Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 11:20:53 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 [336] 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426872 times)
ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 13, 2014, 08:24:18 PM
 #6701

is anyone mining max right now? how much more profitable than doge or yac with these prices?
I don't think MAX is profitable for us nVidia miners anymore, YAC is pretty good even though it lowered a bit, Doge IDK, I am mining microCoins: I must say the high numbers are addicting  Grin

and now? haha just doubled again mcxnow.com

Might be good...I get 203mh/s out of my 780, and that would net me 0,013btc/day. Yac is worse than that right now I think, but tdp might go higher.

EDIT: 204w vs 264w...not too shabby.
1714605653
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714605653

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714605653
Reply with quote  #2

1714605653
Report to moderator
1714605653
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714605653

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714605653
Reply with quote  #2

1714605653
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714605653
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714605653

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714605653
Reply with quote  #2

1714605653
Report to moderator
AizenSou
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 08:30:25 PM
 #6702

Hey Christian,

Maxcoin's price has increased 3folds. You see, I told you before.  Grin. It's very profitable now.
Banin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 08:35:35 PM
 #6703

hi guys again Smiley.

I would like to start YACOIN, but i can't made cudaminer work on the latest version, can anyone help me ?

Got a GTX 760
yupee
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 08:47:13 PM
 #6704

Hello,

It might sound weird, but I have 3 660 ti cards, which I bought for other CUDA related stuff, and I am not sure what to do with them.


660Ti are excellent miners, also for Yacoin. The three cards together do 10kHash or slightly more.
by all means put them to good use. Pick a 3 slot gaming mainboard, e.g. GA-990FXA-UD3
a cheap Sempron CPU and a 750W PSU and mine away.

you could earn about 10 Euros a day with power costs in the order of 2-3 Euros/day,
getting return of investment on the mainboard and additional components in about a month.

Thank for the reply. I made fast calculation and I got 500-600 euros from alternate. I will have to think if it is worth it.
Morgahl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 08:51:44 PM
 #6705

Hey Christian,

Maxcoin's price has increased 3folds. You see, I told you before.  Grin. It's very profitable now.

Glad I sold out at 0.0125 right now lol.

That said it look like a few other exchanges opened up for MAX namely Bter causing a spike. Only worth going back to mining it if it stays stable at these new prices. Switching now and watching it drop while still waiting for coins to mature will suck. The ideal Mining coin is a long term stable coin not one valued at a current day snap shot.

If you already have unexchanged MAXCoins you should be rejoicing though Smiley
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 08:58:49 PM
 #6706

If you already have unexchanged MAXCoins you should be rejoicing though Smiley

rejoice.

now I can order 10 more pizzas online without ever using any cash.

I heard some payment services will allow you to use crypto coins for checkout on sites like amazon or ebay.
This could be interesting, too.

EDIT: why did I sell at 0.31 and not at 0.64? Wink  Hit me with a hammer.
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 08:59:58 PM
 #6707

Hello,

It might sound weird, but I have 3 660 ti cards, which I bought for other CUDA related stuff, and I am not sure what to do with them.


by all means put them to good use. Pick a 3 slot gaming mainboard, e.g. GA-990FXA-UD3
a cheap Sempron CPU and a 750W PSU and mine away.

Thank for the reply. I made fast calculation and I got 500-600 euros from alternate. I will have to think if it is worth it.

wait I thought you already had three GTX 660Ti's to spare. The mainboard and stuff should be way cheaper. A case is luxury. Rigs love open air

Christian
Morgahl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:02:13 PM
Last edit: February 13, 2014, 09:18:17 PM by Morgahl
 #6708

If you already have unexchanged MAXCoins you should be rejoicing though Smiley

rejoice.

now I can order 10 more pizzas online without ever using any cash.

I heard some payment services will allow you to use crypto coins for checkout on sites like amazon or ebay.
This could be interesting, too.




I'd get your sell order in quickish though, total volume out for sale has literally halved in about 10 minutes... if it hit a wall price will rocket for a few minutes then slump lol. timing is key.

EDIT: AAAAAND CRASH!!!
debido666
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:22:55 PM
 #6709

https://mcxnow.com/exchange/MAX

Entertainment, in a sad way. Chat Box.
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:27:23 PM
 #6710

These boxes aren't called troll boxes for no reason!

CUDA 6.0 RC is available. You have to be a registered developer though
https://developer.nvidia.com/user

compile cudaminer and compare results. the T kernel for keccak might be interesting to check out.
In CUDA 5.5 it gives a rather shocking performance.

Christian
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:41:08 PM
 #6711

These boxes aren't called troll boxes for no reason!

CUDA 6.0 RC is available. You have to be a registered developer though
https://developer.nvidia.com/user

compile cudaminer and compare results. the T kernel for keccak might be interesting to check out.
In CUDA 5.5 it gives a rather shocking performance.

Christian

Meh too much questions, can't really say I am THAT much of a developer...

Edit:
Quote
Unified Memory -- Simplifies programming by enabling applications to access CPU and GPU memory without the need to manually copy data from one to the other, and makes it easier to add support for GPU acceleration in a wide range of programming languages.
That, scrypt-jane anyone?

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:48:36 PM
 #6712

Unified memory isn't really helping in terms of speed, only in terms of code simplicity.
I'd rather be in full control, having to write a bit more code though.

I am more interested in possible compiler / code generation improvements...
gg234
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:50:09 PM
 #6713

I am running cudaminer 2014-02-09 (beta) and i am seeing very slow hash rate

card model GeForce GTS 240

Current settings

cudaminer -l K600x16 -a keccak -H 1 -i 1 -C 1 -o stratum+tcp://xxx -u x -p x
Morgahl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:50:46 PM
 #6714

Unified memory would cause a huge burden on the PCI-x lane. You'd need powered risers and would get severely impacted by boards that split the lanes to different cards when multiple cards are in use Sad
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:50:57 PM
 #6715


Unified memory isn't really helping in terms of speed, only in terms of code simplicity.
I'd rather be in full control, having to write a bit more code though.

Hmm yeah I read a bit more, sounds like it "hides" the code to copy from CPU to GPU, rather than extending CPU to GPU.

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:51:10 PM
 #6716

that K kernel really likes to have an x32 at the end...

but your problem is a different one: The GTS 240 is a "legacy" compute 1.x device, asking for the F kernel (which also supports Compute 1.x)

so -l F600x16 it is..

Christian
Morgahl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:54:43 PM
 #6717

I am running cudaminer 2014-02-09 (beta) and i am seeing very slow hash rate

card model GeForce GTS 240

Current settings

cudaminer -l K600x16 -a keccak -H 1 -i 1 -C 1 -o stratum+tcp://xxx -u x -p x


Code:
-i 0 -H 1 -l F<...>x16 -o stratum+tcp://xxx -u x -p x

Please replace the <...> in the above with about the highest value you can place without getting an out of memory error when launching CUDAminer.

That is a fairly old card I'm not sure you will see much more then 20MH/s and that's generous.
Morgahl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 09:55:56 PM
 #6718


Unified memory isn't really helping in terms of speed, only in terms of code simplicity.
I'd rather be in full control, having to write a bit more code though.

Hmm yeah I read a bit more, sounds like it "hides" the code to copy from CPU to GPU, rather than extending CPU to GPU.

I'm sure control of this is retained but it just adds functionality to easy assigning this for extra compatibility Smiley
chapmanjw
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2014, 11:06:08 PM
 #6719

These boxes aren't called troll boxes for no reason!

CUDA 6.0 RC is available. You have to be a registered developer though
https://developer.nvidia.com/user

compile cudaminer and compare results. the T kernel for keccak might be interesting to check out.
In CUDA 5.5 it gives a rather shocking performance.

Christian


Using CUDA 6.0 with my GeForce GT 650M (1024MB) on OS X (MacBook) seems to have reduced my performance.  With 5.5 I was seeing 70 - 75 Kh/s.  With 6.0 I am seeing 45 - 50 Kh/s. 

With both versions I have been using K4x32 as my configuration.  Any suggestions on other configuration options that might work better with 6.0?

Thanks!
Morgahl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 13, 2014, 11:11:50 PM
 #6720

These boxes aren't called troll boxes for no reason!

CUDA 6.0 RC is available. You have to be a registered developer though
https://developer.nvidia.com/user

compile cudaminer and compare results. the T kernel for keccak might be interesting to check out.
In CUDA 5.5 it gives a rather shocking performance.

Christian


Using CUDA 6.0 with my GeForce GT 650M (1024MB) on OS X (MacBook) seems to have reduced my performance.  With 5.5 I was seeing 70 - 75 Kh/s.  With 6.0 I am seeing 45 - 50 Kh/s. 

With both versions I have been using K4x32 as my configuration.  Any suggestions on other configuration options that might work better with 6.0?

Thanks!

CUDA 6.0 might need adjusting or tweaking and it's not an official release yet just an RC for people to look at and devs to develop on, there may be issue or adjustments to software needed
Pages: « 1 ... 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 [336] 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!