Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)

[nevermind41]

@Claymore I got the same error in my 3 rig ith 9.2. Gpu0 hangs in all rigs. If I disable gpu0 in all rigs everything is stable. This problem doesn't exist in old releases. System asrock h81 btc pro + 6 X rx 470 nitro 8gb + 8 gb ram + ssd + evga 1300 g2 + celeron cpu win 8.1

13:31:33:443   ec0   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters
13:31:35:380   a14   recv: 51
13:31:35:380   a14   srv pck: 50
13:31:35:380   a14   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters
13:31:35:380   a14   srv bs: 0
13:31:35:380   a14   sent: 159
13:31:36:458   ec0   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters
13:31:39:474   ec0   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters
13:31:40:365   a20   recv: 51
13:31:40:365   a20   srv pck: 50
13:31:40:365   a20   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters
13:31:40:365   a20   srv bs: 0
13:31:40:380   a20   sent: 159
13:31:42:490   ec0   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters
13:31:42:490   ec0   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters
13:31:42:490   ec0   em hbt: 0, fm hbt: 94,
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 0, hb time 62109
13:31:42:490   ec0   WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 1, hb time 62250
13:31:42:490   ec0   WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 2, hb time 62156
13:31:42:490   ec0   WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 3, hb time 62203
13:31:42:490   ec0   WATCHDOG: GPU 0 hangs in OpenCL call, exit
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 4, hb time 47
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 5, hb time 188
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 6, hb time 94
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 7, hb time 141
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 8, hb time 47
13:31:42:490   ec0   watchdog - thread 9, hb time 94
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 10, hb time 141
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 11, hb time 0
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 12, hb time 156
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 13, hb time 16
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 14, hb time 63
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 15, hb time 109
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 16, hb time 109
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 17, hb time 156
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 18, hb time 0
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 19, hb time 63
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 20, hb time 78
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 21, hb time 125
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 22, hb time 188
13:31:42:506   ec0   watchdog - thread 23, hb time 31
13:31:42:506   ec0   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters
13:31:43:521   ec0   Restarting OK, exit...

[Claymore]

@Claymore I got the same error in my 3 rig ith 9.2. Gpu0 hangs in all rigs. If I disable gpu0 in all rigs everything is stable. This problem doesn't exist in old releases. System asrock h81 btc pro + 6 X rx 470 nitro 8gb + 8 gb ram + ssd + evga 1300 g2 + celeron cpu win 8.1

In a couple of days I'll release an update with a bug fix for Polaris cards, though I'm not sure if it's related to the problem you describe.

[nevermind41]

This problem begins with 9.2. Gpu0 always hangs. I tried with default speeds and voltage but nothing changed. Log is full with ''a20   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters''  All my 3 rigs have same problem. with 9.0 everything is ok.

[Claymore]

This problem begins with 9.2. Gpu0 always hangs. I tried with default speeds and voltage but nothing changed. Log is full with ''a20   ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters''  All my 3 rigs have same problem. with 9.0 everything is ok.

"ADL: Cannot find any AMD adapters" is not reason. Also same message must be in v9.0. It must be driver-related problem if ADL library sees no adapters. ADL library is a part of AMD drivers and related to temperature/fan management.

[nevermind41]

Sorry I understand now. I start miner from ssh nowadays. I think message is releated with it. Miner manager can't show gpu temp and fan speed when you start it from ssh.

[fmz89]

No, now 430 hash for 1070...

See edits. Still isn't worth it...

Further Edit:

Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis.
                    Edit:       Edit:
Card   Price   Hash/s   Power (W)   H/$
1070  $400    380        100            0.95
Fury   $260    300        100            1.15

Full Bore Setup
Card   Price   Hash/s   H/$
1070  $400    430      1.075
Fury   $260    350      1.346

The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look.  The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash.

it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330

If you did a little math yourself you'd see at 380 it's still not wrong.  AMD is still ahead of Nvidia in H/$ running efficiently AND running full bore.  Even with the adjusted numbers the 1070 is still 20% less H/$.  AMD dead?? It's still in the LEAD.

Edit: AMD guys are quibbling over 0.5% using ssl and 2%-4% in pool variance.
Nvidia guys are paying a 20% premium just to play the game and screaming victory.  It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

it is because 380 sol is always better than 300 sol at the same wattage, you need 25% more uselesses components with 300 sol to have the same total hash

you must remember than on large scale the less rig you haev that do the job the better

even i dont have nvidia, pascal its truly win, amd fanboys need to admite that,
well considering to build nvidia rig,
hope vega or polaris refresh bring amd to the top again
haha old gpu will die soon the tahiti king wont pop again

[QuintLeo]

Hi!
Claymore v9.2 linux miner how to run windows cygwin terminal?

 Your question is confusing - are you wanting to run the LINUX version of v9.2 in Windows?

[marcelospera]

Hi, dude. I'm curious... What parameters do you use when miner goes to devfee mode? In this mode the miner finds much more shares than it does with my parameters. I'm talking about ZClassic mining.

ZECMINER64 -zpool ssl://zcl.suprnova.cc:4142 -zwal marcelospera.zclassic_frank -zpsw xxxx -i 7

Thanks. I believe you really deserves your devfee for your hard work. Make us rich, please!

[ocminer]

Hi, dude. I'm curious... What parameters do you use when miner goes to devfee mode? In this mode the miner finds much more shares than it does with my parameters. I'm talking about ZClassic mining.

ZECMINER64 -zpool ssl://zcl.suprnova.cc:4142 -zwal marcelospera.zclassic_frank -zpsw xxxx -i 7

Thanks. I believe you really deserves your devfee for your hard work. Make us rich, please!

This just happens because diff is lower when dev mining starts, it's the same speed as when you're mining normally

[Lucky - Luciano]

No, now 430 hash for 1070...

See edits. Still isn't worth it...

Further Edit:

Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis.
                    Edit:       Edit:
Card   Price   Hash/s   Power (W)   H/$
1070  $400    380        100            0.95
Fury   $260    300        100            1.15

Full Bore Setup
Card   Price   Hash/s   H/$
1070  $400    430      1.075
Fury   $260    350      1.346

The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look.  The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash.

it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330

If you did a little math yourself you'd see at 380 it's still not wrong.  AMD is still ahead of Nvidia in H/$ running efficiently AND running full bore.  Even with the adjusted numbers the 1070 is still 20% less H/$.  AMD dead?? It's still in the LEAD.

Edit: AMD guys are quibbling over 0.5% using ssl and 2%-4% in pool variance.
Nvidia guys are paying a 20% premium just to play the game and screaming victory.  It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

it is because 380 sol is always better than 300 sol at the same wattage, you need 25% more uselesses components with 300 sol to have the same total hash

you must remember than on large scale the less rig you haev that do the job the better

You are right, Amph. Also, real prices are not listed. AMD Fury is much more than a listed prices. Here is the actual price at the same shop in the EU:

[manasd]

Hi ALL
What is the best intensity for Saphire RX480 ref?

[adly3000]

No, now 430 hash for 1070...

See edits. Still isn't worth it...

Further Edit:

Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis.
                    Edit:       Edit:
Card   Price   Hash/s   Power (W)   H/$
1070  $400    380        100            0.95
Fury   $260    300        100            1.15

Full Bore Setup
Card   Price   Hash/s   H/$
1070  $400    430      1.075
Fury   $260    350      1.346

The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look.  The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash.

it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330

If you did a little math yourself you'd see at 380 it's still not wrong.  AMD is still ahead of Nvidia in H/$ running efficiently AND running full bore.  Even with the adjusted numbers the 1070 is still 20% less H/$.  AMD dead?? It's still in the LEAD.

Edit: AMD guys are quibbling over 0.5% using ssl and 2%-4% in pool variance.
Nvidia guys are paying a 20% premium just to play the game and screaming victory.  It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

it is because 380 sol is always better than 300 sol at the same wattage, you need 25% more uselesses components with 300 sol to have the same total hash

you must remember than on large scale the less rig you haev that do the job the better

You are right, Amph. Also, real prices are not listed. AMD Fury is much more than a listed prices. Here is the actual price at the same shop in the EU:

https://i.imgur.com/6sItcu6.jpg

On ebay there is some fury at 260 USD:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/Graphics-Video-Cards/27386/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=fury&rt=nc
http://www.ebay.com/itm/SAPPHIRE-NITRO-Radeon-R9-Fury-100379NTOC-SR-4GB-4096-Bit-HBM-TRI-X-OC-UEFI-Vi-/291648915692?hash=item43e7a148ec:g:A8QAAOSwu1VW7qbd
, also on newegg:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202186
btw I never bought or tried fury as I know its consume 300W so I prefer to buy 290 or 290x @ 200USD (used). So i wonder if fury consumes 100W

[bazsy]

Hi!
Claymore v9.2 linux miner how to run windows cygwin terminal?

 Your question is confusing - are you wanting to run the LINUX version of v9.2 in Windows?

Yes

[ldw-com]

No, now 430 hash for 1070...

See edits. Still isn't worth it...

Further Edit:

Efficiency Setup - at equal power use for comparison without power costs impacting the analysis.
                    Edit:       Edit:
Card   Price   Hash/s   Power (W)   H/$
1070  $400    380        100            0.95
Fury   $260    300        100            1.15

Full Bore Setup
Card   Price   Hash/s   H/$
1070  $400    430      1.075
Fury   $260    350      1.346

The 1070 has a long way to go before it's worth a look.  The entry cost of $400/card is just too steep to overcome without some serious hash.

it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330

If you did a little math yourself you'd see at 380 it's still not wrong.  AMD is still ahead of Nvidia in H/$ running efficiently AND running full bore.  Even with the adjusted numbers the 1070 is still 20% less H/$.  AMD dead?? It's still in the LEAD.

Edit: AMD guys are quibbling over 0.5% using ssl and 2%-4% in pool variance.
Nvidia guys are paying a 20% premium just to play the game and screaming victory.  It would be funny if it wasn't so pathetic.

it is because 380 sol is always better than 300 sol at the same wattage, you need 25% more uselesses components with 300 sol to have the same total hash

you must remember than on large scale the less rig you haev that do the job the better

You are right, Amph. Also, real prices are not listed. AMD Fury is much more than a listed prices. Here is the actual price at the same shop in the EU:

On ebay there is some fury at 260 USD:
http://www.ebay.com/sch/Graphics-Video-Cards/27386/i.html?_from=R40&_nkw=fury&rt=nc
http://www.ebay.com/itm/SAPPHIRE-NITRO-Radeon-R9-Fury-100379NTOC-SR-4GB-4096-Bit-HBM-TRI-X-OC-UEFI-Vi-/291648915692?hash=item43e7a148ec:g:A8QAAOSwu1VW7qbd
, also on newegg:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814202186
btw I never bought or tried fury as I know its consume 300W so I prefer to buy 290 or 290x @ 200USD (used). So i wonder if fury consumes 100W

Funny comparisons..

My nano's are close to 325sol while consuming just over 90watt..

Aint that something 

[fredeq]

it's wrong, the 1070 do 380 at 100watt not 330

With what miner?

[Densitymax]

Hi ALL
What is the best intensity for Saphire RX480 ref?

Choose intensity -i 5 or 6, optimal temperature and difference with -i 8 in few h/s.

[mettalmag]

Does any one have any information about coinmiune.pl SSL connection? I'm unable to connect to port 7017, I posted in there thread but no one is willing to answer..

[philipma1957]

What did I do wrong ? : no of mining
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL: //zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 

Thanks

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL:(YOU HAVE SPACE HERE)//zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 

so  my question is why do I want SSL?

HOW MUCH is fee with and with out ssl

At the moment I have no SSL  on my 11 miners I certainly am willing to upgrade to SSL  but what do I gain?

[mettalmag]

What did I do wrong ? : no of mining
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL: //zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 

Thanks

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL:(YOU HAVE SPACE HERE)//zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 

so  my question is why do I want SSL?

HOW MUCH is fee with and with out ssl

At the moment I have no SSL  on my 11 miners I certainly am willing to upgrade to SSL  but what do I gain?

-0.5% devfee in case of using Claymore's miner

[Gotomoon]

What did I do wrong ? : no of mining
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL: //zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 

Thanks

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL:(YOU HAVE SPACE HERE)//zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 

so  my question is why do I want SSL?

HOW MUCH is fee with and with out ssl

At the moment I have no SSL  on my 11 miners I certainly am willing to upgrade to SSL  but what do I gain?

The ssl fee is 2% while the non ssl fee is 2.5%. So there is 0.05% difference. But not all pool will accept ssl.