Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 07:05:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 [353] 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426872 times)
liomojo1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 676
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 10:34:59 PM
 #7041

New nvidia driver out 334.89
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714763119
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714763119

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714763119
Reply with quote  #2

1714763119
Report to moderator
1714763119
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714763119

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714763119
Reply with quote  #2

1714763119
Report to moderator
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 10:36:17 PM
Last edit: February 18, 2014, 10:50:50 PM by cbuchner1
 #7042

Hi all.

I posted a 2014-02-18 release that will not barf when it finds a Maxwell. This doesn't mean that it was optimized for Maxwell (it wasn't!), but it runs.
Previously you had to force it to use either the T kernel (scrypt, scrypt-jane) or the K kernel (best for keccak) in order to run. Now it's selected
automatically instead of just crashing.

Also CTRL-C terminates the program much faster when mining on a stratum server. Same for the --time-limit option.

Oh, and Autotune does something on Keccak. I just don't think it's of much use Wink  You still need to pass a large -L parameter because otherwise
the (unnecessarily allocated) scrypt scratchpad limits the maximum number of warps we can run this with.

Let me know if my changes broke anything else for you...

Christian



ivanlabrie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 812
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 18, 2014, 11:10:19 PM
 #7043

Thanks! I'll give it a shot asap...
chapmanjw
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 18, 2014, 11:10:43 PM
 #7044

Hi all.

I posted a 2014-02-18 release that will not barf when it finds a Maxwell. This doesn't mean that it was optimized for Maxwell (it wasn't!), but it runs.
Previously you had to force it to use either the T kernel (scrypt, scrypt-jane) or the K kernel (best for keccak) in order to run. Now it's selected
automatically instead of just crashing.

Also CTRL-C terminates the program much faster when mining on a stratum server. Same for the --time-limit option.

Oh, and Autotune does something on Keccak. I just don't think it's of much use Wink  You still need to pass a large -L parameter because otherwise
the (unnecessarily allocated) scrypt scratchpad limits the maximum number of warps we can run this with.

Let me know if my changes broke anything else for you...

Christian

The 2014-02-18 release for Mac OS X is available here: http://www.johnchapman.net/crypto-currency/cudaminer-2-18-2014-release-now-available-for-os-x-10-6-10-7-10-8-and-10-9/
antonio8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 11:16:49 PM
 #7045

Hey Christian,

At work but wanted to ask for when I get home.

Just got the MSI gtx750ti non powered OC. I am seeing from the results it already does the exact same as my 670 but a lot less power. Awesome.

Want would be a proper bat file since Maxwell is new? Should I use K or T setting in the bat? I want to try scrypt, jane and kecca to see how it competes with my 670.

I want to test it out with PTS also and see if it will do about 1,000 c/m like my 670. I will be thrilled if it does for the price of the card and the power draw. If it can I am going back to Fry's and picking up 3 more. I would really like the powered edition but this is all they have.

Thanks

Which Frys did you go to? The 750 isn't showing up on their website yet.

Indianapolis.

They had 8 in stock this morning. I had them price match Newegg and I got the rebate also.

If you are going to leave your BTC on an exchange please send it to this address instead 1GH3ub3UUHbU5qDJW5u3E9jZ96ZEmzaXtG, I will at least use the money better than someone who steals it from the exchange. Thanks Wink
JimmyD
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 11:34:40 PM
 #7046

Sorry guys just wanted to ask - with the new Nvidia drivers released today (334.89) my hashing performance went down on my 2 machines. Did you have the same experience?
Pustul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 18, 2014, 11:40:36 PM
 #7047

Those 750 looks promising. I'd try them if I had't just ordered 3x r9 270.
R9 270: 475khs at 140W for 170$ = 2.79khs/$ but 0.29W/khs
GTX 750: 300khs at 60W for 130$ = 2.30khs/$ but 0.20W/khs

I like the low consumption but problems are space and cost of the rig due to the low hashrate per card. Some kind of multiple gpu on one board like the asus mars would be nice.

PS: Prices are as found in Switzerland
I_M
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 135
Merit: 100



View Profile
February 18, 2014, 11:47:14 PM
 #7048

Christian,

    What kind of hopeful things do you think you can squeeze out with an M(axwell) kernel?  I was looking at this, and it all seems pretty interesting.
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 11:51:49 PM
 #7049

Christian,

    What kind of hopeful things do you think you can squeeze out with an M(axwell) kernel?  I was looking at this, and it all seems pretty interesting.

more Keccak (Maxcoin) and a good Blake256 (BlakeCoin) performance, hopefully. I still do not fully understand all architectural differences between Kepler and Maxwell.

For scrypt I do not think that a significant leap can be made. We're memory limited here. the bigger L2 cache makes a difference, I guess. But you would already see this benefit in the current benchmarks (297 kHash/s overclocked which rivals my GTX 660Ti's )

I will have to study some Maxwell white papers and tuning guides, once published by nVidia.

Christian
Morgahl
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 19, 2014, 12:17:43 AM
Last edit: February 19, 2014, 12:31:26 AM by Morgahl
 #7050

Soo.. TITAN BLACK edition anyone? I'd be interested to know how these get on!
basically a 780Ti with 6 Gigs of RAM and a slightly higher base clock. I'll pass.

It will probably have a slight advantage in Yacoin, but the price tag is too high.

Christian

Doubt you will get better then a 780 Ti, you won't be able to properly allocate the beyond then 3 GB, unless the DAC is higher then 384 just won't work correctly, unless you can allocate and use two scratch pads on a single instance of CUDAMiner lol.

8 and I know someone maxing this out Wink

about the drivers? dunno. I remember having seen some forum posting (nvidia forums) of a guy having 14 cards recognized. But during operation there were issues.

Christian

I think it was 11 cards and he was using a expandable backplane that had 18 PCI-e slots avail.

I'm confused - I thought I read that the cards had 640 cuda cores - the msi specifications show 960.  (5x128=640 - they would need 7.5 SMM units to hit 960)

5*192=960

This said, I'm seeing NewEgg confused on this. The MSI cards are listed as 960 CUDA cores (the rest show 640) until you view the item itself and then it shows 640 Cuda Cores so your 5x128 is probably correct.

Also CTRL-C terminates the program much faster when mining on a stratum server. Same for the --time-limit option.

Christian
lol, yay for quick fixes Smiley


The quotes for OCing the new Maxwell kind of bug me, I've never seen a benefit for up-clocking the the memory for Scrypt or Scrypt-Jane... I'd be interested how far you can push the core if the memory was floored to -502... and still stay under the 100% TDP limit.


This one seems to think +650 Memory is needed?
apluscarp
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2014, 12:43:03 AM
 #7051

anyone have a good config for scrypt on a 560 ti using 2014-2-9?
ManiacMiner
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 145
Merit: 101



View Profile
February 19, 2014, 01:31:30 AM
 #7052

anyone have a good config for scrypt on a 560 ti using 2014-2-9?
For scrypt on 560Ti try 2013-12-18. With this config -H 1 -i 0 -C 1 -m 0 -l F8x16 i have ~188kHash on this version, other versions ~165kHash

(つ ͡๏ ͜১ ͡๏ )つ[̲̅$̲̅(̲̅5̲̅)̲̅$̲̅]ε=ʕ ͡๏ ͜১ ͡๏ʔ=з
CrystalCoin
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 19, 2014, 01:35:36 AM
 #7053


GUISE YOU CAN GET A 280X MADE BY NVIDIA ERMAHGAWD HURR..
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=8796895&CatId=7387

Also does anyone have a good batch for maxcoin? I got 188mhash on my 780.
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
February 19, 2014, 02:16:23 AM
 #7054

They had a chance over two... better luck next time

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
sub-80
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 19, 2014, 03:27:47 AM
 #7055

Started mining pandacoin getting 300khash/s with my 780. Is that the highest one can get with the 780?

This is my bat file: "cudaminer.exe --algo=scrypt:2048 -o stratum+tcp://panda.nitro.org:3338 -O user:pwd"    

Launch config is T12x20
Bench hash/sec: 329142 hash/s
Max total warps (BxW): 322


-i 1 -C 0 -H 0 (Default)
ouchmefoot
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 198
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 19, 2014, 03:32:07 AM
 #7056

Get 315-320 kh/s with a GTX680 (not overclocked, no cudaminer parameters) mining standard Scrypt

PostCoin:PYrnF6rLzvERtS73rRc76fpP4QCKP2WJS4
bacon_wrangler
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 26
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 19, 2014, 03:45:13 AM
 #7057

This is weird: I just upgraded to Nvidia drivers 334.89 and to cudaminer 2-18, and get this on startup:

Unable to query CUDA driver version! Is an nVidia driver installed?

Running a 650 ti boost.

On second thought, bet a reboot fixes this.

EDIT: yep.
paulk11087
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 987
Merit: 254


View Profile WWW
February 19, 2014, 04:02:41 AM
 #7058

so, i've been messing around with a 9800GTX and can't seem to figure this out... when i tried L32x8, it says "requires too much memory" and then switches to F32x8. i'm trying to mine MAX with this... it's going at roughly 3mh/s. does that sound right? anyone with a 9800 GTX get this working? haven't found any shares yet at this rate, and when i autotune it only hashes at about 1.2mh/s. my GPU load right now is sitting at 12% so i don't think it's really working.

any help would be great!
cwizard
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 19, 2014, 04:11:06 AM
 #7059

I can get 10 zotac and 17 gigabyte out of D&H, but I read that you want cards with 6 pin power for use with risers.
sub-80
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 19, 2014, 04:21:42 AM
 #7060

Get 315-320 kh/s with a GTX680 (not overclocked, no cudaminer parameters) mining standard Scrypt

For mining ltc and other scrypt coins seems to be in the range of the google spreadsheet Christian presented. The highest was a 415 Khash/sec.
Pages: « 1 ... 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 [353] 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!