gpumax users!


Or maybe I got the wrong idea about all of this.

If you were using GPUMax as a signal that a round began on a proportional pool, and it was reliable (from what I've read, GPUMax can't pool hop), then yes. Otherwise, after the "hop point", you'd earn less.

Moving with GPUMax on a DGM pool lets you share a proportion of a reward. You might get the reward sooner, but you'll earn less from it. I'm just guessing here, but I think you might see less variance if you only mined a fair pool when the hashrate was up, but then you can do the same thing by spreading your shares across several pools.

PPS and variance protection schemes will reduce the variance per submitted share to zero, but at a cost.

... and kano wonders how long until the DGM master replies to this comment