Omicron - OMC

[menace.bit]

Gladimor- how many coins have you developed? DeltaCredits, BitToken and now Omicron. Are they just a clone of each other with a few minor changes in the GUI of wallet?

[1713857617]

1713857617

[1713857617]

1713857617

[drays]

...removed the text here not to clutter the page...

As always, thoughtful and reasonable input from Tortoise75. Its a pleasure to read your posts, man. I also wanted to answer the claims from tomcat, but was too lazy And my English is not that good.

I want to give credit to Tomcat and Pap0u too though. They raise good points, and some are valid concerns, while some are biased. In any case time will tell. This is the risk investors are taking, and it is good they can read this discussion and see both sides of the coin (pun not intended here ), before making a decision.

For some folks this is a game. For some others this is a serious investment with the hopes to get money for something important. If its a game for you, then I think it is worth to invest. If this is serious investment with serious plans, then I would not advice to go in, as this is really very high-risk investment.

[drays]

Gladimor- how many coins have you developed? DeltaCredits, BitToken and now Omicron. Are they just a clone of each other with a few minor changes in the GUI of wallet?

Gladimor developed (better to tell - launched) those three coins (as stated few times on this thread). Technologically they are not advanced, and yes - few minor changes in wallet and in specs are the only technical difference. Those are basic coins without new tech features, if you mean that. But technological advancement is not the important part of them, as they are created for other purpose. Read OP to find out the purpose.

[Gladimor]

Gladimor- how many coins have you developed? DeltaCredits, BitToken and now Omicron. Are they just a clone of each other with a few minor changes in the GUI of wallet?

Those 3 coins yes. And all 3 are now involved with Omicron. The trade in for BXT and DCRE ended 2 days ago.

[drays]

OP what happens to the unsold coins?

This was answered before:

The remaining unsold tokens will be set aside for sale to private investors, in the future (address will be public, any TX will be transparent and explained for). Any private sale will be off-exchange, and by an escrow. Any BTC from private investors will be added to the OMC fund.

[Odd Thomas]

You literally saw iconomi's idea and rushed to make a similar idea on fund management and dividends etc.

Gladimor had this idea and website long before iconomi existed.

[Babayega31]

You literally saw iconomi's idea and rushed to make a similar idea on fund management and dividends etc.

Gladimor had this idea and website long before iconomi existed.

Maybe he's just hestirical when he saw's iconomi thread, but for what i've see gladimor site existance goes first before iconomi undergo to it, so i dont think their's similarity or copying happens here, so if someone don't like the idea of gladimor here well you can go out of this thread and find another alt and stay there. I literally follow this one since i want to know more developments incoming to be happen in this coin.

[drays]

Is the deadline for 25% discount today?

The ICO discount breakdown is not really clear...

The IAO will begin on September 3, 2016 at 10 pm EST. It will end on September 17, after a period of 2 weeks. The IAO discount structure is as follows:

Original price per coin: 0.00012000 BTC (9.3M coins available for IAO)

Days 0-3: 25% discount (0.00009000 BTC per OMC)

Days 3-6: 15% discount (0.00010200 BTC per OMC)

Days 6-9: 5% discount (0.00011400 BTC per OMC)

Days 9-14: No discount (0.00012000 BTC per OMC)

This could be interpreted in many ways. Better to use exact time instead of day 0-14, which is not precise at all..

[Pap0u]

Is the deadline for 25% discount today?

The ICO discount breakdown is not really clear...

The IAO will begin on September 3, 2016 at 10 pm EST. It will end on September 17, after a period of 2 weeks. The IAO discount structure is as follows:

Original price per coin: 0.00012000 BTC (9.3M coins available for IAO)

Days 0-3: 25% discount (0.00009000 BTC per OMC)

Days 3-6: 15% discount (0.00010200 BTC per OMC)

Days 6-9: 5% discount (0.00011400 BTC per OMC)

Days 9-14: No discount (0.00012000 BTC per OMC)

This could be interpreted in many ways. Better to use exact time instead of day 0-14, which is not precise at all..

The whole project isn't precise at all

[Odd Thomas]

My posts ain't precise at all

More accurate.

[Gladimor]

IAO page has been updated as per suggestions. The 25% discount phase is ending in 19 hours.

[andyste]

the next project make create online wallet or not
i think online wallet is very good project

[Gladimor]

the next project make create online wallet or not
i think online wallet is very good project

One of the core engaging ideas of Omicron is that the investors hold the base investment, and not give it to a third party. There is no "trust" involved here. Creating an online wallet where its uptime can be controlled goes against OMC's principles.

[tomkat]

Yeah, yeah, I know this type of babbling very well, but don't use these nice tricks like comparing your project to the biggest financial industries in the world.

-People don't have time - it's not that time consuming as it looks like - people tend to be lazy and think others will make something for them which is completely irrational
-they lack experience - yes, I guess they do, but they can get experience quickly
-they don't want to take the risk themselves - so you mean that the risk is reduced thanks to You? Hmm....
-they lack the tools - tools are available to everyone these days, what tools do you have that no one else can't get or buy?
-they lack the market power - so you think after this ICO you will have enough power to beat the market? well...
-they want a better chance at returns - they have exactly the same chance as you have, why do you think your chances are higher?
-people want a more suitable individual for the task - yes, and you should rather offer your investment services to individuals rather than trying to run a mass project that can fail and create substantial losses to many people. Your business model in this project creates risk for many, and you can reduce it by offering the same to limited number of people.
-And yes, you don't have to remind the community that there are risks involved with investing. - there're many newbies these days, so it's never enough to remind and warn

The important part you are missing is that the more money you play with, the gains will be higher. If 100 people with 10 btc comes together, they are able to drive some markets by themselves. I've known Gladimor for a long period now and I know he is a good trader. He just needs more funds to trade for more profit. And he is willing to share that profit it seems.

Do you know it from your experience? You really think it's much different when you have 10 BTC or 100 BTC? In both cases you can allocate the same percentage to various crypto assets. This may be some difference in stock markets where fees are much higher, but not here in crypto.
He could easily continue his earnings with his high 6 digits amount, but for some reason he needs more money at his disposal. What for? Is 6 digits amount still not enough to make money? He multiplied his money from few dollars to thousands, so why he can't continue?

[Updated]

OH so you are asking for gazzilions of BTC but you are not able to create a website UI/landingpage by yourself, you need to use a free theme right? lol
At least you should delete the link from your landingpage
http://themeisle.com/themes/zerif-lite/

[tomkat]

-people want a more suitable individual for the task - yes, and you should rather offer your investment services to individuals rather than trying to run a mass project that can fail and create substantial losses to many people. Your business model in this project creates risk for many, and you can reduce it by offering the same to limited number of people.

-OK, sorry but that one sounds ridiculous to me. How is it better to risk more money per individual than less money per person but more people? Or to exclude people in the first place by servicing only a selected few? What I think is important is not taking more money total than could be handled responsibly, not taking a larger number of investors than could be serviced, and not requiring too much money from a single investor to participate to reduce risk of people investing more than they can afford just to be able to join in.

My point here was that his service is more like wealth management rather than open investment fund. I didn't say anything about amounts per investor, but only about the number of investors involved in a potential failure of this risky project. OP presents himself as highly skilled trader and from this point of view he would perfectly fit in wealth mangament world IMO.

[Yutikas_11920]

You literally saw iconomi's idea and rushed to make a similar idea on fund management and dividends etc.

Gladimor had this idea and website long before iconomi existed.

Maybe he's just hestirical when he saw's iconomi thread, but for what i've see gladimor site existance goes first before iconomi undergo to it, so i dont think their's similarity or copying happens here, so if someone don't like the idea of gladimor here well you can go out of this thread and find another alt and stay there. I literally follow this one since i want to know more developments incoming to be happen in this coin.

Yeah that is true, but I see that it has similarities in ICONOMI. But the similarities are only on transactions (anonymous) and also the speed of transactions, moreover there is no similarity. So, if there is indeed a new altcoin certainly I am sure that they have in common in the altcoin previously, but he appeared (alt coin new) definitely has advantages not possessed by the previous altcoin

[PokerFace3]

the next project make create online wallet or not
i think online wallet is very good project

One of the core engaging ideas of Omicron is that the investors hold the base investment, and not give it to a third party. There is no "trust" involved here. Creating an online wallet where its uptime can be controlled goes against OMC's principles.

Yes, most of the online wallets do not share the private-key of our fund holding addresses. Only blockchain.info is an exception here and I do not know any similar service is available for altcoins. As long as we are having other strong wallets, I too believe online wallets are less concerned.

[NeuroticFish]

Hi OP, do you need Romanian translation?
I suddenly got some free time and could do this.

[betlord90]

Yeah, yeah, I know this type of babbling very well, but don't use these nice tricks like comparing your project to the biggest financial industries in the world.

-People don't have time - it's not that time consuming as it looks like - people tend to be lazy and think others will make something for them which is completely irrational
-they lack experience - yes, I guess they do, but they can get experience quickly
-they don't want to take the risk themselves - so you mean that the risk is reduced thanks to You? Hmm....
-they lack the tools - tools are available to everyone these days, what tools do you have that no one else can't get or buy?
-they lack the market power - so you think after this ICO you will have enough power to beat the market? well...
-they want a better chance at returns - they have exactly the same chance as you have, why do you think your chances are higher?
-people want a more suitable individual for the task - yes, and you should rather offer your investment services to individuals rather than trying to run a mass project that can fail and create substantial losses to many people. Your business model in this project creates risk for many, and you can reduce it by offering the same to limited number of people.
-And yes, you don't have to remind the community that there are risks involved with investing. - there're many newbies these days, so it's never enough to remind and warn

The important part you are missing is that the more money you play with, the gains will be higher. If 100 people with 10 btc comes together, they are able to drive some markets by themselves. I've known Gladimor for a long period now and I know he is a good trader. He just needs more funds to trade for more profit. And he is willing to share that profit it seems.

Do you know it from your experience? You really think it's much different when you have 10 BTC or 100 BTC? In both cases you can allocate the same percentage to various crypto assets. This may be some difference in stock markets where fees are much higher, but not here in crypto.
He could easily continue his earnings with his high 6 digits amount, but for some reason he needs more money at his disposal. What for? Is 6 digits amount still not enough to make money? He multiplied his money from few dollars to thousands, so why he can't continue?

Maybe his probably afford this project because it says that they thought it long before release . So whatever the outcome of his project is likely with the team he will support him and even less likely with the capital resources to be ready in time of need . Since I thought new coins comes first now have to strain to think carefully before going release it in the public.