Altcoining
|
|
November 29, 2016, 08:56:17 PM |
|
I just tried dwarfpool mined for two hours Earned nothing? Here's my bat file ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -zpsw x -wd 1 -r 0 -i 6
I appeared to connect just fine and I saw my accurate hash rate displayed along with shares found ...but no earnings?
same here, no earnings a looot of time Pool didn't find any block last 8 hours, u get paid when pool finds a new block. Do you have any Idea what the average time it takes to find a block? They are ideally timed at one block every 2.5 minutes. For the whole network.................
|
|
|
|
KrokoTill
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 09:02:38 PM |
|
Dwarf pool started.
I am testing it. But the calculated speed is around 10% higher than the speed reported by Claymore. I also used the flypool, the speed is 6% below Claymore. I am not sure which one is better. Like any other pool, dwarf will take some time before showing stable results Yea give it some time. Dwarfpool is the most stable and consistent pool I've ever mined with. can any one give me code for .bat file for DWARFPOOL i am using this code for 5 cards but getting error zecminer64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.MYRIGNUMBER1 -zpsw x Try changing your Port: Main-Port (vardiff): 3333 Stratum-Port (diff=8): 3334 for CPU Stratum-Port (diff=128): 3335 for videocards Stratum-Port (diff=512): 3336 for rigs Stratum-Port (diff=1024): 3337 for big rigs is my code ok? and rightnow i am using http://zcash.flypool.org is dwarfpool is better than flypool? Don't use letters in worker identifier, only numbers
|
|
|
|
gegebitlover
Member
Offline
Activity: 116
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 09:02:53 PM |
|
how many sols with R9 290? anybody?
r9 290 hash at 240 sol My 2 * 280x both are stable for Zcash mining using Claymore's ZCash AMD GPU Miner v8.0, when i adds 2*290x my rig gets hang/black screen or sometimes system shutdown.using following code in two different start bat file also tried in configure file; for 280x ZecMiner64.exe -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal MY WALLET ADDRESS -zpsw x -mport 0 -i 5 -di 01 for 290x ZecMiner64.exe -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal MY WALLET ADDRESS -zpsw x -mport 0 -i 5 -di 23
also tried this; for 280x ZecMiner64.exe -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal MY WALLET ADDRESS -zpsw x -mport 2345 -i 5 -di 01 for 290x ZecMiner64.exe -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal MY WALLET ADDRESS -zpsw x -mport 0 -i 5 -di 23
also tried -mport as 3333, -3333, (-mport 0, -mport 2345), (-mport 3333, -mport 0).
problem facing when claymore's v5 was released.
in flypool You need to add a worker with your wallet ZecMiner64.exe -zpool eu1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -zwal t1YZMnyXStuGKykkFxM6Lh8DTVJdTMx6R51.WORKER -zpsw x *****
|
|
|
|
Taxidermista
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
|
|
November 29, 2016, 09:15:23 PM |
|
I just tried dwarfpool mined for two hours Earned nothing? Here's my bat file ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -zpsw x -wd 1 -r 0 -i 6
I appeared to connect just fine and I saw my accurate hash rate displayed along with shares found ...but no earnings?
same here, no earnings a looot of time Pool didn't find any block last 8 hours, u get paid when pool finds a new block. Do you have any Idea what the average time it takes to find a block? In a 42 Msol/s network Dwarfpool needs almost 2 hours to find a block (average).
|
|
|
|
Thor78
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 09:47:36 PM |
|
I just tried dwarfpool mined for two hours Earned nothing? Here's my bat file ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -zpsw x -wd 1 -r 0 -i 6
I appeared to connect just fine and I saw my accurate hash rate displayed along with shares found ...but no earnings?
same here, no earnings a looot of time Pool didn't find any block last 8 hours, u get paid when pool finds a new block. Do you have any Idea what the average time it takes to find a block? In a 42 Msol/s network Dwarfpool needs almost 2 hours to find a block (average). Tested Dwarfpool........ no good, I get about 50% coins more on suprnova.
|
|
|
|
suggsy89
|
|
November 29, 2016, 09:59:11 PM |
|
I just tried dwarfpool mined for two hours Earned nothing? Here's my bat file ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -zpsw x -wd 1 -r 0 -i 6
I appeared to connect just fine and I saw my accurate hash rate displayed along with shares found ...but no earnings?
same here, no earnings a looot of time Pool didn't find any block last 8 hours, u get paid when pool finds a new block. Do you have any Idea what the average time it takes to find a block? In a 42 Msol/s network Dwarfpool needs almost 2 hours to find a block (average). Tested Dwarfpool........ no good, I get about 50% coins more on suprnova. http://zcash.flypool.org/ 10 blocks an hour at least
|
|
|
|
mishka25
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 10:00:08 PM |
|
how many sols with R9 290? anybody?
r9 290 hash at 240 have you overclocked it?
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
November 29, 2016, 10:06:13 PM |
|
I just tried dwarfpool mined for two hours Earned nothing? Here's my bat file ZecMiner64.exe -zpool zec-eu1.dwarfpool.com:3333 -zwal xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -zpsw x -wd 1 -r 0 -i 6
I appeared to connect just fine and I saw my accurate hash rate displayed along with shares found ...but no earnings?
The pool found the last block more than 9 hours ago. We only get paid when blocks are found, in any pool Dwarf is just unlucky at the moment We need more miners there in order to balance the hashrate between pools
|
|
|
|
mamboOo
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
November 29, 2016, 10:15:05 PM |
|
thank you. That helps a lot
|
|
|
|
ivomm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 3094
All good things to those who wait
|
|
November 29, 2016, 10:35:45 PM |
|
Let me share something funny. Year after year my family could afford to heat only half of our appartment during the winters. This winter my rigs gathered in 1 room generate so much heat that the temps in all rooms are around 30 C. We are literally walking in T-shirts and eating ice creams while outside we have snow and temps -10 C. Not only that but we get paid for these heating devices so our income doubled. Life is great! Thanks Sir Claymore!
|
|
|
|
manotroll
|
|
November 29, 2016, 10:41:21 PM |
|
Why when I use 2 boards does the board yield better?
180 rx480 260 390x
However the 390x alone makes 300 Is there any difference in using pci-e 1x?
|
|
|
|
Kimax
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
November 29, 2016, 10:42:52 PM |
|
Hi guys. Its me with the weird R9 280X doing 205 Sol/s I know that my wattage seems weird and they are. I changed my wattage to 150W (my highest measurement) on the comparison page: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ZCash_mining_GPU_ComparisonI tryed to check my wattage even further and i used 2 different methods this time. 1. method is a high-grade wattage-meter sitting between my PC and the power plug. The meter is a Telco Sensors ST2300A aprooved by one of the biggest power-companys in Denmark (SEAS-NVE). 2. Method was calculating the wattage from the data showing in GPU-Z (Voltage multiplyed by Amps) And here is my results: WALL: Idle: 155 - 160 W Mining: 290 - 310 W 135 - 150 W (I'm only using my R9 280X) GPU-Z: VDDC: 1.133 - 1.146 V VDDC Current: 83 - 104 A 94 - 119 W
|
|
|
|
antantti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
|
|
November 29, 2016, 11:02:45 PM |
|
Hi guys. Its me with the weird R9 280X doing 205 Sol/s
WALL: Idle: 155 - 160 W Mining: 290 - 310 W 135 - 150 W (I'm only using my R9 280X)
They do use some power when idling too, you need to add that to calculations. If you have one powered riser and a spare psu it is very easy to check. Wall - meter - psu - (riser + pcie power connectors), so only one psu that feeds only that one gpu connected to meter. That leaves only speculations for psu efficiency.
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
November 29, 2016, 11:58:21 PM |
|
I'm about to give up on dwarfpool... Almost 12 hours without one single block being found It's too much variance for me, and it really feels like a waste of time and hashpower
|
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
November 30, 2016, 12:03:57 AM |
|
Hey all, Wanting to build another mining rig using this older cpu, motherboard and RAM (below). I have this stuff kicking around, will Zcash mining work with 4GB of DDR2? This motherboard supports a maximum of 4GB DDR2 so I can't add any more sticks I was planning on buying an RX470 4GB for this rig. I have a decent 600 Watt power supply which will be plenty and planning to use Windows 7. thanks AMD ATHLON 64+ 3200 2.0 GHZ SOCKET AM2 CPU 2 X 2GB DDR RAM (4GB TOTAL) XMS2 CORSAIR 800 MHZ ASUS M2N68-AM SE2 SOCKET A MOTHERBOARD I've got single-card rigs running 2 GB of RAM on the MB. My dual 280x rig has 4 GB - yes, the GPUs have more total memory than the MB does.
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
QuintLeo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
|
|
November 30, 2016, 12:06:40 AM |
|
So according to the table, a R9 280x (205 sol/s@130W) is more efficient than a RX 480 (205 sol/s@180W) ?
That's weird.
I'm pretty sure that the 280x are in the 180-210w range ... that's certainly the case with 1100 core clock 440 watts total for my dual 280x rig - so 180-200 watts per card sounds about right (MB and CPU and MB RAM etc eats some). That's stock Gigabyte Windforce 3x cards at 1100/1500
|
I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind! Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin) 1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
|
|
|
Squall10
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
November 30, 2016, 12:08:28 AM |
|
Hi guys. Its me with the weird R9 280X doing 205 Sol/s I know that my wattage seems weird and they are. I changed my wattage to 150W (my highest measurement) on the comparison page: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/ZCash_mining_GPU_ComparisonI tryed to check my wattage even further and i used 2 different methods this time. 1. method is a high-grade wattage-meter sitting between my PC and the power plug. The meter is a Telco Sensors ST2300A aprooved by one of the biggest power-companys in Denmark (SEAS-NVE). 2. Method was calculating the wattage from the data showing in GPU-Z (Voltage multiplyed by Amps) And here is my results: WALL: Idle: 155 - 160 W Mining: 290 - 310 W 135 - 150 W (I'm only using my R9 280X) GPU-Z: VDDC: 1.133 - 1.146 V VDDC Current: 83 - 104 A 94 - 119 W Hi, what is the model of your R9 280x ?
|
|
|
|
sorry2xs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
Dark Passenger Bitcoin miner 2013,Bitcoin node
|
|
November 30, 2016, 12:19:08 AM |
|
|
Please tip the Node 1MPWKB23NsZsXHANnFwVAWT86mL24fqAjF; KO4UX THAT NO GOOD DO GOODER BAT!!!
|
|
|
d57heinz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1453
Merit: 1011
Bitcoin Talks Bullshit Walks
|
|
November 30, 2016, 12:24:32 AM |
|
I'm about to give up on dwarfpool... Almost 12 hours without one single block being found It's too much variance for me, and it really feels like a waste of time and hashpower i agree im beginning to wonder myself.. At current pool hr they should find ~ 14 blocks per day. = ~1 msols/s / 41 msols/s x 576 blocks per day Im getting the feeling im donating this day today:) BR
|
As in nature, all is ebb and tide, all is wave motion, so it seems that in all branches of industry, alternating currents - electric wave motion - will have the sway. ~Nikola Tesla~
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1564
Merit: 1027
|
|
November 30, 2016, 12:25:04 AM |
|
I'm back on flypool! Will keep an eye on dwarf's progress too, but for now I can't afford to wait indefinitely for payment
|
|
|
|
|