fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 06, 2016, 07:19:29 PM |
|
Getting strange results(wattage) with Gigabyte G1 1070(samsung mem):
ETH: 29.7@115W - core using lowest curve possible@1165, Mem +700@2250, 55%TDP, 0.793V LBC: 292@160W - core +200@2012, Mem -500@1650, 75%TDP, 0.931V Measured at the wall.
Also memory is always 100Mhz lower than it should be according to settings. Starts at 1900Mhz. Is that normal?
Hi, I have the same card but i'm at 24MHs can you help me to get around 29 ? Thx in advance Use latest msi afterburner beta with the details I have posted. To edit voltage-frequency curve press `ctrl+f` in the afterburner. @Amph Could you please explain how did you get to 30Mhash@80W? Did you measure that at the wall? Cant decide between lbry and ETH... ETH has high memory OC, but lower wattage. Lbry lower OC, but higher wattage
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
October 06, 2016, 08:12:58 PM |
|
Getting strange results(wattage) with Gigabyte G1 1070(samsung mem):
ETH: 29.7@115W - core using lowest curve possible@1165, Mem +700@2250, 55%TDP, 0.793V LBC: 292@160W - core +200@2012, Mem -500@1650, 75%TDP, 0.931V Measured at the wall.
Also memory is always 100Mhz lower than it should be according to settings. Starts at 1900Mhz. Is that normal?
Hi, I have the same card but i'm at 24MHs can you help me to get around 29 ? Thx in advance Use latest msi afterburner beta with the details I have posted. To edit voltage-frequency curve press `ctrl+f` in the afterburner. @Amph Could you please explain how did you get to 30Mhash@80W? Did you measure that at the wall? Cant decide between lbry and ETH... ETH has high memory OC, but lower wattage. Lbry lower OC, but higher wattage sry it was 90w, not 80w, 80w is not possible it was not my setup, it was a setup of another user here, he reached something like 31.5MH at 90w 55% tdp, +100 on core and +1000 on the mem
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 06, 2016, 09:02:09 PM |
|
sry it was 90w, not 80w, 80w is not possible
it was not my setup, it was a setup of another user here, he reached something like 31.5MH at 90w
55% tdp, +100 on core and +1000 on the mem
Then my guess is he just multiplied 160 * 55% = 88W. I am reading at least 115W with reduced core and *only* +700 on mem. Thanks for info
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
October 06, 2016, 09:34:29 PM |
|
Getting strange results(wattage) with Gigabyte G1 1070(samsung mem):
ETH: 29.7@115W - core using lowest curve possible@1165, Mem +700@2250, 55%TDP, 0.793V LBC: 292@160W - core +200@2012, Mem -500@1650, 75%TDP, 0.931V Measured at the wall.
Also memory is always 100Mhz lower than it should be according to settings. Starts at 1900Mhz. Is that normal?
Hi, I have the same card but i'm at 24MHs can you help me to get around 29 ? Thx in advance Use latest msi afterburner beta with the details I have posted. To edit voltage-frequency curve press `ctrl+f` in the afterburner. @Amph Could you please explain how did you get to 30Mhash@80W? Did you measure that at the wall? Cant decide between lbry and ETH... ETH has high memory OC, but lower wattage. Lbry lower OC, but higher wattage sry it was 90w, not 80w, 80w is not possible it was not my setup, it was a setup of another user here, he reached something like 31.5MH at 90w 55% tdp, +100 on core and +1000 on the mem Which miner , driver and OS you are reaching this score with , mate ?
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
October 07, 2016, 05:38:29 AM |
|
Getting strange results(wattage) with Gigabyte G1 1070(samsung mem):
ETH: 29.7@115W - core using lowest curve possible@1165, Mem +700@2250, 55%TDP, 0.793V LBC: 292@160W - core +200@2012, Mem -500@1650, 75%TDP, 0.931V Measured at the wall.
Also memory is always 100Mhz lower than it should be according to settings. Starts at 1900Mhz. Is that normal?
Hi, I have the same card but i'm at 24MHs can you help me to get around 29 ? Thx in advance Use latest msi afterburner beta with the details I have posted. To edit voltage-frequency curve press `ctrl+f` in the afterburner. @Amph Could you please explain how did you get to 30Mhash@80W? Did you measure that at the wall? Cant decide between lbry and ETH... ETH has high memory OC, but lower wattage. Lbry lower OC, but higher wattage sry it was 90w, not 80w, 80w is not possible it was not my setup, it was a setup of another user here, he reached something like 31.5MH at 90w 55% tdp, +100 on core and +1000 on the mem Which miner , driver and OS you are reaching this score with , mate ? it's not me it was another user, i'm at 100w last time i tried it, also i'm not able to put mem at 1000, without artifact, it depend o your 1070 model sry it was 90w, not 80w, 80w is not possible
it was not my setup, it was a setup of another user here, he reached something like 31.5MH at 90w
55% tdp, +100 on core and +1000 on the mem
Then my guess is he just multiplied 160 * 55% = 88W. I am reading at least 115W with reduced core and *only* +700 on mem. Thanks for info no he used nvidia smi tool to monitor the wattage
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 07, 2016, 06:25:23 AM |
|
@Amph I wouldnt believe any software wattage tool for a second. Its only good for noticing drops / raises, not actual values.
Your 100W are at the wall or from software? Can you post exact readings(core, mem, v, settings) for that wattage please?
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
October 07, 2016, 06:33:37 AM Last edit: October 07, 2016, 07:53:49 AM by Amph |
|
i was thinking the same at you until i actually measured it with my wattmeter, and the wattage were almost the same, so the tool is definitely working
wattmeter it's not needed anymore, there are very precise tool nowadays, like the nvidia one and the corsair link, tollerance is only +-5% max
if you don't believe me just try it yourself, use the nvidia tool, and then do the ultimate proof with the wattmeter
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 07, 2016, 06:57:41 AM |
|
i was thinking the same at you until i actually measured it with my wattmeter, and the wattage were almost the same, so the tool is definitely working
wattmeter it's not needed anymore, there are very precise tool nowadays, like the nvidia one and the corsair link, tollerance is only +-5% max
if you don't believe me just try it your self, use the nvidia tool, and then do the ultimate proof with the wattmeter
Ok will check it out Can you still post your settings please? Oh and drivers. I am using the latest 372.9 Btw are your cards also starting with 1900 mem instead of 2000Mhz? This really annoys me.
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
October 07, 2016, 07:43:57 AM |
|
I'll do some tests with my Palits and wattmeter during the weekend..
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
October 07, 2016, 07:53:35 AM Last edit: October 07, 2016, 08:12:56 AM by Amph |
|
i was thinking the same at you until i actually measured it with my wattmeter, and the wattage were almost the same, so the tool is definitely working
wattmeter it's not needed anymore, there are very precise tool nowadays, like the nvidia one and the corsair link, tollerance is only +-5% max
if you don't believe me just try it your self, use the nvidia tool, and then do the ultimate proof with the wattmeter
Ok will check it out Can you still post your settings please? Oh and drivers. I am using the latest 372.9 Btw are your cards also starting with 1900 mem instead of 2000Mhz? This really annoys me. yeah 3800, i'm not mining etheruem, i don't like that i need to OC the mem so much, it may be a bad thing in the long term last time i was able to do 100w 29MH, i posted it here few weeks ago ok i tested it now this is with the gpu attached to the monitor(not with the mining rig but the gaming one), 1440p so there is some instability, because i'm using the pc also for browsing and video, that's why you see 24MH as a lowest, but the average is definitely 29MH+
|
|
|
|
djole
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
October 07, 2016, 09:31:50 AM |
|
Does anyone have rigs built with nVidia cards ? Which model/manufacturer is the best one?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
pallas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
|
|
October 07, 2016, 09:34:42 AM |
|
Does anyone have rigs built with nVidia cards ? Which model/manufacturer is the best one?
Thanks
I tend to prefer EVGA 1070s. The SC one with backplate and single 8 pin power plug. YMMV
|
|
|
|
pokeytex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
|
|
October 07, 2016, 10:37:16 AM |
|
Does anyone have rigs built with nVidia cards ? Which model/manufacturer is the best one?
Thanks
I tend to prefer EVGA 1070s. The SC one with backplate and single 8 pin power plug. YMMV I second that! EVGA is all I use.
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 08, 2016, 02:31:27 PM |
|
i was thinking the same at you until i actually measured it with my wattmeter, and the wattage were almost the same, so the tool is definitely working
wattmeter it's not needed anymore, there are very precise tool nowadays, like the nvidia one and the corsair link, tollerance is only +-5% max
if you don't believe me just try it yourself, use the nvidia tool, and then do the ultimate proof with the wattmeter
In nvidia-smi the values are the same as you reported, but its just a computed "current_tdp * 180W". I dont state that those values are incorrect - they probably are on the card level. Nothing internal however can know your PSU efficiency, which directly translates to power at the wall. Looks like my efficiency is kinda low for lbry "135 / 160 = 0.84". Strange cause this is a gold corsair PSU at 50% load which should give around 90%. For ETH the efficiency is pretty similar "99 / 115 = 0.86".
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
October 08, 2016, 02:37:20 PM |
|
i was thinking the same at you until i actually measured it with my wattmeter, and the wattage were almost the same, so the tool is definitely working
wattmeter it's not needed anymore, there are very precise tool nowadays, like the nvidia one and the corsair link, tollerance is only +-5% max
if you don't believe me just try it yourself, use the nvidia tool, and then do the ultimate proof with the wattmeter
In nvidia-smi the values are the same as you reported, but its just a computed "current_tdp * 180W". I dont state that those values are incorrect - they probably are on the card level. Nothing internal however can know your PSU efficiency, which directly translates to power at the wall. Looks like my efficiency is kinda low for lbry "135 / 160 = 0.84". Strange cause this is a gold corsair PSU at 50% load which should give around 90%. For ETH the efficiency is pretty similar "99 / 115 = 0.86". ah yeah when you measure with a wattmeter you need to account the efficiency, for that i use corsair link(you need a corsair psu with the "I"), which display the IN and the OUT, the OUT is the real usage of your system minus the efficiency for the psu like this so here i'm losing 70w at the wall, due to the efficiency
|
|
|
|
djole
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
October 08, 2016, 06:05:15 PM |
|
I also have a corsair PSU with Corsair Link enabled, and it reports about 70W more consumption than my wattmeter. So, Corsair link ~ 900, wattmeter 820. Which one should i trust?
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
October 08, 2016, 06:26:44 PM |
|
I also have a corsair PSU with Corsair Link enabled, and it reports about 70W more consumption than my wattmeter. So, Corsair link ~ 900, wattmeter 820. Which one should i trust? 900 w is the IN or the OUT? maybe that is the efficiency
|
|
|
|
djole
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
October 08, 2016, 09:45:36 PM |
|
900w in...
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
October 09, 2016, 06:22:34 AM |
|
900w in...
the wattmeter is at the wall?
|
|
|
|
fredeq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1537
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 09, 2016, 07:36:43 AM |
|
Hmm I like to know my wall values, cause the cost is based on that. Not really concerned with internal wattage. Thanks for all the info Now I must look into my psu efficiency.
|
|
|
|
|