pilotbtc1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 0
|
|
February 14, 2017, 05:07:46 AM |
|
Claymore super! My 5 cards give 2% more than Optiminer. Thank you Since 2% is equivalent to the devfee (if you mine on an SSL/TLS connection), I'll ask if you've deducted CM's devfee from the hash rate shown in the miner log? CM shows the hash rate *before* his devfee comes out, while Optiminer shows the hash *after* the devfee is deducted. It's not a big deal, and either way is fine, but when you're making comparisons, you need to keep that in mind (and I'm not saying you didn't, just asking). look at the payments, which the miner is better? I need time
|
|
|
|
alucard20724
|
|
February 14, 2017, 05:18:02 AM |
|
my one RX460 went from 100sols/s to 94 sols/s... and it seems i can't choose asm for it... it just stays in algorithm 1
|
|
|
|
kev7112001
|
|
February 14, 2017, 05:26:56 AM |
|
Wow what a nice bunch of idiots around here, asking for a pascal dual miner. You will kill the coin before you can make some profit, and the power consumption and heat would kill the cards faster than the ETH dual miner does. Dual miners squeezes the card in such way, that they last 10 months at least. I had to stop using the dual miner functions because the heat screwed 3 of my cards.
No pascal dual miner, it would be great to improve the Cryptonight miner. And if you want to release a pascal miner, do it only to improve the pascal mining process, not for dual mining. Don't kill a promising coin right now.
lol that the dumbest thing i have heard if u killed your cards next time dont run them blazin hot or buy better designed card = better components
|
MCXNOW MODERATOR
|
|
|
zzzzzzzzzz
|
|
February 14, 2017, 05:34:24 AM |
|
Claymore super! My 5 cards give 2% more than Optiminer. Thank you Since 2% is equivalent to the devfee (if you mine on an SSL/TLS connection), I'll ask if you've deducted CM's devfee from the hash rate shown in the miner log? CM shows the hash rate *before* his devfee comes out, while Optiminer shows the hash *after* the devfee is deducted. It's not a big deal, and either way is fine, but when you're making comparisons, you need to keep that in mind (and I'm not saying you didn't, just asking). look at the payments, which the miner is better? I need time Yes, I agree. It's your effective hash rate on the pool (or solo) that counts - that's what produces the revenue!
|
|
|
|
Eisenkopf89
|
|
February 14, 2017, 05:42:13 AM |
|
my one RX460 went from 100sols/s to 94 sols/s... and it seems i can't choose asm for it... it just stays in algorithm 1
Same here for me the RX460 is slower now then in the old Version.
|
|
|
|
kinsik
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
February 14, 2017, 05:51:56 AM |
|
Does anyone have Fury on drivers higher than 16.3.2 as they do not support RX series? If yes what is the speed you get?
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723
|
|
February 14, 2017, 05:52:09 AM |
|
Wow what a nice bunch of idiots around here, asking for a pascal dual miner. You will kill the coin before you can make some profit, and the power consumption and heat would kill the cards faster than the ETH dual miner does. Dual miners squeezes the card in such way, that they last 10 months at least. I had to stop using the dual miner functions because the heat screwed 3 of my cards.
No pascal dual miner, it would be great to improve the Cryptonight miner. And if you want to release a pascal miner, do it only to improve the pascal mining process, not for dual mining. Don't kill a promising coin right now.
lol that the dumbest thing i have heard if u killed your cards next time dont run them blazin hot or buy better designed card = better components Pretty sure he is making stuff up. Dual mining uses like 40-50 Watts more on a 280X. So it uses 250 Watts instead of 200 Watt solo mining ETH. Back in Scrypt LiteCoin days, each 280X used 350 Watts and we were all fine. On the newer RX cards, I think dual mining uses even less power.
|
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
|
February 14, 2017, 06:05:54 AM |
|
Make cryptonote not crash on RX 4x series. God damned crashing non stop on default bios. Zcash 11.1 runs for 500+ hours but i want to mine cryptonote coins. Less than one hour before crash. Pile of shit!
Same problem here. That's why I can't mine XMR so I need to stay on ZEC. It's rock-stable
|
|
|
|
citronick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1080
---- winter*juvia -----
|
|
February 14, 2017, 06:35:14 AM |
|
Make cryptonote not crash on RX 4x series. God damned crashing non stop on default bios. Zcash 11.1 runs for 500+ hours but i want to mine cryptonote coins. Less than one hour before crash. Pile of shit!
Same problem here. That's why I can't mine XMR so I need to stay on ZEC. It's rock-stable sgminer-gm v5.5.5 and wolf 0.4 is better and stable for XMR mining - until Claymore updates the XMR miner for RX cards....
|
If I provided you good and useful info or just a smile to your day, consider sending me merit points to further validate this Bitcointalk account ~ useful for future account recovery...
|
|
|
Qazo
|
|
February 14, 2017, 06:39:18 AM |
|
Yeah I did not concentrate on tonga cards. I can reach 430H/s on stock 390X. Or I can try to add Pascal coin to dual miner, or improve CryptoNight miner. Need to select.
please update cryptonight miner, it's unstable to use
|
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
|
February 14, 2017, 06:46:34 AM |
|
I tried CZM12 and it works great! I got 289H/s on one of my RX470 4GB ref. (Sapphire) card, with ASM, -i 6, stock bios. The average values on these cards are about 280H/s. Thank you @claymore!
|
|
|
|
Pennywis3
|
|
February 14, 2017, 07:02:42 AM |
|
Another vote for XMR here. Zcash seems to be loosing value and we don't realy know what will happen with ETH in the following months so i guess XMR is the best option to develop atm. Love the power consumption on XMR
|
|
|
|
devlin
|
|
February 14, 2017, 07:08:06 AM |
|
Nice speed improvement. "...not enough memory, intensity value reduced (5)" this is related to GPU memory or system memory? For me 280X and 7950 with 3G can run at i 5.
|
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
|
February 14, 2017, 07:25:42 AM |
|
I tried CZM12 and it works great! I got 289H/s on one of my RX470 4GB ref. (Sapphire) card, with ASM, -i 6, stock bios. The average values on these cards are about 280H/s. Thank you @claymore! ~295H/s on RX480 8G ~400-410H/s on 390X ~380H/s on 390 ~160-165H/s on 380X (no improvement for Tonga)
|
|
|
|
chohav
|
|
February 14, 2017, 07:28:04 AM |
|
Great work with v12.0, improved speed on all of my rigs. Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 4GB doing 295h/s. And I vote for improving the CryptoNight miner too.
|
|
|
|
Mr047
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 14, 2017, 07:28:56 AM |
|
History of speed improvement (Sol per version)
GPU---- v12 v11 v10 v9.2 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 7870--- 170 150 140 140 140 110 95 65 55 40 35 32 7950--- 265 235 205 190 190 180 155 125 95 70 45 38 7970--- 290 250 205 210 210 200 165 120 95 65 55 48 270x--- 180 150 145 145 145 115 100 67 55 40 35 32 280x--- 290 255 220 210 210 200 165 125 90 65 60 51 285---- 190 160 150 150 150 125 110 85 70 40 36 32 RX 470 290 245 230 217 207 180 155 144 120 70 60 47
|
|
|
|
Demarsac
|
|
February 14, 2017, 07:36:13 AM |
|
Good Work Claymore
Indeed speed is increased Out of 6 RX 480's I am now getting 1860-1880 H/s That is 310-315 H/s per GPU
The power consumption though is still High Measured from the wall i get 1150 Watts
In comparison with Optiminer i get 1840 H/s That is an average of 305-307 H/s per GPU But measured from the wall i get 940 Watts
So for the people that pay their electricity Opti ( In Linux) is still a better deal
PS. I am about to check Claymore in Linux also to see if i get better consumption
|
|
|
|
ffthomas
|
|
February 14, 2017, 07:48:43 AM |
|
Great work with v12.0, improved speed on all of my rigs. Sapphire Nitro+ RX470 4GB doing 295h/s. And I vote for improving the CryptoNight miner too.
+1 for CN miner upgrade and optimization for Polaris cards
|
|
|
|
deadsix
|
|
February 14, 2017, 08:10:21 AM |
|
History of speed improvement (Sol per version)
GPU---- v12 v11 v10 v9.2 v9 v8 v7 v6 v5 v4 v3 v2 7870--- 170 150 140 140 140 110 95 65 55 40 35 32 7950--- 265 235 205 190 190 180 155 125 95 70 45 38 7970--- 290 250 205 210 210 200 165 120 95 65 55 48 270x--- 180 150 145 145 145 115 100 67 55 40 35 32 280x--- 290 255 220 210 210 200 165 125 90 65 60 51 285---- 190 160 150 150 150 125 110 85 70 40 36 32 RX 470 290 245 230 217 207 180 155 144 120 70 60 47
Great job maintaining that history mate.
|
|
|
|
Spectr12341234
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
February 14, 2017, 08:35:44 AM |
|
Pleas up speed r9 380 r9 380 4gb memory have 190 h/s, in game testing is 10 to 15 percent less R9 280, 280 but we 295 h/s
|
|
|
|
|