Bitcoin Forum
May 18, 2024, 01:28:31 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 [477] 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 ... 760 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux)  (Read 3839041 times)
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 08:51:33 PM
 #9521

Hello Claymore , could you add dynamic control of intensity from working miner for example by "shift +" "shift -" hotkeys ?
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
December 25, 2016, 09:19:13 PM
 #9522

What did I do wrong ? : no of mining Huh
ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL: //zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 

Thanks

ZecMiner64.exe -zpool SSL:(YOU HAVE SPACE HERE)//zec-eu1.nanopool.org:6633 -zwal t1RGQ4QhSqMMDNF8RaZRm5AHvrP7zyFZD6v.1 -zpsw r -i 8 

so  my question is why do I want SSL?

HOW MUCH is fee with and with out ssl

At the moment I have no SSL  on my 11 miners I certainly am willing to upgrade to SSL  but what do I gain?
-0.5% devfee in case of using Claymore's miner

There is also 0% fee during the holidays on https://zec.suprnova.cc in case you want so save some fees. SSL port is of course also available
would be even better if it ended 12:01 01/02/2017

Don't worry, won't be the last promo Smiley

ocminer, Thank you for your Christmas and New Year gift Wink

Pleasure, great to have you on the pool Smiley

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
Lucky - Luciano
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 711
Merit: 500



View Profile
December 25, 2016, 10:01:11 PM
 #9523

Does anyone know why this much variation hashrate -  is it because of dev fee?

chown.multi
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 10:09:54 PM
 #9524

Does anyone know why this much variation hashrate -  is it because of dev fee?

https://i.imgur.com/5TYsMfy.jpg

When devfee is working, your hashrate drops.
If you want no devfee, contact me on PM.
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 10:22:33 PM
 #9525

Hello Claymore , could you add dynamic control of intensity from working miner for example by "shift +" "shift -" hotkeys ?

It would require reallocating GPU memory which will cause crash after few iterations, so I wouldn't like to do it.
Why do you need it?

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 10:42:05 PM
 #9526

Hello Claymore , could you add dynamic control of intensity from working miner for example by "shift +" "shift -" hotkeys ?

It would require reallocating GPU memory which will cause crash after few iterations, so I wouldn't like to do it.
Why do you need it?

Freezing the 6-RX480 (1100/1950 - 88mv) with -i 4 after start but ok with -i 0. PSU Corsair HX1000i.
thedreamer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002

Go Big or Go Home.....


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 10:50:31 PM
 #9527

Hello Claymore , could you add dynamic control of intensity from working miner for example by "shift +" "shift -" hotkeys ?

It would require reallocating GPU memory which will cause crash after few iterations, so I wouldn't like to do it.
Why do you need it?

Freezing the 6-RX480 (1100/1950 - 88mv) with -i 4 after start but ok with -i 0. PSU Corsair HX1000i.

Power supply issue or maybe how you are powering the pci riser boards.

Go Big or Go Home.
qqqq
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 10:54:19 PM
 #9528

Hello Claymore , could you add dynamic control of intensity from working miner for example by "shift +" "shift -" hotkeys ?

It would require reallocating GPU memory which will cause crash after few iterations, so I wouldn't like to do it.
Why do you need it?

Freezing the 6-RX480 (1100/1950 - 88mv) with -i 4 after start but ok with -i 0. PSU Corsair HX1000i.

Power supply issue or maybe how you are powering the pci riser boards.

4 standard riser with molex and 2 - usb 3.0 riser. Yeah i guess it maybe peak power when start with -i 4 but i'm not sure. With -i 0 (1100/1950 - 88mv)  it consumes ~ 700W.
thedreamer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002

Go Big or Go Home.....


View Profile
December 25, 2016, 11:02:39 PM
 #9529

Hello Claymore , could you add dynamic control of intensity from working miner for example by "shift +" "shift -" hotkeys ?

It would require reallocating GPU memory which will cause crash after few iterations, so I wouldn't like to do it.
Why do you need it?

Freezing the 6-RX480 (1100/1950 - 88mv) with -i 4 after start but ok with -i 0. PSU Corsair HX1000i.

Power supply issue or maybe how you are powering the pci riser boards.

4 standard riser with molex and 2 - usb 3.0 riser. Yeah i guess it maybe peak power when start with -i 4 but i'm not sure. With -i 0 (1100/1950 - 88mv)  it consumes ~ 700W.

Are you powering 2 risers with 1 Molex daisychain each? They can pull over 100watts each initially. Even with my modified bios xfx rx480s, they pull 70 watts from Molex on the risers. (running at 0.95 core/mem)

Go Big or Go Home.
Jinx99
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 91
Merit: 10



View Profile
December 25, 2016, 11:09:40 PM
 #9530

Even with my modified bios xfx rx480s, they pull 70 watts from Molex on the risers. (running at 0.95 core/mem)
Ref or non-ref 480?
thedreamer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1694
Merit: 1002

Go Big or Go Home.....


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 03:02:09 AM
 #9531

Even with my modified bios xfx rx480s, they pull 70 watts from Molex on the risers. (running at 0.95 core/mem)
Ref or non-ref 480?

Non-Ref 2nd gen XFX RX480's with the 2 fans.

Go Big or Go Home.
nerdralph
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 251


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 04:22:09 AM
 #9532

Yeah - I've unpacked the real miner binary (zecminer64 is only 66k, this is because it loads Data3.bin, decodes it, and then runs it.)

From there you end up with a binary that looks to have been packed by a modified version of UPX - unpacking what it drops looks like an ELF loaded at 0x80000 - it patches several jumps in it to make it work, because it looks like it expects to be loaded at 0x40000. THAT looks like it drops ld.so and the real miner ELF into memory.

Yo dawg, I herd you like executing, so I put an ELF64 in your ELF64 so you can execute while you execute.

I think now one of my points about Linux release is clear - other devs want to see how my miner works and do reverse engineering as soon as they can. It's much easier to do it in Linux.
My License.txt prohibits such things clearly, so you violate the license.
Remember I violated MIT license in past and was blamed that I steal other's work. Now I see same thing from you. Have fun...

Maybe you don't have such a sense of humor...
You also don't seem to understand how copyright law works.  It restricts copying, not reverse engineering.
smaxz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 430
Merit: 253


VeganAcademy


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 04:46:58 AM
 #9533

ya but dmca..

cant we all just get along? seeing more hostility against nerdralph than buddy openly selling workarounds for your fee structure for like .3 or .1 btc in this same forum.

is juicing nvidia camp and increasing dif going to prop up those donations is what i'd really like to know.

- NGdTwHRSdnThdi1drQuHGT3khAHRtZ1HMq -
forzendiablo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1000


the grandpa of cryptos


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 04:47:48 AM
 #9534

we need 9.3 to fix 280x issues on last one

yolo
smaxz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 430
Merit: 253


VeganAcademy


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 04:54:48 AM
 #9535

what are the lowest undervolting people have been getting away with on reference rx480's and top overclock %'s on stilt flashed r9 290's?

anyone experimenting with the chill setting? figure it wont come into effect unless it can take advantage of this multi-algo switching.. kind of a hail mary but i'll report back on results if i notice anything worthwhile.

- NGdTwHRSdnThdi1drQuHGT3khAHRtZ1HMq -
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 06:25:04 AM
 #9536


WTM says ETH is more profitable than ZEC for time being, oh btw what does a 1070 does on ETH ?

470 4gb i call it the best bang for buck does around 28 mh/s ++ ish on a light mem mod + OC.


 380 sol/s more or less depending on the model and overclocks for my various 1070 cards.
 Some folks have reported up to 430 but I suspect they have cards that like to overclock more or have cards with "better memory" in them.

 I am inclined to agree that the RX 470 4GB is the best "bang for the buck" right now for a mining-specific card, though the 8GB and the various RX 480s can argue the point depending on which specific models are on sale and for how much at any given point.

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 06:33:53 AM
 #9537

Hi ALL
What is the best intensity for Saphire RX480 ref?

 My RX 470 Sapphire ref cards like -i 8

 I'm quite certain the 480 should like it even better.

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 06:34:47 AM
 #9538

Hi!
Claymore v9.2 linux miner how to run windows cygwin terminal?

 Your question is confusing - are you wanting to run the LINUX version of v9.2 in Windows?

Yes

 Why not just run the NATIVE Windows version?

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Claymore (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610
Merit: 1325

Miners developer


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 08:24:49 AM
 #9539

Yeah - I've unpacked the real miner binary (zecminer64 is only 66k, this is because it loads Data3.bin, decodes it, and then runs it.)

From there you end up with a binary that looks to have been packed by a modified version of UPX - unpacking what it drops looks like an ELF loaded at 0x80000 - it patches several jumps in it to make it work, because it looks like it expects to be loaded at 0x40000. THAT looks like it drops ld.so and the real miner ELF into memory.

Yo dawg, I herd you like executing, so I put an ELF64 in your ELF64 so you can execute while you execute.

I think now one of my points about Linux release is clear - other devs want to see how my miner works and do reverse engineering as soon as they can. It's much easier to do it in Linux.
My License.txt prohibits such things clearly, so you violate the license.
Remember I violated MIT license in past and was blamed that I steal other's work. Now I see same thing from you. Have fun...

Maybe you don't have such a sense of humor...
You also don't seem to understand how copyright law works.  It restricts copying, not reverse engineering.

It seems you should learn a bit.
The License file is a part of miner package. Besides copyrights, it also describes what you may do and what you may not. Do you state that you may ignore "License.txt"? If so, that's what I mean when I say that some devs don't respect licenses.

Please read Readme and FAQ in the first post of this thread before asking any questions, probably the answer is already there.
List of my miners: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3019607
BLACKYB99
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 26, 2016, 08:26:53 AM
 #9540

Hello Claymore , could you add dynamic control of intensity from working miner for example by "shift +" "shift -" hotkeys ?

It would require reallocating GPU memory which will cause crash after few iterations, so I wouldn't like to do it.
Why do you need it?

Freezing the 6-RX480 (1100/1950 - 88mv) with -i 4 after start but ok with -i 0. PSU Corsair HX1000i.

Have you try opening different instances of the miner ? It would be mining 2 GPUs, 1 min later another 2 , and 1 min later the last 2. You could adjust the intensity (or different for each instance) till your PSU gets the limit.
Just an idea.

-di    GPU indexes, default is all available GPUs. For example, if you have four GPUs "-di 02" will enable only first and third GPUs (#0 and #2).

Regards

BTW, thanks Claymore for your work.
Pages: « 1 ... 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 [477] 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 ... 760 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!